the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
A new High-Resolution daily Mean South China Sea Ocean Reanalysis dataset: SCSORA
Abstract. High-resolution three-dimensional (3D) ocean reanalysis data are essential for investigating multiscale ocean dynamics in the regional ocean and their impacts on energy transport, marine ecosystems, and climate change. The South China Sea (SCS), as one of the most eddy-active marginal seas in the global ocean, is characterized by complex 3D dynamical processes and frequent extreme ocean events, imposing urgent data demands on the scientific community. This paper presents a new South China Sea Ocean Reanalysis (SCSORA) dataset, with high resolution (1/30°) covering the period 2001–2024, which is generated by the second version of the South China Sea Operational Oceanography Forecast System (SCSOFSv2). SCSORA provides daily 3D fields of temperature, salinity, and current velocity, together with sea surface height (SSH).Three categories of observational data are assimilated into SCSOFSv2, including satellite-derived optimum interpolation sea surface temperature (OISST), along-track sea level anomaly (SLA) from AVISO, and in-situ temperature–salinity Argo profiles. Systematic validations against multisource satellite retrievals, in-situ observations, and existing reanalysis products demonstrates that SCSORA achieves satisfactory accuracy and reliability in reproducing sea surface temperature (RMSE: 0.34 °C), SLA (RMSE: 5.9 cm), and subsurface thermohaline structure. Kinetic energy spectral analysis reveals that SCSORA is capable of resolving ocean dynamical processes spanning from mesoscale to part of the submesoscale range. Representative applications demonstrate the potential of SCSORA in characterizing the spatiotemporal features of marine heatwaves (MHWs) in the SCS and in examining the 3D structural modulation of MHWs by mesoscale eddies, revealing distinct modulation mechanisms of different eddy polarities on the vertical structure of MHWs. SCSORA provides a critical 3D data foundation for the physical oceanography and extreme event research communities focusing on the SCS. It is publicly available at https://doi.org/10.12378/geodb.2026.2.005.V1 (Zhu et al., 2026).
- Preprint
(3682 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 04 Oct 2026)
-
CC1: 'Comment on essd-2026-440', Ranran Zhang, 14 Aug 2026
reply
-
CC2: 'Reply on CC1', Xueming Zhu, 19 Aug 2026
reply
Dear Dr. Zhang,
Thanks for your interesting to our SCSORA dataset. I sincerely apologize that the data URL can not be accessed a few days ago. It is because that the website had been checked for some regular security issues. Right now, it can be accessed.
Please do not hesitate to let us know if you have any question about the dataset.
Regards,
Xueming Zhu
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2026-440-CC2
-
CC2: 'Reply on CC1', Xueming Zhu, 19 Aug 2026
reply
-
RC1: 'Comment on essd-2026-440', Anonymous Referee #1, 26 Aug 2026
reply
A high-resolution ocean reanalysis dataset in the South China Sea named SCSORA was created, covering the period from 2001 to 2024. The horizontal resolution is 1/30 degree, which permits submesoscale circulations. Comparisons with the observation dataset, which are not used to assimilate SCSORA, show how well this high-resolution reanalysis dataset represents the small-scale oceanic state. The dataset appears to be very valuable for investigating spatiotemporal variations of oceanic circulations ranging from submesoscale to large scale in the South Cina Sea. I recommend several minor modifications before publication.
Minor comments
L100-102: What global reanalysis data is used for open boundary conditions?
L125-126: The number of Argo floats should be small in the SCS in the early 2000s. Also, the number of Argo floats should be limited in the southern SCS because the depth is shallow in the region. Please comment more about how the assimilation using Argo data works in the SCS.
L155: Please check the URL for the SLA product.
Sec. 3.1: Could you plot or check the SST anomaly of OISST (Fig. 2top)? Do the time series mostly overlap SCSORA due to the assimilation? There are annual variations in the SST RMSE: large in winter and small in summer. Is this why spatial variations are larger in winter than summer?
Sec. 3.2. If possible, please comment on why the SLA RMSE is relatively large in 2017-2022 (Fig. 3bottom).
Fig. 6: Near the coast and southern SCS south to the equator, the MLD in GLORYS is not estimated. Did you use the strictly same method to estimate the MLD in both dataset?
Sec. 4.2: Could you plot or check the time series of the MHW using OISST in Fig. 10 and Fig. 11? Do these time series overlap with those using SCSORA? How the assimilated data constrains the SST in SCSORA should be checked.
Sec. 4.3: Why is the number of eddies extremely large in 2022, 2023, and 2024 in SCSORA, which is not observed in AVISO (Fig 12 top panels)? Do the small-scale (submesoscale) eddies increase, which cannot be detected in AVISO?
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2026-440-RC1
Data sets
South China Sea Ocean Reanalysis (SCSORA) dataset Xueming Zhu https://doi.org/10.12378/geodb.2026.2.005.V1
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 167 | 35 | 9 | 211 | 10 | 13 |
- HTML: 167
- PDF: 35
- XML: 9
- Total: 211
- BibTeX: 10
- EndNote: 13
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
This appears to be a very valuable dataset. However, the provided download links are non-standard. The institutional data URL cannot be accessed, which hinders data acquisition. It is suggested to release the dataset via commonly used international data repositories.