Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-109
https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-109
04 Aug 2025
 | 04 Aug 2025
Status: this preprint is currently under review for the journal ESSD.

Insights into Lake Baikal Radiocarbon Age Offsets from a Database of AMS Radiocarbon Age Estimates

Samuel R. S. Newall, Anson W. Mackay, Natalia Piotrowska, and Maarten Blaauw

Abstract. Radiocarbon dates are an essential tool for dating non-varved lake sediments, however their interpretation is hindered by issues such as reservoir age or contamination which culminate in age estimates that can be thousands of years younger or older than the true depositional age of that sediment (we call this an age offset). Often, precise estimators of the radiocarbon age offset are not available, as in the case of Lake Baikal. Linear regression of uncalibrated radiocarbon dates has been used to estimate the age offset, with answers ranging from 0 to 1500 14C yr BP. These have been interpreted to suggest that different regions of Lake Baikal have different age offsets, although some dispute this. Other estimators have returned estimates of approximately 2000 14C yr BP. Despite this, most previous studies have not included any estimates of uncertainties for these age offsets in their proxy analysis, or have included uncertainty of, at most, ± 90 14C yr. Here, we present a complete database of published AMS radiocarbon dates from Lake Baikal sediment cores up to 2023 and, using this, review the use of linear regression on uncalibrated radiocarbon ages as a method for estimating age offsets from the sediments of Lake Baikal. We apply a standardised linear regression age offset method to all cores in our database to better quantify the age offset of Total Organic Carbon (TOC) in the lake’s sediments. We conclude that there is no statistically significant evidence from linear regression methods for a large difference in age offset in different regions of Lake Baikal. Our results return a lake-wide age offset estimate of TOC of 1.56 ± 0.75 14C kyr BP, suggesting previous studies in Lake Baikal have significantly underestimated the temporal uncertainty of radiocarbon ages. Finally, our results are a caution that linear regression-based age offset estimates in lake sediments have a large uncertainty that might only be observable with multiple datasets.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Share
Samuel R. S. Newall, Anson W. Mackay, Natalia Piotrowska, and Maarten Blaauw

Status: open (until 10 Sep 2025)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Samuel R. S. Newall, Anson W. Mackay, Natalia Piotrowska, and Maarten Blaauw

Data sets

Lake Baikal sediment core AMS radiocarbon data S. R. S. Newall et al. https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.973799

Samuel R. S. Newall, Anson W. Mackay, Natalia Piotrowska, and Maarten Blaauw
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 04 Aug 2025
Download
Short summary
Lake sediment cores are records of ancient climate change. Radiocarbon dates help us understand these records. Radiocarbon data from Lake Baikal can be difficult to access or understand. We present a database of all published radiocarbon data from Lake Baikal sediment cores to facilitate re-use of this data quickly and efficiently. We then evaluate a key correction required to use radiocarbon data. We show that uncertainty in estimating this correction is much larger than previously thought.
Share
Altmetrics