the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Thirteen years of aerosol chemical composition measurements in the Paris region: reprocessing and applications
Abstract. The recent development of very long-term Aerosol Chemical Speciation Monitor (ACSM) time series presents new insights into the spatiotemporal variability of atmospheric submicron aerosol (PM1) composition. However, challenges in analyzing long-term datasets remain due to their discontinuities. This study proposes a new methodology to homogenize long-term features monitored at the semi-urban SIRTA observatory, located in the Paris region, and then analyzes the variability of the reprocessed dataset, which can be found in EBAS database at https://doi.org/10.48597/4RKH-6RDU (Petit, J.-E. and Brochet, J. and ACTRIS and GAW-WDCA, 2025). Response factor (RF) and relative ionization efficiencies (RIEs) have been identified as major parameters to reevaluate, as the concentrations of aerosol are most sensitive to these parameters. Secondly, corrections of ion transmission and mass calibration present a smaller, yet significant, interest in the harmonization protocol. This approach shows a good consistency with the latest standard operation protocol and encouraging results when compared to previous studies. Long-term datasets allow the evaluation of parameterizations like the composition-dependent collection efficiency (CDCE) determined by Middlebrook et al. (2012). In this case, the SIRTA dataset shows good correlation with the CDCE equations, as they stay in their data inter-quartile range, despite the lack of extreme concentration values recorded at the SIRTA observatory. However, this study shows better data consistency with a default collection efficiency (CE) of 0.5 rather than 0.45.
From 2012 to 2024, PM1 have decreased by 3 μg/m3/yr. Within PM1 components, NH4 and SO4 are significantly decreasing at the annual and seasonal scale, in Autumn (NH4 -0.050 and -0.053 μg/m3/yr, SO4 -0.044 and -0.046 μg/m3/yr respectively). Spring, with the highest PM1 concentrations, demonstrates significant decreasing trends for the majority of PM1 components (OM -0.21 μg/m3/yr, NO3 -0.23 μg/m3/yr, NH4 -0.12 μg/m3/yr and SO4 -0.093 μg/m3/yr). Compared with the original dataset, these results highlight the critical importance of harmonized reprocessing for the analysis of very long-term features. Persistent Pollution Episodes (PPE) also have a decreasing trend of occurrence (5 % per year) and might correlate between their duration and maximum concentrations. These trends are placed in the context of synoptic weather regimes, in which blocking regimes dominate the formation of PPE. Finally, the long-term measurements of SO4 at SIRTA reveal the need for S-related source apportionment analysis, through the identification of the contributions of volcanic and marine biogenic aerosols. Overall, with the general reduction in atmospheric aerosol concentrations, this study shows encouraging results for air quality, emphasizing the need to maintain mitigation efforts in the Paris region.
- Preprint
(2209 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: final response (author comments only)
- RC1: 'Comment on essd-2026-490', Anonymous Referee #1, 30 Sep 2026
-
RC2: 'Comment on essd-2026-490', Anonymous Referee #2, 27 Oct 2026
This manuscript presents a 13-year dataset of aerosol chemical composition measurements at the SIRTA observatory in Paris, with a focus on harmonized data reprocessing and its applications to long-term aerosol trends and pollution episodes. The dataset is valuable for understanding long-term changes in atmospheric aerosol composition, and the study is relevant to the scope of Earth System Science Data. However, several aspects require further clarification and evaluation, particularly the robustness of the reprocessing methodology, data quality and uncertainty assessment, and the interpretation of long-term trends. I recommend major revision before the manuscript can be considered for publication.
Major Comments:
- The dataset has an overall temporal coverage of 70%, with substantial gaps, particularly from March to November 2013. Such gaps may affect the reliability of annual and seasonal trend estimates. The authors should provide annual and seasonal data coverage statistics and assess whether the reported trends remain robust when years with low data completeness are excluded.
- The reproducibility of the reprocessed dataset is important for an ESSD data publication. However, several methodological details remain unclear, including the quality control thresholds, calibration parameter selection, and criteria for excluding invalid measurements. The authors should provide these details in the supplementary materials and clarify whether the dataset includes quality flags and measurement uncertainties.
- The reprocessed dataset is the central contribution of this ESSD manuscript, while Sections 4.1-4.3 focus more on scientific interpretations of aerosol trends, pollution episodes, and source attribution. Although these analyses demonstrate the potential applications of the dataset, some interpretations are not sufficiently supported by the presented evidence. For example, the attribution of decreasing aerosol concentrations to emission reductions and the interpretation of weather-regime effects require stronger supporting evidence. I suggest that the authors either provide additional quantitative analyses to support these interpretations or present them more cautiously, while maintaining a clearer focus on the dataset itself.
Specific Comments:
- Abstract: The authors state that PM1 concentrations decreased by approximately 3 µg m-3 yr-1 from 2012 to 2024, whereas Section 4.1 and the Conclusions report a decreasing trend of 0.34 µg m-3 yr-1. Please correct this inconsistency.
- Section 4.1 and Table A2: The sulfate trend reported in Table A2 appears inconsistent with the values presented in the main text. Table A2 lists a global sulfate trend of -0.44 µg m-3 yr-1, whereas Section 4.1 reports approximately -0.044 µg m-3 yr-1. Please verify the value. In addition, Table 2 appears to assign the values -0.050 and -0.044 µg m-3 yr-1 to sulfate and ammonium, respectively, which is opposite to the assignments in Section 4.1 and Table A2. These inconsistencies should be corrected throughout the manuscript.
- Line 322: “Concentration-weighed Trajectory” should be corrected to “Concentration-Weighted Trajectory”.
- The authors report that approximately 16000 measurements were discarded during data validation. Please clarify whether these excluded measurements are distributed evenly throughout the observational period or concentrated in particular years. A figure or table showing annual data completeness and the number of observations removed by each quality control procedure would be helpful.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2026-490-RC2
Data sets
Inorganics in air and particle phase at SIRTA Atmospheric Research Observatory Jean-Eudes Petit and Juliette Brochet https://doi.org/10.48597/4RKH-6RDU
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 275 | 133 | 156 | 564 | 165 | 135 |
- HTML: 275
- PDF: 133
- XML: 156
- Total: 564
- BibTeX: 165
- EndNote: 135
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
The manuscript presents a detailed reprocessing strategy for the long-term ACSM measurements at SIRTA and provides a valuable homogeneous dataset spanning more than 13 years. I found the overall methodology and presentation generally clear. My comments focus on Section 4 (the long-term analyses) and on the overall significance of the dataset.
Major comments:
(a) apply the identical trend analysis (same period, same temporal aggregation, same Mann–Kendall/Sen settings) to both the original and the reprocessed datasets;
(b) show the two annual-mean time series and their difference;
(c) identify which processing steps are primarily responsible for the differences.
(a) The Abstract (L15) reports a PM1 decrease of 3 µg m⁻³ yr⁻¹, whereas Sect. 4.1 and Table A2 give 0.34 µg m⁻³ yr⁻¹.
(b) The NH4 and SO4 slopes appear swapped between the text (L249–250: NH4 0.05, SO4 0.044) and Table 2 (SO4 −0.05, NH4 −0.044). The global SO4 slope in Table A2 (−0.44) is presumably −0.044.
(c) The spring NRPM1 slope (−0.83 µg m⁻³ yr⁻¹) is considerably larger than the sum of the component slopes (~−0.65). Sen's slopes are not additive, but a brief comment would help readers.
Minor comments: