the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
The Greenland Ice-Marginal Lake Inventory Series from 2016 to 2023
Abstract. The Greenland Ice Sheet and its surrounding peripheral glaciers and ice caps are projected to be the largest cryospheric contributor to sea level rise in the next century. While glacial meltwater is typically assumed to flow directly into the ocean, ice-marginal lakes temporarily store a portion of this runoff, influencing glacier dynamics, lacustrine-driven ablation, ecosystems, and downstream hydrology. The size, abundance and dynamics of ice-marginal lakes are expected to change in the future. However, they remain under-represented in projections of sea level change and glacier mass loss. Here, we provide eight annual records across Greenland of lake abundance, lake surface extents, and surface water temperature estimates from 2016 to 2023. The dataset catalogs 2918 automatically classified ice-marginal lakes and reveals their evolving conditions over time. Our dataset fills critical gaps in understanding Greenland’s terrestrial water storage and its implications for sea level change projections, providing a first step toward quantifying meltwater storage at ice margins. Equally important, it supports assessments of ice sheet and glacier dynamics, such as lacustrine-driven ablation, and Arctic ecological studies of lake changes impacting ecosystems. The inventory series will also aid environmental management and hydropower planning aligned with Greenland’s proposed commitments under the Paris Agreement. The inventory series is openly accessible on the GEUS Dataverse (https://doi.org/10.22008/FK2/MBKW9N) with full metadata, documentation, and a reproducible processing workflow (How et al., 2025).
- Preprint
(12327 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 11 Apr 2025)
-
RC1: 'Comment on essd-2025-18', Anonymous Referee #1, 28 Mar 2025
reply
This paper presents an annual ice-marginal lake inventory from 2016 to 2023, classified using an established remote sensing approach. The paper is short. Figures and Tables are nicely drafted. The dataset is certainly valuable, but the authors also report that their automated processing are underdetecting the lakes but apparently do not take any means to improve it. I miss more information on validation and more discussion on how improvements could be made. I also question why there are so many authors (I counted 12 incl 3 'managers') on this rather short paper not involving any field investigations.
Minor comments
I have checked the readme.txt, and downloaded one of the lake files. Seems fine
7 ‘The dataset catalogs 2918 automatically classified ice-marginal lakes and reveals their evolving conditions over time.’ Does not the number of lakes vary through time?
26 do you have a reference for this sentence?
30-41 I found this a bit detailed, is all needed? I suggest shortening this part, do it a bit wider in terms of authors cited and more general before zooming in on Greenland.
55 I am not sure that you in your paper defend the statement ‘ and assess the impact of these changes on future sea level projections.’ There is no reference for the statement and I would be careful with it.
63-65 here you use both ice-marginal and ice-contact lakes- you define ice-contact lakes, but not the other. I suggest you define both and check the use throughout.
68./103/ can you here or elsewhere mention if there are any previous lake inventories based on Landsat that you use for reference or if this is the first?
Can you specify that 2016 is the first year due to launch of Sentinel. It is implicit but not explicitly stated.
105 remove –?
3.1.1./3.1.2./3.1.3/3.2/5.1/throughout where your work are described
Usually work done in methods are written using past tense. If you did the work, use past tense. This makes it easier differencing published work (present tense) from what has been done for this paper/dataset.’
163+ will this number of lakes sharing margin not differ with time, this can change for year to year, which year of the dataset are you referring to? Suggest to rewrite this. You mention below that lake number vary from year to year, so how come one number is static while other differs.
209 past tense, was?
243 can you elaborate a bit more on how this was done and explain this better, it is a huge difference. Were lakes then included annually based on this effort? What was the follow up from the results you found. Did you try to improve the mapping method or include manual digitisation? Not clear to me. The last sentence ‘ ..no manual lake delineations are included’ seems to be a strange follow up if the underdetection is so substantial. I am not sure if any of the statements in 6.1 is valid if the dataset is missing so many lakes. Could the methods have been improved? Or could manual updated help?
The result of the validation is completely missing from conclusion and abstract, data uncertainty and accuracy is important part of an ESSD paper. I would rewrite the abstract to be less general and more direct on results and uncertainties. same with conclusion.
I miss a figure showing validation of the method from one of the newer years that is previously not published.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-18-RC1
Data sets
Greenland Ice-Marginal Lake Inventory annual time-series Edition 1 Penelope How, Dorthe Petersen, Nanna B. Karlsson, Kristian K. Kjeldsen, Katrine Raundrup, Alexandra Messerli, Anja Rutishauser, Jonathan L. Carrivick, James M. Lea, Robert S. Fausto, Andreas P. Ahlstrøm, and Signe B. Andersen https://doi.org/10.22008/FK2/MBKW9N
Model code and software
GrIML v0.1.0 Penelope How https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6498006
GrIML code repository Penelope How https://github.com/GEUS-Glaciology-and-Climate/GrIML
GrIML code documentation Penelope How https://griml.readthedocs.io
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
158 | 40 | 4 | 202 | 6 | 8 |
- HTML: 158
- PDF: 40
- XML: 4
- Total: 202
- BibTeX: 6
- EndNote: 8
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1