Articles | Volume 18, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-18-2179-2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-18-2179-2026
Data description article
 | 
02 Apr 2026
Data description article |  | 02 Apr 2026

Australia's terrestrial industrial footprint and ecological intactness

Ruben Venegas-Li, Scott Atkinson, Milton Aurelio Uba de Andrade Junior, Rachel Fletcher, Peter Owen, Lucia Morales-Barquero, Bora Aska, Miguel Arias-Patino, Hedley S. Grantham, Hugh Possingham, Oscar Venter, Michelle Ward, and James E. M. Watson

Viewed

Total article views: 2,171 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
1,769 341 61 2,171 117 64 100
  • HTML: 1,769
  • PDF: 341
  • XML: 61
  • Total: 2,171
  • Supplement: 117
  • BibTeX: 64
  • EndNote: 100
Views and downloads (calculated since 16 Jul 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 16 Jul 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,171 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,147 with geography defined and 24 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 02 Apr 2026
Download
Short summary
We developed two datasets representing human industrial pressures and ecological intactness across Australia´s landscapes. These datasets fill a long-standing gap in national-scale pressure mapping, providing key insights into human disturbance of the environment. They can support conservation planning, environmental policy, and restoration efforts, aligning with Australia’s Strategy for Nature and global biodiversity targets to protect intact ecosystems and promote sustainable development.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint