the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Daily Human Thermal Index Dataset for India (HiTIC-India) at 1-km Spatial Resolution (2003–2020)
Abstract. Human exposure to extreme heat and cold poses increasing risks to public health, labour productivity, and urban sustainability, particularly in densely populated and climate-sensitive regions such as India. Human-perceived temperature (HPT) indices provide a more realistic measure of thermal stress than air temperature alone by integrating multiple meteorological factors. Here, we present the Human Thermal Index Collection for India (HiTIC-India), a high-resolution daily gridded dataset comprising twelve widely used HPT indices at 1 km spatial resolution for 2003–2020. The indices are initially derived from ERA5-based meteorological data and then downscaled using a Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) framework. This downscaling incorporates satellite-derived land surface temperature, precipitable water vapour, population density, and topographic variables (slope, elevation and aspect) to generate spatially continuous predictions at 1 km resolution. Model valuation shows high prediction accuracy across all indices, with a mean root-mean-square error (RMSE) of 3.12 °C, a coefficient of determination (R²) of 0.89, and a mean absolute error (MAE) of 2.39 °C. The resulting dataset significantly captures local-scale variability in heat and cold stress across India’s diverse climatic and physiographic zones. HiTIC-India also supports numerous applications, including public health risk evaluation, urban heat exposure analysis, labour productivity assessment, and climate adaptation and mitigation planning. By providing consistent daily HPT datasets, HiTIC-India provides a comprehensive, high-resolution, and publicly accessible resource for climate–health research and evidence-based decision-making under warming climate.
- Preprint
(3376 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: final response (author comments only)
- RC1: 'Comment on essd-2026-103', Anonymous Referee #1, 08 Jun 2026
-
RC2: 'Comment on essd-2026-103', Anonymous Referee #2, 14 Jun 2026
This paper present the HumanThermal Index Collection for India (HiTIC-India), a high-resolution daily gridded dataset comprising twelve widely used HPT indices at 1 km spatial resolution for 2003-2020. While there are some issues should be clarified as followings:
- The study adopts LightGBM for downscaling but lacks comparison with other mainstream downscaling models(e.g., random forest, XGBoost, regression models), so the superiority of LightGBM cannot be fully verified.
- Covariate selection is not discussed for multicollinearityamong LST, PWV, population density and topographic factors, which may interfere with model stability.
- The study uses ERA5 reanalysis data as the benchmark, but no validation against in-situ meteorological station observationsacross India is conducted; the reliability of model outputs in real terrain remains unclear.
- Hyperparameter tuning only applies grid search and 5-fold cross-validation, without testing more advanced strategies (e.g., Bayesian optimization), potentially limiting model performance optimization.
- Model evaluation mainly relies on overall statistical metrics (R², RMSE, MAE), while spatial heterogeneity of errorsacross different climatic/topographic zones of India is not analyzed.
- Error variation under extreme weather (heatwaves, cold waves) is not assessed; the model’s performance for extreme thermal stress events is unknown.
- The 12 HPT indices show differentiated accuracy, but the reasons for performance gaps among indices(e.g., wind-related indices with higher errors) are not explained.
- Temporal validation only presents annual overall performance, lacking assessment of seasonal error differencesbetween hot and cold seasons.
- The downscaling framework ignores diurnal variationsof thermal factors; the daily mean dataset cannot reflect intra-day human thermal stress changes.
- The contribution degree of each covariate to HPT simulation is not quantified via feature importance analysis, so the driving mechanism of surface/topographic factors is unclear.
- The dataset covers 2003–2020, but trend analysis of long-term thermal stress changesbased on the new dataset is missing in results.
- The study demonstrates seasonal spatial patterns of HPT but does not discuss urban-rural differencesin thermal stress, despite incorporating population density as a covariate.
- The conclusion overstates dataset applicability; it fails to clearly state the limitations and applicable scopeof HiTIC-India in practical scenarios.
- No uncertainty analysis is performed for the final 1 km gridded dataset, which affects its credibility for climate-health and decision-making applications.
- The study does not discuss the influence of data gaps and interpolation errorsof original MODIS LST and PWV products on HPT simulation results.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2026-103-RC2
Data sets
Daily Human Thermal Index Dataset for India (HiTIC-India) at 1-km Spatial Resolution (2003–2020) S. S. Gouda et al. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18510626
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 292 | 120 | 28 | 440 | 26 | 27 |
- HTML: 292
- PDF: 120
- XML: 28
- Total: 440
- BibTeX: 26
- EndNote: 27
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
This manuscript presents a valuable data product: a 1‑km daily gridded dataset of 12 human‑perceived temperature (HPT) indices over India for 2003‑2020, derived from ERA5 reanalysis and downscaled using LightGBM with auxiliary covariates (LST, PWV, population, topography). The potential applications in public health, urban planning, and labour productivity assessment are clear. However, the manuscript only covers the period from 2003 to 2020 and does not extend to more recent years. The actual thermal stress accuracy is unknown without real ground verification. The method doesn't clearly explain how to scale down from 0.1° to 1km. Therefore, I recommend submitting the manuscript again after it is rejected.
Specific comments are as follows: