Articles | Volume 13, issue 12
https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-5565-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-5565-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
An updated version of the global interior ocean biogeochemical data product, GLODAPv2.2021
Siv K. Lauvset
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
NORCE Norwegian Research Centre, Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research, Bergen, Norway
Nico Lange
GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Kiel, Germany
Toste Tanhua
GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Kiel, Germany
Henry C. Bittig
Leibniz Institute for Baltic Sea Research Warnemünde, Rostock, Germany
Are Olsen
Geophysical Institute, University of Bergen and Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research, Bergen, Norway
Alex Kozyr
NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information, Silver Spring, MD, USA
Marta Álvarez
Instituto Español de Oceanografía, IEO-CSIC, A Coruña, Spain
Susan Becker
Scripps Institution of Oceanography, UC San Diego, San Diego CA 92093, USA
Peter J. Brown
National Oceanography Centre, Southampton, UK
Brendan R. Carter
Cooperative Institute for Climate Ocean and Ecosystem Studies, University Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Seattle, Washington, USA
Leticia Cotrim da Cunha
PPG-Oceanografia, Faculdade de Oceanografia, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro (RJ), Brazil
Richard A. Feely
Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Seattle, Washington, USA
Steven van Heuven
Centre for Isotope Research, Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
Mario Hoppema
Alfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Bremerhaven, Germany
Masao Ishii
Meteorological Research Institute, Japan Meteorological Agency, Tsukuba, Japan
Emil Jeansson
NORCE Norwegian Research Centre, Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research, Bergen, Norway
Sara Jutterström
IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute, Gothenburg, Sweden
Steve D. Jones
Geophysical Institute, University of Bergen and Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research, Bergen, Norway
Maren K. Karlsen
Geophysical Institute, University of Bergen and Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research, Bergen, Norway
Claire Lo Monaco
LOCEAN, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
Patrick Michaelis
GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Kiel, Germany
Akihiko Murata
Research Institute for Global Change, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology, Yokosuka, Japan
Fiz F. Pérez
Instituto de Investigacións Mariñas, IIM – CSIC, Vigo, Spain
Benjamin Pfeil
IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute, Gothenburg, Sweden
Carsten Schirnick
GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Kiel, Germany
Reiner Steinfeldt
Institute of Environmental Physics, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
Toru Suzuki
Marine Information Research Center, Japan Hydrographic Association, Tokyo, Japan
Bronte Tilbrook
CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere and Australian Antarctic Program Partnership, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia
Anton Velo
Instituto de Investigacións Mariñas, IIM – CSIC, Vigo, Spain
Rik Wanninkhof
Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Miami, USA
Ryan J. Woosley
Center for Global Change Science, Massachusetts Institute for Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
Robert M. Key
Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, 08540, USA
Download
- Final revised paper (published on 03 Dec 2021)
- Supplement to the final revised paper
- Preprint (discussion started on 02 Aug 2021)
- Supplement to the preprint
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor
| : Report abuse
- RC1: 'Review of 'An updated version of the global interior ocean biogeochemical data product, GLODAPv2.2021' by Lauvset et al. [essd-2021-234]', Matthew Humphreys, 03 Aug 2021
-
RC2: 'Comment on essd-2021-234', Anonymous Referee #2, 05 Oct 2021
As is usual for GLODAP, the authors have been careful and thorough in their analysis and documentation of this critically important dataset. I have reviewed the manuscript as well as the relatively minor comments from the other reviewer and have no further comments.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2021-234-RC2 -
AC1: 'Authors' reply to reviewers', Siv K Lauvset, 04 Nov 2021
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://essd.copernicus.org/preprints/essd-2021-234/essd-2021-234-AC1-supplement.pdf
Peer review completion
AR – Author's response | RR – Referee report | ED – Editor decision | EF – Editorial file upload
AR by Siv K Lauvset on behalf of the Authors (04 Nov 2021)
Author's response
Author's tracked changes
Manuscript
ED: Publish as is (04 Nov 2021) by David Carlson
AR by Siv K Lauvset on behalf of the Authors (05 Nov 2021)
Manuscript
Download
- Article
(4622 KB) - Full-text XML
Short summary
GLODAP is a data product for ocean inorganic carbon and related biogeochemical variables measured by the chemical analysis of water bottle samples from scientific cruises. GLODAPv2.2021 is the third update of GLODAPv2 from 2016. The data that are included have been subjected to extensive quality control, including systematic evaluation of measurement biases. This version contains data from 989 hydrographic cruises covering the world's oceans from 1972 to 2020.
GLODAP is a data product for ocean inorganic carbon and related biogeochemical variables...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint
This manuscript presents the latest update to GLODAP (GLODAPv2.2021) with 43 new cruises added since the previous version along with a few other minor QC-related updates. The changes and additions have been clearly explained and justified where necessary. The explanation of the overall QC procedure (inherited from the previous version of the manuscript) is comprehensive. The QC procedure itself is robust and now well established.
I have only a few minor techincal/copy-editing notes and suggestions as follows. Having also been a reviewer for the previous iteration of this manuscript I focused on the track-changes supplement provided by the authors. The line numbers below refer to that version.
185 'two-years' should be 'two years' (no hyphen needed here)
188 'update, is presented here which' should be 'update is presented here, which'
192 remove comma after '989 cruises'
217 'essentially the same' implies that there are minor differences - is this intended? If not, just delete 'essentially'.
219-221 why is there no Southern Ocean identifier? Are these cruises included in the Atlantic/Indian/Pacific sectors based on longitude? Please clarify and also mention briefly how the basins are defined (what are the lat/lon/etc. cutoffs).
220 should be Arctic 'and' Mediterranean Seas
366 'as the difference, is in accordance' should be 'as the difference, in accordance'
371-372 'The TCO2 data measured on this cruise are high by 2.15 ± 1.04 umol kg-1 when compared to the data measured on nearby cruises' suggest rephrase to 'The TCO2 data measured on this cruise are 2.15 ± 1.04 umol kg-1 greater/higher than the data measured on nearby cruises'
391 'avoid the communicating' should be 'avoid communicating'
425 'pH dependent' should be 'pH-dependent'
425 'in calculated pH with' might be clearer as 'in calculated pH compared with'
428 'pH dependent' should be 'pH-dependent'
518, 525, 529, 530, 532, 533, 534 & 535 missing full stop at end of sentence
588 'cruises that ended at 2106' should be 'cruises, which ended at 2106'
615-616 awkward sentence; suggest rephrase 'Neutral density for all 989 cruises was calculated using/following J & M (1997).'
616 missing full stop at end of sentence
740 'Silicate in the Atlantic Ocean, for example, shows' consider rephrase to 'For example, silicate in the Atlantic Ocean shows'
771 https://explore.webodv.awi.de/ link did not work for me (503 Service Unavailable), but it might be a temporary issue
776 expocode and doi are mostly lowercase but sometimes uppercase as here; suggest to be consistent throughout
880 & 881 'Python', not 'PYTHON'