the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Peat-DBase v.1: A Compiled Database of Global Peat Depth Measurements
Abstract. Peatlands are globally important carbon stores that face increasing threats from human activities and climate change impacts. Comprehensive peatland data are essential for understanding ecosystem responses to these stressors and mapping their past and current characteristics. Current peatland datasets remain limited due to poor representation in global soil mapping initiatives and the absence of a recognized, coordinated central repository for peat depth data. Existing compilations often contain errors, duplicates, and outdated observations, requiring researchers to repeatedly gather and harmonize data on a study-by-study basis. To address these challenges, we present Peat-DBase version 1.0—a harmonized, quality-controlled global compilation of basal peat depth measurements.
Version 1.0 of Peat-DBase comprises 204,902 peat depth measurements from 29 sources spanning 54.933° S to 82.217° N, with a significant proportion of measurements in Atlantic Canada and Scotland due to the inclusion of two particularly large datasets focused on those regions. We supplement the peat study measurements with 94,615 non-peat soil measurements to ensure comprehensive coverage consistent with the relatively low spatial coverage of peatlands globally. Despite the uneven distribution of peat depth measurements, Peat-DBase contains reasonable coverage of the major global peatland complexes in temperate and boreal North America and Europe, portions of Russia, the Amazon and Congo basins, and the Malay Archipelago, though gaps remain in the lower Amazon Basin, Eastern Indonesia, and Eastern Russia. From the current data, peat depths average 144 cm, although this is influenced by a predominance of measurements in the North Atlantic regions. Peat-DBase's deepest measurement is 3,527 cm.
While sampling biases and measurement uncertainties exist, Peat-DBase provides an essential foundation for global peatland research. Peat-DBase is under active development and future versions will incorporate additional datasets, information on current peatland status, and improved positional uncertainty quantification. Peat-DBase eliminates the need for overlapping data compilation efforts while identifying critical observational gaps for future research. Peat-DBase is available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15530645.
- Preprint
(10271 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 11 Nov 2025)
- CC1: 'Comment on essd-2025-432', Julie Loisel, 13 Oct 2025 reply
Data sets
Peat-DBase: A Compiled Database of Global Peat Depth Measurements J. Skye et al. https://zenodo.org/records/15530645
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1,348 | 94 | 19 | 1,461 | 21 | 19 |
- HTML: 1,348
- PDF: 94
- XML: 19
- Total: 1,461
- BibTeX: 21
- EndNote: 19
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
We are a group of graduate students who have read your study with interest. For context, we discuss 1-3 scientific papers that relate to peatland dynamics weekly.
The study reads very well and is adequately referenced. We understood the context, objectives, and the flow of information was always relevant to addressing the study’s goals.
One issue that was raised regards the definition of ‘peat’. Depending on the threshold used, the peatland extent could be more than 3%. Also, we appreciate that all peat depth data are included, making the ‘peat / no-peat cutoff’ at the discretion of the user, but it could be good to explicitly state this fact in the document. In other words, maybe add a sentence to the effect that all peat depths have been included.
Based on Figure 2, it looks like the vast majority of the shallowest peats (less than 30 cm; in red on panel A) are in the Congo Basin. Are we sure that these individual points referred to ‘peat depths’ in the original paper (Crezee et al. 2022), or did the original authors include lots of points aimed at showing areas without peat? (we believe the latter is correct). We also noticed a few of those red points in the Colombian lowlands. Lastly, the reds vs. greens may not be colorblind friendly.
Data availability: we like the ease of downloading a single CSV file that contains the database and the opportunity to share new data points via the Google form.
Discussion: we appreciate the focus on peat depth alone, without trying to correlate with other predictive factors. We anticipate that future work will be based on such types of analysis, given the inclusion of the (non-peat) WoSIS data.