<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
        <title>ESSD - recent papers</title>


    <link rel="self" href="https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/"/>
    <id>https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/</id>
    <updated>2026-04-11T23:09:33+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name>Copernicus Publications</name>
    </author>
        <entry>
            <id>https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-18-2573-2026</id>
            <title type="html">Spatially distributed measurements of aerosols  and stable isotopes in water vapour and  precipitation in coastal Northern Norway  during the ISLAS2021 campaign
            </title>
            <link href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-18-2573-2026"/>
            <summary type="html">
                &lt;b&gt;Spatially distributed measurements of aerosols  and stable isotopes in water vapour and  precipitation in coastal Northern Norway  during the ISLAS2021 campaign&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
                Alena Dekhtyareva, Harald Sodemann, Tim Carlsen, Iris Thurnherr, Aina Johannessen, Andrew Seidl, David M. Chandler, Daniele Zannoni, Alexandra Touzeau, Marvin Kähnert, Astrid B. Gjelsvik, Franziska Hellmuth, Britta Schäfer, and Robert O. David&lt;br&gt;
                    Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 18, 2573&#8211;2607, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-18-2573-2026, 2026&lt;br&gt;
                During a recent field campaign from 15 to 30 March 2021 at Andenes, Norway, we collected a set of observations that allows to better constrain how clouds and precipitation processes work. Frequent alternations between mid-latitude and arctic weather systems were encountered during the campaign. Our dataset is unique in combining measurements in both vapour and precipitation, aerosols, ice nucleating particles, and was made simultaneously at different elevations at a high latitude location.
            </summary>
            <content type="html">
                &lt;b&gt;Spatially distributed measurements of aerosols  and stable isotopes in water vapour and  precipitation in coastal Northern Norway  during the ISLAS2021 campaign&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
                Alena Dekhtyareva, Harald Sodemann, Tim Carlsen, Iris Thurnherr, Aina Johannessen, Andrew Seidl, David M. Chandler, Daniele Zannoni, Alexandra Touzeau, Marvin Kähnert, Astrid B. Gjelsvik, Franziska Hellmuth, Britta Schäfer, and Robert O. David&lt;br&gt;
                    Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 18, 2573&#8211;2607, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-18-2573-2026, 2026&lt;br&gt;
                <p>Precipitation from mixed-phase clouds at high-latitudes is difficult to represent correctly in numerical weather prediction models. Paired water vapour and precipitation isotope measurements provide a constraint on the integrated effect of evaporation and condensation processes, but have rarely been collected in a way that allows to use these for model validation and improvement. Here we present a collection of spatially distributed measurements of water isotopes in the different phases at high time resolution during the ISLAS2021 field campaign  over the period 15&amp;#160;to 30&amp;#160;March&amp;#160;2021. The main observational site of this campaign was Andenes, Norway (69.3144&amp;#176;&amp;#8201;N, 16.1194&amp;#176;&amp;#8201;E). Isotopic measurements were conducted simultaneously at sea level and a mountain observatory, as well as additional coastal sites at distances of 120&amp;#8201;km (Troms&amp;#248;, Norway) and 1100&amp;#8201;km (Bergen, Norway), enabling the assessment of spatial representativeness of vapour isotope measurements. Precipitation samples for water isotope analysis were collected on site at sub-event time resolution, and along a transect across the Vester&amp;#229;len archipelago. These measurements were complemented by a suite of aerosol measurements, including ice-nucleating particles, and additional in situ and remote sensing observations of meteorological variables. During the two weeks of the ISLAS2021 field campaign, frequent alternations between mid-latitude and arctic weather systems were encountered, providing a range of different cases for more detailed process studies. The dataset is available at <a href="https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.984616">https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.984616</a&gt; <span class="cit" id="xref_paren.1">(<a href="#bib1.bibx61">Sodemann et&amp;#160;al.</a>,&amp;#160;<a href="#bib1.bibx61">2025</a>)</span>, and can serve as a test bed for assessing the spatial representativeness and sampling strategies for water isotope measurements on meteorological time scales. Furthermore, we anticipate our data to be useful in various aspects related to cloud microphysics, for example the quantification of riming processes in convective clouds, the role of ice nucleating particles in marine cold-air outbreaks, and on the condensation efficiency of mid-latitude storms.</p>
            </content>
            <author>
                <name>Copernicus Electronic Production Support Office</name>
            </author>
            <published>2026-04-10T23:09:33+02:00</published>
            <updated>2026-04-10T23:09:33+02:00</updated>
        </entry>
        <entry>
            <id>https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2026-232</id>
            <title type="html">OceanTACO: A Multi-Sensor Global Ocean Sea Surface State Dataset
            </title>
            <link href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2026-232"/>
            <summary type="html">
                &lt;b&gt;OceanTACO: A Multi-Sensor Global Ocean Sea Surface State Dataset&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
                Nils Lehmann, Cesar Aybar, Ando Shah, Marcello Passaro, Jonathan L. Bamber, and Xiao Xiang Zhu&lt;br&gt;
                    Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., doi:10.5194/essd-2026-232,2026&lt;br&gt;
                    &lt;b&gt;Preprint under review for ESSD&lt;/b&gt; (discussion: open, 0 comments)&lt;br&gt;
                We created a global ocean dataset that brings together satellite measurements, model outputs, and observations into one consistent system. We did this to reduce the time and effort needed to combine different data sources, to improve reproducibility, and enable new analyses. The result makes it easier to study ocean changes, compare methods, and support better understanding of climate processes and extreme events.
            </summary>
            <content type="html">
                &lt;b&gt;OceanTACO: A Multi-Sensor Global Ocean Sea Surface State Dataset&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
                Nils Lehmann, Cesar Aybar, Ando Shah, Marcello Passaro, Jonathan L. Bamber, and Xiao Xiang Zhu&lt;br&gt;
                    Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2026-232,2026&lt;br&gt;
                    &lt;b&gt;Preprint under review for ESSD&lt;/b&gt; (discussion: open, 0 comments)&lt;br&gt;
                We present OceanTACO, a harmonised global collection of sea surface state datasets designed to support reproducible Earth system research. The collection integrates satellite altimetry, sea surface temperature, salinity, surface winds, reanalysis fields, and Argo in situ observations within a unified cloud-optimised specification based on Transparent Access to Cloud-optimised datasets (TACO). It includes Level-3 observations, Level-4 gap-filled products, and reanalysis outputs while preserving native spatial and temporal resolution. The core dataset spans 29 March 2023 to 1 August 2025, covering the Surface Water and Ocean Topography (SWOT) mission, with an extended record from 1 January 2015 until 29 March 2023 for non-SWOT sources.</p&gt; <p>Datasets are harmonised through standardised metadata, spatial referencing, and temporal indexing, enabling consistent spatiotemporal queries across sensors and processing levels. A uniform internal structure reduces product-specific preprocessing and allows the same data-access routines to be applied across regions, sensors, and studies. This supports Earth systems analyses workflows such as validation against in situ observations, comparisons between observation and mapped products, observation system experiments, and multivariate sensor analyses.</p&gt; <p>Example applications demonstrate cross-product collocation with Argo, analysis of sea surface height variability during extreme events, and relationships between surface variables relevant for data-driven reconstruction. OceanTACO improves accessibility to coordinated multi-source analyses while preserving data provenance and native observation characteristics, and can be extended with new missions without restructuring the dataset. The core and extended dataset are available at <a href="https://doi.org/10.57967/hf/8171" target="_blank" rel="noopener">https://doi.org/10.57967/hf/8171</a&gt; (Lehmann and Aybar, 2026a) and <a href="https://doi.org/10.57967/hf/8172" target="_blank" rel="noopener">https://doi.org/10.57967/hf/8172</a&gt; (Lehmann and Aybar, 2026b) respectively.
            </content>
            <author>
                <name>Copernicus Electronic Production Support Office</name>
            </author>
            <published>2026-04-10T23:09:33+02:00</published>
            <updated>2026-04-10T23:09:33+02:00</updated>
        </entry>
        <entry>
            <id>https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2026-99</id>
            <title type="html">The ICOS Ecosystem Station Loobos: a pine forest site exposed to atmospheric pollution
            </title>
            <link href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2026-99"/>
            <summary type="html">
                &lt;b&gt;The ICOS Ecosystem Station Loobos: a pine forest site exposed to atmospheric pollution&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
                Michiel K. van der Molen, Henk Snellen, Rupert Holzinger, Johannes G. M. Barten, Hong Zhao, Laurens Ganzeveld, Julie Fry, Wouter Peters, Maarten Krol, Jordi Vila-Guerau de Arrelano, and Bart Kruijt&lt;br&gt;
                    Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., doi:10.5194/essd-2026-99,2026&lt;br&gt;
                    &lt;b&gt;Preprint under review for ESSD&lt;/b&gt; (discussion: open, 0 comments)&lt;br&gt;
                In 2021, a second tower was built in Loobos (NL-Loo) to measure carbon dioxide and water fluxes, as an Integrated Carbon Observing System (ICOS) Class 2 Ecosystem station. Instrumentation was installed to measure volatile organic compound and ozone fluxes. This paper describes the site&amp;#8217;s geological and cultural history, ecosystem composition, instrumentation and ancillary ecosystem measurements. The paper goes into the quality of the measurements and continuity with respect to the first tower.
            </summary>
            <content type="html">
                &lt;b&gt;The ICOS Ecosystem Station Loobos: a pine forest site exposed to atmospheric pollution&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
                Michiel K. van der Molen, Henk Snellen, Rupert Holzinger, Johannes G. M. Barten, Hong Zhao, Laurens Ganzeveld, Julie Fry, Wouter Peters, Maarten Krol, Jordi Vila-Guerau de Arrelano, and Bart Kruijt&lt;br&gt;
                    Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2026-99,2026&lt;br&gt;
                    &lt;b&gt;Preprint under review for ESSD&lt;/b&gt; (discussion: open, 0 comments)&lt;br&gt;
                The Loobos Ecosystem Station (ICOS: NL-Loo) is in a pine forest on sandy soil, the most dominant forest type in the Netherlands. The station was first built in 1995 and the first atmospheric flux measurements were taken in 1997. The station was one of the first in EuroFlux and FLUXNET. Between 2021 and 2023, the station was rebuilt to meet the ICOS standards as an Ecosystem Class 2 station. The initial purpose of the station was to measure fluxes of heat, water and carbon dioxide. Over time, interest has increased in better understanding the forest water use and ecosystem dynamics and its interaction with air quality. This has resulted in additional concentration and flux measurements of ozone and volatile organic compounds. In the near future, we intend to include measurements of nitrogen species (ammonia and nitrogen oxides) to exploit Loobos&amp;#8217; unique location downwind of major anthropogenic emission hotspots. Documenting the instrumentation and exploring the quality of the data is important to understand the observational data. This paper therefore describes the station in terms of geography, ecosystem and instrumentation.
            </content>
            <author>
                <name>Copernicus Electronic Production Support Office</name>
            </author>
            <published>2026-04-10T23:09:33+02:00</published>
            <updated>2026-04-10T23:09:33+02:00</updated>
        </entry>
        <entry>
            <id>https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-18-2549-2026</id>
            <title type="html">Differences in anthropogenic greenhouse gas  emissions estimates explained
            </title>
            <link href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-18-2549-2026"/>
            <summary type="html">
                &lt;b&gt;Differences in anthropogenic greenhouse gas  emissions estimates explained&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
                William F. Lamb, Robbie M. Andrew, Matthew Jones, Zebedee Nicholls, Glen P. Peters, Chris Smith, Marielle Saunois, Giacomo Grassi, Julia Pongratz, Steven J. Smith, Francesco N. Tubiello, Monica Crippa, Matthew Gidden, Pierre Friedlingstein, Jan Minx, and Piers M. Forster&lt;br&gt;
                    Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 18, 2549&#8211;2572, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-18-2549-2026, 2026&lt;br&gt;
                This study explores why global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions estimates vary. Key reasons include different coverage of gases and sectors, varying definitions of anthropogenic land use change emissions, and the Paris Agreement not covering all emission sources. The study highlights three main ways emissions data is reported, each with different objectives and resulting in varying global emission totals. It emphasizes the need for transparency in choosing datasets and setting assessment scopes.
            </summary>
            <content type="html">
                &lt;b&gt;Differences in anthropogenic greenhouse gas  emissions estimates explained&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
                William F. Lamb, Robbie M. Andrew, Matthew Jones, Zebedee Nicholls, Glen P. Peters, Chris Smith, Marielle Saunois, Giacomo Grassi, Julia Pongratz, Steven J. Smith, Francesco N. Tubiello, Monica Crippa, Matthew Gidden, Pierre Friedlingstein, Jan Minx, and Piers M. Forster&lt;br&gt;
                    Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 18, 2549&#8211;2572, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-18-2549-2026, 2026&lt;br&gt;
                <p>We examine differences in global and national greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions estimates, focusing on the role of varying system boundaries and conceptual approaches in driving these variations. Despite consensus among assessments and datasets that GHG emissions continue to increase and that trends are far from aligned with the Paris Agreement goals, estimates can differ significantly. Our review finds three main reasons for these differences. First, datasets vary in their coverage of gases, sectors and countries; second, there are different approaches to defining &amp;#8220;anthropogenic&amp;#8221; emissions and removals in the land use, land-use change and forestry (LULUCF) sector; and third, the Paris Agreement doesn't cover all relevant sources of emissions, including the cement carbonation sink and ozone depleting substances. As different assessments have different objectives, they may deal with these issues differently. We highlight three assessment conventions that report or use emissions data: those focused on interpreting national progress, policies and pledges under the Paris Agreement; those consistent with integrated assessment modelling (IAM) benchmarks of emissions under different warming scenarios; and those consistent with climate forcing assessments. Considering annual average emissions over the period 2014 to 2023, we show global totals of 44.4&amp;#8201;GtCO<span class="inline-formula"><sub>2</sub></span>e&amp;#8201;yr<span class="inline-formula"><sup>&amp;#8722;1</sup></span&gt; [90&amp;#8201;%&amp;#8201;CI&amp;#8201;<span class="inline-formula">&amp;#177;</span>&amp;#8201;4.9], 54.5&amp;#8201;GtCO<span class="inline-formula"><sub>2</sub></span>e&amp;#8201;yr<span class="inline-formula"><sup>&amp;#8722;1</sup></span&gt; [90&amp;#8201;%&amp;#8201;CI&amp;#8201;<span class="inline-formula">&amp;#177;</span>&amp;#8201;5.6], and 56.4&amp;#8201;GtCO<span class="inline-formula"><sub>2</sub></span>e&amp;#8201;yr<span class="inline-formula"><sup>&amp;#8722;1</sup></span&gt; [90&amp;#8201;%&amp;#8201;CI&amp;#8201;<span class="inline-formula">&amp;#177;</span>&amp;#8201;5.7] for these three conventions, respectively. We suggest that users of GHG<span id="page2550"/&gt; emissions data increase transparency in their decision criteria for choosing datasets and setting the scope of an assessment. The data used in this study to make Figs. 9&amp;#8211;14 is available at: <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15126539">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15126539</a&gt; (Lamb, 2026).</p>
            </content>
            <author>
                <name>Copernicus Electronic Production Support Office</name>
            </author>
            <published>2026-04-09T23:09:33+02:00</published>
            <updated>2026-04-09T23:09:33+02:00</updated>
        </entry>
        <entry>
            <id>https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-18-2507-2026</id>
            <title type="html">Soil information and soil property maps for the Kurdistan region, Dohuk governorate (Iraq)
            </title>
            <link href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-18-2507-2026"/>
            <summary type="html">
                &lt;b&gt;Soil information and soil property maps for the Kurdistan region, Dohuk governorate (Iraq)&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
                Mathias Bellat, Mjahid Zebari, Benjamin Glissmann, Tobias Rentschler, Paola Sconzo, Nafiseh Kakhani, Ruhollah Taghizadeh-Mehrjardi, Pegah Kohsravani, Bekas Brifkany, Peter Pfälzner, and Thomas Scholten&lt;br&gt;
                    Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 18, 2507&#8211;2548, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-18-2507-2026, 2026&lt;br&gt;
                This dataset presents the first soil maps for the region produced using digital mapping techniques. It includes predictions for ten major physical and chemical soil properties at various depths, plus a map of total soil depth. For each property, we selected the most accurate models and key environmental drivers. In Southwestern Asia and many arid or semi-arid regions, detailed soil data are often missing. This dataset fills that gap, supporting agriculture, research, planning, and local policy.
            </summary>
            <content type="html">
                &lt;b&gt;Soil information and soil property maps for the Kurdistan region, Dohuk governorate (Iraq)&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
                Mathias Bellat, Mjahid Zebari, Benjamin Glissmann, Tobias Rentschler, Paola Sconzo, Nafiseh Kakhani, Ruhollah Taghizadeh-Mehrjardi, Pegah Kohsravani, Bekas Brifkany, Peter Pfälzner, and Thomas Scholten&lt;br&gt;
                    Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 18, 2507&#8211;2548, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-18-2507-2026, 2026&lt;br&gt;
                <p>We present the first detailed soil property maps at multiple depths for the northwestern autonomous Kurdistan region of Iraq (Dohuk). A total of 532 soil samples from 122 sites were collected at five depth increments (0&amp;#8211;10, 10&amp;#8211;30, 30&amp;#8211;50, 50&amp;#8211;70, and 70&amp;#8211;100&amp;#8201;cm), and their mid-infrared (MIR) spectra were measured. A subset of 108 samples, selected via Kennard&amp;#8211;Stone sampling, was analysed in a laboratory on ten soil properties. A Cubist model was trained and used from these measured values to predict all samples' soil properties from their MIR spectra. Digital soil mapping was conducted using a machine learning regression techniques based on a quantile random forest model, trained on the predicted soil properties and using a total of 85 covariates at 30&amp;#8201;m pixel resolution, resulting in 50 prediction maps in total. Results were compared with the SoilGrids 2.0 product and a regional texture model. Soil depth was also mapped using a similar model with 26 covariates. Our model outperformed global SoilGrids 2.0 predictions in resolution and accuracy, with texture RMSEs (sand: <span class="inline-formula"><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M1" display="inline" overflow="scroll" dspmath="mathml"><mover accent="true"><mi>x</mi><mo mathvariant="normal">&amp;#8254;</mo></mover></math><span><svg:svg xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="9pt" height="11pt" class="svg-formula" dspmath="mathimg" md5hash="e02c752e32f492df5a018ff3a11c551e"><svg:image xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="essd-18-2507-2026-ie00001.svg" width="9pt" height="11pt" src="essd-18-2507-2026-ie00001.png"/></svg:svg></span></span&gt; RMSE 11.03; silt: <span class="inline-formula"><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M2" display="inline" overflow="scroll" dspmath="mathml"><mover accent="true"><mi>x</mi><mo mathvariant="normal">&amp;#8254;</mo></mover></math><span><svg:svg xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="9pt" height="11pt" class="svg-formula" dspmath="mathimg" md5hash="edc50e7df18a3e5de8c9b6628c07df2d"><svg:image xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="essd-18-2507-2026-ie00002.svg" width="9pt" height="11pt" src="essd-18-2507-2026-ie00002.png"/></svg:svg></span></span&gt; RMSE 8.82; clay: <span class="inline-formula"><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M3" display="inline" overflow="scroll" dspmath="mathml"><mover accent="true"><mi>x</mi><mo mathvariant="normal">&amp;#8254;</mo></mover></math><span><svg:svg xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="9pt" height="11pt" class="svg-formula" dspmath="mathimg" md5hash="2611363637b61e1ae2b92b8cdcbb2969"><svg:image xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="essd-18-2507-2026-ie00003.svg" width="9pt" height="11pt" src="essd-18-2507-2026-ie00003.png"/></svg:svg></span></span&gt; RMSE 7.39) comparable to local models. Key predictors included Landsat 8 SWIR, EVI, SAVI, Sentinel 2 SWIR, PET and solar radiation. Spatial patterns reflected the contrast between the flat areas of the Selevani and Zakho plains, as opposed to the shallower and steeper Little Khabur Valley and anticline formations. Furthermore, the soil depth prediction model (<span class="inline-formula"><i>R</i><sup>2</sup></span&gt; 0.39; RMSE 30.76&amp;#8201;cm) showed strong correlation with slope and a similar pattern distribution with deeper soils in the flat areas of the Selevani and Zakho plains, while shallow soils were predicted in the anticline and strongly erodible areas. Our comprehensive dataset (<a href="https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.973700">https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.973700</a>, <span class="cit" id="xref_altparen.1"><a href="#bib1.bibx29">Bellat et&amp;#160;al.</a>,&amp;#160;<a href="#bib1.bibx29">2024</a><a href="#bib1.bibx29">a</a></span>; <a href="https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.973701">https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.973701</a>, <span class="cit" id="xref_altparen.2"><a href="#bib1.bibx30">Bellat et&amp;#160;al.</a>,&amp;#160;<a href="#bib1.bibx30">2024</a><a href="#bib1.bibx30">b</a></span>; <a href="https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.973714">https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.973714</a>, <span class="cit" id="xref_altparen.3"><a href="#bib1.bibx31">Bellat et&amp;#160;al.</a>,&amp;#160;<a href="#bib1.bibx31">2024</a><a href="#bib1.bibx31">c</a></span>; <a href="https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.31320958.v2">https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.31320958.v2</a>, <span class="cit" id="xref_altparen.4"><a href="#bib1.bibx32">Bellat et&amp;#160;al.</a>,&amp;#160;<a href="#bib1.bibx32">2026</a><a href="#bib1.bibx32">a</a></span>; <a href="https://doi.org/10.57754/FDAT.d5h1h-4x027">https://doi.org/10.57754/FDAT.d5h1h-4x027</a>, <span class="cit" id="xref_altparen.5"><a href="#bib1.bibx33">Bellat et&amp;#160;al.</a>,&amp;#160;<a href="#bib1.bibx33">2026</a><a href="#bib1.bibx33">b</a></span>) offers substantial insights for soil knowledge in the region, as well as for aridic and semi-aridic areas.</p>
            </content>
            <author>
                <name>Copernicus Electronic Production Support Office</name>
            </author>
            <published>2026-04-09T23:09:33+02:00</published>
            <updated>2026-04-09T23:09:33+02:00</updated>
        </entry>
        <entry>
            <id>https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2026-201</id>
            <title type="html">Towards a global database on building architecture and construction materials for urban climate models
            </title>
            <link href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2026-201"/>
            <summary type="html">
                &lt;b&gt;Towards a global database on building architecture and construction materials for urban climate models&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
                Lorena de Carvalho Araujo, Valéry Masson, Robert Schoetter, Jean Wurtz, Anouk Le Bihan, and Marion Bonhomme&lt;br&gt;
                    Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., doi:10.5194/essd-2026-201,2026&lt;br&gt;
                    &lt;b&gt;Preprint under review for ESSD&lt;/b&gt; (discussion: open, 0 comments)&lt;br&gt;
                Urban populations are increasingly exposed to heat stress due to climate change and the urban heat island effect. Urban climate models require detailed data on building materials (e.g. roof cover material, insulation in walls) to simulate the meteorological impact on humans and infrastructure. This study presents an open database of residential building types by country that has been created based on a global survey of architects and urban climatologists.
            </summary>
            <content type="html">
                &lt;b&gt;Towards a global database on building architecture and construction materials for urban climate models&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
                Lorena de Carvalho Araujo, Valéry Masson, Robert Schoetter, Jean Wurtz, Anouk Le Bihan, and Marion Bonhomme&lt;br&gt;
                    Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2026-201,2026&lt;br&gt;
                    &lt;b&gt;Preprint under review for ESSD&lt;/b&gt; (discussion: open, 0 comments)&lt;br&gt;
                Due to regional climate change exacerbated by the Urban Heat Island (UHI) effect, the population of dense urban areas is vulnerable to heat stress. Accurate urban climate models are essential for quantifying UHI mitigation strategies and supporting climate adaptation efforts. These models require input data on urban form, materials, and function. However, existing frameworks, such as Local Climate Zones (LCZ) and Geoclimate, only provide urban morphological parameters and lack detailed information on building materials and systems.</p&gt; <p>To address these limitations, architects, engineers, urban climatologists and researchers in many countries have been contacted via a survey platform to provide information on building materials and systems. The survey has been translated into 11 languages to enable global coverage. This approach captures significant architectural and construction trends by collecting key data on building systems and envelope characteristics (e.g., walls, roofs, windows, and insulation).</p&gt; <p>The survey yielded 521 responses from 141 countries, demonstrating substantial global coverage. A multi-step imputation strategy was applied to create a comprehensive global database, and residential building typologies are defined for each country. Global homogeneous typologies are defined for non-residential buildings. The resulting datasets are freely available and can easily be combined with LCZ maps. These datasets provide a valuable resource for urban climate modeling and facilitate more accurate climate assessments on a global scale. Future work may enhance data granularity further, for instance, by providing typologies at the subnational level.
            </content>
            <author>
                <name>Copernicus Electronic Production Support Office</name>
            </author>
            <published>2026-04-08T23:09:33+02:00</published>
            <updated>2026-04-08T23:09:33+02:00</updated>
        </entry>
        <entry>
            <id>https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2026-198</id>
            <title type="html">The Greenland GNSS Network (GNET): Geodetic Grade GNSS measurements of Greenland's 3D Bedrock Displacement from 1995&#8211;2025
            </title>
            <link href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2026-198"/>
            <summary type="html">
                &lt;b&gt;The Greenland GNSS Network (GNET): Geodetic Grade GNSS measurements of Greenland's 3D Bedrock Displacement from 1995–2025&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
                Christian Solgaard, Finn Bo Madsen, Malte Winther-Dahl, Thomas Henry Nylen, Danjal Longfors Berg, Ole Bjerregaard, Javed Hassan, Per Knudsen, Michael Bevis, and Shfaqat Abbas Khan&lt;br&gt;
                    Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., doi:10.5194/essd-2026-198,2026&lt;br&gt;
                    &lt;b&gt;Preprint under review for ESSD&lt;/b&gt; (discussion: open, 0 comments)&lt;br&gt;
                Greenland GNSS Network consist of more than 70 high grade GNSS (Global Navigation Satellite System) stations placed along the perimeter of Greenland. With this work, we present the processed position solution for the 20+ year record in a daily resolution. Along with the processed time series, we also publish the extensive metadata record for the network + all the raw data. A comparison with other subsets of the data showed an increased stability in the full processed dataset we here publish.
            </summary>
            <content type="html">
                &lt;b&gt;The Greenland GNSS Network (GNET): Geodetic Grade GNSS measurements of Greenland's 3D Bedrock Displacement from 1995–2025&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
                Christian Solgaard, Finn Bo Madsen, Malte Winther-Dahl, Thomas Henry Nylen, Danjal Longfors Berg, Ole Bjerregaard, Javed Hassan, Per Knudsen, Michael Bevis, and Shfaqat Abbas Khan&lt;br&gt;
                    Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2026-198,2026&lt;br&gt;
                    &lt;b&gt;Preprint under review for ESSD&lt;/b&gt; (discussion: open, 0 comments)&lt;br&gt;
                The Greenland GNSS Network (GNET) consists of 71 individual geodetic-grade Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) stations mounted directly in bedrock located along the perimeter of the Greenland Ice Sheet (GrIS). The first continuously running GNSS (cGNSS) station was set up in 1995 and has been running up to date. During the fourth International Polar Year (IPY) 2007&amp;#8211;2008, GNET was established with the expansion of 49 stations. As of 2025, the network has expanded to include 19 town sites and 48 remote sites. Over time, the installations have undergone various updates, helping to stabilize and improve the return observations from the network. The original installations were done using Global Positioning System (GPS)-only receivers; these have, with time, been changed to receivers capable of tracking multiple constellations. Operating cGNSS stations in the remote high Arctic is troublesome, giving rise to data gaps and/or downtime for stations in the network. Here we present the most comprehensive dataset from 1995 to 2025, Receiver Independent Exchange Format (RINEX) v2 and/or v3 daily files are now available, see Table B1. Processed daily East-North-Up (ENU) time series for all sites is available at <a href="https://doi.org/10.11583/DTU.31397901" target="_blank" rel="noopener">https://doi.org/10.11583/DTU.31397901</a&gt; Solgaard, et al. (2026), and extensive metadata logfiles documenting the entire lifespan of the specific stations can be found here Danish Agency for Climate Data (KDS) (2026). Photos of the stations can be found on (<a href="https://go-gnet.org/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">https://go-gnet.org/</a>). Through a noise characterization analysis, we show that a fractional Gaussian noise profile is expected. Furthermore, we compare our processed ENU time series with already published subsets of the full dataset from independent processing centers. Here, we conclude that the DTU release is significantly more stable in the horizontal components compared to other publicly available products.
            </content>
            <author>
                <name>Copernicus Electronic Production Support Office</name>
            </author>
            <published>2026-04-08T23:09:33+02:00</published>
            <updated>2026-04-08T23:09:33+02:00</updated>
        </entry>
        <entry>
            <id>https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-841</id>
            <title type="html">Regional Oceanographic Database (BaRDO) for the Argentine Continental Shelf
            </title>
            <link href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-841"/>
            <summary type="html">
                &lt;b&gt;Regional Oceanographic Database (BaRDO) for the Argentine Continental Shelf&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
                Ana G. Baldoni, Graciela N. Molinari, and Raul A. Guerrero&lt;br&gt;
                    Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., doi:10.5194/essd-2025-841,2026&lt;br&gt;
                    &lt;b&gt;Preprint under review for ESSD&lt;/b&gt; (discussion: open, 0 comments)&lt;br&gt;
                This paper presents information on physical data collected over the past 47 years by INIDEP research vessels, primarily from the Argentine Continental Shelf. The main objective of this work is to provide access to this important dataset by describing the main characteristics of the instruments used over time, as well as the evolution of sampling, data processing, and quality-control procedures.
            </summary>
            <content type="html">
                &lt;b&gt;Regional Oceanographic Database (BaRDO) for the Argentine Continental Shelf&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
                Ana G. Baldoni, Graciela N. Molinari, and Raul A. Guerrero&lt;br&gt;
                    Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-841,2026&lt;br&gt;
                    &lt;b&gt;Preprint under review for ESSD&lt;/b&gt; (discussion: open, 0 comments)&lt;br&gt;
                The Regional Oceanographic Data Base (BaRDO) contains 25,845 quality-controlled oceanographic stations acquired by INIDEP research vessels in the Southwest Atlantic. This paper describes the operability of the data management system, the characteristics and accuracy of the dataset, the quality-control procedures, and the main errors detected and corrected during the flagging process. In addition, we present information on the geographical and temporal distribution of the data, the evolution of the dataset in response to technological advances, and recommendations for its use. BaRDO contains two main data types: quasi-continuous CTD profiles (conductivity, temperature, and depth) and discrete, low-resolution OSD (Ocean Station Data) profiles. The majority of observations comprise temperature and salinity, while fluorometry, oxygen, and turbidity are also available when measured. Cruise listings and data access covering the period up to 2012 are provided at <a href="https://catalogo.inidep.edu.ar/geonetwork/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">https://catalogo.inidep.edu.ar/geonetwork/</a>.
            </content>
            <author>
                <name>Copernicus Electronic Production Support Office</name>
            </author>
            <published>2026-04-07T23:09:33+02:00</published>
            <updated>2026-04-07T23:09:33+02:00</updated>
        </entry>
        <entry>
            <id>https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-811</id>
            <title type="html">Validation samples for the Land Cover Map of Europe 2017
            </title>
            <link href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-811"/>
            <summary type="html">
                &lt;b&gt;Validation samples for the Land Cover Map of Europe 2017&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
                Małgorzata Jenerowicz-Sanikowska, Elke Krätzschmar, Peter Schauer, Ewa Gromny, Radek Malinowski, Michał Krupiński, Stanisław Lewiński, Marcin Rybicki, and Cezary Wojtkowski&lt;br&gt;
                    Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., doi:10.5194/essd-2025-811,2026&lt;br&gt;
                    &lt;b&gt;Preprint under review for ESSD&lt;/b&gt; (discussion: open, 0 comments)&lt;br&gt;
                We present the validation dataset created within the Sentinel-2 Global Land Cover project. Development of this dataset aimed at supporting accuracy assessment of pan-European database at both continental and country levels. The outcome was a large dataset composed of over 50,000 samples and 13 land cover/land use classes which represent different climatic regions and conditions.
            </summary>
            <content type="html">
                &lt;b&gt;Validation samples for the Land Cover Map of Europe 2017&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
                Małgorzata Jenerowicz-Sanikowska, Elke Krätzschmar, Peter Schauer, Ewa Gromny, Radek Malinowski, Michał Krupiński, Stanisław Lewiński, Marcin Rybicki, and Cezary Wojtkowski&lt;br&gt;
                    Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-811,2026&lt;br&gt;
                    &lt;b&gt;Preprint under review for ESSD&lt;/b&gt; (discussion: open, 0 comments)&lt;br&gt;
                Accuracy assessment is an integral part of the production of land cover/land use maps. The process requires the availability of a good-quality validation dataset for the qualitative and quantitative evaluation of generated products. This paper describes the development of the validation dataset that was used for the accuracy assessment of the Land Cover Map of Europe 2017 in the context of the Sentinel-2 Global Land Cover project. Sample selection was based on a two-step stratified random sampling process. In the first step, validation sites (Sentinel-2 tiles) were selected randomly and in proportion to the area covered by each country. In the second step, validation sites were stratified with the CORINE Land Cover dataset, which enabled the proportional selection of land cover classes. The selected samples were visually inspected by experts who categorised them into 13 classes. This resulted in a large set of 52,024 samples, spread over Europe. The final dataset can be used to validate European land cover products at continental scale, and may also be included in larger (e.g. global) datasets, or for country-based studies.
            </content>
            <author>
                <name>Copernicus Electronic Production Support Office</name>
            </author>
            <published>2026-04-07T23:09:33+02:00</published>
            <updated>2026-04-07T23:09:33+02:00</updated>
        </entry>
        <entry>
            <id>https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2026-29</id>
            <title type="html">Fusing Local and Regional Datasets to Develop a Composite Land Cover Product Across High Latitudes
            </title>
            <link href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2026-29"/>
            <summary type="html">
                &lt;b&gt;Fusing Local and Regional Datasets to Develop a Composite Land Cover Product Across High Latitudes&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
                Valeria Briones, Hélène Genet, Elchin Jafarov, Brendan Rogers, Jennifer Watts, Anna-Maria Virkkala, Annett Bartsch, Benjamin Maglio, Joshua Rady, and Susan Natali&lt;br&gt;
                    Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., doi:10.5194/essd-2026-29,2026&lt;br&gt;
                    &lt;b&gt;Preprint under review for ESSD&lt;/b&gt; (discussion: open, 0 comments)&lt;br&gt;
                Rapid warming is reshaping Arctic landscapes as frozen ground thaws, affecting ecosystems and climate. To better understand these changes, we created a map showing the distribution of land types such as forests, shrubs, and wetlands across the Arctic and northern regions. We combined several existing maps using computer-based pattern recognition to develop a harmonized circumpolar land cover dataset that maps ecosystems across the Arctic&amp;#8211;Boreal region at 1-km resolution for the period 2000&amp;#8211;2023.
            </summary>
            <content type="html">
                &lt;b&gt;Fusing Local and Regional Datasets to Develop a Composite Land Cover Product Across High Latitudes&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
                Valeria Briones, Hélène Genet, Elchin Jafarov, Brendan Rogers, Jennifer Watts, Anna-Maria Virkkala, Annett Bartsch, Benjamin Maglio, Joshua Rady, and Susan Natali&lt;br&gt;
                    Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2026-29,2026&lt;br&gt;
                    &lt;b&gt;Preprint under review for ESSD&lt;/b&gt; (discussion: open, 0 comments)&lt;br&gt;
                Rapid warming across the Arctic is the primary driver of widespread permafrost thaw, with far-reaching consequences for local ecosystem resilience, the regional carbon budget, and the global climate system. Because permafrost characteristics and vulnerability are tightly linked to land cover, particularly vegetation type and surface properties, understanding these dynamics requires accurate and detailed land cover information. Spatial variation in vegetation cover influences energy balance, snow insulation, and soil moisture, factors that directly affect permafrost stability. Consequently, high-resolution land cover products are essential for assessing the ecological impacts of permafrost thaw and for improving the representation of permafrost-related processes in predictive models. However, many global land cover datasets fail to capture the spatial heterogeneity and fine-scale ecological features that influence permafrost dynamics, while more detailed regional products often lack coverage across broader, continental extents. This gap presents a challenge for large-scale assessments of permafrost vulnerability under accelerating climate change.</p&gt; <p>To create a spatially cohesive land cover map that accurately represents the distribution of ecosystems across the Arctic-Boreal region, we integrated existing global and regional land cover datasets using a workflow including machine learning techniques. This approach seamlessly combines diverse data sources, enhancing representation and accuracy. The resulting map represents high-latitude land cover types at a 1 km spatial resolution, better capturing the spatial heterogeneity of the landscape compared to coarser resolution land surface products, with a total of 35 land cover classes, including 20 forest types (e.g., Larch, Birch, Mixed forests), 6 shrubland classes, and wetlands subdivided into bog, fen, and marsh. To achieve this, we used a global land cover map, the European Space Agency Climate Change Initiative Land Cover data (ESA CCI-LC), as the base map and integrated regional maps across the circumpolar region with finer-resolution land cover information to capture the diversity of land cover types. This approach ensured consistent classification across geopolitical boundaries, while incorporating representative vegetation communities at a region-specific level. Here we documented a workflow used to produce a harmonized circumpolar land cover dataset at 1 km&amp;#178; resolution, encompassing the time period 2000&amp;#8211;2023. The hybrid land cover is an open-source product <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17968808" target="_blank" rel="noopener">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17968808</a&gt; (Briones et al 2025).
            </content>
            <author>
                <name>Copernicus Electronic Production Support Office</name>
            </author>
            <published>2026-04-07T23:09:33+02:00</published>
            <updated>2026-04-07T23:09:33+02:00</updated>
        </entry>
        <entry>
            <id>https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-18-2469-2026</id>
            <title type="html">A first approach towards dual-hemisphere sea ice reference measurements from multiple data sources repurposed for evaluation and product intercomparison of satellite altimetry
            </title>
            <link href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-18-2469-2026"/>
            <summary type="html">
                &lt;b&gt;A first approach towards dual-hemisphere sea ice reference measurements from multiple data sources repurposed for evaluation and product intercomparison of satellite altimetry&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
                Ida Lundtorp Olsen, Henriette Skourup, Heidi Sallila, Stefan Hendricks, Renée Mie Fredensborg Hansen, Stefan Kern, Stephan Paul, Marion Bocquet, Sara Fleury, Dmitry Divine, and Eero Rinne&lt;br&gt;
                    Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 18, 2469&#8211;2505, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-18-2469-2026, 2026&lt;br&gt;
                Discover the latest advancements in sea ice research with our comprehensive Climate Change Initiative (CCI) sea ice thickness (SIT) Round Robin Data Package (RRDP). This pioneering collection contains reference measurements from 1960 to 2024 from airborne sensors, buoys, visual observations and sonar and covers the polar regions from 1993 to 2024, providing crucial reference measurements for validating satellite-derived sea ice thickness.
            </summary>
            <content type="html">
                &lt;b&gt;A first approach towards dual-hemisphere sea ice reference measurements from multiple data sources repurposed for evaluation and product intercomparison of satellite altimetry&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
                Ida Lundtorp Olsen, Henriette Skourup, Heidi Sallila, Stefan Hendricks, Renée Mie Fredensborg Hansen, Stefan Kern, Stephan Paul, Marion Bocquet, Sara Fleury, Dmitry Divine, and Eero Rinne&lt;br&gt;
                    Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 18, 2469&#8211;2505, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-18-2469-2026, 2026&lt;br&gt;
                <p>Sea ice altimetry currently remains the primary method for estimating sea ice thickness from space, however, time series of such satellite-derived estimates are of limited use without having been quality-controlled against reference measurements. Such reference measurements (a term encapsulating in situ observations and remotely sensed measurements from ground, air, and below the ice) for validation of altimetry measurements over sea ice in the polar regions are sparse and rarely presented in a manner where the time-space averaging matches that of the satellite-derived products. Here, an approach to a published comprehensive collection of sea ice reference measurements repurposed for satellite altimetry observations over sea ice is presented, which includes estimates of freeboard, thickness, draft and snow depth from sea ice-covered regions in the Northern Hemisphere (NH) and the Southern Hemisphere (SH), all of which are relevant for comparison with altimetry estimates. The measurements have been collected using airborne sensors, autonomous drifting buoys, moored and submarine-mounted upward-looking sonars, and visual observations. The data package has been prepared to match the spatial (25&amp;#8201;km for NH and 50&amp;#8201;km for SH) and temporal (monthly) resolutions of conventional satellite altimetry-derived sea ice thickness data products for a direct evaluation of these, and the code is publicly available and distributed for users to modify depending on their aim. This data package, also known as the Climate Change Initiative (CCI) sea ice thickness (SIT) Round Robin Data Package (RRDP), was produced within the ESA CCI Sea Ice project. The current version of the CCI SIT RRDP covers the polar satellite altimetry era (1993&amp;#8211;2024) and has ongoing efforts aimed at continuously updating the datasets. The CCI SIT RRDP has been collocated with satellite-derived sea ice thickness products from CryoSat-2, Envisat, and ERS-1/2 produced within the<span id="page2470"/&gt; ESA CCI and the Fundamental Data Records for Altimetry (FDR4ALT) projects to demonstrate the overlap and inter-comparison between the reference measurements and satellite-derived products. Here, the CCI SIT RRDP is introduced along with examples of its use as a validation source for satellite altimetry products, where the averaging, collocation and uncertainty methodology is presented, and advantages and limitations are discussed. The CCI SIT RRDP dataset is available at <a href="https://doi.org/10.11583/DTU.24787341">https://doi.org/10.11583/DTU.24787341</a&gt; <span class="cit" id="xref_paren.1">(<a href="#bib1.bibx72">Olsen and Skourup</a>,&amp;#160;<a href="#bib1.bibx72">2026</a><a href="#bib1.bibx72">a</a>)</span>.</p>
            </content>
            <author>
                <name>Copernicus Electronic Production Support Office</name>
            </author>
            <published>2026-04-02T23:09:33+02:00</published>
            <updated>2026-04-02T23:09:33+02:00</updated>
        </entry>
        <entry>
            <id>https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-18-2413-2026</id>
            <title type="html">NortheastChinaSoybeanYield20m: an annual soybean yield dataset at 20&#8201;m in Northeast China from 2019 to 2023
            </title>
            <link href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-18-2413-2026"/>
            <summary type="html">
                &lt;b&gt;NortheastChinaSoybeanYield20m: an annual soybean yield dataset at 20 m in Northeast China from 2019 to 2023&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
                Jingyuan Xu, Xin Du, Taifeng Dong, Qiangzi Li, Yuan Zhang, Hongyan Wang, Jing Xiao, Jiashu Zhang, Yunqi Shen, and Yong Dong&lt;br&gt;
                    Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 18, 2413&#8211;2441, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-18-2413-2026, 2026&lt;br&gt;
                This study proposed a 20 m soybean yield dataset in Northeast China (NortheastChinaSoybeanYield20m) from 2019 to 2023 using a hybrid framework coupling crop growth model with deep learning algorithm. Stable results were achieved through the years. The overall accuracy of the dataset was 287.44 and 272.36 kg ha<sup>&amp;#8211;1</sup>&amp;#160;in the root&amp;#160;mean squared error&amp;#160;for field and regional scale, respectively. The&amp;#160;study&amp;#160;satisfied&amp;#160;the urgent demands for&amp;#160;precise control of crop yield information.
            </summary>
            <content type="html">
                &lt;b&gt;NortheastChinaSoybeanYield20m: an annual soybean yield dataset at 20 m in Northeast China from 2019 to 2023&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
                Jingyuan Xu, Xin Du, Taifeng Dong, Qiangzi Li, Yuan Zhang, Hongyan Wang, Jing Xiao, Jiashu Zhang, Yunqi Shen, and Yong Dong&lt;br&gt;
                    Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 18, 2413&#8211;2441, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-18-2413-2026, 2026&lt;br&gt;
                <p>Accurate monitoring of crop yield is critical for ensuring food security. While various yield datasets covering Northeast China exist, they were produced at a coarse spatial resolution and remain inadequate for capturing small-scale spatial heterogeneity. Current yield estimation methods, such as machine learning models and the assimilation of remotely sensed biophysical variables into crop growth models, are heavily reliant on ground observations and are computationally expensive. To address these limitations, we propose a hybrid framework that couples the World Food Studies Simulation Model (WOFOST) and a Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) model to generate a high-resolution (20&amp;#8201;m) soybean yield dataset in Northeast China from 2019 to 2023 (NortheastChinaSoybeanYield20m). First, to generate a comprehensive training dataset, WOFOST was employed to simulate diverse soybean growth scenarios by accounting for variations in climate, crop varieties, soil types and agro-management practices. The GRU model was then trained to establish the relationships between model-simulated leaf area index (LAI) and soybean yield. The trained model was applied to estimate soybean yield in Northeast China using two stage-averaged LAI variables derived from Sentinel-2, which were validated as a feasible alternative to time-series LAI. The accuracy of estimates was evaluated using in situ measurements and government statistical data. The overall root mean squared error (RMSE) was 287.44 and 272.36&amp;#8201;<span class="inline-formula">kg&amp;#8201;ha<sup>&amp;#8722;1</sup></span&gt; at the field and regional scales, respectively. The model exhibited consistent interannual stability, with mean relative errors (MREs) averaging 11.46&amp;#8201;% and 7.94&amp;#8201;% at the municipal and provincial scales, respectively. The dataset effectively captured spatiotemporal yield variability, offering potential for optimizing soybean production, guiding precision agriculture practices, and informing agricultural policy. The NortheastChinaSoybeanYield20m dataset is publicly available at <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14263103">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14263103</a&gt; (Xu et al., 2024).</p>
            </content>
            <author>
                <name>Copernicus Electronic Production Support Office</name>
            </author>
            <published>2026-04-02T23:09:33+02:00</published>
            <updated>2026-04-02T23:09:33+02:00</updated>
        </entry>
        <entry>
            <id>https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-18-2179-2026</id>
            <title type="html">Australia's terrestrial industrial footprint and  ecological intactness
            </title>
            <link href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-18-2179-2026"/>
            <summary type="html">
                &lt;b&gt;Australia's terrestrial industrial footprint and  ecological intactness&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
                Ruben Venegas-Li, Scott Atkinson, Milton Aurelio Uba de Andrade Junior, Rachel Fletcher, Peter Owen, Lucia Morales-Barquero, Bora Aska, Miguel Arias-Patino, Hedley S. Grantham, Hugh Possingham, Oscar Venter, Michelle Ward, and James E. M. Watson&lt;br&gt;
                    Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 18, 2179&#8211;2201, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-18-2179-2026, 2026&lt;br&gt;
                We developed two datasets representing human industrial pressures and ecological intactness across Australia&amp;#180;s landscapes. These datasets fill a long-standing gap in national-scale pressure mapping, providing key insights into human disturbance of the environment. They can support conservation planning, environmental policy, and restoration efforts, aligning with Australia&amp;#8217;s Strategy for Nature and global biodiversity targets to protect intact ecosystems and promote sustainable development.
            </summary>
            <content type="html">
                &lt;b&gt;Australia's terrestrial industrial footprint and  ecological intactness&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
                Ruben Venegas-Li, Scott Atkinson, Milton Aurelio Uba de Andrade Junior, Rachel Fletcher, Peter Owen, Lucia Morales-Barquero, Bora Aska, Miguel Arias-Patino, Hedley S. Grantham, Hugh Possingham, Oscar Venter, Michelle Ward, and James E. M. Watson&lt;br&gt;
                    Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 18, 2179&#8211;2201, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-18-2179-2026, 2026&lt;br&gt;
                <p>Australia's unique biodiversity faces significant threats from anthropogenic activities that drive habitat destruction and degradation. This study presents the first comprehensive national-scale cumulative pressure map for terrestrial Australia since the 1980s, providing key insights into human disturbance of the landscape. We developed a Human Industrial Footprint (HIF) index map at a 100&amp;#8201;m spatial resolution, incorporating 16 nationally relevant pressure layers, which offers a contemporary assessment of cumulative pressures on Australia's landscapes. The HIF was used to derive an Ecological Intactness Index (EII), which accounts for habitat loss, quality, and fragmentation, to provide an estimate of an area's structural intactness. A technical validation comparing visually scored pressures in 1397 stratified random samples using high-resolution satellite images revealed a strong agreement with the mapped pressure values (the HIF). We also conducted an uncertainty (sensitivity) analysis by adjusting individual pressure scores by up to <span class="inline-formula">&amp;#177;50</span>&amp;#8201;% across 100&amp;#8201;000 simulations, which showed a moderate impact on cumulative pressure scores, confirming the robustness of our approach. We believe both the HIF and EII datasets can be valuable tools for guiding conservation efforts, such as informing protected area expansion, ecosystem restoration priorities, and biodiversity offset strategies. By offering a detailed assessment of cumulative pressures and ecological integrity, this study addresses a critical knowledge gap, and can support evidence-based decision-making for Australia's biodiversity conservation and sustainable development objectives. The HIF, EII, and scaled pressure layers are available at <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17606284">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17606284</a&gt; (Venegas-Li et al., 2025).</p>
            </content>
            <author>
                <name>Copernicus Electronic Production Support Office</name>
            </author>
            <published>2026-04-02T23:09:33+02:00</published>
            <updated>2026-04-02T23:09:33+02:00</updated>
        </entry>
        <entry>
            <id>https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-18-2443-2026</id>
            <title type="html">Reconstruction of <i>&#948;</i><sup>13</sup>C<sub>DIC</sub> in the Atlantic Ocean: a probabilistic machine learning approach for filling historical data gaps
            </title>
            <link href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-18-2443-2026"/>
            <summary type="html">
                &lt;b&gt;Reconstruction of δ13CDIC in the Atlantic Ocean: a probabilistic machine learning approach for filling historical data gaps&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
                Hui Gao, Zelun Wu, Zhentao Sun, Diana Cai, Meibing Jin, and Wei-Jun Cai&lt;br&gt;
                    Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 18, 2443&#8211;2467, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-18-2443-2026, 2026&lt;br&gt;
                Observations of stable carbon isotopes in dissolved inorganic carbon are sparse, limiting their potential in carbon cycle studies. We compiled 51 cruises and used a machine learning method trained on 37 cruises that passed secondary quality control to reconstruct isotope values in the Atlantic. The reconstruction expands usable samples from 8,941 to 68,435, reducing noise, filling gaps, preserving decadal trend, and strengthening studies of carbon variability and model validation.
            </summary>
            <content type="html">
                &lt;b&gt;Reconstruction of δ13CDIC in the Atlantic Ocean: a probabilistic machine learning approach for filling historical data gaps&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
                Hui Gao, Zelun Wu, Zhentao Sun, Diana Cai, Meibing Jin, and Wei-Jun Cai&lt;br&gt;
                    Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 18, 2443&#8211;2467, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-18-2443-2026, 2026&lt;br&gt;
                <p>Stable carbon isotope composition of marine dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC), <span class="inline-formula"><i>&amp;#948;</i><sup>13</sup></span>C<span class="inline-formula"><sub>DIC</sub></span>, is a valuable tracer for oceanic carbon cycling. However, its observational coverage remains much sparser than that of DIC and other physical or biogeochemical variables, limiting its full potential. Here, we reconstruct <span class="inline-formula"><i>&amp;#948;</i><sup>13</sup></span>C<span class="inline-formula"><sub>DIC</sub></span&gt; in the Atlantic Ocean using a probabilistic machine learning framework, Gaussian Process Regression (GPR). We compiled data from 51 historical cruises, including a high-resolution 2023 A16N transect, and applied secondary quality control via crossover analysis, retaining 37 cruises for model training, validation, and testing. The trained GPR model achieved an average bias of <span class="inline-formula">&amp;#8722;</span>0.007&amp;#8201;<span class="inline-formula">&amp;#177;</span>&amp;#8201;0.082&amp;#8201;&amp;#8240; and an overall uncertainty of 0.11&amp;#8201;&amp;#8240;, arising from measurement (0.07&amp;#8201;&amp;#8240;), mapping (0.08&amp;#8201;&amp;#8240;), and input-variable (0.009&amp;#8201;&amp;#8240;) errors. To address validation limitations related to sparse observations, we further supplemented this work with numerical model-based validation (Claret et al., 2021), confirming the GPR model's robustness in <span class="inline-formula"><i>&amp;#948;</i><sup>13</sup></span>C<span class="inline-formula"><sub>DIC</sub></span&gt; reconstruction. Using the GLODAPv2.2023 Atlantic dataset as predictors, the reconstruction expanded the number of acceptable <span class="inline-formula"><i>&amp;#948;</i><sup>13</sup></span>C<span class="inline-formula"><sub>DIC</sub></span&gt; samples by a factor of 7.65, from 8941 to 68&amp;#8201;435 across the Atlantic basins. The resulting dataset markedly improves the spatial resolution in longitude, latitude, and depth, and provides enhanced temporal continuity over the past four decades, offering great advantages in decadal trend assessment. Compared to the sparse original measurements, the reconstruction also reduces spatial discontinuities and reveals finer vertical structures consistent with other high-resolution biogeochemical observations. Additionally, the validated GPR framework was applied to the GLODAPv2 1&amp;#176;&amp;#8201;<span class="inline-formula">&amp;#215;</span>&amp;#8201;1&amp;#176; global interior ocean mapped climatology (Lauvset et al., 2016), producing a climatological gridded 3D <span class="inline-formula"><i>&amp;#948;</i><sup>13</sup></span>C<span class="inline-formula"><sub>DIC</sub></span&gt; dataset for the Atlantic Ocean. These reconstructed <span class="inline-formula"><i>&amp;#948;</i><sup>13</sup></span>C<span class="inline-formula"><sub>DIC</sub></span&gt; datasets provide new opportunities to resolve regional carbon cycle dynamics, validate Earth system models, refine estimates of oceanic carbon uptake on at least decadal timescales, and extend climate reanalysis records. The reconstructed <span class="inline-formula"><i>&amp;#948;</i><sup>13</sup></span>C<span class="inline-formula"><sub>DIC</sub></span&gt; data, quality-controlled observational data from 51 cruises, and gridded <span class="inline-formula"><i>&amp;#948;</i><sup>13</sup></span>C<span class="inline-formula"><sub>DIC</sub></span&gt; product are available at <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18481145">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18481145</a&gt; (Gao et al., 2025).</p>
            </content>
            <author>
                <name>Copernicus Electronic Production Support Office</name>
            </author>
            <published>2026-04-02T23:09:33+02:00</published>
            <updated>2026-04-02T23:09:33+02:00</updated>
        </entry>
        <entry>
            <id>https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2026-215</id>
            <title type="html">PlanktoShare: A large (50k+) and FAIR learning set for the Plankton Imager (Pi-10) for the Greater North Sea and NE Atlantic, based on a new flexible classification protocol
            </title>
            <link href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2026-215"/>
            <summary type="html">
                &lt;b&gt;PlanktoShare: A large (50k+) and FAIR learning set for the Plankton Imager (Pi-10) for the Greater North Sea and NE Atlantic, based on a new flexible classification protocol&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
                Lodewijk van Walraven, James Scott, Sophie Pitois, Joseph Ribeiro, Hayden Close, James Pettigrew, Cecilia M. Liszka, Elaine Fileman, Jeroen Hoekendijk, Pieter Hovenkamp, Robbert Jak, Joost van Dalen, and Dick van Oevelen&lt;br&gt;
                    Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., doi:10.5194/essd-2026-215,2026&lt;br&gt;
                    &lt;b&gt;Preprint under review for ESSD&lt;/b&gt; (discussion: open, 0 comments)&lt;br&gt;
                PlanktoShare offers a large collection of carefully labelled plankton images collected using the Pi-10 Plankton Imager in the North-East Atlantic. It was created to overcome inconsistent naming across datasets and to support reliable classification. By standardizing taxonomic details and storing extra traits separately, the database enables sharing and combining learning sets. This helps expand global monitoring efforts and strengthens future plankton imaging research.
            </summary>
            <content type="html">
                &lt;b&gt;PlanktoShare: A large (50k+) and FAIR learning set for the Plankton Imager (Pi-10) for the Greater North Sea and NE Atlantic, based on a new flexible classification protocol&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
                Lodewijk van Walraven, James Scott, Sophie Pitois, Joseph Ribeiro, Hayden Close, James Pettigrew, Cecilia M. Liszka, Elaine Fileman, Jeroen Hoekendijk, Pieter Hovenkamp, Robbert Jak, Joost van Dalen, and Dick van Oevelen&lt;br&gt;
                    Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2026-215,2026&lt;br&gt;
                    &lt;b&gt;Preprint under review for ESSD&lt;/b&gt; (discussion: open, 0 comments)&lt;br&gt;
                The use of imaging techniques for the study of particles and plankton is a rapidly advancing field in marine sciences. The data the tools produce require automated classification solutions that are trained on learning sets of manually labelled images. In this study we present PlanktoShare, a comprehensive (50k+ images) database with manually labelled images captured by the vessel-mounted Plankton Imager (Pi-10), in the 200 &amp;#8211; 2,000 &amp;#956;m size range and including phytoplankton, holoplankton, meroplankton and various gelatinous taxa. The Pi-10 images particles continuously in a flow-through mode and can operate alongside research operations and during transits making it a popular choice for plankton monitoring. PlanktoShare provides a robust resource for &amp;#160;training classifiers as an open resource. A key challenge in developing classifiers such as these is that commonly arises when merging learning sets from different sources, because images are often organized in a folder-like structure with incompatible or inconsistent nomenclature. To address this, we propose a database approach which separates the taxonomic information from descriptive attributes. Each image is assigned to one of the classes &amp;#8216;Organism&amp;#8217; (whole organism), &amp;#8216;Taxo_particle&amp;#8216; (particle with taxonomic information, such as exuvia) and &amp;#8216;Non_taxo_particle&amp;#8217; (particle without taxonomic information, such as marine snow aggregates). Taxonomic information is standardised using the aphiaID system from the WOrld Register of Marine Species while additional descriptive information (e.g. Life_stage) is stored as attributes. This database approach ensures full interoperability across learning sets from research groups allowing rapid expansion of geographical coverage and improved classification performance. Finally, we provide open-source code to apply pre-trained classifiers for users and outline future directions for collaborative plankton imaging.
            </content>
            <author>
                <name>Copernicus Electronic Production Support Office</name>
            </author>
            <published>2026-04-02T23:09:33+02:00</published>
            <updated>2026-04-02T23:09:33+02:00</updated>
        </entry>
        <entry>
            <id>https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2026-107</id>
            <title type="html">Bridging the Data Gap: An Enhanced Global Inventory for Statistical Characterization and Hazard Assessment of Landslide Dams
            </title>
            <link href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2026-107"/>
            <summary type="html">
                &lt;b&gt;Bridging the Data Gap: An Enhanced Global Inventory for Statistical Characterization and Hazard Assessment of Landslide Dams&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
                Xiangang Jiang, Guoqiang Xiao, Tao Wen, and Guang Yang&lt;br&gt;
                    Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., doi:10.5194/essd-2026-107,2026&lt;br&gt;
                    &lt;b&gt;Preprint under review for ESSD&lt;/b&gt; (discussion: open, 0 comments)&lt;br&gt;
                Landslide dams pose serious flood risks, yet data on them remains scarce. To address this, we compiled a global database of 902 dams spanning the years 1800 to 2020. Our analysis reveals that the maximum water flow is strictly controlled by the width and depth of the breach channel. We found that deeper breaches drive significantly more intense floods than wider ones. This work aids in predicting floods and planning disaster relief.
            </summary>
            <content type="html">
                &lt;b&gt;Bridging the Data Gap: An Enhanced Global Inventory for Statistical Characterization and Hazard Assessment of Landslide Dams&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
                Xiangang Jiang, Guoqiang Xiao, Tao Wen, and Guang Yang&lt;br&gt;
                    Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2026-107,2026&lt;br&gt;
                    &lt;b&gt;Preprint under review for ESSD&lt;/b&gt; (discussion: open, 0 comments)&lt;br&gt;
                Landslide dams and their subsequent outburst floods represent cascading geohazards with profound socio-economic and morphological impacts. However, the widespread absence of dynamic breaching parameters in existing global inventories severely constrains quantitative hydrodynamic modeling and downstream risk assessment. To bridge this critical data void, this study presents a comprehensive global landslide dam dataset encompassing 902 rigorously vetted events spanning before 2020. Moving beyond traditional static cataloging, the assembled dataset integrates 11 fundamental morphological and triggering parameters with 6 highly transient breaching metrics. Notably, it significantly improves the data availability of historically scarce variables, including peak discharge, released water volume, and three-dimensional breach geometries. Spatially, the database achieves global coverage, with the highest data densities clustered within the Alpine-Himalayan and Circum-Pacific active belts. To objectively account for observational limitations and chronological biases across different technological eras, a point-by-point Data Quality Flag (DQF) system is incorporated into the dataset, transparently classifying the spatial, geometric, and hydrodynamic uncertainties for every cataloged event. This multi-dimensional and structurally transparent inventory provides a robust empirical foundation for future machine-learning-based hazard susceptibility mapping and physically-based dam-breach simulations. The dataset is publicly available at Zenodo <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19198720" target="_blank" rel="noopener">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19198720</a&gt; (Jiang et al. 2026).
            </content>
            <author>
                <name>Copernicus Electronic Production Support Office</name>
            </author>
            <published>2026-04-02T23:09:33+02:00</published>
            <updated>2026-04-02T23:09:33+02:00</updated>
        </entry>
        <entry>
            <id>https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2026-114</id>
            <title type="html">Extending the late 1963 to 1964 Mt Agung rescued searchlight aerosol profiles dataset at 32&#186; N, from early 1963 to 1976
            </title>
            <link href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2026-114"/>
            <summary type="html">
                &lt;b&gt;Extending the late 1963 to 1964 Mt Agung rescued searchlight aerosol profiles dataset at 32º N, from early 1963 to 1976&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
                Juan Carlos Antuña-Marrero, Abel Calle, Juan Antonio Añel, Victoria E. Cachorro, Laura de la Torre, David Barriopedro, Ricardo García Herrera, and Javier Pacheco&lt;br&gt;
                    Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., doi:10.5194/essd-2026-114,2026&lt;br&gt;
                    &lt;b&gt;Preprint under review for ESSD&lt;/b&gt; (discussion: open, 1 comment)&lt;br&gt;
                New rescued searchlight stratospheric aerosol profiles (SSAEP) at 32&amp;#176; N extent the recovered SAP from late 1963 to 1964 to early 1963 to 1976. It covers 1963 Agung and 1974 Fuego volcanic eruptions and background conditions in between. Early 1963 perturbed SSAEP challenges currently assumed northern hemisphere arrival in second half of 1963. The extended dataset will contribute to advance our limited knowledge and understanding of the Agung stratospheric aerosol transport.
            </summary>
            <content type="html">
                &lt;b&gt;Extending the late 1963 to 1964 Mt Agung rescued searchlight aerosol profiles dataset at 32º N, from early 1963 to 1976&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
                Juan Carlos Antuña-Marrero, Abel Calle, Juan Antonio Añel, Victoria E. Cachorro, Laura de la Torre, David Barriopedro, Ricardo García Herrera, and Javier Pacheco&lt;br&gt;
                    Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2026-114,2026&lt;br&gt;
                    &lt;b&gt;Preprint under review for ESSD&lt;/b&gt; (discussion: open, 1 comment)&lt;br&gt;
                A set of 11 aerosol turbidity profiles (ATP) and 2 aerosol extinction profiles (AEP) at &amp;#955; = 0.55 &amp;#181;m, observed with searchlight in New Mexico at 32&amp;#176; N, has been digitized from plots in scientific articles. They cover the period February to June 1963 and September 1965 to May 1975, complementing the already rescued and previously published 105 individual AEP, corresponding to 36 days, between December 1963 and December 1964. Eleven AEP are calculated (AEP<sub>c</sub>) from the ATP, and the corresponding stratospheric aerosol optical depth (sAOD) between 12 and 25 km is also derived. Estimates of the digitization&amp;#8217;s errors for the AEP<sub>c</sub&gt; and the sAOD are also calculated using information available in the literature. The combined set of rescued AEP reported here and the earlier rescued set of AEP from searchlight observations, are the only AEP dataset covering the period between the 1963 Mt Agung and the 1974 Fuego eruptions at northern midlatitudes. In this regard two relevant features identified in the AEP and the sAOD are described here. The first, using AEP<sub>c</sub&gt; from March and April 1963 identified what could be the date of arrival of the stratospheric aerosols from the Mt. Agung first eruption on March 17<sup>th</sup&gt; 1963. This fact challenges the accepted criteria that the arrival of the stratospheric aerosols from Mt Agung arrived at the northern hemisphere midlatitudes in the second half of 1963. The second feature evidences two anomalous increases of the sAOD during a period supposed to be the decay of the sAOD from Mt. Agung eruption. They show our limited knowledge and understanding of the 1963 Mt Agung volcanic stratospheric aerosol transport. Finally, we describe evidences found in the literature pointing to the possible existence of the original searchlight raw signals and its processing software. The dataset described in this work is available at: <a href="https://issues.pangaea.de/browse/PDI-43217" target="_blank" rel="noopener">https://issues.pangaea.de/browse/PDI-43217</a>, (Antu&amp;#241;a-Marrero et al., 2026).
            </content>
            <author>
                <name>Copernicus Electronic Production Support Office</name>
            </author>
            <published>2026-04-02T23:09:33+02:00</published>
            <updated>2026-04-02T23:09:33+02:00</updated>
        </entry>
        <entry>
            <id>https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-18-2397-2026</id>
            <title type="html">A manually labeled contrail dataset from MSG/SEVIRI
            </title>
            <link href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-18-2397-2026"/>
            <summary type="html">
                &lt;b&gt;A manually labeled contrail dataset from MSG/SEVIRI&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
                Vanessa Santos Gabriel, Luca Bugliaro, Mara Montag, Sabrina Ries, Ziming Wang, Kai Widmaier, Matteo Arico, Simon Unterstrasser, Johanna Mayer, Deniz Menekay, Andreas Marsing, Elena de la Torre Castro, Liam Megill, Monika Scheibe, and Christiane Voigt&lt;br&gt;
                    Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 18, 2397&#8211;2412, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-18-2397-2026, 2026&lt;br&gt;
                We provide observations of the geostationary Meteosat satellite with contrails labeled by three people complemented with detailed cloud information. Contrails influence climate but are hard to identify in satellite imagery. With this study, we support contrail detection development and evaluation, stress the subjectivity of human labeling and reveal which meteorological conditions highlight or hide contrails. This dataset contributes to a better understanding of aviation&amp;#8217;s climate impact.
            </summary>
            <content type="html">
                &lt;b&gt;A manually labeled contrail dataset from MSG/SEVIRI&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
                Vanessa Santos Gabriel, Luca Bugliaro, Mara Montag, Sabrina Ries, Ziming Wang, Kai Widmaier, Matteo Arico, Simon Unterstrasser, Johanna Mayer, Deniz Menekay, Andreas Marsing, Elena de la Torre Castro, Liam Megill, Monika Scheibe, and Christiane Voigt&lt;br&gt;
                    Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 18, 2397&#8211;2412, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-18-2397-2026, 2026&lt;br&gt;
                <p>Contrails &amp;#8211; thin ice clouds formed by aircraft &amp;#8211; are a major contributor to aviation-induced climate forcing, yet their observational characterization remains limited. We present a manually labeled contrail dataset derived from observations of the Meteosat Second Generation (MSG) SEVIRI instrument over Europe and the North Atlantic, comprising 140 scenes of 256&amp;#8201;<span class="inline-formula">&amp;#215;</span>&amp;#8201;256 pixels at 3&amp;#8201;km nominal resolution. The dataset covers the time period in which Meteosat-10 was the operational satellite (from January 2013 through February 2018 and from March 2023 through March 2024) and scenes are distributed randomly over the whole SEVIRI disk. Each scene was independently annotated by three labelers, with ground truth established via majority consensus. To provide additional context, the dataset includes outputs from two satellite retrievals: CiPS (Cirrus Properties from SEVIRI) and ProPS (Probabilistic Cloud Top Phase retrieval), offering information on cloud cover and cloud top phase, cirrus probability, ice optical thickness, and ice cloud top height. These complementary variables enable detailed investigations, such as factors influencing contrail visibility. The dataset supports analyses of contrail detection, contrail characteristics, cloud-contrail interactions, and environmental conditions affecting detection. By providing high-quality labeled data with auxiliary cloud information, this resource facilitates the development and evaluation of contrail studies, contributes to improved understanding of aviation-related cloud effects, and informs strategies for climate impact mitigation. The full dataset is available under: <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17669443">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17669443</a&gt; <span class="cit" id="xref_paren.1">(<a href="#bib1.bibx28">Santos&amp;#160;Gabriel et&amp;#160;al.</a>,&amp;#160;<a href="#bib1.bibx28">2025</a>)</span&gt; with version v2 presented in this study.</p>
            </content>
            <author>
                <name>Copernicus Electronic Production Support Office</name>
            </author>
            <published>2026-04-01T23:09:33+02:00</published>
            <updated>2026-04-01T23:09:33+02:00</updated>
        </entry>
        <entry>
            <id>https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2026-103</id>
            <title type="html">Daily Human Thermal Index Dataset for India (HiTIC-India) at 1-km Spatial Resolution (2003&#8211;2020)
            </title>
            <link href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2026-103"/>
            <summary type="html">
                &lt;b&gt;Daily Human Thermal Index Dataset for India (HiTIC-India) at 1-km Spatial Resolution (2003–2020)&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
                Subhransu Sekhar Gouda, Saket Dubey, Vrinda Kankanala, Jasinta Gera, and Sukeerthi Bharatha&lt;br&gt;
                    Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., doi:10.5194/essd-2026-103,2026&lt;br&gt;
                    &lt;b&gt;Preprint under review for ESSD&lt;/b&gt; (discussion: open, 0 comments)&lt;br&gt;
                Extreme heat and cold affect health, work, and daily life across India, yet existing information on how people experience these conditions is often too coarse to reflect local variations. We created daily maps of 12 human thermal stress datasets for India from 2003 to 2020 using meteorological data and satellite information at 1 km resolution. The dataset reveals local patterns of heat and cold exposure and supports public health planning, urban design, and climate adaptation.
            </summary>
            <content type="html">
                &lt;b&gt;Daily Human Thermal Index Dataset for India (HiTIC-India) at 1-km Spatial Resolution (2003–2020)&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
                Subhransu Sekhar Gouda, Saket Dubey, Vrinda Kankanala, Jasinta Gera, and Sukeerthi Bharatha&lt;br&gt;
                    Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2026-103,2026&lt;br&gt;
                    &lt;b&gt;Preprint under review for ESSD&lt;/b&gt; (discussion: open, 0 comments)&lt;br&gt;
                Human exposure to extreme heat and cold poses increasing risks to public health, labour productivity, and urban sustainability, particularly in densely populated and climate-sensitive regions such as India. Human-perceived temperature (HPT) indices provide a more realistic measure of thermal stress than air temperature alone by integrating multiple meteorological factors. Here, we present the Human Thermal Index Collection for India (HiTIC-India), a high-resolution daily gridded dataset comprising twelve widely used HPT indices at 1 km spatial resolution for 2003&amp;#8211;2020. The indices are initially derived from ERA5-based meteorological data and then downscaled using a Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) framework. This downscaling incorporates satellite-derived land surface temperature, precipitable water vapour, population density, and topographic variables (slope, elevation and aspect) to generate spatially continuous predictions at 1 km resolution. Model valuation shows high prediction accuracy across all indices, with a mean root-mean-square error (RMSE) of 3.12 &amp;#176;C, a coefficient of determination (R&amp;#178;) of 0.89, and a mean absolute error (MAE) of 2.39 &amp;#176;C. The resulting dataset significantly captures local-scale variability in heat and cold stress across India&amp;#8217;s diverse climatic and physiographic zones. HiTIC-India also supports numerous applications, including public health risk evaluation, urban heat exposure analysis, labour productivity assessment, and climate adaptation and mitigation planning. By providing consistent daily HPT datasets, HiTIC-India provides a comprehensive, high-resolution, and publicly accessible resource for climate&amp;#8211;health research and evidence-based decision-making under warming climate.
            </content>
            <author>
                <name>Copernicus Electronic Production Support Office</name>
            </author>
            <published>2026-04-01T23:09:33+02:00</published>
            <updated>2026-04-01T23:09:33+02:00</updated>
        </entry>
        <entry>
            <id>https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2026-179</id>
            <title type="html">Grounded Icebergs around Antarctica: A High-Resolution Dataset Derived from Deep Learning and Sentinel-1 Synthetic Aperture Radar
            </title>
            <link href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2026-179"/>
            <summary type="html">
                &lt;b&gt;Grounded Icebergs around Antarctica: A High-Resolution Dataset Derived from Deep Learning and Sentinel-1 Synthetic Aperture Radar&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
                Kaihong Jiao, Alexander D. Fraser, Johannes Lohse, Pat Wongpan, Caitlin Adams, and Alexander C. Bradley&lt;br&gt;
                    Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., doi:10.5194/essd-2026-179,2026&lt;br&gt;
                    &lt;b&gt;Preprint under review for ESSD&lt;/b&gt; (discussion: open, 0 comments)&lt;br&gt;
                Grounded icebergs anchor Antarctic sea ice and support marine ecosystems, yet their continent-wide distribution was previously unknown. Using satellite radar imagery and an automated artificial intelligence tool, we mapped nearly 39,000 stationary icebergs. We discovered that tiny, frequently overlooked icebergs actually dominate both the total number and area. This public dataset offers a crucial new baseline for modelling coastal ice stability and understanding broader environmental changes.
            </summary>
            <content type="html">
                &lt;b&gt;Grounded Icebergs around Antarctica: A High-Resolution Dataset Derived from Deep Learning and Sentinel-1 Synthetic Aperture Radar&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
                Kaihong Jiao, Alexander D. Fraser, Johannes Lohse, Pat Wongpan, Caitlin Adams, and Alexander C. Bradley&lt;br&gt;
                    Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2026-179,2026&lt;br&gt;
                    &lt;b&gt;Preprint under review for ESSD&lt;/b&gt; (discussion: open, 0 comments)&lt;br&gt;
                Icebergs frequently run aground on shoals on the continental shelf around Antarctica. Once rendered immobile, they can anchor landfast sea ice (fast ice) and their supply of limiting trace nutrients contribute to driving coastal marine productivity. They are also associated with seabed scouring, with implications for benthic marine ecosystems. Despite their importance, there is currently a lack of accurate, continent-wide automated mapping of grounded iceberg distribution and size and as a consequence, no large-scale, complete map of grounded icebergs exists. To address these gaps, this study implements an automated grounded iceberg detection framework based on Sentinel-1 Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) imagery, integrating a proposed ResUNet deep-learning network with a multi-temporal identification algorithm, incorporating strict physical constraints derived from bathymetry and sea ice concentration to mitigate environmental false positives. The method demonstrates strong robustness against interference from complex coastal conditions, achieving a detection F1 score exceeding 0.91 and successfully reducing the minimum detectable iceberg size to 0.016 <em>km</em>&amp;#178;. Since the presence of fast ice makes distinction between "truly grounded icebergs" and "those held motionless by fast ice", we capitalise on the unprecedented low fast ice extent in early 2025 (late February to early April) to construct the first high-resolution, continent-wide dataset of grounded icebergs around Antarctica. A total of 38,905 stationary icebergs were identified on the Antarctic continental shelf. We partition these stationary targets into "high-confidence grounded icebergs" and fast ice entrapped candidates. Analysis shows that 70.5 % of these targets are identified as high-confidence grounded. Across the entire dataset, tiny icebergs (&lt; 1 <em>km</em>&amp;#178;) dominate numerically, accounting for 92.2 % of the total. These high-density grounded iceberg clusters are primarily concentrated on shallow continental shelves and west of (i.e., downstream of) the actively disintegrating fronts of ice shelves, forming complex and discontinuous "grounded iceberg chains". Our dataset reveals that these grounded icebergs cover a combined area of 13,719 <em>km</em>&amp;#178; and are widely distributed along 56.7 % of the Antarctic coastline, with just 14.2 % of the coastline containing 80 % of all grounded icebergs. Crucially, while typically overlooked, tiny icebergs (&lt; 1 <em>km</em>&amp;#178;) contribute 52.6 % of this total grounded area. These dense clusters imply a potential "picket fence effect", providing a quantitative baseline for modelling fast ice stability, assessing nutrient fluxes, and mapping benthic habitats. The grounded iceberg dataset (Jiao et al., 2026) is available at <a href="https://doi.org/10.25959/54sx-pt47" target="_blank" rel="noopener">https://doi.org/10.25959/54sx-pt47</a>.
            </content>
            <author>
                <name>Copernicus Electronic Production Support Office</name>
            </author>
            <published>2026-04-01T23:09:33+02:00</published>
            <updated>2026-04-01T23:09:33+02:00</updated>
        </entry>
</feed>