the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
The first rainfall erosivity database in Mexico: facing challenges of leveraging legacy climate data
Abstract. Soil Water Erosion (SWE) is the dominant soil degradation driver on a global scale. For quantifying SWE, erosivity is an index that reflects the potential (i.e., the energy) of rainfall to cause SWE. To enhance the assessment of the SWE process at the national scale—, the objectives of this research are a) to develop the first Mexican rainfall time series database for three climate normals CNs (1968–1997, 1978–2007, and 1988–2017) leveraging legacy climate data, and b) to estimate rainfall erosivity across continental Mexico by using daily rainfall time series. The workflow has three methodological moments: 1) development of the rainfall time series database, 2) estimation of rainfall erosivity, and 3) rainfall erosivity verification. First, we compiled and harmonized over 5000 useful rainfall time series (RTS) well distributed across the Mexican territory. We performed a quality assurance, homogeneity analysis (using the normal homogeneity test), and data gap-filling (using the proportion method). Then, we use a potential power law equation to estimate rainfall erosivity at daily resolution. Finally, we compared and verified our results with three external datasets (global, national, and local scales). The principal research product is a new database with 1370, 1678, and 1676 RTS for each CN and its corresponding rainfall erosivity. The mean values for rainfall erosivity for the three CNs were 3600, 3296, and 3461 MJ mm ha-1 h-1 yr-1, respectively. The statistical distribution of the erosivity values was right-skewed for the three CNs, with high erosivity values reaching >8000 MJ mm ha-1 h-1 yr-1 in all the three CNs. About the verification of erosivity values, we found that Tropical rain-forests, temperate Sierras, and the Great Plains are the ecoregions with more significant differences concerning the global database, a generalized underestimation of erosivity values concerning the national dataset, and an adjustment coefficient of 1.85 for a local condition in Michoacan state. This new database provides tools for daily climatological analysis across Mexican territory and through a multiyear period (1968 to 2017). Erosivity results trigger the study of SWE at the national scale by identifying areas with higher susceptibility to soil loss due to rainfall action and providing a more spatially dense erosivity database that follows the pattern of erosivity databases from higher time resolution. Following the FAIR principles (Findability, Availability, Interoperability, and Reproducibility) for scientific data, this database is available from a scholarly accepted repository (https://doi.org/10.6073/pasta/7479676e406aeb40127da7b096b28eb2) for public consultation.
- Preprint
(5121 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 09 Mar 2025)
-
RC1: 'Comment on essd-2024-530', Anonymous Referee #1, 02 Feb 2025
reply
The rainfall erosivity factor (R) is a crucial parameter for predicting water erosion, and its reliable estimation is essential for accurate water erosion assessments. However, the calculation of R is challenging due to the need for high-resolution rainfall process data (e.g., one-minute, five-minute, or ten-minute intervals), which makes it difficult to estimate accurately. The study uses daily precipitation data from 5,410 sites in Mexico, which is a commendable effort in terms of the data scale. However, the study has several limitations that significantly impact the confidence in the resulting national rainfall erosivity estimates:
(1) Snowfall Consideration: The study does not discuss how snowfall during precipitation events is treated. It is important to clarify whether snowfall contributes to rainfall erosivity, and if so, how it was incorporated into the model, as this could influence the overall erosivity estimates.
(2) Transferability of Parameters: The study uses the parameters from Xie (2016), which were derived for China, to estimate rainfall erosivity in Mexico. Given the substantial differences in rainfall patterns and climatic conditions between these two countries, the direct application of these parameters raises concerns. A more thorough justification for the transferability of these parameters is needed, or alternative, region-specific parameters should be considered.
(3) Validation Limitations: While the author attempts to validate the results using GloREDa data, the validation is based on a limited dataset of only 15 sites, covering a short time span, and restricted to the mountainous region of Michoacán. Given this narrow scope, the validation does not provide sufficient confidence in the accuracy of the national rainfall erosivity estimates. A broader validation across different regions and time periods would strengthen the findings.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2024-530-RC1 -
RC2: 'Comment on essd-2024-530', Anonymous Referee #2, 12 Feb 2025
reply
Rainfall erosivity in Mexico.
A well structured manuscript which address the important topic of rainfall erosivity in a high erosive country as Mexico. However, I will propose a major revision.
Authors did not discuss about the discrepancies (and uncertainties) when R-factor is calculated based on daily data. As Rainfall erosivity is much dependent on the intensity and not only on the duration, authors should discuss this shortcoming of their study. You are advised to read how the Rainfall Erosivity Database at European Scale (REDES) and the Global one (GloREDa) have been developed and why an approach of high temporal rainfall resolution (15 min, 30 min, 60 min) was chosen. In addition, the correct estimate of erosivity based on amount and intensity should be also reflected in the introduction (L 50-60).
In their comparison with GloREDa, authors sum the 12 monthly erosivity maps and compare their assessment with the summed map. It would be wiser to compare your results with the GloREDa dataset (map) that was produced in 2017. The objective of the 12 monthly erosive months maps was not to have a Global annual erosivity map which already exists since 2017. This should be carefully addressed both in the introduction, in L180-185 and in the comparison of results.
A proper verification/validation takes place against measured erosivity with high temporal rainfall records (less than 1h). You could make a verification by comparing your results as stations with closest (in distance) stations of GloREDa.
In the discussion, it would be useful to mention the use of your dataset to identify trends in erosivity (what are the current trends in the last 50 years?) and how your dataset can be used to make projections of erosivity in 2050 and 2070 based on climate change scenarios?
L73-75 are not necessary
Please refer to the density of the stations . One station per Km2?
L100-110 can be mode densed (concise) described .
In the abstract it should be mentioned that your measured input data are daily.
L5 “moments” is not the right word.
Please use less acronyms in the abstract.
In Fig. 3 you can also add the locations of the 15 stations of GloreDa.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2024-530-RC2
Data sets
Daily rainfall series and rainfall erosivity in Mexico for three climatic normals (1968-1997, 1978-2007, and 1988-2017) Viviana Marcela Varón-Ramírez et al. https://doi.org/10.6073/pasta/7479676e406aeb40127da7b096b28eb2
Model code and software
Rainfall-Erosivity-Mexico Viviana Marcela Varón-Ramírez https://zenodo.org/records/13830947
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
199 | 25 | 14 | 238 | 6 | 6 |
- HTML: 199
- PDF: 25
- XML: 14
- Total: 238
- BibTeX: 6
- EndNote: 6
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1