Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2017-96
https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2017-96
08 Sep 2017
 | 08 Sep 2017
Status: this preprint was under review for the journal ESSD. A revision for further review has not been submitted.

Supraglacial debris cover assessment in the Caucasus Mountains, 1986-2000-2014

Levan G. Tielidze, Roger D. Wheate, Stanislav S. Kutuzov, Kate Doyle, and Ivan I. Lavrentiev

Abstract. Surpaglacial debris cover plays an increasingly important role impacting on glacier ablation, while there have been limited recent studies for the assessment of debris covered glaciers in the Greater Caucasus mountains. We selected 559 glaciers according to the sections and macroslopes in the Greater Caucasus main watershed range and the Elbrus massif to assess supraglacial debris cover (SDC) for the years 1986, 2000 and 2014. Landsat (Landsat 5 TM, Landsat 7 ETM+, Landsat 8 OLI) and SPOT satellite imagery were analysed to generate glacier outlines using manual and semi-automated methods, along with slope information from a Digital Elevation Model. The study shows there is greater SDC area on the northern than the southern macroslope, and more in the eastern section than the western and central. In 1986-2000-2014, the SDC area increased from 6.4 %-8.2 %-19.4 % on the northern macroslope (apart from the eastern Greater Caucasus section), while on the southern macroslope, SDC increased from 4.0 %-4.9 %-9.2 %. Overall, debris covered glacier numbers increased from 122-143-172 (1986-2000-2014) for 559 selected glaciers. Despite the total glacier area decrease, the SDC glacier area and numbers increased as a function of slope inclination, aspect, glacier morphological type, Little Ice Age (LIA) moraines, rock structure and elevation. The datasets are available for public download at https://doi.pangaea.de/10.1594/PANGAEA.880147.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Levan G. Tielidze, Roger D. Wheate, Stanislav S. Kutuzov, Kate Doyle, and Ivan I. Lavrentiev
 
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
 
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
Levan G. Tielidze, Roger D. Wheate, Stanislav S. Kutuzov, Kate Doyle, and Ivan I. Lavrentiev
Levan G. Tielidze, Roger D. Wheate, Stanislav S. Kutuzov, Kate Doyle, and Ivan I. Lavrentiev

Viewed

Total article views: 2,013 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,281 598 134 2,013 145 165
  • HTML: 1,281
  • PDF: 598
  • XML: 134
  • Total: 2,013
  • BibTeX: 145
  • EndNote: 165
Views and downloads (calculated since 08 Sep 2017)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 08 Sep 2017)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,955 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,939 with geography defined and 16 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Discussed

Latest update: 14 Dec 2024
Download
Short summary
It is true, that research is being conducting in hard conditions in Georgia than other mountain countries of Europe. In addition, there was huge generation gap in glaciology field after the USSR colaps (1990s). But gradually we try to develop glaciology research in Georgia and in the Caucasus, as it is vitally important such a mountain region with > 2000 glaciers.
Altmetrics