Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2026-563
https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2026-563
23 Sep 2026
 | 23 Sep 2026
Status: this preprint is currently under review for the journal ESSD.

A National Depth-Resolved Soil-Moisture-to-Electromagnetic Proxy Database for Hydrogeophysical Monitoring

Diaa Sheishah, Enas Abdelsamei, Viktoria Blanka-Vegi, Károly Barta, Ahmed M. Ali, Khaldoun Abualhin, Djamil Al-Halbouni, Wouter Dorigo, and Gyorgy Sipos

Abstract. Soil moisture is a key control on drought, recharge, crop water availability, agricultural water management, and land-atmosphere exchange, but its depth-resolved spatial variability remains difficult to monitor over large areas. Non-invasive methods such as ground-penetrating radar (GPR), electrical resistivity, and electromagnetic surveys can support soil-moisture estimation, yet their interpretation depends strongly on soil texture and hydraulic-retention properties. This study develops a national six-depth soil-moisture-to-electromagnetic proxy database to support future GPR- and resistivity-based root-zone monitoring and decision support. We used multi-year soil-moisture, porosity, saturation, texture, and hydraulic-retention data from 117 monitoring stations across Hungary at 10, 20, 30, 45, 60, and 75 cm depth. Dielectric permittivity, EM-wave velocity, electrical conductivity, attenuation, and apparent resistivity were derived as proxy variables from observed soil moisture using established petrophysical relationships, including the Topp equation and an Archie-type formulation. The proxy database identified a consistent 30-45 cm buffering zone, where soil moisture increased to 22.25%, dielectric permittivity peaked at 12.29, EM-wave velocity reached a minimum of 0.0935 m ns⁻¹, and apparent resistivity decreased to 545 Ω m. Texture strongly shaped the translated EM response: sandy soils were drier and more resistive, whereas clayey soils retained more water and showed higher dielectric response. Hydraulic-retention variables provided calibration-relevant prior information for explaining why similar EM or resistivity signals may represent different true soil-moisture values across soil types. The framework provides a transferable national calibration layer for drought-monitoring agencies, irrigation planners, precision-agriculture users, and future drone-based geophysical surveys in regions with comparable monitoring and soil databases.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Diaa Sheishah, Enas Abdelsamei, Viktoria Blanka-Vegi, Károly Barta, Ahmed M. Ali, Khaldoun Abualhin, Djamil Al-Halbouni, Wouter Dorigo, and Gyorgy Sipos

Status: open (until 30 Oct 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Diaa Sheishah, Enas Abdelsamei, Viktoria Blanka-Vegi, Károly Barta, Ahmed M. Ali, Khaldoun Abualhin, Djamil Al-Halbouni, Wouter Dorigo, and Gyorgy Sipos
Diaa Sheishah, Enas Abdelsamei, Viktoria Blanka-Vegi, Károly Barta, Ahmed M. Ali, Khaldoun Abualhin, Djamil Al-Halbouni, Wouter Dorigo, and Gyorgy Sipos
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 23 Sep 2026
Download
Short summary
Soil moisture controls drought, crop water supply, and groundwater recharge, but it is difficult to monitor below the surface. We used national monitoring data from 117 stations and six soil depths to build an open database that links soil moisture, soil type, water retention, and expected electromagnetic responses. The results identify a key mid-depth buffering zone and provide a practical reference for future drought monitoring, irrigation planning, and non-invasive soil-water surveys.
Share
Altmetrics