the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
WAPOSAL: A Multi-Regional Wave Dataset from Satellite Altimetry for Significant Wave Height, Period Estimation, and Wave Power Density
Abstract. Accurate assessment of wave power density (WPD) is essential for marine renewable energy development and for validating numerical wave models, particularly in coastal and nearshore regions where in situ observations are sparse. This study presents a high-resolution, multi-region wave dataset generated within the WAPOSAL (Wave Power & Satellite Altimetry) project, derived from Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) altimetry data acquired by the Sentinel-3A/B and CryoSat-2 missions. Significant wave height and normalized radar cross-section were obtained using the SAMOSA+ retracker, and zerocrossing wave period was estimated based on an empirical regression method calibrated with in situ buoy and ERA5 data. Wave power density was then computed along altimeter tracks across eleven regions: Norway & Baltic Sea, UK & North Sea, French Facade, Spain Atlantic, Portugal, Mediterranean sea, Madeira, Canary Islands, Azores Archipelago, French Guiana and French Polynesia. The temporal coverage spans 2011–2023, depending on the region and the satellite mission considered. The present paper describes the database and illustrates its use through simple application examples. The dataset in its current format and version can be discovered, shared and cited via the following link: https://doi.org/10.57780/ESA-1AB8CF3 (Ponce de Léon et al., 2026).
- Preprint
(4710 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 21 Jul 2026)
-
RC1: 'Comment on essd-2026-104', Anonymous Referee #1, 11 Apr 2026
reply
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Maria Panfilova, 14 May 2026
reply
We are grateful to the reviewer for insightful comments and suggestions. We provide a point-by-point response to the comments in the attached file.
-
RC2: 'Reply on AC1', Anonymous Referee #1, 08 Jun 2026
reply
Thank you for yor comments whoich seem convincing. I am now waiting for the revised manuscript.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2026-104-RC2
-
RC2: 'Reply on AC1', Anonymous Referee #1, 08 Jun 2026
reply
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Maria Panfilova, 14 May 2026
reply
-
RC3: 'Comment on essd-2026-104', Anonymous Referee #2, 24 Jun 2026
reply
Please, find the review of the manuscript entitled ”WAPOSAL: A Multi-RegionalWave Dataset from Satellite Altimetry for Significant Wave Height, Period Estimation, and Wave Power Density”.
This manuscript presents the satellite altimeter dataset. The authors develop a high-resolution wave dataset derived from Sentinel-3A/B and CryoSat-2 SAR altimetry, providing significant wave height (Hs), estimated zero-crossing wave period (Tz), and wave power density (WPD) across 11 coastal and oceanic regions. The dataset addresses the gap between sparse buoy observations and numerical model limitations, particularly in coastal environments.
The manuscript is clearly written, however methodology requires clarification. Below are my comments and questions:
1. I suggest the authors to discuss potential limitations in regions where validation relies solely on ERA5 rather than in situ measurements, and the implications for confidence in those areas.
2. The methodology is based on the deep water approximation (eq. 2 in the manuscript). The limitations of this approach should be discussed, how this limitations may influence the result.
3. There are several approaches to estimate wave period using altimeter data, for instance (Mackay et. al. 2008, 10.1029/2007JC004438), (Badulin el.al. 2014 10.1002/2013JC009336). Please, justify why the method (Gommenginger at. al. 2003 10.1029/2003GL017743) was chosen.
4. Please, clarify if for obtaining the equation for wave period and for validation the same buoys are used, or a group of buoys in each region is used to develop the model and another one to validate it.
5. The energy wave period is calculated as Te=1.18Tz, however in fact wave period ratio is not constant (Cahill, 2014.). Please discuss the limitations of this approach and possible ways to solve this problem.
I believe the manuscript can be accepted for publication after some revision.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2026-104-RC3
Data sets
High-resolution WAPOSAL wave period and wave power density from Sentinel-3 A/B, CryoSat-2, and SAMOSA+ retracker S. Ponce de Léon et al. https://doi.org/10.57780/ESA-1AB8CF3
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 304 | 97 | 24 | 425 | 22 | 27 |
- HTML: 304
- PDF: 97
- XML: 24
- Total: 425
- BibTeX: 22
- EndNote: 27
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
see attached document