Articles | Volume 12, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-2121-2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-2121-2020
Data description paper
 | 
09 Sep 2020
Data description paper |  | 09 Sep 2020

Cloud_cci ATSR-2 and AATSR data set version 3: a 17-year climatology of global cloud and radiation properties

Caroline A. Poulsen, Gregory R. McGarragh, Gareth E. Thomas, Martin Stengel, Matthew W. Christensen, Adam C. Povey, Simon R. Proud, Elisa Carboni, Rainer Hollmann, and Roy G. Grainger

Related authors

Geostationary aerosol retrievals of extreme biomass burning plumes during the 2019–2020 Australian bushfires
Daniel J. V. Robbins, Caroline A. Poulsen, Steven T. Siems, Simon R. Proud, Andrew T. Prata, Roy G. Grainger, and Adam C. Povey
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 3279–3302, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3279-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3279-2024, 2024
Short summary
Uncertainty-bounded estimates of ash cloud properties using the ORAC algorithm: application to the 2019 Raikoke eruption
Andrew T. Prata, Roy G. Grainger, Isabelle A. Taylor, Adam C. Povey, Simon R. Proud, and Caroline A. Poulsen
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 5985–6010, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-5985-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-5985-2022, 2022
Short summary
Improving discrimination between clouds and optically thick aerosol plumes in geostationary satellite data
Daniel Robbins, Caroline Poulsen, Steven Siems, and Simon Proud
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 3031–3051, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-3031-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-3031-2022, 2022
Short summary
An AeroCom–AeroSat study: intercomparison of satellite AOD datasets for aerosol model evaluation
Nick Schutgens, Andrew M. Sayer, Andreas Heckel, Christina Hsu, Hiren Jethva, Gerrit de Leeuw, Peter J. T. Leonard, Robert C. Levy, Antti Lipponen, Alexei Lyapustin, Peter North, Thomas Popp, Caroline Poulsen, Virginia Sawyer, Larisa Sogacheva, Gareth Thomas, Omar Torres, Yujie Wang, Stefan Kinne, Michael Schulz, and Philip Stier
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 12431–12457, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-12431-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-12431-2020, 2020
Short summary

Related subject area

Atmospheric chemistry and physics
Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) airborne field campaign data products between 2013 and 2018
Fan Mei, Jennifer M. Comstock, Mikhail S. Pekour, Jerome D. Fast, Krista L. Gaustad, Beat Schmid, Shuaiqi Tang, Damao Zhang, John E. Shilling, Jason M. Tomlinson, Adam C. Varble, Jian Wang, L. Ruby Leung, Lawrence Kleinman, Scot Martin, Sebastien C. Biraud, Brian D. Ermold, and Kenneth W. Burk
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 5429–5448, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-5429-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-5429-2024, 2024
Short summary
CREST: a Climate Data Record of Stratospheric Aerosols
Viktoria F. Sofieva, Alexei Rozanov, Monika Szelag, John P. Burrows, Christian Retscher, Robert Damadeo, Doug Degenstein, Landon A. Rieger, and Adam Bourassa
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 5227–5241, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-5227-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-5227-2024, 2024
Short summary
Multiyear high-temporal-resolution measurements of submicron aerosols at 13 French urban sites: data processing and chemical composition
Hasna Chebaicheb, Joel F. de Brito, Tanguy Amodeo, Florian Couvidat, Jean-Eudes Petit, Emmanuel Tison, Gregory Abbou, Alexia Baudic, Mélodie Chatain, Benjamin Chazeau, Nicolas Marchand, Raphaële Falhun, Florie Francony, Cyril Ratier, Didier Grenier, Romain Vidaud, Shouwen Zhang, Gregory Gille, Laurent Meunier, Caroline Marchand, Véronique Riffault, and Olivier Favez
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 5089–5109, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-5089-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-5089-2024, 2024
Short summary
Large synthesis of in situ field measurements of the size distribution of mineral dust aerosols across their life cycles
Paola Formenti and Claudia Di Biagio
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 4995–5007, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-4995-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-4995-2024, 2024
Short summary
A 10 km daily-level ultraviolet-radiation-predicting dataset based on machine learning models in China from 2005 to 2020
Yichen Jiang, Su Shi, Xinyue Li, Chang Xu, Haidong Kan, Bo Hu, and Xia Meng
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 4655–4672, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-4655-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-4655-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Baum, B. A., Yang, P., Heymsfield, A. J., Bansemer, A., Merrelli, A., Schmitt, C., and Wang C.: Ice cloud bulk single-scattering property models with the full phase matrix at wavelengths from 0.2 to 100 µm, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 146, 123–139, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2014.02.029, 2014. a
Baum, B., Menzel, W. P., Frey, R., Tobin, D., Holz, R., and Ackerman, S.: MODIS Cloud Top Property Refinements for Collection 6, J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol., 51, 1145–1163, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-11-0203.1, 2012. a
Baran A. J., Shcherbakov, V. N., Baker, B. A., Gayet J. F., and Lawson, R. P.: On the scattering phase function of non-symmetric ice crystals, Q. J. R. Meteor Soc., 131, 260916, https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.04.137, 2005. a
Brodzik, M. J. and Stewart J. S.: Near-Real-Time SSM/I-SSMIS EASE-Grid Daily Global Ice Concentration and Snow Extent, Version 5, Boulder, Colorado USA, NASA National Snow and Ice Data Center Distributed Active Archive Center, https://doi.org/10.5067/3KB2JPLFPK3R, 2016. a
Christensen, M. W., Neubauer, D., Poulsen, C. A., Thomas, G. E., McGarragh, G. R., Povey, A. C., Proud, S. R., and Grainger, R. G.: Unveiling aerosol–cloud interactions – Part 1: Cloud contamination in satellite products enhances the aerosol indirect forcing estimate, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 13151–13164, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-13151-2017, 2017. a
Download
Short summary
We have created a satellite cloud and radiation climatology from the ATSR-2 and AATSR on board ERS-2 and Envisat, respectively, which spans the period 1995–2012. The data set was created using a combination of optimal estimation and neural net techniques. The data set was created as part of the ESA Climate Change Initiative program. The data set has been compared with active CALIOP lidar measurements and compared with MAC-LWP AND CERES-EBAF measurements and is shown to have good performance.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint