Articles | Volume 13, issue 7
https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-3263-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-3263-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
A national topographic dataset for hydrological modeling over the contiguous United States
Jun Zhang
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Department of Hydrology and Atmospheric Sciences, The University of
Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
Laura E. Condon
Department of Hydrology and Atmospheric Sciences, The University of
Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
Hoang Tran
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Princeton
University, Princeton, NJ, USA
Reed M. Maxwell
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Princeton
University, Princeton, NJ, USA
Related authors
No articles found.
Chen Yang, Zitong Jia, Wenjie Xu, Zhongwang Wei, Xiaolang Zhang, Yiguang Zou, Jeffrey McDonnell, Laura Condon, Yongjiu Dai, and Reed Maxwell
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 2201–2218, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-2201-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-2201-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We developed the first high-resolution, integrated surface water–groundwater hydrologic model of the entirety of continental China using ParFlow. The model shows good performance in terms of streamflow and water table depth when compared to global data products and observations. It is essential for water resources management and decision-making in China within a consistent framework in the changing world. It also has significant implications for similar modeling in other places in the world.
Max Berkelhammer, Gerald F. M. Page, Frank Zurek, Christopher Still, Mariah S. Carbone, William Talavera, Laura Hildebrand, James Byron, Kyle Inthabandith, Angellica Kucinski, Melissa Carlson, Kelsey Foss, Wendy Brown, Rosemary W. H. Carroll, Austin Simonpietri, Marshall Worsham, Ian Breckheimer, Anna Ryken, Reed Maxwell, David Gochis, Mark S. Raleigh, Eric Small, and Kenneth H. Williams
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 701–718, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-701-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-701-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Warming in montane systems is affecting the snowmelt input amount. At the global scale, this will impact subalpine forests that rely on spring snowmelt to support their water demands. We use a network of sensors across a hillslope in the Upper Colorado Basin to show that the changing spring snowpack has a more pronounced impact on dense forest stands, while open stands show a higher reliance on summer rain and are less sensitive to significant changes in snow.
Benjamin D. West, Reed M. Maxwell, and Laura E. Condon
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 245–259, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-245-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-245-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This article describes the addition of reservoirs to the hydrologic model ParFlow. ParFlow is particularly good at helping us understand some of the broader drivers behind different parts of the water cycle. By having reservoirs in such a model, we hope to be able to better understand both our impacts on the environment and how to adjust our management of reservoirs to changing conditions.
Yilin Fang, Hoang Viet Tran, and L. Ruby Leung
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 19–32, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-19-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-19-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Hurricanes may worsen water quality in the lower Mississippi River basin (LMRB) by increasing nutrient runoff. We found that runoff parameterizations greatly affect nitrate–nitrogen runoff simulated using an Earth system land model. Our simulations predicted increased nitrogen runoff in the LMRB during Hurricane Ida in 2021, albeit less pronounced than the observations, indicating areas for model improvement to better understand and manage nutrient runoff loss during hurricanes in the region.
Peyman Abbaszadeh, Fadji Zaouna Maina, Chen Yang, Dan Rosen, Sujay Kumar, Matthew Rodell, and Reed Maxwell
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-280, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-280, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for HESS
Short summary
Short summary
To manage Earth's water resources effectively amid climate change, it's crucial to understand both surface and groundwater processes. We developed a new modeling system that combines two advanced tools, ParFlow and LIS/Noah-MP, to better simulate both land surface and groundwater interactions. By testing this integrated model in the Upper Colorado River Basin, we found it improves predictions of hydrologic processes, especially in complex terrains.
Robert Hull, Elena Leonarduzzi, Luis De La Fuente, Hoang Viet Tran, Andrew Bennett, Peter Melchior, Reed M. Maxwell, and Laura E. Condon
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 4685–4713, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4685-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4685-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Large-scale hydrologic simulators are a needed tool to explore complex watershed processes and how they may evolve with a changing climate. However, calibrating them can be difficult because they are costly to run and have many unknown parameters. We implement a state-of-the-art approach to model calibration using neural networks with a set of experiments based on streamflow in the upper Colorado River basin.
Jennie C. Steyaert and Laura E. Condon
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 1071–1088, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1071-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1071-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Reservoirs impact all river systems in the United States, yet their operations are difficult to quantify due to limited data. Using historical reservoir operations, we find that storage has declined over the past 40 years, with clear regional differences. We observe that active storage ranges are increasing in arid regions and decreasing in humid regions. By evaluating reservoir model assumptions, we find that they may miss out on seasonal dynamics and can underestimate storage.
Luis Andres De la Fuente, Mohammad Reza Ehsani, Hoshin Vijai Gupta, and Laura Elizabeth Condon
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 945–971, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-945-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-945-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Long short-term memory (LSTM) is a widely used machine-learning model in hydrology, but it is difficult to extract knowledge from it. We propose HydroLSTM, which represents processes like a hydrological reservoir. Models based on HydroLSTM perform similarly to LSTM while requiring fewer cell states. The learned parameters are informative about the dominant hydrology of a catchment. Our results show how parsimony and hydrological knowledge extraction can be achieved by using the new structure.
Amanda Triplett and Laura E. Condon
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 2763–2785, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2763-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2763-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Accelerated melting in mountains is a global phenomenon. The Heihe River basin depends on upstream mountains for its water supply. We built a hydrologic model to examine how shifts in streamflow and warming will impact ground and surface water interactions. The results indicate that degrading permafrost has a larger effect than melting glaciers. Additionally, warming temperatures tend to have more impact than changes to streamflow. These results can inform other mountain–valley system studies.
Luis Andres De la Fuente, Mohammad Reza Ehsani, Hoshin Vijai Gupta, and Laura E. Condon
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-666, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-666, 2023
Preprint archived
Short summary
Short summary
Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) is a widely-used machine learning (ML) model in hydrology. However, it is difficult to extract knowledge from it. We propose HydroLSTM which represents processes analogous to a hydrological reservoir. Models using HydroLSTM perform similarly to LSTM but require fewer cell states. The learned parameters are informative about the dominant hydroclimatic characteristics of a catchment. Our results demonstrate how hydrological knowledge is encoded in the new structure.
Aniket Gupta, Alix Reverdy, Jean-Martial Cohard, Basile Hector, Marc Descloitres, Jean-Pierre Vandervaere, Catherine Coulaud, Romain Biron, Lucie Liger, Reed Maxwell, Jean-Gabriel Valay, and Didier Voisin
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 191–212, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-191-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-191-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Patchy snow cover during spring impacts mountainous ecosystems on a large range of spatio-temporal scales. A hydrological model simulated such snow patchiness at 10 m resolution. Slope and orientation controls precipitation, radiation, and wind generate differences in snowmelt, subsurface storage, streamflow, and evapotranspiration. The snow patchiness increases the duration of the snowmelt to stream and subsurface storage, which sustains the plants and streamflow later in the summer.
Robert Hull, Elena Leonarduzzi, Luis De La Fuente, Hoang Viet Tran, Andrew Bennett, Peter Melchior, Reed M. Maxwell, and Laura E. Condon
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2022-345, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2022-345, 2022
Publication in HESS not foreseen
Short summary
Short summary
As the stress on water resources from climate change grows, we need models that represent water processes at the scale of counties, states, and even countries in order to make viable predictions about things will change. While such models are powerful, they can be cumbersome to deal with because they are so large. This research explores a novel way of increasing the efficiency of large-scale hydrologic models using an approach called Simulation-Based Inference.
Jennie C. Steyaert and Laura E. Condon
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-1051, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-1051, 2022
Preprint archived
Short summary
Short summary
All river systems in the US are impacted by dams, yet analyses are limited by a lack of data. We use the first national dataset of reservoir data to analyze reservoir storage trends from 1980–2019. We show that reservoir storage has decreased over the past 40 years. The range in monthly storage has increased over time in drier regions and decreased in wetter ones. Lastly, we find that most regions have reservoir storage that takes longer to recover from and are therefore more vulnerable.
Tom Gleeson, Thorsten Wagener, Petra Döll, Samuel C. Zipper, Charles West, Yoshihide Wada, Richard Taylor, Bridget Scanlon, Rafael Rosolem, Shams Rahman, Nurudeen Oshinlaja, Reed Maxwell, Min-Hui Lo, Hyungjun Kim, Mary Hill, Andreas Hartmann, Graham Fogg, James S. Famiglietti, Agnès Ducharne, Inge de Graaf, Mark Cuthbert, Laura Condon, Etienne Bresciani, and Marc F. P. Bierkens
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 7545–7571, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-7545-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-7545-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Groundwater is increasingly being included in large-scale (continental to global) land surface and hydrologic simulations. However, it is challenging to evaluate these simulations because groundwater is
hiddenunderground and thus hard to measure. We suggest using multiple complementary strategies to assess the performance of a model (
model evaluation).
Mary M. F. O'Neill, Danielle T. Tijerina, Laura E. Condon, and Reed M. Maxwell
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 7223–7254, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-7223-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-7223-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Modeling the hydrologic cycle at high resolution and at large spatial scales is an incredible opportunity and challenge for hydrologists. In this paper, we present the results of a high-resolution hydrologic simulation configured over the contiguous United States. We discuss simulated water fluxes through groundwater, soil, plants, and over land, and we compare model results to in situ observations and satellite products in order to build confidence and guide future model development.
Cited articles
Ashby, S. F. and Falgout, R. D.: A parallel multigrid preconditioned
conjugate gradient algorithm for groundwater flow simulations, Nucl. Sci.
Eng., 124, 145–159, 1996.
Barnes, M. L., Welty, C., and Miller, A. J.: Global topographic slope
enforcement to ensure connectivity and drainage in an urban terrain, J.
Hydrol. Eng., 21, 6015017, https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)he.1943-5584.0001306, 2016.
Barnes, R., Lehman, C., and Mulla, D.: Priority-flood: An optimal
depression-filling and watershed-labeling algorithm for digital elevation
models, Comput. Geosci., 62, 117–127, 2014.
Condon, L. E. and Maxwell, R. M.: Evaluating the relationship between
topography and groundwater using outputs from a continental-scale integrated
hydrology model, Water Resour. Res., 51, 6602–6621,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2014wr016774, 2015.
Condon, L. E. and Maxwell, R. M.: Modified priority flood and global slope
enforcement algorithm for topographic processing in physically based
hydrologic modeling applications, Comput. Geosci., 126, 73–83,
https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CAGEO.2019.01.020, 2019.
Daniels, M. H., Maxwell, R. M., and Chow, F. K.: Algorithm for flow direction
enforcement using subgrid-scale stream location data, J. Hydrol. Eng.,
16, 677–683, 2011.
David, C. H., Maidment, D. R., Niu, G. Y., Yang, Z. L., Habets, F., and
Eijkhout, V.: River network routing on the NHDPlus dataset, J.
Hydrometeorol., 12, 913–934, https://doi.org/10.1175/2011JHM1345.1, 2011.
D'Odorico, P. and Rigon, R.: Hillslope and channel contributions to the
hydrologic response, Water Resour. Res., 39, 1113,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2002WR001708, 2003.
Falcone, J. A.: GAGES-II: Geospatial attributes of gages for evaluating
streamflow, US Geological Survey, 2011.
Freer, J., McDonnell, J. J., Beven, K. J., Peters, N. E., Burns, D. A.,
Hooper, R. P., Aulenbach, B., and Kendall, C.: The role of bedrock topography
on subsurface storm flow, Water Resour. Res., 38, 1–5, 2002.
Frei, S., Lischeid, G., and Fleckenstein, J. H.: Effects of micro-topography
on surface–subsurface exchange and runoff generation in a virtual riparian
wetland – A modeling study, Adv. Water Resour., 33, 1388–1401, 2010.
Gallant, J.: Adaptive smoothing for noisy DEMs, Geomorphometry 2011, 7–9,
2011.
Garousi-Nejad, I., Tarboton, D. G., Aboutalebi, M., and Torres-Rua, A. F.:
Terrain Analysis Enhancements to the Height Above Nearest Drainage Flood
Inundation Mapping Method, Water Resour. Res., 55, 7983–8009,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR024837, 2019.
Gesch, D., Oimoen, M., Greenlee, S., Nelson, C., Steuck, M., and Tyler, D.:
The national elevation dataset, Photogramm. Eng. Remote S., 68,
5–32, 2002.
Gochis, D. J., Barlage, M., Dugger, A., FitzGerald, K., Karsten, L., McAllister, M., McCreight, J., Mills, J., RafieeiNasab, A., Read, L., Sampson, K., Yates, D., and Yu, W.: The WRF-Hydro modeling system technical description, (Version 5.0), NCAR Technical Note, 107 pp., available at: https://ral.ucar.edu/sites/default/files/public/WRF-HydroV5TechnicalDescription.pdf? (last access: 5 July 2021), 2018.
Gupta, V. K. and Mesa, O. J.: Runoff generation and hydrologic response via
channel network geomorphology – Recent progress and open problems, J.
Hydrol., 102, 3–28, https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(88)90089-3, 1988.
Guth, P. L.: Drainage basin morphometry: a global snapshot from the shuttle radar topography mission, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 2091–2099, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-2091-2011, 2011.
Habtezion, N., Tahmasebi Nasab, M., and Chu, X.: How does DEM resolution
affect microtopographic characteristics, hydrologic connectivity, and
modelling of hydrologic processes?, Hydrol. Process., 30, 4870–4892,
2016.
Horton, R. E.: Erosional development of streams and their drainage basins;
hydrophysical approach to quantitative morphology, Geol. Soc. Am. Bull.,
56, 275–370, 1945.
Johnson, J. M., Munasinghe, D., Eyelade, D., and Cohen, S.: An integrated evaluation of the National Water Model (NWM)–Height Above Nearest Drainage (HAND) flood mapping methodology, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 2405–2420, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-19-2405-2019, 2019.
Jones, J. E. and Woodward, C. S.: Newton–Krylov-multigrid solvers for
large-scale, highly heterogeneous, variably saturated flow problems, Adv.
Water Resour., 24, 763–774, 2001.
Kenny, F., Matthews, B., and Todd, K.: Routing overland flow through sinks
and flats in interpolated raster terrain surfaces, Comput. Geosci., 34,
1417–1430, 2008.
Kollet, S. J. and Maxwell, R. M.: Integrated surface–groundwater flow
modeling: A free-surface overland flow boundary condition in a parallel
groundwater flow model, Adv. Water Resour., 29, 945–958, 2006.
Kuffour, B. N. O., Engdahl, N. B., Woodward, C. S., Condon, L. E., Kollet, S., and Maxwell, R. M.: Simulating coupled surface–subsurface flows with ParFlow v3.5.0: capabilities, applications, and ongoing development of an open-source, massively parallel, integrated hydrologic model, Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 1373–1397, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1373-2020, 2020.
Lehner, B., Verdin, K., and Jarvis, A.: Technical Documentation Version 1.0,
USGS Earth Resour. Obs. Sci. Sioux Falls, SD, USA, 2006.
Lindsay, J. B.: Efficient hybrid breaching-filling sink removal methods for
flow path enforcement in digital elevation models, Hydrol. Process., 30,
846–857, 2016a.
Lindsay, J. B.: The practice of DEM stream burning revisited, Earth Surf.
Process. Land., 41, 658–668, https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3888, 2016b.
Lindsay, J. B., Francioni, A., and Cockburn, J. M. H.: LiDAR DEM smoothing
and the preservation of drainage features, Remote Sens., 11, 17–19,
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11161926, 2019.
Liu, Y.-H., Zhang, W.-C., and Xu, J.-W.: Another fast and simple dem
depression-filling algorithm based on priority queue structure, Atmos.
Ocean. Sci. Lett., 2, 214–219, 2009.
Maxwell, R. M.: A terrain-following grid transform and preconditioner for
parallel, large-scale, integrated hydrologic modeling, Adv. Water Resour.,
53, 109–117, 2013.
Moore, R. B., McKay, L. D., Rea, A. H., Bondelid, T. R., Price, C. V.,
Dewald, T. G., and Johnston, C. M.: User's guide for the national hydrography
dataset plus (NHDPlus) high resolution, Open-File Rep., 80,
https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20191096, 2019.
Moretti, G. and Orlandini, S.: Hydrography-driven coarsening of grid digital
elevation models, Water Resour. Res., 54, 3654–3672, 2018.
Sampson, K. and Gochis, D.: WRF Hydro GIS Pre-Processing Tools, Version 5.0, Documentation, Boulder, CO, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Research Applications Laboratory, 2018.
Samu, N. M.: Spatial Discrepancies between NHDPlus and LIDAR-Derived Stream
Networks, University of Tennessee, available at:
http://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/1202, last access: May 2012.
Smith, V. B., David, C. H., Cardenas, M. B., and Yang, Z. L.: Climate, river
network, and vegetation cover relationships across a climate gradient and
their potential for predicting effects of decadal-scale climate change, J.
Hydrol., 488, 101–109, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.02.050, 2013.
Soille, P. and Gratin, C.: An efficient algorithm for drainage network
extraction on DEMs, J. Vis. Commun. Image Represent., 5, 181–189, 1994.
Sørensen, R. and Seibert, J.: Effects of DEM resolution on the
calculation of topographical indices: TWI and its components, J. Hydrol.,
347, 79–89, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.09.001, 2007.
Strahler, A. N.: Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology, Eos
T. Am. Geophys. Un., 38, 913–920, 1957.
Tarboton, D. G.: Terrain analysis using digital elevation models (TauDEM),
Utah State Univ. Logan, available at: https://hydrology.usu.edu/taudem/taudem5/index.html? (last access: 5 July 2021), 2005.
Thompson, J. A., Bell, J. C., and Butler, C. A.: Digital elevation model
resolution: Effects on terrain attribute calculation and quantitative
soil-landscape modeling, Geoderma, 100, 67–89,
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7061(00)00081-1, 2001.
Vaze, J., Teng, J., and Spencer, G.: Impact of DEM accuracy and resolution on
topographic indices, Environ. Model. Softw., 25, 1086–1098,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.03.014, 2010.
Viger, R. J., Rea, A., Simley, J. D., and Hanson, K. M.:. NHDPlusHR: A National Geospatial Framework for surface‐water information, J. Am. Water Resour. As., 52, 901–905, 2016.
Wang, L. and Liu, H.: An efficient method for identifying and filling
surface depressions in digital elevation models for hydrologic analysis and
modelling, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci., 20, 193–213, 2006.
Wickel, B. A., Lehner, B., and Sindorf, N.: HydroSHEDS: A global
comprehensive hydrographic dataset, in: AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts, vol.
2007, H11H-05, 2007.
Wolock, D. M. and McCabe, G. J.: Differences in topographic characteristics
computed from 100- and 1000-m resolution digital elevation model data,
Hydrol. Process., 14, 987–1002,
https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(20000430)14:6<987::AID-HYP980>3.0.CO;2-A, 2000.
Woodrow, K., Lindsay, J. B., and Berg, A. A.: Evaluating DEM conditioning
techniques, elevation source data, and grid resolution for field-scale
hydrological parameter extraction, J. Hydrol., 540, 1022–1029,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.07.018, 2016.
Wu, S., Li, J., and Huang, G. H.: A study on DEM-derived primary topographic
attributes for hydrologic applications: Sensitivity to elevation data
resolution, Appl. Geogr., 28, 210–223, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2008.02.006,
2008.
Zhang, J. and Condon, L. E.: JZhang_LCondon_CONUS_Topography_Sep2020, CyVerse Data Commons,
https://doi.org/10.25739/e1ps-qy48, 2020.
Zhang, J., Huang, Y. F., Munasinghe, D., Fang, Z., Tsang, Y. P., and Cohen,
S.: Comparative Analysis of Inundation Mapping Approaches for the 2016 Flood
in the Brazos River, Texas, J. Am. Water Resour. As., 54, 820–833,
https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12623, 2018.
Zhang, W. and Montgomery, D. R.: Digital elevation model grid size,
landscape representation, and hydrologic simulations, Water Resour. Res.,
30, 1019–1028, 1994.
Zhou, G., Sun, Z., and Fu, S.: An efficient variant of the priority-flood
algorithm for filling depressions in raster digital elevation models,
Comput. Geosci., 90, 87–96, 2016.
Short summary
Existing national topographic datasets for the US may not be compatible with gridded hydrologic models. A national topographic dataset developed to support physically based hydrologic models at 1 km and 250 m over the contiguous US is provided. We used a Priority Flood algorithm to ensure hydrologically consistent drainage networks and evaluated the performance with an integrated hydrologic model. Datasets and scripts are available for direct data usage or modification of processing as desired.
Existing national topographic datasets for the US may not be compatible with gridded hydrologic...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint