Status: this preprint is currently under review for the journal ESSD.
TundraFlux: A database of ecosystem respiration with biotic and abiotic metadata from Arctic and alpine tundra warming experiments
Sarah Schwieger,Jan Dietrich,Mats P. Björkman,Judith M. Sarneel,Bowen Li,Joel White,Inge H. J. Althuizen,Christina Biasi,Robert G. Björk,Hanna Böhner,Brage Bremset Hansen,Michele Carbognani,Giorgio Chiari,Casper T. Christiansen,Elisabeth J. Cooper,Hans Cornelissen,Ludovica D'Imperio,Ellen Dorrepaal,Bo Elberling,Patrick Faubert,Ned Fetcher,T'ai G. W. Forte,Joseph Gaudard,Konstantin Gavazov,Zhen-Huan Guan,Jón Guðmundsson,Siri V. Haugum,Jin-Sheng He,Caitlin Hicks Pries,Mark Hovenden,Simone I. Lang,Gus Jespersen,Ingibjörg S. Jónsdóttir,Ji Young Jung,Olga Khitun,Birgitte Kortegaard Danielsen,Richard Lamprecht,Mathilde Le Moullec,Hanna Lee,Maija E. Marushchak,Anders Michelsen,Tariq Munir,Eero Myrsky,Kevin K. Newsham,Marion Nyberg,Steven F. Oberbauer,Paulo Olivas,Johan Olofsson,Hlynur Óskarsson,Thomas C. Parker,Matteo Petit Bon,Alessandro Petraglia,Emily Pickering Pedersen,Katrine Raundrup,Nynne R. Ravn,Riikka Rinnan,Heidi Rodenhizer,Ingvild Ryde,Alejandro Salazar,Niels M. Schmidt,Ted Schuur,Sofie Sjögersten,Cecilie Skov Nielsen,Sari Stark,Maria Strack,Jianwu Tang,Sylvia Toet,Anne Tolvanen,Maria Väisänen,Richard Van Logtestijn,Vigdis Vandvik,Carolina Voigt,Josefine Walz,Jeffrey M. Welker,Yuanhe Yang,Henni Ylänne,and Sybryn L. Maes
Abstract. Empirical in-situ measurements of ecosystem carbon dioxide respiration (Reco) in high-latitude ecosystems remain limited, yet they are essential for understanding how tundra carbon cycling responds to climate warming across different environmental contexts and for reducing uncertainties in upscaled carbon budgets and carbon–climate feedbacks. Here, we present the TundraFlux Database, which to date is the most comprehensive synthesis of tundra Reco responses to experimental warming. The database compiles over 24,000 daily-aggregated in-situ Reco measurements from control and plots warmed with open-top chambers at 64 Arctic and alpine tundra sites across 12 countries. By coupling Reco measurements with extensive metadata on climate, vegetation, and soil characteristics, the TundraFlux Database enables the integration of field-scale ecological processes into large-scale models, offering new opportunities to refine global carbon budgets and test predictions of tundra ecosystem responses to warming. Open access to the TundraFlux Database empowers the research community to better quantify and predict how warming alters carbon cycling in Arctic and alpine tundra ecosystems.
Received: 29 Dec 2025 – Discussion started: 12 Mar 2026
Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Sarah Schwieger,Jan Dietrich,Mats P. Björkman,Judith M. Sarneel,Bowen Li,Joel White,Inge H. J. Althuizen,Christina Biasi,Robert G. Björk,Hanna Böhner,Brage Bremset Hansen,Michele Carbognani,Giorgio Chiari,Casper T. Christiansen,Elisabeth J. Cooper,Hans Cornelissen,Ludovica D'Imperio,Ellen Dorrepaal,Bo Elberling,Patrick Faubert,Ned Fetcher,T'ai G. W. Forte,Joseph Gaudard,Konstantin Gavazov,Zhen-Huan Guan,Jón Guðmundsson,Siri V. Haugum,Jin-Sheng He,Caitlin Hicks Pries,Mark Hovenden,Simone I. Lang,Gus Jespersen,Ingibjörg S. Jónsdóttir,Ji Young Jung,Olga Khitun,Birgitte Kortegaard Danielsen,Richard Lamprecht,Mathilde Le Moullec,Hanna Lee,Maija E. Marushchak,Anders Michelsen,Tariq Munir,Eero Myrsky,Kevin K. Newsham,Marion Nyberg,Steven F. Oberbauer,Paulo Olivas,Johan Olofsson,Hlynur Óskarsson,Thomas C. Parker,Matteo Petit Bon,Alessandro Petraglia,Emily Pickering Pedersen,Katrine Raundrup,Nynne R. Ravn,Riikka Rinnan,Heidi Rodenhizer,Ingvild Ryde,Alejandro Salazar,Niels M. Schmidt,Ted Schuur,Sofie Sjögersten,Cecilie Skov Nielsen,Sari Stark,Maria Strack,Jianwu Tang,Sylvia Toet,Anne Tolvanen,Maria Väisänen,Richard Van Logtestijn,Vigdis Vandvik,Carolina Voigt,Josefine Walz,Jeffrey M. Welker,Yuanhe Yang,Henni Ylänne,and Sybryn L. Maes
Status: open (until 29 May 2026)
Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor
| : Report abuse
This manuscript describes the aggregation of ecosystem respiration data from air warming experiments across arctic and alpine tundra warming manipulations. Efforts to aggregate data from similar groups of experiments run by PIs distributed across institutions and nations is extremely valuable to facilitate synthesis, model comparison, and identify gaps. Thus, I think this database is a valuable contribution to the literature. There are several other chamber-based flux aggregation products which the authors mention in their next steps as a goal to facilitate integration. I believe it would be worth explicitly mentioning and distinguishing these in the introduction or description and structure sections. A few aggregated datasets of which I am aware are ABCFlux (ambient only), COSORE (global, focused on continuous, not necessarily aggregated for experimental manipulations), and the ITEX Ecosystem carbon flux dataset. Additonally, are all the sites in TrundraFlux listed in Vogt et al 2025. ARGO: ARctic greenhouse Gas Observation metadata version 1? If not, adding entries there would be a good way to build on existing resources and reduce diverging aggregation efforts.
Overall, this paper is well written with informative graphics and descriptions of the data structure. I feel I have a good grasp of what I expect to find in the dataset and how it is organized.
Some detailed, line-by-line comments
Data sources:
Table S1: do some of these come from databases (eg: LTER for CiPEHR and Toolik sites)? It would be helpful to add these links to the table as well. I think it would be additionally helpful to identify which of these sites originates from the establishment of ITEX.
Table S2: not sure how useful Nobs is other than to show generally large vs small datasets. Instead perhaps adding the frequency/interval of measurement or mode of measurement such as manual vs automated.
Table S4: Is the Daily_% the percent of days in a year with measurements? So 0.5% would be and average of 1.8 days of measurement over the years measured?
Use country codes that match a standard. I believe Fluxnet currently uses: ISO-3611-2: https://fluxnet.org/data/fluxnet2015-dataset/known-issues/. I think using standardized names reduces guessing and makes it easier to link with other products.
Reviewer access URL for code, readme, data dictionary did not work (page not found error from Zenodo)
Text:
Line 128: Suggestion not starting the paragraph with ‘its’. Instead something like: ‘Ecosystem respiration plays a central role… making it important to predict… ‘
Line 135: It would be useful to briefly describe the OTC method.
Line 169-171: Are these metadata time-varying if the experiment is multiple years long? Or are they site-specific and temporally fixed?
Line 232-235: Restricting the NEE fluxes to night-time only is a reasonable approach. However, I wonder what the data source was for the CiPEHR data because Reco (extrapolated from night to day using a temperature-response function) is included in the datasets in the BNZ LTER data catalog: https://www.lter.uaf.edu/data/data-detail/id/481.
There are also some respiration measurements during and from the end of the growing season. Not sure if they are included?
https://www.lter.uaf.edu/data/data-detail/id/611
https://www.lter.uaf.edu/data/data-detail/id/572
https://www.lter.uaf.edu/data/data-detail/id/652
Line 262: I think this sentence has a word missing
Line 288: perhaps cite Schadel et al 2018 Divergent patterns of experimental and model-derived permafrost ecosystem carbon dynamics in response to Arctic warming as an example?
Line 295: Remove ‘while’ to start with The TundraFlux Database? I think it’s important to point out, as you do, that the imbalance is a reflection of the field rather than a limitation of the TundraFlux data aggregation effort. In a sense, these aggregation efforts allow us to see the imbalance more clearly.
Line 372: and/or air vs soil warming as the CiPEHR experiments show that the effects of snow-fences carry over into the summer because the warming soil profile is cumulative. And air warming in summer can alter winter conditions as shifts in vegetation can alter soil conditions (eg: Heather Kropp et al 2021 Environ. Res. Lett.)
Sarah Schwieger,Jan Dietrich,Mats P. Björkman,Judith M. Sarneel,Bowen Li,Joel White,Inge H. J. Althuizen,Christina Biasi,Robert G. Björk,Hanna Böhner,Brage Bremset Hansen,Michele Carbognani,Giorgio Chiari,Casper T. Christiansen,Elisabeth J. Cooper,Hans Cornelissen,Ludovica D'Imperio,Ellen Dorrepaal,Bo Elberling,Patrick Faubert,Ned Fetcher,T'ai G. W. Forte,Joseph Gaudard,Konstantin Gavazov,Zhen-Huan Guan,Jón Guðmundsson,Siri V. Haugum,Jin-Sheng He,Caitlin Hicks Pries,Mark Hovenden,Simone I. Lang,Gus Jespersen,Ingibjörg S. Jónsdóttir,Ji Young Jung,Olga Khitun,Birgitte Kortegaard Danielsen,Richard Lamprecht,Mathilde Le Moullec,Hanna Lee,Maija E. Marushchak,Anders Michelsen,Tariq Munir,Eero Myrsky,Kevin K. Newsham,Marion Nyberg,Steven F. Oberbauer,Paulo Olivas,Johan Olofsson,Hlynur Óskarsson,Thomas C. Parker,Matteo Petit Bon,Alessandro Petraglia,Emily Pickering Pedersen,Katrine Raundrup,Nynne R. Ravn,Riikka Rinnan,Heidi Rodenhizer,Ingvild Ryde,Alejandro Salazar,Niels M. Schmidt,Ted Schuur,Sofie Sjögersten,Cecilie Skov Nielsen,Sari Stark,Maria Strack,Jianwu Tang,Sylvia Toet,Anne Tolvanen,Maria Väisänen,Richard Van Logtestijn,Vigdis Vandvik,Carolina Voigt,Josefine Walz,Jeffrey M. Welker,Yuanhe Yang,Henni Ylänne,and Sybryn L. Maes
Sarah Schwieger,Jan Dietrich,Mats P. Björkman,Judith M. Sarneel,Bowen Li,Joel White,Inge H. J. Althuizen,Christina Biasi,Robert G. Björk,Hanna Böhner,Brage Bremset Hansen,Michele Carbognani,Giorgio Chiari,Casper T. Christiansen,Elisabeth J. Cooper,Hans Cornelissen,Ludovica D'Imperio,Ellen Dorrepaal,Bo Elberling,Patrick Faubert,Ned Fetcher,T'ai G. W. Forte,Joseph Gaudard,Konstantin Gavazov,Zhen-Huan Guan,Jón Guðmundsson,Siri V. Haugum,Jin-Sheng He,Caitlin Hicks Pries,Mark Hovenden,Simone I. Lang,Gus Jespersen,Ingibjörg S. Jónsdóttir,Ji Young Jung,Olga Khitun,Birgitte Kortegaard Danielsen,Richard Lamprecht,Mathilde Le Moullec,Hanna Lee,Maija E. Marushchak,Anders Michelsen,Tariq Munir,Eero Myrsky,Kevin K. Newsham,Marion Nyberg,Steven F. Oberbauer,Paulo Olivas,Johan Olofsson,Hlynur Óskarsson,Thomas C. Parker,Matteo Petit Bon,Alessandro Petraglia,Emily Pickering Pedersen,Katrine Raundrup,Nynne R. Ravn,Riikka Rinnan,Heidi Rodenhizer,Ingvild Ryde,Alejandro Salazar,Niels M. Schmidt,Ted Schuur,Sofie Sjögersten,Cecilie Skov Nielsen,Sari Stark,Maria Strack,Jianwu Tang,Sylvia Toet,Anne Tolvanen,Maria Väisänen,Richard Van Logtestijn,Vigdis Vandvik,Carolina Voigt,Josefine Walz,Jeffrey M. Welker,Yuanhe Yang,Henni Ylänne,and Sybryn L. Maes
Viewed
Total article views: 566 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
345
202
19
566
31
14
27
HTML: 345
PDF: 202
XML: 19
Total: 566
Supplement: 31
BibTeX: 14
EndNote: 27
Views and downloads (calculated since 12 Mar 2026)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 12 Mar 2026)
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 529 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 529 with geography defined
and 0 with unknown origin.
Carbone boréal, Département des sciences fondamentales, Université du Québec à Chicoutimi, 555 boulevard de l’Université, Chicoutimi, QC, G7H 2B1, Canada
Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research WSL, Lausanne, Switzerland
Climate Impacts Research Centre, Department of Ecology and Environmental Science, Umeå University, Abisko, Sweden
Zhen-Huan Guan
State Key Laboratory of Herbage Improvement and Grassland Agro-Ecosystems, and College of Pastoral Agriculture Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China
Jón Guðmundsson
Agricultural University of Iceland, Árleyni 22, 112 Reykjavik, Iceland
Institute of Ecology, College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Key Laboratory for Earth Surface Processes of the Ministry of Education, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
State Key Laboratory of Herbage Improvement and Grassland Agro-Ecosystems, and College of Pastoral Agriculture Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China
Caitlin Hicks Pries
Department of Biological Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA 03755
Mark Hovenden
Biological Sciences, School of Natural Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
Arctic and alpine tundra ecosystems are warming rapidly, yet measurements of how they release carbon dioxide to the atmosphere remain scarce. We compiled field measurements of ecosystem respiration from warming experiments across tundra regions worldwide. By combining respiration data with information on climate, vegetation, and soils, this database improves our ability to understand and predict how tundra carbon cycling responds to climate warming and feeds back to the global climate system.
Arctic and alpine tundra ecosystems are warming rapidly, yet measurements of how they release...
This manuscript describes the aggregation of ecosystem respiration data from air warming experiments across arctic and alpine tundra warming manipulations. Efforts to aggregate data from similar groups of experiments run by PIs distributed across institutions and nations is extremely valuable to facilitate synthesis, model comparison, and identify gaps. Thus, I think this database is a valuable contribution to the literature. There are several other chamber-based flux aggregation products which the authors mention in their next steps as a goal to facilitate integration. I believe it would be worth explicitly mentioning and distinguishing these in the introduction or description and structure sections. A few aggregated datasets of which I am aware are ABCFlux (ambient only), COSORE (global, focused on continuous, not necessarily aggregated for experimental manipulations), and the ITEX Ecosystem carbon flux dataset. Additonally, are all the sites in TrundraFlux listed in Vogt et al 2025. ARGO: ARctic greenhouse Gas Observation metadata version 1? If not, adding entries there would be a good way to build on existing resources and reduce diverging aggregation efforts.
Overall, this paper is well written with informative graphics and descriptions of the data structure. I feel I have a good grasp of what I expect to find in the dataset and how it is organized.
Some detailed, line-by-line comments
Data sources:
Table S1: do some of these come from databases (eg: LTER for CiPEHR and Toolik sites)? It would be helpful to add these links to the table as well. I think it would be additionally helpful to identify which of these sites originates from the establishment of ITEX.
Table S2: not sure how useful Nobs is other than to show generally large vs small datasets. Instead perhaps adding the frequency/interval of measurement or mode of measurement such as manual vs automated.
Table S4: Is the Daily_% the percent of days in a year with measurements? So 0.5% would be and average of 1.8 days of measurement over the years measured?
Use country codes that match a standard. I believe Fluxnet currently uses: ISO-3611-2: https://fluxnet.org/data/fluxnet2015-dataset/known-issues/. I think using standardized names reduces guessing and makes it easier to link with other products.
Reviewer access URL for code, readme, data dictionary did not work (page not found error from Zenodo)
Text:
Line 128: Suggestion not starting the paragraph with ‘its’. Instead something like: ‘Ecosystem respiration plays a central role… making it important to predict… ‘
Line 135: It would be useful to briefly describe the OTC method.
Line 169-171: Are these metadata time-varying if the experiment is multiple years long? Or are they site-specific and temporally fixed?
Line 232-235: Restricting the NEE fluxes to night-time only is a reasonable approach. However, I wonder what the data source was for the CiPEHR data because Reco (extrapolated from night to day using a temperature-response function) is included in the datasets in the BNZ LTER data catalog: https://www.lter.uaf.edu/data/data-detail/id/481.
There are also some respiration measurements during and from the end of the growing season. Not sure if they are included?
https://www.lter.uaf.edu/data/data-detail/id/611
https://www.lter.uaf.edu/data/data-detail/id/572
https://www.lter.uaf.edu/data/data-detail/id/652
Line 262: I think this sentence has a word missing
Line 288: perhaps cite Schadel et al 2018 Divergent patterns of experimental and model-derived permafrost ecosystem carbon dynamics in response to Arctic warming as an example?
Line 295: Remove ‘while’ to start with The TundraFlux Database? I think it’s important to point out, as you do, that the imbalance is a reflection of the field rather than a limitation of the TundraFlux data aggregation effort. In a sense, these aggregation efforts allow us to see the imbalance more clearly.
Line 372: and/or air vs soil warming as the CiPEHR experiments show that the effects of snow-fences carry over into the summer because the warming soil profile is cumulative. And air warming in summer can alter winter conditions as shifts in vegetation can alter soil conditions (eg: Heather Kropp et al 2021 Environ. Res. Lett.)