Articles | Volume 17, issue 8
https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-4079-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-4079-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
CAMELS-AUS v2: updated hydrometeorological time series and landscape attributes for an enlarged set of catchments in Australia
Keirnan J. A. Fowler
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Department of Infrastructure Engineering, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
Ziqi Zhang
Department of Infrastructure Engineering, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
Xue Hou
Department of Infrastructure Engineering, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
now at: Department of Energy, Environment, and Climate Action, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Related authors
Gabrielle Burns, Keirnan Fowler, Murray Peel, and Clare Stephens
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3122, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3122, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Hydrology and Earth System Sciences (HESS).
Short summary
Short summary
Improving how rainfall-runoff models estimate evapotranspiration is key to better reproducing water partitioning under current conditions, and will increase model realism under future changing conditions. We tested how well different conceptual rainfall-runoff model equations simulate evapotranspiration using Australian catchment and flux tower data. We found one equation consistently worked better than the others. However, even this equation had flaws, pointing to missing vegetation processes.
Hansini Gardiya Weligamage, Keirnan Fowler, Margarita Saft, Tim Peterson, Dongryeol Ryu, and Murray Peel
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3373, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3373, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Hydrology and Earth System Sciences (HESS).
Short summary
Short summary
This study adopts actual evapotranspiration (AET) signatures to diagnose deficiencies in simulation of AET within conceptual rainfall-runoff models. Five models are assessed using flux tower data at 14 Australian sites. Even when AET is included in the calibration, the models struggle to represent aspects of AET dynamics, including interannual variability and timing on seasonal and event scales. The approach shows promise for more insightful critique of model simulations.
Sandra Pool, Keirnan Fowler, Hansini Gardiya Weligamage, and Murray Peel
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1598, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1598, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Multivariate calibration has become a widely used method to improve model realism. We found that multivariate calibration can lead to less constrained flux maps and more uncertain hydrographs relative to univariate calibration. These symptoms could be caused by non-overlapping behavioural parameter distributions for the individual calibration variables. The results emphasize that the value of non-discharge data in calibration is contingent on the suitability of the model structure.
Matthew O. Grant, Anna M. Ukkola, Elisabeth Vogel, Sanaa Hobeichi, Andy J. Pitman, Alex Raymond Borowiak, and Keirnan Fowler
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-4024, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-4024, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Australia is regularly subjected to severe and widespread drought. By using multiple drought indicators, we show that while there have been widespread decreases in droughts since the beginning of the 20th century. However, many regions have seen an increase in droughts in more recent decades. Despite these changes, our analysis shows that they remain within the range of observed variability and are not unprecedented in the context of past droughts.
Hansini Gardiya Weligamage, Keirnan Fowler, Margarita Saft, Tim Peterson, Dongryeol Ryu, and Murray Peel
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-373, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-373, 2025
Preprint under review for HESS
Short summary
Short summary
This study is the first to propose actual evapotranspiration (AET) signatures, which can be used to assess multiple aspects of AET dynamics across various temporal scales. As a demonstration, we applied AET signatures to evaluate two remotely sensed (RS) AET products against flux tower AET. The results reveal specific deficiencies in RS AET and provide guidance for selecting appropriate RS AET, including for modelling studies.
Keirnan Fowler, Murray Peel, Margarita Saft, Tim J. Peterson, Andrew Western, Lawrence Band, Cuan Petheram, Sandra Dharmadi, Kim Seong Tan, Lu Zhang, Patrick Lane, Anthony Kiem, Lucy Marshall, Anne Griebel, Belinda E. Medlyn, Dongryeol Ryu, Giancarlo Bonotto, Conrad Wasko, Anna Ukkola, Clare Stephens, Andrew Frost, Hansini Gardiya Weligamage, Patricia Saco, Hongxing Zheng, Francis Chiew, Edoardo Daly, Glen Walker, R. Willem Vervoort, Justin Hughes, Luca Trotter, Brad Neal, Ian Cartwright, and Rory Nathan
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 6073–6120, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-6073-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-6073-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Recently, we have seen multi-year droughts tending to cause shifts in the relationship between rainfall and streamflow. In shifted catchments that have not recovered, an average rainfall year produces less streamflow today than it did pre-drought. We take a multi-disciplinary approach to understand why these shifts occur, focusing on Australia's over-10-year Millennium Drought. We evaluate multiple hypotheses against evidence, with particular focus on the key role of groundwater processes.
Luca Trotter, Wouter J. M. Knoben, Keirnan J. A. Fowler, Margarita Saft, and Murray C. Peel
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 6359–6369, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6359-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6359-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
MARRMoT is a piece of software that emulates 47 common models for hydrological simulations. It can be used to run and calibrate these models within a common environment as well as to easily modify them. We restructured and recoded MARRMoT in order to make the models run faster and to simplify their use, while also providing some new features. This new MARRMoT version runs models on average 3.6 times faster while maintaining very strong consistency in their outputs to the previous version.
Keirnan J. A. Fowler, Suwash Chandra Acharya, Nans Addor, Chihchung Chou, and Murray C. Peel
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 13, 3847–3867, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-3847-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-3847-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This paper presents the Australian edition of the Catchment Attributes and Meteorology for Large-sample Studies (CAMELS) series of datasets. CAMELS-AUS comprises data for 222 unregulated catchments with long-term monitoring, combining hydrometeorological time series (streamflow and 18 climatic variables) with 134 attributes related to geology, soil, topography, land cover, anthropogenic influence and hydroclimatology. It is freely downloadable from https://doi.pangaea.de/10.1594/PANGAEA.921850.
Gabrielle Burns, Keirnan Fowler, Murray Peel, and Clare Stephens
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3122, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3122, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Hydrology and Earth System Sciences (HESS).
Short summary
Short summary
Improving how rainfall-runoff models estimate evapotranspiration is key to better reproducing water partitioning under current conditions, and will increase model realism under future changing conditions. We tested how well different conceptual rainfall-runoff model equations simulate evapotranspiration using Australian catchment and flux tower data. We found one equation consistently worked better than the others. However, even this equation had flaws, pointing to missing vegetation processes.
Hansini Gardiya Weligamage, Keirnan Fowler, Margarita Saft, Tim Peterson, Dongryeol Ryu, and Murray Peel
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3373, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3373, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Hydrology and Earth System Sciences (HESS).
Short summary
Short summary
This study adopts actual evapotranspiration (AET) signatures to diagnose deficiencies in simulation of AET within conceptual rainfall-runoff models. Five models are assessed using flux tower data at 14 Australian sites. Even when AET is included in the calibration, the models struggle to represent aspects of AET dynamics, including interannual variability and timing on seasonal and event scales. The approach shows promise for more insightful critique of model simulations.
Sandra Pool, Keirnan Fowler, Hansini Gardiya Weligamage, and Murray Peel
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1598, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1598, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Multivariate calibration has become a widely used method to improve model realism. We found that multivariate calibration can lead to less constrained flux maps and more uncertain hydrographs relative to univariate calibration. These symptoms could be caused by non-overlapping behavioural parameter distributions for the individual calibration variables. The results emphasize that the value of non-discharge data in calibration is contingent on the suitability of the model structure.
Matthew O. Grant, Anna M. Ukkola, Elisabeth Vogel, Sanaa Hobeichi, Andy J. Pitman, Alex Raymond Borowiak, and Keirnan Fowler
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-4024, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-4024, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Australia is regularly subjected to severe and widespread drought. By using multiple drought indicators, we show that while there have been widespread decreases in droughts since the beginning of the 20th century. However, many regions have seen an increase in droughts in more recent decades. Despite these changes, our analysis shows that they remain within the range of observed variability and are not unprecedented in the context of past droughts.
Hansini Gardiya Weligamage, Keirnan Fowler, Margarita Saft, Tim Peterson, Dongryeol Ryu, and Murray Peel
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-373, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-373, 2025
Preprint under review for HESS
Short summary
Short summary
This study is the first to propose actual evapotranspiration (AET) signatures, which can be used to assess multiple aspects of AET dynamics across various temporal scales. As a demonstration, we applied AET signatures to evaluate two remotely sensed (RS) AET products against flux tower AET. The results reveal specific deficiencies in RS AET and provide guidance for selecting appropriate RS AET, including for modelling studies.
Keirnan Fowler, Murray Peel, Margarita Saft, Tim J. Peterson, Andrew Western, Lawrence Band, Cuan Petheram, Sandra Dharmadi, Kim Seong Tan, Lu Zhang, Patrick Lane, Anthony Kiem, Lucy Marshall, Anne Griebel, Belinda E. Medlyn, Dongryeol Ryu, Giancarlo Bonotto, Conrad Wasko, Anna Ukkola, Clare Stephens, Andrew Frost, Hansini Gardiya Weligamage, Patricia Saco, Hongxing Zheng, Francis Chiew, Edoardo Daly, Glen Walker, R. Willem Vervoort, Justin Hughes, Luca Trotter, Brad Neal, Ian Cartwright, and Rory Nathan
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 6073–6120, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-6073-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-6073-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Recently, we have seen multi-year droughts tending to cause shifts in the relationship between rainfall and streamflow. In shifted catchments that have not recovered, an average rainfall year produces less streamflow today than it did pre-drought. We take a multi-disciplinary approach to understand why these shifts occur, focusing on Australia's over-10-year Millennium Drought. We evaluate multiple hypotheses against evidence, with particular focus on the key role of groundwater processes.
Luca Trotter, Wouter J. M. Knoben, Keirnan J. A. Fowler, Margarita Saft, and Murray C. Peel
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 6359–6369, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6359-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6359-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
MARRMoT is a piece of software that emulates 47 common models for hydrological simulations. It can be used to run and calibrate these models within a common environment as well as to easily modify them. We restructured and recoded MARRMoT in order to make the models run faster and to simplify their use, while also providing some new features. This new MARRMoT version runs models on average 3.6 times faster while maintaining very strong consistency in their outputs to the previous version.
Keirnan J. A. Fowler, Suwash Chandra Acharya, Nans Addor, Chihchung Chou, and Murray C. Peel
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 13, 3847–3867, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-3847-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-3847-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This paper presents the Australian edition of the Catchment Attributes and Meteorology for Large-sample Studies (CAMELS) series of datasets. CAMELS-AUS comprises data for 222 unregulated catchments with long-term monitoring, combining hydrometeorological time series (streamflow and 18 climatic variables) with 134 attributes related to geology, soil, topography, land cover, anthropogenic influence and hydroclimatology. It is freely downloadable from https://doi.pangaea.de/10.1594/PANGAEA.921850.
Cited articles
Abbas, A., Boithias, L., Pachepsky, Y., Kim, K., Chun, J. A., and Cho, K. H.: AI4Water v1.0: an open-source python package for modeling hydrological time series using data-driven methods, Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 3021–3039, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-3021-2022, 2022.
ABS (Australian Bureau of Statistics): Australian Census 2006 Population Statistics [data set], https://www.abs.gov.au/websitedbs/censushome.nsf/home/historicaldata2006?opendocument&navpos=280 (last access: 9 August 2025), 2006.
Addor, N., Newman, A. J., Mizukami, N., and Clark, M. P.: The CAMELS data set: catchment attributes and meteorology for large-sample studies, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 5293–5313, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-5293-2017, 2017.
Addor, N., Nearing, G., Prieto, C., Newman, A. J., Le Vine, N., and Clark, M. P.: A Ranking of Hydrological Signatures Based on Their Predictability in Space, Water Resour. Res., 54, 8792–8812, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR022606, 2018.
Addor, N., Do, H. X., Alvarez-Garreton, C., Coxon, G., Fowler, K., and Mendoza, P. A.: Large-sample hydrology: recent progress, guidelines for new datasets and grand challenges, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 65, 712–725, https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2019.1683182, 2019.
Althoff, D. and Destouni, G.: Global patterns in water flux partitioning: Irrigated and rainfed agriculture drives asymmetrical flux to vegetation over runoff, One Earth, 6, 1246–1257, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2023.08.002, 2023.
Alvarez-Garreton, C., Mendoza, P. A., Boisier, J. P., Addor, N., Galleguillos, M., Zambrano-Bigiarini, M., Lara, A., Puelma, C., Cortes, G., Garreaud, R., McPhee, J., and Ayala, A.: The CAMELS-CL dataset: catchment attributes and meteorology for large sample studies – Chile dataset, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 5817–5846, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-5817-2018, 2018.
Brunner, M. I. and Stahl, K.: Temporal hydrological drought clustering varies with climate and land-surface processes, Environ. Res. Lett., 18, 034011, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/acb8ca, 2023.
Chagas, V. B. P., Chaffe, P. L. B., Addor, N., Fan, F. M., Fleischmann, A. S., Paiva, R. C. D., and Siqueira, V. A.: CAMELS-BR: hydrometeorological time series and landscape attributes for 897 catchments in Brazil, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 12, 2075–2096, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-2075-2020, 2020.
Chen, S. and Ruan, X.: A hybrid Budyko-type regression framework for estimating baseflow from climate and catchment attributes, J. Hydrol., 618, 129118, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129118, 2023.
Coxon, G., Addor, N., Bloomfield, J. P., Freer, J., Fry, M., Hannaford, J., Howden, N. J. K., Lane, R., Lewis, M., Robinson, E. L., Wagener, T., and Woods, R.: CAMELS-GB: hydrometeorological time series and landscape attributes for 671 catchments in Great Britain, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 12, 2459–2483, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-2459-2020, 2020.
CSIRO: AUS SRTM 1sec MRVBF mosaic v01, Bioregional Assessment Source Dataset, data.gov.au [data set], https://data.gov.au/data/dataset/6c9b35fd-6985-4751-b66f-f5a510cfe84d (last access: 9 August 2025), 2016.
Delaigue, O., Brigode, P., Andréassian, V., Perrin, C., Etchevers, P., Soubeyroux, J.-M., Janet, B., and Addor, N.: CAMELS-FR: A large sample hydroclimatic dataset for France to explore hydrological diversity and support model benchmarking, IAHS-AISH Scientific Assembly 2022, Montpellier, France, 29 May–3 Jun 2022, IAHS2022-521, https://doi.org/10.5194/iahs2022-521, 2022.
DEWR (Department of the Environment and Water Resources, Australia): Estimated Pre-1750 Major Vegetation Subgroups – NVIS Stage 1, Version 3.1, Australian Government [data set], https://www.environment.gov.au/land/native-vegetation/national-vegetation-information-system (last access: 9 August 2025), 2008.
Euser, T., Winsemius, H. C., Hrachowitz, M., Fenicia, F., Uhlenbrook, S., and Savenije, H. H. G.: A framework to assess the realism of model structures using hydrological signatures, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 1893–1912, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-1893-2013, 2013.
Evans, A., Jones, D., Smalley, R., and Lellyett, S.: An enhanced gridded rainfall analysis scheme for Australia, Bureau of Meteorology (Australia) Research Report – BRR041, ISBN 978-1-925738-12-4, http://www.bom.gov.au/research/publications/researchreports/BRR-041.pdf (last access: 9 August 2025), 2020.
FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations): Irrigation and drainage paper 56: Crop evapotranspiration – Guidelines for computing crop water requirements, https://www.fao.org/4/x0490e/x0490e00.htm (last access: 9 August 2025), 1998.
Fowler, K. J. A., Acharya, S. C., Addor, N., Chou, C., and Peel, M. C.: CAMELS-AUS: hydrometeorological time series and landscape attributes for 222 catchments in Australia, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 13, 3847–3867, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-3847-2021, 2021a.
Fowler, K. J. A., Coxon, G., Freer, J. E., Knoben, W. J. M., Peel, M. C., Wagener, T., Western, A. W., Woods, R. A., and Zhang, L.: Towards more realistic runoff projections by removing limits on simulated soil moisture deficit, J. Hydrol., 600, 126505, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126505, 2021b.
Fowler, K., Peel, M., Saft, M., Peterson, T. J., Western, A., Band, L., Petheram, C., Dharmadi, S., Tan, K. S., Zhang, L., Lane, P., Kiem, A., Marshall, L., Griebel, A., Medlyn, B. E., Ryu, D., Bonotto, G., Wasko, C., Ukkola, A., Stephens, C., Frost, A., Gardiya Weligamage, H., Saco, P., Zheng, H., Chiew, F., Daly, E., Walker, G., Vervoort, R. W., Hughes, J., Trotter, L., Neal, B., Cartwright, I., and Nathan, R.: Explaining changes in rainfall–runoff relationships during and after Australia's Millennium Drought: a community perspective, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 6073–6120, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-6073-2022, 2022.
Fowler, K., Zhang, Z., and Hou, X: Dataset for CAMELS-AUS v2: updated hydrometeorological timeseries and landscape attributes for an enlarged set of catchments in Australia, Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12575680, 2024.
Gallant, J. and Austin, J.: Slope derived from 1” SRTM DEM-S. v4, CSIRO Data Collection [data set], https://doi.org/10.4225/08/5689DA774564A, 2012.
Gallant, J. C. and Dowling, T. I.: A multiresolution index of valley bottom flatness for mapping depositional areas, Water Resour. Res., 39, 1347, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002WR001426, 2003.
Gallant, J., Wilson, N., Tickle, P. K., Dowling, T., and Read, A.: 3 second SRTM Derived Digital Elevation Model (DEM) Version 1.0. Record 1.0, Geoscience Australia, Canberra, Australian Government [data set], http://pid.geoscience.gov.au/dataset/ga/69888 (last access: 9 August 2025), 2009.
Gardiya Weligamage, H., Fowler, K., Peterson, T. J., Saft, M., and Peel, M. C.: Observation based gridded annual runoff estimates over Victoria, Australia, in: MODSIM2021, 24th International Congress on Modelling and Simulation, Sydney, Australia, 5–10 December 2021, 602–608, https://doi.org/10.36334/modsim.2021.k11.weligamage, 2021.
Gardiya Weligamage, H., Fowler, K., Peterson, T. J., Saft, M., Peel, M. C., and Ryu, D.: Partitioning of Precipitation Into Terrestrial Water Balance Components Under a Drying Climate, Water Resour. Res., 59, e2022WR033538, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022WR033538, 2023.
Gardiya Weligamage, H., Fowler, K., Ryu, D., Saft, M., Peterson, T., and Peel, M. C.: Vegetation as a driver of shifts in rainfall-runoff relationship: Synthesising hydrological evidence with remote sensing, J. Hydrol., 132389, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.132389, 2024.
Geoscience Australia: Dams and Water Storages 1990, Geoscience Australia, Canberra [data set], https://data.gov.au/data/dataset/ce5b77bf-5a02-4cf8-9cf2-be4a2cee2677 (last access: 9 August 2025), 2004.
Geoscience Australia: Surface Geology of Australia 1:1 million scale dataset, Australian Government [data set], https://pid.geoscience.gov.au/dataset/ga/74619 (last access: 9 August 2025), 2008.
Gnann, S. J., Coxon, G., Woods, R. A., Howden, N. J. K., and McMillan, H. K.: TOSSH: A Toolbox for Streamflow Signatures in Hydrology, Environ. Model. Softw., 138, 104983, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2021.104983, 2021.
Gordon, N. D., McMahon, T. A., Finlayson, B. L., and Christopher, J.: Stream Hydrology: an Introduction for Ecologists. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., ISBN 978-0-470-84358-1, 1992.
Gupta, H. V., Perrin, C., Blöschl, G., Montanari, A., Kumar, R., Clark, M., and Andréassian, V.: Large-sample hydrology: a need to balance depth with breadth, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 463–477, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-463-2014, 2014.
Höge, M., Kauzlaric, M., Siber, R., Schönenberger, U., Horton, P., Schwanbeck, J., Floriancic, M. G., Viviroli, D., Wilhelm, S., Sikorska-Senoner, A. E., Addor, N., Brunner, M., Pool, S., Zappa, M., and Fenicia, F.: CAMELS-CH: hydro-meteorological time series and landscape attributes for 331 catchments in hydrologic Switzerland, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 5755–5784, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-5755-2023, 2023.
Hutchinson, M. F., Stein, J. L., Stein, J. A., Anderson, H., and Tickle, P. K.: GEODATA 9 second DEM and D8: Digital Elevation Model Version 3 and Flow Direction Grid 2008, Record DEM-9S.v3, Geoscience Australia, Canberra [data set], http://pid.geoscience.gov.au/dataset/ga/66006 (last access: 9 August 2025), 2008.
Jeffrey, S. J., Carter, J. O., Moodie, K. B., and Beswick, A. R.: Using spatial interpolation to construct a comprehensive archive of Australian climate data, Environ. Model. Softw., 16, 309–330, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-8152(01)00008-1, 2001.
Jian, J., Costelloe J., Ryu D., and Wang Q. J.: Does a fifteen-hour shift make much difference? – Influence of time lag between rainfall and discharge data on model calibration, in 22nd International Congress on Modelling and Simulation, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia, 3–8 December 2017, https://doi.org/10.36334/modsim.2017.H3.jian, 2017.
John, A., Fowler, K., Nathan, R., Horne, A., and Stewardson, M.: Disaggregated monthly hydrological models can outperform daily models in providing daily flow statistics and extrapolate well to a drying climate, J. Hydrol., 598, 126471, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126471, 2021.
Jones, D., Wang, W., and Fawcett, R.: High-quality spatial climate data-sets for Australia, Aust. Meteorol. Ocean., 58, 233–248, https://doi.org/10.22499/2.5804.003, 2009.
Kapoor, A., Pathiraja, S., Marshall, L., and Chandra, R.: DeepGR4J: A deep learning hybridization approach for conceptual rainfall-runoff modelling, Environ. Model. Softw., 169, 105831, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2023.105831, 2023.
Kim, D., Choi, M., and Chun, J. A.: Linking the complementary evaporation relationship with the Budyko framework for ungauged areas in Australia, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 5955–5969, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5955-2022, 2022.
Kratzert, F., Nearing, G., Addor, N., Erickson, T., Gauch, M., Gilon, O., Gudmundsson, L., Hassidim, A., Klotz, D., Nevo, S., Shalev, G., and Matias, Y.: Caravan – A global community dataset for large-sample hydrology, Sci. Data, 10, 61, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-023-01975-w, 2023.
Lei, X., Cheng, L., Zhang, L., Cheng, S., Qin, S., and Liu, P.: Improving the Applicability of Lumped Hydrological Models by Integrating the Generalized Complementary Relationship, Water Resour. Res., 60, e2023WR035567, https://doi.org/10.1029/2023WR035567, 2024.
Lymburner, L., Tan, P., McIntyre, A., Thankappan, M., and Sixsmith, J.: Dynamic Land Cover Dataset Version 2.1, Geoscience Australia, Canberra [data set], http://pid.geoscience.gov.au/dataset/ga/83868 (last access: 9 August 2025), 2015.
Mangukiya, N. K., Kumar, K. B., Dey, P., Sharma, S., Bejagam, V., Mujumdar, P. P., and Sharma, A.: CAMELS-IND: hydrometeorological time series and catchment attributes for 228 catchments in Peninsular India, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17, 461–491, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-461-2025, 2025.
McInerney, D., Thyer, M., Kavetski, D., Westra, S., Maier, H. R., Shanafield, M., Croke, B., Gupta, H., Bennett, B., and Leonard, M.: Neglecting hydrological errors can severely impact predictions of water resource system performance, J. Hydrol., 634, 130853, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.130853, 2024.
McKenzie, N. J., Jacquier, D. W., Ashton L. J., and Cresswell, H. P.: Estimation of Soil Properties Using the Atlas of Australian Soils, CSIRO Land and Water Technical Report 11/00, https://www.asris.csiro.au/themes/Atlas.html#Atlas_Digital (last access: 9 August 2025), 2000.
McMahon, T. A. and Peel, M. C. Uncertainty in stage–discharge rating curves: application to Australian Hydrologic Reference Stations data. Hydrolog. Sci. J., 64, 255–275, https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2019.1577555, 2019
McMahon, T. A., Peel, M. C., and Amirthanathan, G. E.: Assessing rating curve uncertainty, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 70, 687–694, https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2024.2442736, 2025.
McMillan, H.: Linking hydrologic signatures to hydrologic processes: A review, Hydrol. Process., 34, 1393–1409, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13632, 2020.
McMillan, H. K., Gnann, S. J., and Araki, R.: Large Scale Evaluation of Relationships Between Hydrologic Signatures and Processes, Water Resour. Res., 58, e2021WR031751, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR031751, 2022.
Morton, F. I.: Operational estimates of areal evapotranspiration and their significance to the science and practice of hydrology, J. Hydrol., 66, 1–76, https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(83)90177-4, 1983.
National Land and Water Resources Audit: Gridded soil information layers, Canberra [data set], https://www.asris.csiro.au/mapping/viewer.htm (last access: 9 August 2025), 2001.
Newman, A. J., Clark, M. P., Sampson, K., Wood, A., Hay, L. E., Bock, A., Viger, R. J., Blodgett, D., Brekke, L., Arnold, J. R., Hopson, T., and Duan, Q.: Development of a large-sample watershed-scale hydrometeorological data set for the contiguous USA: data set characteristics and assessment of regional variability in hydrologic model performance, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 209–223, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-209-2015, 2015.
Niu, J., Vis, M., and Seibert, J.: Evaluation of different precipitation and potential evapotranspiration time series for hydrological modeling in Australian catchments, EGU General Assembly 2024, Vienna, Austria, 14–19 Apr 2024, EGU24-1022, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-1022, 2024.
Perrin, C., Michel, C., and Andréassian, V.: Improvement of a parsimonious model for streamflow simulation, J. Hydrol., 279, 275–289, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(03)00225-7, 2003.
Peterson, T. J., Saft, M., Peel, M. C., and John, A.: Watersheds may not recover from drought, Science, 372, 745–749, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abd5085, 2021.
Poff, N. L., Allan, J. D., Bain, M. B., Karr, J. R., Prestegaard, K. L., Richter, B. D., Sparks, R. E., and Stromberg, J. C.: The Natural Flow Regime, BioScience, 47, 769–784, https://doi.org/10.2307/1313099, 1997.
Rasiya Koya, S. and Roy, T.: Temporal Fusion Transformers for streamflow Prediction: Value of combining attention with recurrence, J. Hydrol., 637, 131301, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.131301, 2024.
Raupach, M. R., Kirby, J. M., Barrett, D. J., and Briggs, P. R.: Balances of Water, Carbon, Nitrogen and Phosphorus in Australian Landscapes version 2.04, CSIRO Land and Water, Canberra, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/43515086_Balances_of_Water_Carbon_Nitrogen_and_Phosphorus_in_Australian_Landscapes_1_Project_Description_and_Results (last access: 22 August 2025), 2002.
Rayner, D.: Australian synthetic daily Class A pan evaporation. Technical Report December, Queensland Department of Natural Resources and Mines, Indooroopilly, Qld., Australia [data set], https://data.longpaddock.qld.gov.au/static/silo/pdf/AustralianSyntheticDailyClassAPanEvaporation.pdf (last access: 9 August 2025), 2005.
Saft, M., Weligamage, H. G., Peel, M., Peterson, T., Brown, R., Jordan, P., Morden, R., and Fowler, K.: Victorian Water and Climate dataset: long-term streamflow, climate, and vegetation observation records and catchment attributes (1.0), Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7527565, 2023.
Sawicz, K., Wagener, T., Sivapalan, M., Troch, P. A., and Carrillo, G.: Catchment classification: empirical analysis of hydrologic similarity based on catchment function in the eastern USA, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 2895–2911, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-2895-2011, 2011.
Stein, J. L., Stein, J. A., and Nix, H. A.: Spatial analysis of anthropogenic river disturbance at regional and continental scales: identifying the wild rivers of Australia, Landscape Urban Plan., 60, 1–25, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00048-8, 2002.
Stein, J. L., Hutchinson, M. F., and Stein, J. A.: National Catchment and Stream Environment Database version 1.1.4, Australian Government [data set], http://pid.geoscience.gov.au/dataset/ga/73045 (last access: 9 August 2025), 2011.
Strahler, A. N.: Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology, Eos Transactions American Geophysical Union, 38, 913–920, https://doi.org/10.1029/TR038i006p00913, 1957.
Teutschbein, C.: CAMELS-SE: Long-term hydroclimatic observations (19612020) across 50 catchments in Sweden as a resource for modelling, education, and collaboration, Geosci. Data J., 11, gdj3.239, https://doi.org/10.1002/gdj3.239, 2024.
Tozer, C. R., Kiem, A. S., and Verdon-Kidd, D. C.: On the uncertainties associated with using gridded rainfall data as a proxy for observed, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 1481–1499, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-1481-2012, 2012.
Trotter, L., Saft, M., Peel, M. C., and Fowler, K. J. A.: “Naïve” inclusion of diverse climates in calibration is not sufficient to improve model reliability under future climate uncertainty, in: MODSIM2021, 24th International Congress on Modelling and Simulation, Sydney, Australia, 5–10 December 2021, https://doi.org/10.36334/modsim.2021.J8.trotter, 2021.
Trotter, L., Saft, M., Peel, M. C., and Fowler, K. J. A.: Symptoms of Performance Degradation During Multi-Annual Drought: A Large-Sample, Multi-Model Study, Water Resour. Res., 59, e2021WR031845, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR031845, 2023.
Trotter, L., Saft, M., Peel, M. C., and Fowler, K. J. A.: Recession constants are non-stationary: Impacts of multi-annual drought on catchment recession behaviour and storage dynamics, J. Hydrol., 630, 130707, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.130707, 2024.
van Oorschot, F., van der Ent, R. J., Alessandri, A., and Hrachowitz, M.: Influence of irrigation on root zone storage capacity estimation, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 2313–2328, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2313-2024, 2024.
Walter, I., Allen, R., Elliot, R., Jensen, M., Itenfisu, D., Mecham, B., Howell, T., Snyder, R., Brown, P., Echings, S., Spofford, T., Hattendorf, M., Cuenca, R., Wright, J., and Martin, D.: ASCE’s standardized reference evapotranspiration equation, Proc. National Irrigation Symposium on Watershed management and operations management, Pheonix, Arizone, 1–11, https://doi.org/10.1061/40499(2000)126, 2000.
Wang, H., Li, X., Tong, C., Xu, Y., Lin, D., Wang, J., Yao, F., Zhu, P., and Yan, G.: Varying performance of eight evapotranspiration products with aridity and vegetation greenness across the globe, Front. Environ. Sci., 11, 1079520, https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1079520, 2023.
Western, A. and McKenzie, N.: Soil hydrological properties of Australia Version 1.0.1, CRC for Catchment Hydrology, Melbourne, 2004.
Woods, R. A.: Analytical model of seasonal climate impacts on snow hydrology: Continuous snowpacks, Adv. Water Resour., 32, 1465–1481, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2009.06.011, 2009.
Xu, T. and Hutchinson, M.: ANUCLIM version 6.1 user guide. The Australian National University, Fenner School of Environment and Society, Canberra, https://fennerschool.anu.edu.au/files/anuclim61.pdf (last access: 9 August 2025), 2011.
Short summary
This paper presents version 2 of the Australian edition of the Catchment Attributes and Meteorology for Large-sample Studies (CAMELS) series of datasets. CAMELS-AUS (Australia) v2 comprises data for an increased number (561) of catchments, each with long-term monitoring, combining hydrometeorological time series with attributes related to geology, soil, topography, land cover, anthropogenic influence and hydroclimatology. It is freely downloadable from https://zenodo.org/doi/10.5281/zenodo.12575680.
This paper presents version 2 of the Australian edition of the Catchment Attributes and...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint