the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
SHEDIS-Temperature: Linking temperature-related disaster impacts to subnational data on meteorology and human exposure
Abstract. International databases of disaster impacts are crucial for advancing disaster risk research, particularly as climate change intensifies the frequency and intensity of many natural hazards – including temperature extremes. However, many widely-used disaster impact databases lack information on the physical dimension of the hazards associated with an impact, and on the exposure to such hazards. This hinders analysing drivers of severe disaster outcomes. To bridge this knowledge gap, we present SHEDIS-Temperature, a dataset that provides Subnational Hazard and Exposure information for temperature-related DISaster impact records (https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/WNOTTC; Lindersson and Messori, 2025). This open-access dataset links temperature-related impact records from the Emergency Events Database (EM-DAT) with subnational data on their locations, associated meteorological time series, and population maps. SHEDIS-Temperature provides hazard and exposure data for 2,835 subnational locations associated with 382 disaster records from 1979 to 2018 in 71 countries. Detailed hazard metrics, derived from 0.1° 3-hourly data, encompass absolute indicators, such as the heat stress measure apparent temperature accounting for humidity and wind speed, as well as percentile-based indicators of when and where temperatures exceeded local thresholds. Population exposure data include annual population figures for impacted subnational administrative units and person-days of exposure to threshold-exceeding temperatures. Outputs are available at grid-point level as well as zonally aggregated to administrative subdivision units, and disaster-record levels. By providing comprehensive attributes across the hazard-exposure spectrum, SHEDIS-Temperature supports interdisciplinary research on past temperature-related disasters, offering valuable insights for future risk mitigation and resilience strategies.
- Preprint
(2753 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 17 Sep 2025)
-
RC1: 'Comment on essd-2025-128', Anonymous Referee #1, 14 Jul 2025
reply
The authors have presented a useful dataset with clear explanations of the processing. The dataset allows for the fair comparison of extreme heat and cold events across the globe, subject to the geographical biases inherent in the available data. The dataset clearly provides added value to the EM-DAT database.
I have a suggestion and also a question. Firstly, in section 2.2.4 the authors could state the use of a moving average window earlier in the first paragraph to avoid confusion. Secondly, I'd like to know why MSWX was chosen over ERA5-LAND? It isn't clear to me from the text what advantage MSWX offers over the hourly 0.1 degree scale reanalysis provided by ERA5-LAND.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-128-RC1 -
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Sara Lindersson, 22 Aug 2025
reply
The author team thank referee RC1 for providing a positive and constructive comment, we are happy to read that our dataset is found to be useful. Please find answers to the individual points of improvement below.
- RC1: “in section 2.2.4 the authors could state the use of a moving average window earlier in the first paragraph to avoid confusion.”
Authors: We agree with RC1 and will change the text accordingly. - RC1: “I'd like to know why MSWX was chosen over ERA5-LAND? It isn't clear to me from the text what advantage MSWX offers over the hourly 0.1 degree scale reanalysis provided by ERA5-LAND.”
Authors: We agree that ERA5-Land is also a viable data source for this type of work. Our decision to use MSWX was based on both our own analysis and due to practical reasons. First, we compared maximum and minimum temperature estimates from MSWX and ERA5-Land against EM-DAT records for a subset of our study area. Both products showed broadly similar agreement with EM-DAT, with the main difference being that ERA5-Land aligned less well with minimum temperatures during cold waves. Second, in practical terms, we also found the 3-hourly structure of MSWX less computationally demanding than the hourly files from ERA5-Land. Given these considerations, we chose to proceed with MSWX, while acknowledging that ERA5-Land would also have been a defensible choice. To increase transparency, we would be happy to include the results of our MSWX–ERA5Land–EM-DAT comparison in the revised manuscript.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-128-AC1 -
RC2: 'Reply on AC1', Anonymous Referee #1, 25 Aug 2025
reply
Hi Sara, I don't think it is necessary to include the results of the ERA5LAND comparison, but given it is generally the standard dataset used in these kind of situations, I think it would be good to briefly explain your choice of MSWX as you have done in your response. It is also valuable from the point of view of identifying areas of relative weakness with ERA5-LAND.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-128-RC2 -
RC3: 'Reply on RC2', Anonymous Referee #1, 25 Aug 2025
reply
I would then happily accept the paper for publication.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-128-RC3 -
AC3: 'Reply on RC3', Sara Lindersson, 26 Aug 2025
reply
Dear Anonymous Referee #1,
We are grateful for your supportive feedback and pleased to read your positive assessment of our work.
Kind regards, Sara
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-128-AC3
-
AC3: 'Reply on RC3', Sara Lindersson, 26 Aug 2025
reply
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Sara Lindersson, 26 Aug 2025
reply
Thank you, Anonymous Referee #1, for this helpful suggestion. We will modify the text accordingly in the revised manuscript.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-128-AC2
-
RC3: 'Reply on RC2', Anonymous Referee #1, 25 Aug 2025
reply
- RC1: “in section 2.2.4 the authors could state the use of a moving average window earlier in the first paragraph to avoid confusion.”
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Sara Lindersson, 22 Aug 2025
reply
Data sets
SHEDIS-Temperature Sara Lindersson and Gabriele Messori https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/WNOTTC
Model code and software
Code for SHEDIS-Temperature Sara Lindersson https://github.com/sara-lindersson/shedis-temperature-replication-code
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 474 | 84 | 27 | 585 | 21 | 37 |
- HTML: 474
- PDF: 84
- XML: 27
- Total: 585
- BibTeX: 21
- EndNote: 37
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1