the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
A 3-hour, 1-km surface soil moisture dataset for the contiguous United States from 2015 to 2023
Abstract. Surface soil moisture (SSM) is a critical variable for understanding the terrestrial hydrologic cycle, and it influences ecosystem dynamics, agriculture productivity, and water resource management. Although SSM information is widely estimated through satellite-derived and model-assimilated methods, datasets with fine spatio-temporal resolutions remain unavailable at the continental scale, yet are essential for improving weather forecasting, optimizing precision irrigation, and enhancing fire risk assessment. In this study, we developed a new 3-hour, 1-km spatially seamless SSM dataset spanning 2015 to 2023, covering the entire contiguous United States (CONUS), using a spatio-temporal fusion model. This approach effectively combines the distinct advantages of two long-term SSM datasets, namely, the Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) L4 SSM product and the Crop Condition and Soil Moisture Analytics (Crop-CASMA) dataset. The SMAP product provides spatially seamless SSM observations with a 3-hour temporal resolution but at a 9-km spatial resolution, while the Crop-CASMA SSM dataset offers a finer spatial resolution of 1 km but has a daily temporal resolution and contains spatial gaps. To overcome the spatio-temporal mismatch between the two products, we developed a time-series data mining approach known as the highly comparative time-series analysis (HCTSA) method to extract multiple spatially seamless characteristics (e.g., maximum and mean) from the two inter-annual SSM datasets (i.e., SMAP and Crop-CASMA). Then the fusion model was constructed using the extracted 9-km and 1-km characteristics and each scene of the SMAP, in turn. Finally, the 3-hour, 1-km SSM data (named as STF_SSM) were predicted from 2015 to 2023. The comparison with in-situ data from multiple SSM observation networks showed that the performance of our STF_SSM dataset is better than the Crop-CASMA and is close to the SMAP L4 product, with mean correlation coefficients (CC) of 0.716 at the daily scale and 0.689 at the 3-hour scale. The STF_SSM dataset in this study is the first long time-series, spatially seamless SSM dataset to realize continuous intra-day 1-km SSM observations every 3 hours across the CONUS, which provides a new insight into the fast changes in soil moisture along with drought and wet spell occurrences, and ecosystem responses. Additionally, this dataset provides a valuable data source for the calibration and validation of land surface models. The STF_SSM dataset is available at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.28188011 (Yang et al., 2025).
Competing interests: At least one of the (co-)authors is a member of the editorial board of Earth System Science Data.
Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.- Preprint
(2355 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 26 Apr 2025)
-
RC1: 'Comment on essd-2025-55', Anonymous Referee #1, 25 Feb 2025
reply
The manuscript presents a soil moisture dataset for the contiguous United States with fine temporal and spatial resolution. The authors disaggregate the fine soil moisture data from a daily level to a 3-hour level. I also note that the spatial coverage of soil moisture data is complete. It seems to make the dataset more useful.
I have a concern. In section 4.1, the authors used the drought in four states as a case study to display the decline in soil moisture. However, since drought is always a slow process, it seems the data have potential to characterize changes in drought using the daily soil moisture data. I suggest that the authors supply fast-forming disasters as a case study further to amplify the importance of hourly soil moisture data.
There are also some minor suggestions as follows:
1). The units of RMSE, Bias, and ubRMSE in Tables 2-5 should be provided.
2). Section 2.2: The VIPSTF model includes two different versions. Which version was used in the manuscript? Please explain it.
3). Line 265: What is the size of the soil moisture dataset? What is the data format? I suggest the authors to provide more detailed information about the STF_SSM dataset.
4). Figure 3: Is the scene in the first column an average of all the intraday scenes? Please clarify the specific time for each scene.
5). Line 475: The potential for hourly soil moisture data applications needs to be further emphasized. That is the main driver of fine soil moisture dataset development.
6). The references listed also provide 1-km soil moisture data or downscaling methods, which may be helpful to your work. In addition, what the difference is between the proposed and listed methods.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2023.103572
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2022.113334
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2024.114579
Â
Â
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-55-RC1 -
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Haoxuan Yang, 23 Mar 2025
reply
Please see the attached file.
-
RC3: 'Reply on AC1', Anonymous Referee #1, 24 Mar 2025
reply
The authors have well addressed the concerns. I have no more comments.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-55-RC3
-
RC3: 'Reply on AC1', Anonymous Referee #1, 24 Mar 2025
reply
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Haoxuan Yang, 23 Mar 2025
reply
-
RC2: 'Comment on essd-2025-55', Anonymous Referee #2, 08 Mar 2025
reply
This manuscript produces a 3-hour, 1-km soil moisture (SM) dataset generated using a spatiotemporal fusion approach that integrates the 3-hour, 9-km SMAP L4 soil moisture product with the 1-day, 1-km Crop-CASMA soil moisture data. The resulting dataset is evaluated against in-situ SM observations. Overall, the manuscript is well-structured, and the generated SM dataset holds significant potential for the scientific community. However, several aspects require clarification and further discussion:
- Validation Approach: The methodology leverages the higher-accuracy SMAP L4 product to capture temporal variations while using the lower-accuracy but higher-resolution Crop-CASMA data to retain spatial details. Consequently, the accuracy of the fused product should theoretically be higher than that of Crop-CASMA but lower than SMAP L4.Â
- Comparative Analysis: The authors compare their product only with SMAP L4 and Crop-CASMA but do not benchmark it against other 1-km resolution datasets or even higher-resolution (30-m) products (DOI: 10.1038/s41597-021-01050-2). Including such comparisons, or at least discussing them, would provide a more comprehensive evaluation of the dataset's performance.
- Temporal Variability Discussion: It is recommended that the authors expand their discussion on the temporal variations of the generated SM dataset within a single day, in addition to the analysis presented in Figures 6 and 7. This would help highlight the advantages of the product in capturing sudden SM changes compared to daily-scale products.
- Figure 3: The date and time of the SM data should be explicitly stated in the figure title for clarity.
- Figure 8 / Table 4: It is recommended that the authors provide the number of validation sites corresponding to each land cover type, either in Figure 8 or Table 4, to enhance transparency in the validation process.
- Figure 9: If feasible, the authors are encouraged to analyze and present the relationship between RMSE, slope, and altitude, as this could provide additional insights into the dataset’s accuracy under varying topographic conditions.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-55-RC2 -
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Haoxuan Yang, 23 Mar 2025
reply
Please see the attached file.
Data sets
A 3-hour, 1-km surface soil moisture dataset in Continental United States Haoxuan Yang, Jia Yang, and Tyson E. Ochsner https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.28188011
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
227 | 43 | 7 | 277 | 5 | 6 |
- HTML: 227
- PDF: 43
- XML: 7
- Total: 277
- BibTeX: 5
- EndNote: 6
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1