the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Storage potentials for carbon-rich products in Germany – a database and outlook on final storage of products derived from negative emission technologies
Abstract. Addressing the need to achieve the EU's net-zero emissions target by 2050, the inclusion of unconventional measures for CO2 removal from the atmosphere into the technology portfolio appears necessary, meaning the implementation of carbon dioxide removal (CDR) or negative emissions technologies (NET). Various CDR approaches are explored for their potential in carbon dioxide removal but do not take into account the final disposal of by-products and end products as well as the potential of different areas for the required long-term storage. To complement existing methods, the NETPEC project (Negative Emission Technologies based on Photo-Electro-Chemical methods) proposes a novel approach utilizing (photo-)electrochemical methods to convert CO2 into solid or fluid products for secure long-term storage. The aim of this work is to identify potentials for the final disposal of such carbon-rich products resulting from negative emission technologies and to develop a database of sites and areas in Germany, taking into account a broad regional distribution and sufficient storage capacities. Promising sites for storage are identified, highlighting the importance of comprehensive data collection and systematic evaluation. A database is established to catalog past, present and potential mining activity in Germany, providing essential information on storage potentials, regulatory considerations and potential estimations. Despite challenges in data availability and regulatory complexity, re-purposing old mining sites and mining related areas for storage offers significant potential in mitigating climate change by securely sequestering carbon-rich products. This study builds on the collection of data via the geological state offices towards the creation of a database on the determination of areas and estimations of potentials. The assessments suggest that even if only 1 % of these mining-related areas are considered suitable for storing carbon-rich products, a significant surface area of around 990 km2 – larger than Berlin – would be available. Additionally, another 348 km2 of subsurface space – surpassing the size of Frankfurt (Main) – could potentially be utilized. These figures highlight the immense storage potential of Germany's mining sites, making them key to the project's long-term carbon storage strategy. By utilizing existing infrastructure and geological formations, the project addresses the urgent demand for large-scale carbon storage while minimizing environmental impact and reducing costs. This database serves as a crucial foundation for informing, decision-making and ensuring effective implementation of carbon storage initiatives and shows possibilities for the subsequent use of such areas.
- Preprint
(3175 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Review recommendation', Anonymous Referee #1, 27 Jun 2025
Paper Title: Storage potentials for carbon-rich products in Germany - a database and outlook on final storage of products derived from negative emission technologiesAuthors: Sarah Diekmeier, Karsten Reiter, Andreas Henk, and Colin FriebeJournal: Earth System Science Data DiscussionsThis manuscript evaluates a study on storing carbon rich products from Negative Emission Technologies (NETs) in German mines. The research, part of the NETPEC project, explores converting atmospheric CO2 into stable solids or liquids for storage. The study finds that Germany has significant and widespread potential for this type of long-term carbon sequestration in former and active mining sites.Strengths: The research addresses the critical and under-explored area of storing non-gaseous carbon products. The creation of a comprehensive national database of potential storage sites is a major contribution. The report effectively uses maps and data to illustrate the large-scale feasibility of this concept and is transparent about current challenges and uncertainties.Areas for Improvement: The analysis could be improved by discussing the potential chemical interactions between the stored carbon products and the host rock. A preliminary economic analysis comparing this method to traditional Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) would also strengthen the manuscript.Conclusion: This is a high quality and important study that establishes the significant potential for storing solid and liquid carbon products in Germany's mining regions. It provides a foundational database for future work and addresses a key bottleneck in implementing large-scale carbon removal. The manuscript is recommended for acceptance with minor revisions.Despite the minor points of critique, the manuscript is of high quality and scientific merit.Recommendation: Accept with minor revisions.Citation: https://doi.org/
10.5194/essd-2024-489-RC1 -
CC1: 'Reply on RC1', Sarah Diekmeier, 30 Jun 2025
Thank you for your thoughtful and constructive review. We’re pleased the study is seen as a valuable contribution and appreciate your helpful suggestions. We will address them in the revision and look forward to improving the manuscript accordingly.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2024-489-CC1
-
CC1: 'Reply on RC1', Sarah Diekmeier, 30 Jun 2025
-
RC2: 'Comment on essd-2024-489', Anonymous Referee #2, 12 Jul 2025
In its submitted version the manuscript does not fulfill the purpose of an essd publication. So far it is a mixture of many things and lacks a clear structure. Especially the title is not precise enough to outline the data publication. So far the article itself is not appropriate to support the publication of the data set. However, the data set is significant but not unique. It might be useful. It is not complete but this is to some extent explained. For publication the manuscript would need a thorough work over to my point of view. For that, compare the commented PDF.
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Review recommendation', Anonymous Referee #1, 27 Jun 2025
Paper Title: Storage potentials for carbon-rich products in Germany - a database and outlook on final storage of products derived from negative emission technologiesAuthors: Sarah Diekmeier, Karsten Reiter, Andreas Henk, and Colin FriebeJournal: Earth System Science Data DiscussionsThis manuscript evaluates a study on storing carbon rich products from Negative Emission Technologies (NETs) in German mines. The research, part of the NETPEC project, explores converting atmospheric CO2 into stable solids or liquids for storage. The study finds that Germany has significant and widespread potential for this type of long-term carbon sequestration in former and active mining sites.Strengths: The research addresses the critical and under-explored area of storing non-gaseous carbon products. The creation of a comprehensive national database of potential storage sites is a major contribution. The report effectively uses maps and data to illustrate the large-scale feasibility of this concept and is transparent about current challenges and uncertainties.Areas for Improvement: The analysis could be improved by discussing the potential chemical interactions between the stored carbon products and the host rock. A preliminary economic analysis comparing this method to traditional Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) would also strengthen the manuscript.Conclusion: This is a high quality and important study that establishes the significant potential for storing solid and liquid carbon products in Germany's mining regions. It provides a foundational database for future work and addresses a key bottleneck in implementing large-scale carbon removal. The manuscript is recommended for acceptance with minor revisions.Despite the minor points of critique, the manuscript is of high quality and scientific merit.Recommendation: Accept with minor revisions.Citation: https://doi.org/
10.5194/essd-2024-489-RC1 -
CC1: 'Reply on RC1', Sarah Diekmeier, 30 Jun 2025
Thank you for your thoughtful and constructive review. We’re pleased the study is seen as a valuable contribution and appreciate your helpful suggestions. We will address them in the revision and look forward to improving the manuscript accordingly.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2024-489-CC1
-
CC1: 'Reply on RC1', Sarah Diekmeier, 30 Jun 2025
-
RC2: 'Comment on essd-2024-489', Anonymous Referee #2, 12 Jul 2025
In its submitted version the manuscript does not fulfill the purpose of an essd publication. So far it is a mixture of many things and lacks a clear structure. Especially the title is not precise enough to outline the data publication. So far the article itself is not appropriate to support the publication of the data set. However, the data set is significant but not unique. It might be useful. It is not complete but this is to some extent explained. For publication the manuscript would need a thorough work over to my point of view. For that, compare the commented PDF.
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
440 | 105 | 22 | 567 | 23 | 27 |
- HTML: 440
- PDF: 105
- XML: 22
- Total: 567
- BibTeX: 23
- EndNote: 27
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1