Articles | Volume 17, issue 7
https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-3619-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-3619-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Data description paper
| 
30 Jul 2025
Data description paper |
| 30 Jul 2025
| 30 Jul 2025
Northern Hemisphere in situ snow water equivalent dataset (NorSWE, 1979–2021)
Colleen Mortimer
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Climate Research Division, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Toronto, Canada
Vincent Vionnet
Meteorological Research Division, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Dorval, Canada
Related authors
Haorui Sun, Yiwen Fang, Steven A. Margulis, Colleen Mortimer, Lawrence Mudryk, and Chris Derksen
The Cryosphere, 19, 2017–2036, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-2017-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-2017-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The European Space Agency's Snow Climate Change Initiative (Snow CCI) developed a high-quality snow cover extent and snow water equivalent (SWE) climate data record. However, gaps exist in complex terrain due to challenges in using passive microwave sensing and in situ measurements. This study presents a methodology to fill the mountain SWE gap using Snow CCI snow cover fraction within a Bayesian SWE reanalysis framework, with potential applications in untested regions and with other sensors.
Libo Wang, Lawrence Mudryk, Joe R. Melton, Colleen Mortimer, Jason Cole, Gesa Meyer, Paul Bartlett, and Mickaël Lalande
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1264, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1264, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study shows that an alternate snow cover fraction (SCF) parameterization significantly improves SCF simulated in the CLASSIC model in mountainous areas for all three choices of meteorological datasets. Annual mean bias, unbiased root mean squared area, and correlation improve by 75 %, 32 %, and 7 % when evaluated with MODIS SCF observations over the Northern Hemisphere. We also link relative biases in the meteorological forcing data to differences in simulated snow water equivalent and SCF.
Pinja Venäläinen, Colleen Mortimer, Kari Luojus, Lawrence Mudryk, Matias Takala, and Jouni Pulliainen
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3643, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3643, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Satellite data-based estimation of large SWE values can be improved with bias correction. This study updates the bias correction method by using updated snow course data, extending correction to two new months. Additionally, bias correction is expanded from a monthly to a daily time scale. The daily bias correction offers more accurate hemispheric snow mass estimation, aligning well with reanalysis data.
Lawrence Mudryk, Colleen Mortimer, Chris Derksen, Aleksandra Elias Chereque, and Paul Kushner
The Cryosphere, 19, 201–218, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-201-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-201-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We evaluate and rank 23 different datasets on their ability to accurately estimate historical snow amounts. The evaluation uses new a set of surface snow measurements with improved spatial coverage, enabling evaluation across both mountainous and nonmountainous regions. Performance measures vary tremendously across the products: while most perform reasonably in nonmountainous regions, accurate representation of snow amounts in mountainous regions and of historical trends is much more variable.
Colleen Mortimer, Lawrence Mudryk, Eunsang Cho, Chris Derksen, Mike Brady, and Carrie Vuyovich
The Cryosphere, 18, 5619–5639, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-5619-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-5619-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Ground measurements of snow water equivalent (SWE) are vital for understanding the accuracy of large-scale estimates from satellites and climate models. We compare two types of measurements – snow courses and airborne gamma SWE estimates – and analyze how measurement type impacts the accuracy assessment of gridded SWE products. We use this analysis to produce a combined reference SWE dataset for North America, applicable for future gridded SWE product evaluations and other applications.
Aleksandra Elias Chereque, Paul J. Kushner, Lawrence Mudryk, Chris Derksen, and Colleen Mortimer
The Cryosphere, 18, 4955–4969, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-4955-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-4955-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We look at three commonly used snow depth datasets that are produced through a combination of snow modelling and historical measurements (reanalysis). When compared with each other, these datasets have differences that arise for various reasons. We show that a simple snow model can be used to examine these inconsistencies and highlight issues. This method indicates that one of the complex datasets should be excluded from further studies.
Pinja Venäläinen, Kari Luojus, Colleen Mortimer, Juha Lemmetyinen, Jouni Pulliainen, Matias Takala, Mikko Moisander, and Lina Zschenderlein
The Cryosphere, 17, 719–736, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-719-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-719-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Snow water equivalent (SWE) is a valuable characteristic of snow cover. In this research, we improve the radiometer-based GlobSnow SWE retrieval methodology by implementing spatially and temporally varying snow densities into the retrieval procedure. In addition to improving the accuracy of SWE retrieval, varying snow densities were found to improve the magnitude and seasonal evolution of the Northern Hemisphere snow mass estimate compared to the baseline product.
Vincent Vionnet, Colleen Mortimer, Mike Brady, Louise Arnal, and Ross Brown
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 13, 4603–4619, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-4603-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-4603-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Water equivalent of snow cover (SWE) is a key variable for water management, hydrological forecasting and climate monitoring. A new Canadian SWE dataset (CanSWE) is presented in this paper. It compiles data collected by multiple agencies and companies at more than 2500 different locations across Canada over the period 1928–2020. Snow depth and derived bulk snow density are also included when available.
Julien Meloche, Nicolas R. Leroux, Benoit Montpetit, Vincent Vionnet, and Chris Derksen
The Cryosphere, 19, 2949–2962, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-2949-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-2949-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Measuring snow mass from radar measurements is possible with information on snow and a radar model to link the measurements to snow. A key variable in a retrieval is the number of snow layers, with more layers yielding richer information but at increased computational cost. Here, we show the capabilities of a new method for simplifying a complex snowpack while preserving the scattering behavior of the snowpack and conserving its mass.
Alireza Amani, Marie-Amélie Boucher, Alexandre R. Cabral, Vincent Vionnet, and Étienne Gaborit
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 2445–2465, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-2445-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-2445-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Accurately estimating groundwater recharge using numerical models is particularly difficult in cold regions with snow and soil freezing. This study evaluated a physics-based model against high-resolution field measurements. Our findings highlight a need for a better representation of soil-freezing processes, offering a roadmap for future model development. This leads to more accurate models to aid in water resource management decisions in cold climates.
Benoit Montpetit, Julien Meloche, Vincent Vionnet, Chris Derksen, Georgina Wooley, Nicolas R. Leroux, Paul Siqueira, J. Max Adams, and Mike Brady
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2317, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2317, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This paper presents the workflow to retrieve snow water equivalent from radar measurements for the future Canadian radar satellite mission, TSMM. The workflow is validated by using airborne radar data collected at Trail Valley Creek, Canada, during winter 2018–19. We detail important considerations to have in the context of an Earth Observation mission over a vast region such as Canada. The results show that it is possible to achieve the desired accuracy for TSMM, over an Arctic environment.
Haorui Sun, Yiwen Fang, Steven A. Margulis, Colleen Mortimer, Lawrence Mudryk, and Chris Derksen
The Cryosphere, 19, 2017–2036, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-2017-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-2017-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The European Space Agency's Snow Climate Change Initiative (Snow CCI) developed a high-quality snow cover extent and snow water equivalent (SWE) climate data record. However, gaps exist in complex terrain due to challenges in using passive microwave sensing and in situ measurements. This study presents a methodology to fill the mountain SWE gap using Snow CCI snow cover fraction within a Bayesian SWE reanalysis framework, with potential applications in untested regions and with other sensors.
Georgina J. Woolley, Nick Rutter, Leanne Wake, Vincent Vionnet, Chris Derksen, Julien Meloche, Benoit Montpetit, Nicolas R. Leroux, Richard Essery, Gabriel Hould Gosselin, and Philip Marsh
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1498, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1498, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for The Cryosphere (TC).
Short summary
Short summary
The impact of uncertainties in the simulation of snow density and SSA by the snow model Crocus (embedded within the Soil, Vegetation and Snow version 2 land surface model) on the simulation of snow backscatter (13.5 GHz) using the Snow Microwave Radiative Transfer model were quantified. The simulation of SSA was found to be a key model uncertainty. Underestimated SSA values lead to high errors in the simulation of snow backscatter, reduced by implementing a minimum SSA value (8.7 m2 kg-1).
Libo Wang, Lawrence Mudryk, Joe R. Melton, Colleen Mortimer, Jason Cole, Gesa Meyer, Paul Bartlett, and Mickaël Lalande
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1264, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1264, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study shows that an alternate snow cover fraction (SCF) parameterization significantly improves SCF simulated in the CLASSIC model in mountainous areas for all three choices of meteorological datasets. Annual mean bias, unbiased root mean squared area, and correlation improve by 75 %, 32 %, and 7 % when evaluated with MODIS SCF observations over the Northern Hemisphere. We also link relative biases in the meteorological forcing data to differences in simulated snow water equivalent and SCF.
Manon Gaillard, Vincent Vionnet, Matthieu Lafaysse, Marie Dumont, and Paul Ginoux
The Cryosphere, 19, 769–792, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-769-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-769-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study presents an efficient method to improve large-scale snow albedo simulations by considering the spatial variability in light-absorbing particles (LAPs) like black carbon and dust. A global climatology of LAP deposition was created and used to optimize a parameter in the Crocus snow model. Testing at 10 global sites improved albedo predictions by 10 % on average and over 25 % in the Arctic. This method can enhance other snow models' predictions without complex simulations.
Pinja Venäläinen, Colleen Mortimer, Kari Luojus, Lawrence Mudryk, Matias Takala, and Jouni Pulliainen
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3643, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3643, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Satellite data-based estimation of large SWE values can be improved with bias correction. This study updates the bias correction method by using updated snow course data, extending correction to two new months. Additionally, bias correction is expanded from a monthly to a daily time scale. The daily bias correction offers more accurate hemispheric snow mass estimation, aligning well with reanalysis data.
Lawrence Mudryk, Colleen Mortimer, Chris Derksen, Aleksandra Elias Chereque, and Paul Kushner
The Cryosphere, 19, 201–218, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-201-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-201-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We evaluate and rank 23 different datasets on their ability to accurately estimate historical snow amounts. The evaluation uses new a set of surface snow measurements with improved spatial coverage, enabling evaluation across both mountainous and nonmountainous regions. Performance measures vary tremendously across the products: while most perform reasonably in nonmountainous regions, accurate representation of snow amounts in mountainous regions and of historical trends is much more variable.
Georgina J. Woolley, Nick Rutter, Leanne Wake, Vincent Vionnet, Chris Derksen, Richard Essery, Philip Marsh, Rosamond Tutton, Branden Walker, Matthieu Lafaysse, and David Pritchard
The Cryosphere, 18, 5685–5711, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-5685-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-5685-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Parameterisations of Arctic snow processes were implemented into the multi-physics ensemble version of the snow model Crocus (embedded within the Soil, Vegetation, and Snow version 2 land surface model) and evaluated at an Arctic tundra site. Optimal combinations of parameterisations that improved the simulation of density and specific surface area featured modifications that raise wind speeds to increase compaction in surface layers, prevent snowdrift, and increase viscosity in basal layers.
Colleen Mortimer, Lawrence Mudryk, Eunsang Cho, Chris Derksen, Mike Brady, and Carrie Vuyovich
The Cryosphere, 18, 5619–5639, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-5619-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-5619-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Ground measurements of snow water equivalent (SWE) are vital for understanding the accuracy of large-scale estimates from satellites and climate models. We compare two types of measurements – snow courses and airborne gamma SWE estimates – and analyze how measurement type impacts the accuracy assessment of gridded SWE products. We use this analysis to produce a combined reference SWE dataset for North America, applicable for future gridded SWE product evaluations and other applications.
Aleksandra Elias Chereque, Paul J. Kushner, Lawrence Mudryk, Chris Derksen, and Colleen Mortimer
The Cryosphere, 18, 4955–4969, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-4955-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-4955-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We look at three commonly used snow depth datasets that are produced through a combination of snow modelling and historical measurements (reanalysis). When compared with each other, these datasets have differences that arise for various reasons. We show that a simple snow model can be used to examine these inconsistencies and highlight issues. This method indicates that one of the complex datasets should be excluded from further studies.
Giulia Mazzotti, Jari-Pekka Nousu, Vincent Vionnet, Tobias Jonas, Rafife Nheili, and Matthieu Lafaysse
The Cryosphere, 18, 4607–4632, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-4607-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-4607-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
As many boreal and alpine forests have seasonal snow, models are needed to predict forest snow under future environmental conditions. We have created a new forest snow model by combining existing, very detailed model components for the canopy and the snowpack. We applied it to forests in Switzerland and Finland and showed how complex forest cover leads to a snowpack layering that is very variable in space and time because different processes prevail at different locations in the forest.
Louise Arnal, Martyn P. Clark, Alain Pietroniro, Vincent Vionnet, David R. Casson, Paul H. Whitfield, Vincent Fortin, Andrew W. Wood, Wouter J. M. Knoben, Brandi W. Newton, and Colleen Walford
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 4127–4155, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4127-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4127-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Forecasting river flow months in advance is crucial for water sectors and society. In North America, snowmelt is a key driver of flow. This study presents a statistical workflow using snow data to forecast flow months ahead in North American snow-fed rivers. Variations in the river flow predictability across the continent are evident, raising concerns about future predictability in a changing (snow) climate. The reproducible workflow hosted on GitHub supports collaborative and open science.
Benoit Montpetit, Joshua King, Julien Meloche, Chris Derksen, Paul Siqueira, J. Max Adam, Peter Toose, Mike Brady, Anna Wendleder, Vincent Vionnet, and Nicolas R. Leroux
The Cryosphere, 18, 3857–3874, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-3857-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-3857-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This paper validates the use of free open-source models to link distributed snow measurements to radar measurements in the Canadian Arctic. Using multiple radar sensors, we can decouple the soil from the snow contribution. We then retrieve the "microwave snow grain size" to characterize the interaction between the snow mass and the radar signal. This work supports future satellite mission development to retrieve snow mass information such as the future Canadian Terrestrial Snow Mass Mission.
Ange Haddjeri, Matthieu Baron, Matthieu Lafaysse, Louis Le Toumelin, César Deschamps-Berger, Vincent Vionnet, Simon Gascoin, Matthieu Vernay, and Marie Dumont
The Cryosphere, 18, 3081–3116, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-3081-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-3081-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Our study addresses the complex challenge of evaluating distributed alpine snow simulations with snow transport against snow depths from Pléiades stereo imagery and snow melt-out dates from Sentinel-2 and Landsat-8 satellites. Additionally, we disentangle error contributions between blowing snow, precipitation heterogeneity, and unresolved subgrid variability. Snow transport enhances the snow simulations at high elevations, while precipitation biases are the main error source in other areas.
Matthieu Baron, Ange Haddjeri, Matthieu Lafaysse, Louis Le Toumelin, Vincent Vionnet, and Mathieu Fructus
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 1297–1326, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1297-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1297-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Increasing the spatial resolution of numerical systems simulating snowpack evolution in mountain areas requires representing small-scale processes such as wind-induced snow transport. We present SnowPappus, a simple scheme coupled with the Crocus snow model to compute blowing-snow fluxes and redistribute snow among grid points at 250 m resolution. In terms of numerical cost, it is suitable for large-scale applications. We present point-scale evaluations of fluxes and snow transport occurrence.
Hadleigh D. Thompson, Julie M. Thériault, Stephen J. Déry, Ronald E. Stewart, Dominique Boisvert, Lisa Rickard, Nicolas R. Leroux, Matteo Colli, and Vincent Vionnet
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 5785–5806, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-5785-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-5785-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The Saint John River experiment on Cold Season Storms was conducted in northwest New Brunswick, Canada, to investigate the types of precipitation that can lead to ice jams and flooding along the river. We deployed meteorological instruments, took precipitation measurements and photographs of snowflakes, and launched weather balloons. These data will help us to better understand the atmospheric conditions that can affect local communities and townships downstream during the spring melt season.
Pinja Venäläinen, Kari Luojus, Colleen Mortimer, Juha Lemmetyinen, Jouni Pulliainen, Matias Takala, Mikko Moisander, and Lina Zschenderlein
The Cryosphere, 17, 719–736, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-719-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-719-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Snow water equivalent (SWE) is a valuable characteristic of snow cover. In this research, we improve the radiometer-based GlobSnow SWE retrieval methodology by implementing spatially and temporally varying snow densities into the retrieval procedure. In addition to improving the accuracy of SWE retrieval, varying snow densities were found to improve the magnitude and seasonal evolution of the Northern Hemisphere snow mass estimate compared to the baseline product.
Juliane Mai, Hongren Shen, Bryan A. Tolson, Étienne Gaborit, Richard Arsenault, James R. Craig, Vincent Fortin, Lauren M. Fry, Martin Gauch, Daniel Klotz, Frederik Kratzert, Nicole O'Brien, Daniel G. Princz, Sinan Rasiya Koya, Tirthankar Roy, Frank Seglenieks, Narayan K. Shrestha, André G. T. Temgoua, Vincent Vionnet, and Jonathan W. Waddell
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 3537–3572, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3537-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3537-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Model intercomparison studies are carried out to test various models and compare the quality of their outputs over the same domain. In this study, 13 diverse model setups using the same input data are evaluated over the Great Lakes region. Various model outputs – such as streamflow, evaporation, soil moisture, and amount of snow on the ground – are compared using standardized methods and metrics. The basin-wise model outputs and observations are made available through an interactive website.
Vincent Vionnet, Colleen Mortimer, Mike Brady, Louise Arnal, and Ross Brown
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 13, 4603–4619, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-4603-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-4603-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Water equivalent of snow cover (SWE) is a key variable for water management, hydrological forecasting and climate monitoring. A new Canadian SWE dataset (CanSWE) is presented in this paper. It compiles data collected by multiple agencies and companies at more than 2500 different locations across Canada over the period 1928–2020. Snow depth and derived bulk snow density are also included when available.
Vincent Vionnet, Christopher B. Marsh, Brian Menounos, Simon Gascoin, Nicholas E. Wayand, Joseph Shea, Kriti Mukherjee, and John W. Pomeroy
The Cryosphere, 15, 743–769, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-743-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-743-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Mountain snow cover provides critical supplies of fresh water to downstream users. Its accurate prediction requires inclusion of often-ignored processes. A multi-scale modelling strategy is presented that efficiently accounts for snow redistribution. Model accuracy is assessed via airborne lidar and optical satellite imagery. With redistribution the model captures the elevation–snow depth relation. Redistribution processes are required to reproduce spatial variability, such as around ridges.
Guoqiang Tang, Martyn P. Clark, Andrew J. Newman, Andrew W. Wood, Simon Michael Papalexiou, Vincent Vionnet, and Paul H. Whitfield
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 12, 2381–2409, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-2381-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-2381-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Station observations are critical for hydrological and meteorological studies, but they often contain missing values and have short measurement periods. This study developed a serially complete dataset for North America (SCDNA) from 1979 to 2018 for 27 276 precipitation and temperature stations. SCDNA is built on multiple data sources and infilling/reconstruction strategies to achieve high-quality estimates which can be used for a variety of applications.
Cited articles
Arnal, L., Clark, M. P., Pietroniro, A., Vionnet, V., Casson, D. R., Whitfield, P. H., Fortin, V., Wood, A. W., Knoben, W. J. M., Newton, B. W., and Walford, C.: FROSTBYTE: a reproducible data-driven workflow for probabilistic seasonal streamflow forecasting in snow-fed river basins across North America, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 4127–4155, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4127-2024, 2024.
Avanzi, F., De Michele C., and Ghezzi, A.: On the performances of empirical regressions for the estimation of bulk snow density, Geogr. Fis. Din. Quat., 38, 105–112, https://doi.org/10.4461/GFDQ.2015.38.10, 2015.
Barnett, T. P., Adam, J. C., and Lettenmaier, D. P.: Potential impacts of a warming climate on water availability in snow-dominated regions, Nature, 438, 303–309, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04141, 2005.
Beaudette, D., Skovlin, J., Roecker, S., and Brown, A.: soilDB: Soil Database Interface. R package version 2.8.5 [code], https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=soilDB (last access: April 2024), 2024.
Beaudoin-Galaise, M. and Jutras, S.: Comparison of manual snow water equivalent (SWE) measurements: seeking the reference for a true SWE value in a boreal biome, The Cryosphere, 16, 3199–3214, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-3199-2022, 2022.
Beaumont, R. T.: Mt. Hood pressure pillow snow gage, J. Appl. Meteorol., 4, 626–631, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1965)004<0626:MHPPSG>2.0.CO;2, 1965.
Biemans, H., Siderius, C., Lutz, A. F., Nepal, S., Ahmad, B., Hassan, T., von Bloh, W., Wijngaard, R. R., Wester, P., Shrestha, A. B., and Immerzeel, W. W.: Importance of Snow and Glacier Meltwater for Agriculture on the Indo-Gangetic Plain, Nat. Sustain., 2, 594–601, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0305-3, 2019.
Braaten, R.: Canadian Snow Water Equivalent Database Main Documentation, Main Documentation, Environment Canada, Climate Processes and Earth Observation Division, 25 pp., http://data.ec.gc.ca/data/climate/systems/canadian-historical-snow-survey-data/Braaten_1998_Canadian_SWE_Database.pdf (last access: September 2021), 1998.
Brown, R. D., Walker, A., and Goodison, B.: Seasonal snow cover monitoring in Canada: An assessment of Canadian contributions for global climate monitoring, Proceedings of the 57th Eastern Snow Conference, 17–19 May 2000, Syracuse, New York, USA, 131–142, ISBN 0-920081-22-3, 2000.
Brown, R. D., Fang, B., and Mudryk, L.: Update of Canadian historical snow survey data and analysis of snow water equivalent trends, 1967–2016, Atmos. Ocean, 57, 149–156, https://doi.org/10.1080/07055900.2019.1598843, 2019.
Brown, R. D., Smith, C., Derksen, C., and Mudryk, L.: Canadian in situ snow cover trends for 1955–2017 including an assessment of the impact of Automation, Atmos. Ocean, 59, 77–92, https://doi.org/10.1080/07055900.2021.1911781, 2021.
Broxton, P., Zeng, X., and Dawson, N.: Daily 4 km Gridded SWE and Snow Depth from Assimilated In-Situ and Modeled Data over the Conterminous US (NSIDC-0719, Version 1), NASA National Snow and Ice Data Center Distributed Active Archive Center, Boulder Colorado, USA [data set], https://doi.org/10.5067/0GGPB220EX6A, 2019.
Bulygina, O. N., Groisman, P. Ya., Razuvaev, V. N., and Korshunova, N. N.: Changes in snow cover characteristics over Northern Eurasia since 1996, Environ. Res. Lett., 6, 045204, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/6/4/045204, 2011.
Campbell Scientific (Canada) Corp.: CS725 Snow Water Equivalent Sensor Instruction Manual, https://s.campbellsci.com/documents/ca/manuals/cs725_man.pdf (last access: September 2024), January 2017.
Carroll, S. S. and Carroll, T. R.: Effect of forest biomass on airborne snow water equivalent estimates obtained by measuring terrestrial gamma radiation, Remote Sens. Environ., 27, 313–319, https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(89)90091-6, 1989a.
Carroll, S. S. and Carroll, T. R.: Effect of uneven snow cover on airborne snow water equivalent estimates obtained by measuring terrestrial gamma radiation, Water Resour. Res., 25, 1505–1510, https://doi.org/10.1029/WR025i007p01505, 1989b.
Carroll, T. R.: Airborne Gamma Radiation Snow Survey Program: A user's guide, Version 5.0, National Operational Hydrologic Remote Sensing Center (NOHRSC), Chanhassen, 14, https://www.nohrsc.noaa.gov/special/tom/gamma50.pdf (last access: November 2024), 2001.
Carroll, T. R. and Vose, G. D.: Airborne snow water equivalent measurements over a forested environment using terrestrial gamma radiation, in: Proceedings of the 41st Eastern Snow Conference, 7–8 June 1984, New Carrolton, Maryland, USA, 29, 101–115, ISBN 0-920081-06-1, 1984.
Carroll, T. R., Glynn, J. E., and Goodison, B. E.: A comparison of U. S. and Canadian airborne gamma radiation snow water equivalent measurements, P. West. Snow Conf., 51, 27–37, 1983.
Cho, E., Jacobs, J. M., Schroeder, R., Tuttle, S. E., and Olheiser, C.: Improvement of operational airborne gamma radiation using SMAP soil moisture, Remote Sens. Environ., 240, 111668, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2020.111668, 2020a.
Cho, E., Jacobs, J. M., and Vuyovich, C.: The value of long-term (40 years) airborne gamma radiation SWE record for evaluating three observation-based gridded SWE datasets by seasonal snow and land cover classifications, Water Resour. Res., 56, e2019WR025813, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR025813, 2020b.
Choquette, Y., Ducharme, P., and Rogoza, J.: CS725, An Accurate Sensor for the Snow Water Equivalent and Soil Moisture Measurements, in: Proceedings ISSW 2013, 2013 International Snow Science Workshop, Grenoble – Chamonix Mont-Blanc, France, 931–936, https://arc.lib.montana.edu/snow-science/objects/ISSW13_paper_O2-09.pdf (last access: July 2025), 2013.
Copernicus Program: Copernicus DEM—Global and European digital elevation model (COP-DEM), GLO-30, https://doi.org/10.5270/ESA-c5d3d65, 2023.
Cork, H. F. and Loijens, H. S.: The effect of snow drifting on gamma survey results, J. Hydrol., 48, 41–51, https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(80)90064-5, 1980.
Dixon, D. and Boon, S.: Comparison of the SnowHydro snow sampler with existing snow tube designs, Hydrol. Process., 26, 2555–2562, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.9317, 2012.
Dulfer, H. E., Margold, M., Darvill, C. M., and Stroeven, A. P.: Reconstructing the advance and retreat dynamics of the central sector of the last Cordilleran Ice Sheet, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 284, 107465, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2022.107465, 2022.
Elias Chereque, A., Kushner, P. J., Mudryk, L., Derksen, C., and Mortimer, C.: A simple snow temperature index model exposes discrepancies between reanalysis snow water equivalent products, The Cryosphere, 18, 4955–4969, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-4955-2024, 2024.
Engel, C., Hastings, R., Giovando, J., Gabel, E., Duncan, C., and Dahl, T.: Summary of Ground-Based Snow Measurements for the Northeastern United States, Engineer Research and Development Special Report No. 22–1, US Army Corps of Engineers, https://doi.org/10.21079/11681/44122, 2022.
Environment Canada, Meteorological Service of Canada: Snow Surveying – Manual of Standards Snow Surveying Procedures Draft, 3rd edn., last updated January 2004, Toronto, Canada, 18 pp., 2004.
Fleig, A. (Ed.): Norwegian hydrological reference dataset for climate change studies, Report no. 2 – 2013, Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Directorate, Oslo, Norway, 84 pp., ISBN 978-82-410-0869-6, 2013.
Fleming, S. W., Zukiewicz, L., Strobel, M. L., Hofman, H., and Goodbody, A. G.: SNOTEL, the Soil Climate Analysis Network, and Water Supply Forecasting at the Natural Resources Conservation Service: Past, Present, and Future, J. Am. Water Resour. As., 59, 585–599, https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13104, 2023.
Fontrodona-Bach, A., Schaefli, B., Woods, R., Teuling, A. J., and Larsen, J. R.: NH-SWE: Northern Hemisphere Snow Water Equivalent dataset based on in situ snow depth time series, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 2577–2599, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-2577-2023, 2023.
Foster, J. L., Hall, D. K., Eylander, J. B., Riggs, G. A., Nghiem, S. V., Tedesco, M., Kim, E., Montesano, P. M., Kelly, R. E. J., Casey, K. A., and Choudhury, B.: A blended global snow product using visible, passive microwave and scatterometer satellite data, Int. J. Remote Sens., 32, 1371–1395, https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160903548013, 2011.
Fyfe, J. C., Derksen, C., Mudryk, L., Flato, G. M., Santer, B. D., Swart, N. C., Molotch, N. P., Zhang, X., Wan, H., Arora, V. K., Scinocca, J., and Jiao, Y.: Large near-term projected snowpack loss over the western United States, Nat. Commun., 8, 1–7, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14996, 2017.
Gao, X., Pan, J., Peng, Z., Zhao, T., Bai, Y., Yang, J., Jiang, L., Shi, J., and Husi, L.: Snow density retrieval in Quebec using space-borne SMOS observations, Remote Sens.-Basel, 15, 2065, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15082065, 2023.
Garnaud, C., Vionnet, V., Gaborit, É., Fortin, V., Bilodeau, B., Carrera, M., and Durnford, D.: Improving Snow Analyses for Hydrological Forecasting at ECCC Using Satellite-Derived Data, Remote Sens.-Basel, 13, 5022, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13245022, 2021.
Gesch, D., Oimoen, M., Greenlee, S., Nelson, C., Steuck, M., and Tyler, D.: The National Elevation Dataset, Photogramm. Eng. Rem. S., 68, 5–32, 2002.
Glynn, J. E., Carroll, T. R., Holman, P. B., and Grasty, R. L.: An airborne gamma ray snow survey of a forested covered area with a deep snowpack, Remote Sens. Environ., 26, 149–160, https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(88)90093-4, 1988.
Gottlieb, A. R. and Mankin, J. S.: Evidence of human influence on Northern Hemisphere snow loss, Nature, 625, 293–300, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06794-y, 2024.
Haberkorn, A. (Ed.): European Snow Booklet – an Inventory of Snow Measurements in Europe, EnviDat, 363 pp., https://doi.org/10.16904/envidat.59, 2019.
Hale, K. E., Jennings, K. S., Musselman, K. N., Livneh, B., and Molotch, N. P.: Recent decreases in snow water storage in western North America, Comm. Earth Environ., 4, 170, https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-023-00751-3, 2023.
Helms, D., Phillips, S. E., and Reich, P. F. (Eds.): The history of snow survey and water supply forecasting: Interviews with US Department of Agriculture Pioneers, No. 8, Natural Resources Conservation Service, US Department of Agriculture, Washington DC, https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/sites/default/files/2022-09/History-Of-Snow-Survey.pdf (last access: July 2025), 2008.
Henkel, P., Koch, F., Appel, F., Bach, H., Prasch, M., Schmid, L., Schweizer, J., and Mauser, W.: Snow water equivalent of dry snow derived from GNSS carrier phases, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 56, 3561–3572, https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2018.2802494, 2018.
Hill, D. F., Burakowski, E. A., Crumley, R. L., Keon, J., Hu, J. M., Arendt, A. A., Wikstrom Jones, K., and Wolken, G. J.: Converting snow depth to snow water equivalent using climatological variables, The Cryosphere, 13, 1767–1784, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-1767-2019, 2019.
Huning, L. A. and AghaKouchak, A.: Global snow drought hot spots and characteristics, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 117, 19753–19759, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1915921117, 2020.
Johnson, J. B.: A theory of pressure sensor performance in snow, Hydrol. Process., 18, 53–64, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.1310, 2004.
Johnson, J. B. and Marks, D.: The detection and correction of snow water equivalent pressure sensor errors, Hydrol. Process., 18, 3513–3525, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.5795, 2004.
Kodama, M., Nakai, K., Kawasaki, S., and Wada, M.: An application of cosmic-ray neutron measurements to the determination of the snow-water equivalent, J. Hydrol., 41, 85–92, https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(79)90107-0, 1979.
Kuusisto, E.: Snow accumulation and snowmelt in Finland, vol. 55, Water Research Institute, Helsinki, 149 pp., ISBN 951-46-7494-4, 1984.
Leppänen, L., Kontu, A., Hannula, H.-R., Sjöblom, H., and Pulliainen, J.: Sodankylä manual snow survey program, Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 5, 163–179, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-5-163-2016, 2016.
Leys, C., Klein, O., Dominicy, Y., and Ley, C.: Detecting multivariate outliers: Use a robust variant of the Mahalanobis distance, J. Exp. Soc. Psychol., 74, 150–156, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.09.011, 2018.
Liston, G. E. and Sturm, M.: Global Seasonal-Snow Classification (NSIDC-0768, Version 1). 30 arcsec, NASA National Snow and Ice Data Center Distributed Active Archive Center, Boulder, Colorado USA [data set], https://doi.org/10.5067/99FTCYYYLAQ0, 2021.
López-Moreno, J. I., Leppänen, L., Luks, B., Holko, L., Picard, G., Sanmiguel Vallelado, A., Alonso González, E., Finger, D. C., Arslan, A. N., Gillemot, K., Sensoy, A., Sorman, A., Ertaş, M. C., Fassnacht, S. R., Fierz, C., and Marty, C.: Intercomparison of measurements of bulk snow density and water equivalent of snow cover with snow core samplers: Instrumental bias and variability induced by observers, Hydrol. Process., 34, 3120–3133, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13785, 2020.
Luojus, K., Pulliainen, J., Takala, M., Lemmetyinen, J., Mortimer, C., Derksen, C., Mudryk, L., Moisander, M., Venäläinen, P., Hiltunen, M., Ikonen, J., Smolander, T., Cohen, J., Salminen, M., Veijola, K., and Norberg, J.: GlobSnow v3.0 Northern Hemisphere snow water equivalent dataset, Sci. Data, 8, 163, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-021-00939-2, 2021.
Magnusson, J., Nævdal, G., Matt, F., Burkhart, J. F., and Winstral, A.: Improving hydropower inflow forecasts by assimilating snow data, Hydrol. Res., 51, 226–237, https://doi.org/10.2166/nh.2020.025, 2020.
Mai, J., Shen, H., Tolson, B. A., Gaborit, É., Arsenault, R., Craig, J. R., Fortin, V., Fry, L. M., Gauch, M., Klotz, D., Kratzert, F., O'Brien, N., Princz, D. G., Rasiya Koya, S., Roy, T., Seglenieks, F., Shrestha, N. K., Temgoua, A. G. T., Vionnet, V., and Waddell, J. W.: The Great Lakes Runoff Intercomparison Project Phase 4: the Great Lakes (GRIP-GL), Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 3537–3572, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3537-2022, 2022.
Maine Geological Survey: Maine Cooperative Snow Survey Snow Measurements Standard Operating Procedure, revised 4 October 2016, 9 pp., 2016.
Marsh, C. B., Lv, Z., Vionnet, V., Harder, P., Spiteri, R. J., and Pomeroy, J. W.: Snowdrift-permitting simulations of seasonal snowpack processes over large mountain extents, Water Resour. Res., 60, e2023WR036948, https://doi.org/10.1029/2023WR036948, 2024.
Marty, C.: GCOS SWE data from 11 stations in Switzerland, EnviDat [data set], last updated 2024, https://doi.org/10.16904/15, 2020.
Marty, C., Rohrer, M. B., Huss, M., and Stähli, M.: Multi-decadal observations in the Alps reveal less and wetter snow, with increasing variability, Front. Earth Sci., 11, 1165861, https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2023.1165861, 2023.
Meredith, M., Sommerkorn, M., Cassotta, S., Derksen, C., Ekaykin, A., Hollowed, A., Kofinas, G., Mackintosh, A., J. Melbourne-Thomas, J., Muelbert, M. M. C., Ottersen, G., Pritchard, H., and Schuur, E. A. G.: Polar Regions, in: IPCC Special Report on the Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate, edited by: Pörtner, H.-O., Roberts, D. C., Masson-Delmotte, V., Zhai, P., Tignor, M., Poloczanska, E., Mintenbeck, K., Alegría, A., Nicolai, M., Okem, A., Petzold, J., Rama, B., and Weyer, N. M., https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157964, Cambridge University Press, 2022.
Meromy, L., Molotch, N. P., Link, T. E., Fassnacht, S. R., and Rice, R.: Subgrid variability of snow water equivalent at operational snow stations in the western USA, Hydrol. Process., 27, 2383–2400, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.9355, 2013.
Meyer, J. D. D., Jin, J., and Wang, S.-Y.: Systematic Patterns of the Inconsistency between Snow Water Equivalent and Accumulated Precipitation as Reported by the Snowpack Telemetry Network, J. Hydrometeorol., 13, 1970–1976, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-12-066.1, 2012.
Mortimer, C. and Vionnet, V.: Northern Hemisphere historical in-situ Snow Water Equivalent dataset (NorSWE, 1979–2021) (3.0), Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15263370, 2025.
Mortimer, C., Mudryk, L., Derksen, C., Luojus, K., Brown, R., Kelly, R., and Tedesco, M.: Evaluation of long-term Northern Hemisphere snow water equivalent products, The Cryosphere, 14, 1579–1594, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-1579-2020, 2020.
Mortimer, C., Mudryk, L., Derksen, C., Brady, M., Luojus, K., Venäläinen, P., Moisander, M., Lemmetyinen, J., Takala, M., Tanis, C., and Pulliainen, J.: Benchmarking algorithm changes to the Snow CCI+ snow water equivalent product, Remote Sens. Environ., 274, 112988, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2022.112988, 2022.
Mortimer, C., Mudryk, L., Cho, E., Derksen, C., Brady, M., and Vuyovich, C.: Use of multiple reference data sources to cross-validate gridded snow water equivalent products over North America, The Cryosphere, 18, 5619–5639, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-5619-2024, 2024.
Mudryk, L., Santolaria-Otín, M., Krinner, G., Ménégoz, M., Derksen, C., Brutel-Vuilmet, C., Brady, M., and Essery, R.: Historical Northern Hemisphere snow cover trends and projected changes in the CMIP6 multi-model ensemble, The Cryosphere, 14, 2495–2514, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-2495-2020, 2020.
Mudryk, L., Mortimer, C., Derksen, C., Elias Chereque, A., and Kushner, P.: Benchmarking of snow water equivalent (SWE) products based on outcomes of the SnowPEx+ Intercomparison Project, The Cryosphere, 19, 201–218, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-201-2025, 2025.
Musselman, K. N.: Daily snow water equivalent (SWE) observations from 1065 stations in western North America for years 1960–2019, Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4546864, 2021.
Painter, T. H., Berisford, D. F., Boardman, J. W., Bormann, K. J., Deems, J. S., Gehrke, F., Hedrick, A., Joyce, Laidlaw, M. R., Marks, D., Mattmann, C., McGurk, B., Ramirez, P., Richardson, M., Skiles, S. M., Seidel, F. C., and Winstral, A.: The Airborne Snow Observatory: Fusion of scanning lidar, imaging spectrometer, and physically-based modeling for mapping snow water equivalent and snow albedo, Remote Sens. Environ., 184, 169–152, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2016.06.018, 2016.
Paquet, E., Laval, M., Basalaev, L. M., Belov, A., Eroshenko, E., Kartyshov, V., Struminsky, A., and Yanke, V.: An Application of Cosmic-Ray Neutron Measurements to the Determination of the Snow Water Equivalent, in: Proceedings of the 30th International Cosmic Ray Conference, Merida, Mexico, 3–11 July 2008, https://indico.nucleares.unam.mx/event/4/session/39/contribution/1000/material/paper/0.pdf (last access: 21 September 2021), 2008.
Pirazzini, R., Leppänen, L., Picard, G., López-Moreno, J. I., Marty, C., Macelloni, G., Kontu, A., von Lerber, A., Tamis, C. M., Schneebeli, M., de Rosnay, P., and Arslan, A. N.: European In-Situ Snow Measurements: Practices and Purposes, Sensors-Basel, 18, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/s18072016, 2018.
Pokorny, S., Stadnyk, T. A., and Ali, G.: Evaluating Operational Risk in Environmental Modeling: Assessment of Reliability and Sharpness for Ensemble Selection, J. Hydrol. Eng., 28, 8, https://doi.org/10.1061/JHYEFF.HEENG-5833, 2023.
Pomeroy, J. W. and Gray, D. M.: Snowcover accumulation relocation and management, National Hydrology Research Institute Science Rep. 7, 144 pp., https://hdl.handle.net/10388/15161 (last access: October 2024), 1995.
Pulliainen, J., Luojus, K., Derksen, C., Mudryk, L., Lemmetyinen, J., Salminen, M., Ikonen, J., Takala, M., Cohen, J., Smolander, T., and Norberg, J.: Patterns and trends of Northern Hemisphere snow mass from 1980 to 2018, Nature, 581, 294–298. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2258-0, 2020.
Qin, Y., Abatzoglou, J. T., Siebert, S., Huning, L. S., AghaKouchak, A., Mankin, J. S., Hong, C., Tong, D., Davis, S. J., and Mueller, N. D.: Agricultural Risks from Changing Snowmelt, Nat. Clim. Change, 10, 459–465, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-0746-8, 2020.
Royer, A., Roy, A., Jutras, S., and Langlois, A.: Review article: Performance assessment of radiation-based field sensors for monitoring the water equivalent of snow cover (SWE), The Cryosphere, 15, 5079–5098, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-5079-2021, 2021.
Shrestha, N. K., Seglenieks, F., Temgoua, A. G. T., and Dehghan, A.: The Impacts of Climate Change on Land Hydroclimatology of the Laurentian Great Lakes Basin, Front. Water, 4, 2022, https://doi.org/10.3389/frwa.2022.801134, 2022.
Smith, C. D., Kontu, A., Laffin, R., and Pomeroy, J. W.: An assessment of two automated snow water equivalent instruments during the WMO Solid Precipitation Intercomparison Experiment, The Cryosphere, 11, 101–116, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-11-101-2017, 2017.
Snethlage, M. A., Geschke, J., Spehn, E. M., Ranipeta, A., Yoccoz, N. G., Körner, Ch., Jetz, W., Fischer, M., and Urbach, D.: A hierarchical inventory of the world's mountains for global comparative mountain science, Sci. Data, 9, 149, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01256-y, 2022a.
Snethlage, M. A., Geschke, J., Spehn, E. M., Ranipeta, A., Yoccoz, N. G., Körner, Ch., Jetz, W., Fischer, M., and Urbach, D.: GMBA Mountain Inventory v2, GMBA-EarthEnv. [data set], https://doi.org/10.48601/earthenv-t9k2-1407 (last access: June 2023), 2022b.
Steiner, L., Studemann, G., Grimm, D. E., Marty, C., and Leinss, S.: (Near) Real-time snow water equivalent observation using GNSS refractometry and RTKLIB, Sensors-Basel, 22, 6918, https://doi.org/10.3390/s22186918, 2022.
Stone, D. C.: Application of median filtering to noisy data, Can. J. Chem., 73, 1573–1581, https://doi.org/10.1139/v95-195, 1995.
Stranden, H. and Saloranta, T.: NVE's snow reference datasets for climate change studies, 6 pp., last updated December 2021, https://www.nve.no/media/13163/nve_snow_reference_datasets_2021.pdf (last access: February 2025), 2021.
Stranden, H. B. and Grønsten, H. A.: Filefjell forskningsstasjon: Evaluering av måledata for snø, sesongene 2009/2010 og 2010/2011, NVE rapport 23/2011, 2011.
Stranden, H. B., Haugen, T., Skaugen, T., and Møen, K.: Design and Performance of the NVE Snow Scales, Cold Reg. Sci. Technol., 217, 104039, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2023.104039, 2024.
Stranden, H. N., Lirbuh, B., and Møen, K. M.: Recommendations for automatic measurements of snow water equivalent in NVE, Report no. 96 – 2015, Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Directorate, Oslo, Norway, 35 pp., ISBN 978-82-410-1148-1, 2015.
Sturm, M. and Liston, G. E.: Revisiting the global seasonal Snow classification: an updated dataset for earth system applications, J. Hydrometeorol., 22, 2917–2938, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-21-0070.1, 2021.
Sturm, M., Taras, B., Liston, G., Derksen, C., Jonas, T., and Lea, J.: Estimating snow water equivalent using snow depth data and climate classes, J. Hydrometeorol. 11, 1380–1394, https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JHM1202.1, 2010.
Sturm, M., Goldstein, M. A., and Parr, C.: Water and Life from Snow: A Trillion Dollar Science Question, Water Resour. Res., 53, 3534–3544, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR020840, 2017.
Sun, H., Fang, Y., Margulis, S. A., Mortimer, C., Mudryk, L., and Derksen, C.: Evaluation of the Snow Climate Change Initiative (Snow CCI) snow-covered area product within a mountain snow water equivalent reanalysis, The Cryosphere, 19, 2017–2036, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-2017-2025, 2025.
Sun, N., Yan, H., Wigmosta, M., Skaggs, R., Leung, R., and Hou, Z.: Regional snow parameters estimation for large-domain hydrological applications in the western United States, J Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 124, 5296–5313, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD030140, 2019.
Thornton, J. M., Palazzi, E., Pepin, N. C., Cristofanelli, P., Essery, R., Kotlarski, S., Giuliani, G., Guigoz, Y., Kulonen, A., Pritchard, D., Li, X., Fowler, H. J., Randin, C. F., Shahgedanova, M., Steinbacher, M., Zebisch M., and Adler, C.: Toward a Definition of Essential Mountain Climate Variables, One Earth, 4, 805–827, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2021.05.005, 2021.
Tian, X., Lu, C., Song, Z., An, C., Wan, S., Peng, H., Feng, Q., and Chen, Z.: Quantifying weather-induced unreliable public transportation service in cold regions under future climate model scenarios, Sustain. Cities Soc., 113, 105660, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2024.105660, 2024.
United States Department of Agriculture National Resources Conservation Servies: Title 210-National Engineering Handbook, Part 622 Snow Survey and Water Supply Forecasting, 210-VI-NEH, Chap. 2: Data Parameters. Amendment 43, US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC, https://directives.sc.egov.usda.gov/landingpage/46ec6eaf-5d3b-432a-a0e0-df8e7c5cab98 (last access: November 2024), 2012.
Venäläinen, P., Luojus, K., Lemmetyinen, J., Pulliainen, J., Moisander, M., and Takala, M.: Impact of dynamic snow density on GlobSnow snow water equivalent retrieval accuracy, The Cryosphere, 15, 2969–2981, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-2969-2021, 2021.
Venäläinen, P., Luojus, K., Mortimer, C., Lemmetyinen, J., Pulliainen, J., Takala, M., Moisander, M., and Zschenderlein, L.: Implementing spatially and temporally varying snow densities into the GlobSnow snow water equivalent retrieval, The Cryosphere, 17, 719–736, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-719-2023, 2023.
Vershinina, L.: Assessment of the accuracy in determining water equivalent of snow cover, in: Determination of the water equivalent of snow cover, Keter Press, Jerusalem, 100–127, ISBN 7065 1090 9, 1971.
Vershinina, L. and Volchenko, V.: Maximum water equivalents of snow in the northwestern regions of the European USSR, Soviet Hydrology, 13, 1–11, 1974.
Vionnet, V., Fortin, V., Gaborit, E., Roy, G., Abrahamowicz, M., Gasset, N., and Pomeroy, J. W.: Assessing the factors governing the ability to predict late-spring flooding in cold-region mountain basins, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 2141–2165, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-2141-2020, 2020.
Vionnet, V., Mortimer, C., Brady, M., Arnal, L., and Brown, R.: Canadian historical Snow Water Equivalent dataset (CanSWE, 1928–2020), Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 13, 4603–4619, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-4603-2021, 2021.
Vionnet, V., Verville, M., Fortin, V., Brugman, M., Abrahamowicz, M., Lemay, F., Thériault, J. M., Lafaysse, M., and Milbrandt, J. A.: Snow level from post-processing of atmospheric model improves snowfall estimate and snowpack prediction in mountains, Water Resour. Res., 58, e2021WR031778, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR031778, 2022.
Vionnet, V., Mortimer, C., Brady, M., Arnal, L., and Brown, R.: Canadian historical Snow Water Equivalent dataset (CanSWE, 1928–2023) (Version v6), Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10835278, 2024.
Vogel, R. M., Carroll, T. R., and Carroll, S. S.: Simulation of airborne snow water equivalent measurement errors made over a forest environment, Proceedings of symposium Watershed management in the eighties, edited by: Jones, B. and Ward, T. J., 30 April–1 May, Denver, Colorado, USA, American Society of Civil Engineers, 248=-255, ISBN 0-87262-449-8, 1985
WMO (Ed.): Guide to instruments and methods of observation: Volume II – Measurement of Cryospheric Variables, 2024 edition, World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, WMO-No. 8, 52 pp., https://doi.org/10.59327/WMO/CIMO/2, 2024.
WMO (Ed.): Manual on Codes: International codes Volume 1.2, Annex II to the WMO Technical Regulations, Part B – Binary Codes; Part C – Common Features to Binary and Alphanumeric Codes, WMO-No.-306, 2025 Edn., World Meteorological Organization WMO, Geneva, Switzerland, ISBN 978-92-63-10306-2, 2025.
Yan, H., Sun, N., Wigmosta, M., Skaggs, R., Hou, Z., and Leung, R.: Next-generation intensity-duration-frequency curves for hydrologic design in snow-dominated environments, Water Resour. Res., 54, 1093–1108, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR021290, 2018.
Zeng, X., Broxton, P., and Dawson, N.: Snowpack change from 1982 to 2016 over Conterminous United States, Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 12940–12947, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL079621, 2018.
Short summary
In situ observations of snow water equivalent (SWE) are critical for climate applications and resource management. NorSWE is a dataset of in situ SWE observations covering North America, Norway, Finland, Switzerland, Russia, and Nepal over the period 1979–2021. It includes more than 11.5 million observations from more than 10 000 different locations compiled from nine different sources. Snow depth and derived bulk snow density are included when available.
In situ observations of snow water equivalent (SWE) are critical for climate applications and...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint