the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Hydrographic CTD profiles capturing the onset of near-surface stratification in Southwest Greenland fjords during two consecutive spring 2025 field campaigns
Abstract. In situ hydrographic observations in Greenland fjords remain sparse, particularly during late winter and early spring, despite their importance for Arctic freshwater export, glacier–ocean interactions, and the seasonal development of stratification. A major limitation of many existing hydrographic datasets is the poor representation of the near-surface layer, where meltwater lenses, sharp salinity gradients, and strong density gradients are often concentrated within the upper few metres.
Here we present a quality-controlled Level 2 conductivity, temperature, and depth dataset comprising 73 vertical hydrographic profiles collected across Southwest Greenland fjords (60.2–69.5° N, 43.6–53.9° W) during two expeditions aboard the icebreaker Le Commandant Charcot: the Sea Ice Measurements for Satellite thickness retrieval Validation campaign (32 profiles, 24 March–4 April 2025) and the Freshwater fluxes and Atlantic-Nordic Seas hydrography campaign (41 profiles, 18–28 April 2025).
The dataset includes pressure, temperature, conductivity, practical salinity, and derived thermodynamic variables. Two RBR Concerto3 conductivity, temperature, and depth instruments sampling at 16 Hz and 2 Hz were processed through a reproducible eight-step workflow including atmospheric-pressure correction, automatic soak detection, signal conditioning, loop removal, thermodynamic calculations, and automated quality control following international ocean-data recommendations.
Unlike many standard conductivity, temperature, and depth products, the processing strategy preserves the shallowest valid observations and the native vertical sampling. This allows users to investigate thin freshwater lenses and sharp near-surface gradients rather than systematically removing the upper few metres of the water column. The dataset therefore provides a detailed view of the onset of meltwater-driven stratification and offers the flexibility to apply alternative vertical averaging or filtering strategies depending on the objectives of future analyses.
Thermohaline diagnostics identify four main hydrographic regimes: coastal and glacier meltwater-influenced waters, Polar Water, Winter Water, and modified Atlantic or Irminger Water. The comparison between the late-winter and early-spring campaigns documents the onset of surface restratification across Southwest Greenland fjords. The strongest freshening and shallow stratification are observed in fjords directly influenced by tidewater glaciers, while deeper water masses remain comparatively stable over the one-month period.
The dataset is distributed in NetCDF-4 format compliant with Climate and Forecast Metadata Conventions version 1.8 and Attribute Convention for Data Discovery version 1.3, and is publicly available through Zenodo. The processing code is archived on GitHub and Zenodo. By preserving the upper-ocean structure during a critically undersampled season, this dataset provides a valuable resource for studies of Arctic freshwater dynamics, glacier–ocean interactions, fjord stratification, ocean model evaluation, and satellite product validation.
- Preprint
(58414 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on essd-2026-429', Alexey Mishonov, 09 Jul 2026
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Marta Umbert, 16 Jul 2026
We thank the reviewer for the positive assessment of our manuscript and for recognising the value of the dataset collected in these remote and poorly sampled regions of Southwest Greenland. We also appreciate the constructive remarks, which have helped us improve the clarity and quality of the manuscript. We have addressed all comments in the revised version, as detailed in the attached document.
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Marta Umbert, 16 Jul 2026
-
RC2: 'Comment on essd-2026-429', Giuseppe M.R. Manzella, 17 Jul 2026
Hydrographic CTD profiles capturing the onset of near-surface stratification in Southwest Greenland fjords during two consecutive spring 2025 field campaigns
By Marta Umbert et al.
General comment
The dataset presented by the authors is certainly interesting, particularly for a region that has been sampled very little. The main strengths of the paper lie in the methodology used for the monitoring, although some issues need to be clarified.
The data are high resolution, allowing the identification of vertical stratification. The measurements were carried out from a Zodiac boat using a manual winch. The CTD may therefore have been subject to small but significant vertical movements that could affect the purpose of the measurements. The authors should clarify whether and how corrections were applied to account for these movements, particularly with regard to the calculation of salinity.
In the quality control procedure, the authors use gross range checks and fine range checks that appear to be based on methodologies developed for areas different from those examined here. A region-specific adaptation would have been desirable.
Specific comments
Para. 4.3: Could the movements of the small boat, and therefore the vertical movements of the CTD (up and down), introduce spurious data?
Para. 4.6: The gross range check is certainly appropriate for "oceanic" values, but the threshold values are excessive for this area.
Para. 4.6: The regional range check should be complemented by a different check for each fjord, in order to take into account their different characteristics.
Final comment
The paper deserves to be published. The authors should clarify some points regarding the quality control procedures that were applied.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2026-429-RC2 -
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Marta Umbert, 20 Jul 2026
We thank the reviewer for the positive evaluation of the dataset and for highlighting the value of the high-resolution observations collected in a region and season that remain poorly sampled. We also appreciate the reviewer's constructive comments regarding the potential influence of Zodiac motion and manual winch operation on the CTD profiles, as well as the need to clarify the regional applicability of the quality-control thresholds. We have revised the manuscript to explain these aspects more explicitly.
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Marta Umbert, 20 Jul 2026
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on essd-2026-429', Alexey Mishonov, 09 Jul 2026
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Marta Umbert, 16 Jul 2026
We thank the reviewer for the positive assessment of our manuscript and for recognising the value of the dataset collected in these remote and poorly sampled regions of Southwest Greenland. We also appreciate the constructive remarks, which have helped us improve the clarity and quality of the manuscript. We have addressed all comments in the revised version, as detailed in the attached document.
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Marta Umbert, 16 Jul 2026
-
RC2: 'Comment on essd-2026-429', Giuseppe M.R. Manzella, 17 Jul 2026
Hydrographic CTD profiles capturing the onset of near-surface stratification in Southwest Greenland fjords during two consecutive spring 2025 field campaigns
By Marta Umbert et al.
General comment
The dataset presented by the authors is certainly interesting, particularly for a region that has been sampled very little. The main strengths of the paper lie in the methodology used for the monitoring, although some issues need to be clarified.
The data are high resolution, allowing the identification of vertical stratification. The measurements were carried out from a Zodiac boat using a manual winch. The CTD may therefore have been subject to small but significant vertical movements that could affect the purpose of the measurements. The authors should clarify whether and how corrections were applied to account for these movements, particularly with regard to the calculation of salinity.
In the quality control procedure, the authors use gross range checks and fine range checks that appear to be based on methodologies developed for areas different from those examined here. A region-specific adaptation would have been desirable.
Specific comments
Para. 4.3: Could the movements of the small boat, and therefore the vertical movements of the CTD (up and down), introduce spurious data?
Para. 4.6: The gross range check is certainly appropriate for "oceanic" values, but the threshold values are excessive for this area.
Para. 4.6: The regional range check should be complemented by a different check for each fjord, in order to take into account their different characteristics.
Final comment
The paper deserves to be published. The authors should clarify some points regarding the quality control procedures that were applied.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2026-429-RC2 -
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Marta Umbert, 20 Jul 2026
We thank the reviewer for the positive evaluation of the dataset and for highlighting the value of the high-resolution observations collected in a region and season that remain poorly sampled. We also appreciate the reviewer's constructive comments regarding the potential influence of Zodiac motion and manual winch operation on the CTD profiles, as well as the need to clarify the regional applicability of the quality-control thresholds. We have revised the manuscript to explain these aspects more explicitly.
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Marta Umbert, 20 Jul 2026
Data sets
High-Resolution CTD Profiles from the SIMSVAL and FANS Oceanographic Campaigns (Greenland Expedition 2025) N. Hoareau et al. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20489479
Model code and software
SIMSVAL and FANS March–April 2025 CTD post-processing workflow N. Hoareau et al. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20527364
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 74 | 31 | 4 | 109 | 14 | 12 |
- HTML: 74
- PDF: 31
- XML: 4
- Total: 109
- BibTeX: 14
- EndNote: 12
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
Please see attached file