the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Aerosol single scattering albedo derived by merging OMI/POLDER satellite products and AERONET ground observations
Abstract. Accurate global aerosol single scattering albedo (SSA) data is critical for assessing aerosol radiative effects and identifying aerosol composition. However, current satellite-based SSA retrievals are both limited and highly uncertain, whereas the more accurate ground-based observations lack global coverage. In this study, we employ an Ensemble Kalman Filter (EnKF) data synergy technique to construct two monthly mean SSA datasets over land by synergizing OMI and POLDER with AERONET observations respectively, namely Merged-OMI and Merged-POLDER dataset. The background ensemble is constructed with 231/106 members using all monthly mean OMI/POLDER SSA available to represent the variability of SSA field. Then AERONET measurements are assimilated into each satellite dataset using the EnKF approach. The merged datasets show substantial improvements against the original products, with the correlation coefficient increased by up to 100 %, and the mean absolute bias (MAB) and root mean square error (RMSE) reduced by more than 30 % compared with AERONET results. Cross validation using independent AERONET observations shows an average increase of 70 % in correlation, 15 % reduction in RMSE and 14 % reduction in MAB for Merged-OMI dataset, and similar although weaker improvement for Merged-POLDER mainly due to the smaller sample size. This study confirms the effectiveness of the EnKF technique in extending the information obtained from ground stations to larger regions. The two merged datasets generated in this study can offer more accurate SSA estimates for assessing aerosol radiative forcing and improving climate modeling, serving as an important resource for advancing global aerosol research.
- Preprint
(18844 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(18799 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (extended)
-
RC1: 'Comment on essd-2024-583', Anonymous Referee #1, 24 Feb 2025
reply
Review comments on “Aerosol single scattering albedo derived by merging OMI/POLDER satellite products and AERONET ground observations” by Dong et al. submitted to the journal Earth System Science Data.
##################################################
General comments:
This study by Dong et al. uses Ensemble Kalman Filter (EnKF) data synergy technique to construct Merged-OMI and Merged-POLDER datasets based on SSA products of AERONET, OMI and POLDER. At the same time, the results verify the effectiveness of EnKF technology in extending the information obtained from the ground station to a larger area. The constructed SSA global dataset can provide data support for global aerosol radiative forcing assessment and climate change detection. Overall, this manuscript is clearly written, and the topic is suitable for the journal. I would support for publication in the journal of Earth System Science Data after some corrections and clarifications.
- Following the ESSD requirement, the author need mention the generated dataset with register doi in your abstract. And in the main text, some general description about the data structure is mandatory.
- General question about how you make averaging to get monthly/annual mean SSA from OMI, POLDER and AERONET? SSA is a relative value and always provided with certain AOD threshold, or its uncertainty strongly depends on the AOD levels. Therefore, a direct value average seems meaningless to me, you need average aerosol absorption and extinction, then covert to averaged SSA.
- Why not merge OMI, POLDER and AERONET into one single global SSA datasets?
##################################################
Specific comments:
Abstract: in order to follow the ESSD requirement, you should mention the generated dataset with register doi in your abstract.
P2 L55: I would draw your attention about two recent and studies related to your discussions by Chen et al. (2020) and Schutgens et al. (2021) about aerosol absorption evaluation and intercomparison between satellite products.
Chen, C., Dubovik, O., Schuster, G.L. et al. Multi-angular polarimetric remote sensing to pinpoint global aerosol absorption and direct radiative forcing. Nat Commun 13, 7459 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-35147-y
Schutgens, N., Dubovik, O., Hasekamp, O., Torres, O., Jethva, H., Leonard, P. J. T., Litvinov, P., Redemann, J., Shinozuka, Y., de Leeuw, G., Kinne, S., Popp, T., Schulz, M., and Stier, P.: AEROCOM and AEROSAT AAOD and SSA study – Part 1: Evaluation and intercomparison of satellite measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 6895–6917, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-6895-2021, 2021.
P3 L71: why not merge OMI, POLDER and AERONET into one single global SSA datasets?
P4 L95: could you please explicit how you do average SSA? SSA is a relative value, therefor a direct value average seems meaningless. In addition, SSA is usually provided with certain AOD threshold.
L105: could you please provide proper reference to it?
Section 2.3: if I understood, is it 1D data assimilation? You correct only the grids with ground-based measurements, right?
Line 225: Figure 3 shows that the RMSE of SSA/original-OMI and SSA/AERONET is 0.036, while the RMSE on this figure is 0.035.
Figure 4: there are less effects on Sahara Desert w/wo data assimilation, both Original and Merged-OMI seem underestimate SSA there, could you elaborate more about it?
Figure 6: in most cases/sites, R is improved after merging, while Bias and RMSE could become worse in few sites (6h and 6i), could you explain why is that?
L308: there is a known issue for POLDER measurements at 440 nm.
Section 3.4: since you treat 4 channels (440, 670, 865, and 1020 nm) SSA for POLDER, it would be interesting you check or evaluate the SSA spectral dependence w/wo assimilation.
Figure 17: could you provide the same figure for merged product?
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2024-583-RC1
Data sets
Merged-OMI and Merged-POLDER aerosol single scattering albedo Yueming Dong https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14294463
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
201 | 25 | 6 | 232 | 22 | 4 | 5 |
- HTML: 201
- PDF: 25
- XML: 6
- Total: 232
- Supplement: 22
- BibTeX: 4
- EndNote: 5
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1