the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
MATCHA, a novel regional hydroclimate-chemical reanalysis: System description and evaluation
Abstract. We present MATCHA (Model for Atmospheric Transport and Chemistry in Asia), a 17-year (2003–2019) regional hydroclimate-chemical reanalysis for Asia (58° – 140° E, 4° – 40° N) at 12 km resolution that is based on the Weather Research and Forecasting model coupled with Chemistry (WRF-Chem), Community Land Model (CLM), and SNow, ICe and Aerosol Radiative (SNICAR) model as well as satellite data assimilation to explicitly represent interactions between key atmospheric composition and regional hydroclimate (including aerosol-snowpack interactions) across High Mountain Asia (HMA). Approximately two decades of satellite observations of aerosol optical depth (AOD) from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) and carbon monoxide (CO) profiles from the Measurement of Pollution in the Troposphere (MOPITT) were assimilated every three hours into WRF-Chem to further constrain the representation of aerosols and chemistry. MATCHA provides comprehensive outputs across different light-absorbing aerosol species, e.g., black carbon (BC), dust, and brown carbon (BrC), trace gases, and a range of meteorological, hydrological, and land-surface variables over the region. This paper describes the MATCHA coupled modeling and data assimilation framework and evaluates 12 key variables across aerosols (fine particulate matter (PM2.5/PM10), AOD, single scattering albedo (SSA), and surface BC concentration), trace gases (surface CO), meteorology (precipitation, planetary boundary layer height (PBLH), temperature, relative humidity, and wind speed), and hydrology (snow cover fraction) against available in-situ and satellite observations across Asia. Meteorological fields (surface and vertical profiles) are consistently well-reproduced with Kling-Gupta efficiencies (KGEs) ranging from 0.65 to 1. Notable issues include persistent cold and dry bias over high-elevation regions in winter, with stronger-than-observed surface winds. Snow cover fraction seasonality is well captured with slight underestimation during snowmelt seasons across major glacier regions. Daily accumulated precipitation estimates agree with satellite observations, particularly with the best KGE (0.6) during the monsoon season, albeit underestimated over high-elevation regions. The diurnal and seasonal evolution of PBLH is well-represented, with biases reflecting shallower heights in the morning and deeper heights in the afternoon in summer, likely due to model parameterizations and resolution limitations. MATCHA also captures the spatial and seasonal variability of AOD and SSA at 550 nm, yet overestimates summer AOD over India and southeast Asia with a strong negative bias in SSA. Biases in PM2.5/PM10 are also higher, which appears to be particularly related to high biases in wind speeds, causing overestimation of natural emissions of aerosols and overestimation of anthropogenic emissions. Comparisons with site-specific aerosol chemical composition derived from air samples at Kanpur confirm the positive bias in sea salt concentrations and lower carbonaceous aerosols during high pollution events. MATCHA captures the seasonal cycle of surface CO, but underestimates the observations, which can be attributed to the assimilation of CO profiles from MOPITT. A unique feature of MATCHA is its tagged-tracers of BC for sectoral and regional source attribution analysis. These tracers show anthropogenic BC peaking in winter, primarily from Chinese sources in the eastern and northern part of HMA, and Indian sources in western and central HMA. Biomass burning BC dominates during March–April along with substantial trans-boundary inflow throughout the year. BC emissions from Pakistan and Nepal also contribute significantly to the anthropogenic column burden of BC in parts of HMA. MATCHA is the first-of-its-kind high-resolution reanalysis to fully couple aerosols, radiation, and snow processes over HMA, offering a valuable dataset for investigating aerosol–cryosphere feedbacks and informing emission mitigation strategies in Asia. The dataset consists of hourly surface and column-integrated products and 3-hourly three-dimensional fields, and is publicly available at DOI: 10.5067/CG4OT8DJX2Z7.
- Preprint
(21648 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on essd-2025-275', Narendra Ojha, 19 Mar 2026
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Chayan Roychoudhury, 06 Jul 2026
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://essd.copernicus.org/preprints/essd-2025-275/essd-2025-275-AC1-supplement.pdf
- AC3: 'Reply on AC1', Chayan Roychoudhury, 10 Jul 2026
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Chayan Roychoudhury, 06 Jul 2026
-
RC2: 'Comment on essd-2025-275', Anonymous Referee #2, 01 May 2026
General Comments
The manuscript presents a 17-year regional hydroclimate-chemical reanalysis for Asia (MATCHA) at 12 km spatial resolution using WRF-Chem, including assimilation of MODIS AOD and MOPITT CO and coupling between aerosols, radiation, and snow processes. The development of such a system represents a significant technical effort and the study provides a comprehensive dataset that is likely to be very valuable for the community. In particular, the manuscript includes extensive comparison against independent observations for multiple variables including meteorology, snow cover and atmospheric composition, which is an important strength.
I have a few major comments:
- It is currently unclear who the primary target users of this dataset are. As mentioned in the abstract, if the dataset is intended to support emission mitigation strategies, additional discussion is needed regarding whether the data quality is sufficient for such use. Clarifying the intended applications and associated limitations of the dataset would greatly improve its application for the broader community.
- It will be helpful to provide more detailed information on the anthropogenic emission inventories used. Given that the simulation spans approximately 17 years, emissions are likely to have changed substantially across different regions within the domain. These temporal changes could contribute significantly to biases in simulated PM2.5 and PM10. If possible, it would be useful to compare the emissions used in this study with more recent or alternative inventories to better assess emission-related uncertainties.
- The manuscript evaluates the dataset against independent observations extensively. However, without some sensitivity analysis, it is difficult to determine to what extent the improvement of model performance is attributed to the assimilation of AOD and MOPITT CO. In addition, one of the key novel aspects of this work is to represent the LAPs and their feedback in the HMA region. The manuscript seems to lack some quantitative analysis to demonstrate the impacts of the BC deposition on snow and the subsequent impacts on snow or hydrology properties. Additional analysis or discussion would strengthen this aspect of the study.
- The manuscript includes extensive evaluation across multiple variables and datasets, which is valuable. However, it would be beneficial to provide a high-level summary (e.g., Taylor diagrams or a summary table) that highlights key performance metrics across variables. This would help readers more easily grasp the overall performance and key strengths and limitations of the dataset rather than browsing through each figure or table.
I also have a few minor comments:
- Line 20: fine particulate matter: PM2.5 /PM10: this is confusing.
- Figure 1 is helpful in summarizing the modeling framework and assimilation workflow; however, the presentation could be significantly improved for clarity and overall quality. The current flowchart is difficult to follow due to cluttered arrows and a lack of clear visual hierarchy among key processes. In addition, the meaning of different arrow colors is not clearly explained.
- Regarding sea salt and dust aerosols, it would be helpful to show what PM10 looks like including these two aerosols or a plot to show the contribution of these two aerosols. In addition, for dust aerosols, it would be useful to clarify the relative contributions of local emissions versus lateral boundary transport, as long-range transport may play an important role in this region. Please also specify which dust emission scheme is used in the WRF-Chem model and briefly discuss its potential impact on the results.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-275-RC2 -
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Chayan Roychoudhury, 06 Jul 2026
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://essd.copernicus.org/preprints/essd-2025-275/essd-2025-275-AC2-supplement.pdf
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on essd-2025-275', Narendra Ojha, 19 Mar 2026
Detailed comments are provided in form of a supplementary file, uploaded herewith.
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Chayan Roychoudhury, 06 Jul 2026
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://essd.copernicus.org/preprints/essd-2025-275/essd-2025-275-AC1-supplement.pdf
- AC3: 'Reply on AC1', Chayan Roychoudhury, 10 Jul 2026
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Chayan Roychoudhury, 06 Jul 2026
-
RC2: 'Comment on essd-2025-275', Anonymous Referee #2, 01 May 2026
General Comments
The manuscript presents a 17-year regional hydroclimate-chemical reanalysis for Asia (MATCHA) at 12 km spatial resolution using WRF-Chem, including assimilation of MODIS AOD and MOPITT CO and coupling between aerosols, radiation, and snow processes. The development of such a system represents a significant technical effort and the study provides a comprehensive dataset that is likely to be very valuable for the community. In particular, the manuscript includes extensive comparison against independent observations for multiple variables including meteorology, snow cover and atmospheric composition, which is an important strength.
I have a few major comments:
- It is currently unclear who the primary target users of this dataset are. As mentioned in the abstract, if the dataset is intended to support emission mitigation strategies, additional discussion is needed regarding whether the data quality is sufficient for such use. Clarifying the intended applications and associated limitations of the dataset would greatly improve its application for the broader community.
- It will be helpful to provide more detailed information on the anthropogenic emission inventories used. Given that the simulation spans approximately 17 years, emissions are likely to have changed substantially across different regions within the domain. These temporal changes could contribute significantly to biases in simulated PM2.5 and PM10. If possible, it would be useful to compare the emissions used in this study with more recent or alternative inventories to better assess emission-related uncertainties.
- The manuscript evaluates the dataset against independent observations extensively. However, without some sensitivity analysis, it is difficult to determine to what extent the improvement of model performance is attributed to the assimilation of AOD and MOPITT CO. In addition, one of the key novel aspects of this work is to represent the LAPs and their feedback in the HMA region. The manuscript seems to lack some quantitative analysis to demonstrate the impacts of the BC deposition on snow and the subsequent impacts on snow or hydrology properties. Additional analysis or discussion would strengthen this aspect of the study.
- The manuscript includes extensive evaluation across multiple variables and datasets, which is valuable. However, it would be beneficial to provide a high-level summary (e.g., Taylor diagrams or a summary table) that highlights key performance metrics across variables. This would help readers more easily grasp the overall performance and key strengths and limitations of the dataset rather than browsing through each figure or table.
I also have a few minor comments:
- Line 20: fine particulate matter: PM2.5 /PM10: this is confusing.
- Figure 1 is helpful in summarizing the modeling framework and assimilation workflow; however, the presentation could be significantly improved for clarity and overall quality. The current flowchart is difficult to follow due to cluttered arrows and a lack of clear visual hierarchy among key processes. In addition, the meaning of different arrow colors is not clearly explained.
- Regarding sea salt and dust aerosols, it would be helpful to show what PM10 looks like including these two aerosols or a plot to show the contribution of these two aerosols. In addition, for dust aerosols, it would be useful to clarify the relative contributions of local emissions versus lateral boundary transport, as long-range transport may play an important role in this region. Please also specify which dust emission scheme is used in the WRF-Chem model and briefly discuss its potential impact on the results.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-275-RC2 -
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Chayan Roychoudhury, 06 Jul 2026
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://essd.copernicus.org/preprints/essd-2025-275/essd-2025-275-AC2-supplement.pdf
Data sets
High Mountain Asia 12 km Modeled Estimates of Aerosol Transport, Chemistry, and Deposition Reanalysis, 2003-2019, Version 1 R. Kumar et al. https://doi.org/10.5067/CG4OT8DJX2Z7
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1,229 | 586 | 48 | 1,863 | 55 | 76 |
- HTML: 1,229
- PDF: 586
- XML: 48
- Total: 1,863
- BibTeX: 55
- EndNote: 76
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
Detailed comments are provided in form of a supplementary file, uploaded herewith.