the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
A Global Classification Dataset of Daytime and Nighttime Marine Low-cloud Mesoscale Morphology Based on Deep Learning Methods
Abstract. Marine low clouds tend to organize into larger mesoscale patterns with distinct morphological appearances over the ocean, referred to as mesoscale morphology. While prior studies have mainly examined the fundamental characteristics and shortwave radiative effects of these mesoscale morphologies, their behaviour in the nighttime marine boundary layer (MBL) remains underexplored due to limited observations. To address this, we created a global classification dataset of daytime and nighttime mesoscale morphologies of marine low clouds using a deep residual network model and Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) infrared radiance data, with machine-learning-retrieved all-day cloud optical thickness aiding in model training. We analysed day-night contrasts in climatology, seasonal cycles, and cloud properties of different cloud morphology types in this study. Results show that relative frequency of occurrence (RFO) of closed mesoscale cellular convection (MCC) significantly increase at night, while that of suppressed cumulus (Cu) shows a remarkable decrease. Disorganized MCC and clustered Cu display a slight frequency increase during night. In addition, solid stratus and three MCC types exhibit distinct seasonal variations, whereas two cumuliform types show no clear seasonal cycle. Our dataset extends the study of mesoscale cloud morphologies from daytime to nighttime and 1° × 1° resolution makes it better match with other climate datasets. It will provide a vital foundation for further research on the interactions between cloud morphology and climate processes. Our dataset is open-access and available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13990646 (Wu et al., 2024).
- Preprint
(3192 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(697 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: final response (author comments only)
- RC1: 'Comment on essd-2024-536', Anonymous Referee #1, 29 Dec 2024
-
RC2: 'Comment on essd-2024-536', Anonymous Referee #2, 10 Jan 2025
Marine low-clouds cover the majority of the ocean, and play an important role on the Earth’s radiation budget. Due to a lack of local or ground-based observations, satellites become powerful tools for MLC measurement, while satellite observations over nighttime are still relatively limited. Thus, this study by Wu et al. introduced a deep-learning based method for the classification of MLC and their mesoscale morphology using MODIS observations, and a global dataset is developed as well. Both all-day model and day-time model were developed and evaluated. It is interesting to find some differences on the daytime and nighttime MLC, and distinct seasonal variations were also noticed for different MLCs. The new method as well as the resulting dataset is an important addition for the community, and the paper is well organized and presented. The paper could be considered for publication after considering following suggestions.
1. The quality of the training and testing dataset has been essential for DL-based models, so the datasets for the training should be carefully constructed. The 2.2 Data session gave some information on the dataset, while missed some as well. For example, Figure 1 gave some examples of MLCs of different kinds, and how was the original training dataset classified? The independency of training and testing dataset is also important, so I would suggest to introduce the testing and evaluation dataset at the Data session as well.
2. Cloudy and atmospheric properties show clear seasonal variations. For example, surface and atmospheric temperatures may significantly different from season to season, and this is also true for clouds. It is mentioned that only the results over the first half of 2014 were used for data training. Would such choice of results from half a year influence the DL performance?
3. Would it be possible to include the exact variables of input for different models in the flowchart of figure 2? This would be very helpful to better understood the details of the model efficiently.
4. The example of solid stratus show relatively regular linear structure, and are such structures natural? Please double check.
5. The training model based on daytime results is extend to nighttime observations. This is essential for the work, and could be tricky. The validation of the model for nighttime observations is very important, while only some examples were shown in Figure 4. Would it be possible to improve the validation to ensure the reliability of the results for nighttime?
6. Figures 7 indicates clear day and time differences between RFO of different MLCs. Could the authors give some discussions on the reasons for the differences?
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2024-536-RC2 - RC3: 'Comment on essd-2024-536', Anonymous Referee #3, 13 Jan 2025
Data sets
Global Classification Dataset of Daytime and Nighttime Marine Low-cloud Mesoscale Morphology Yuanyuan Wu, Jihu Liu, Yannian Zhu, Yu Zhang, Yang Cao, Kang-En Huang, Boyang Zheng, Yichuan Wang, Quan Wang, Chen Zhou, Yuan Liang, Minghuai Wang, and Daniel Rosenfeld https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13990646
Model code and software
Cloud-morphology-dataset Yuanyuan Wu, Jihu Liu, Yannian Zhu, Yu Zhang, Yang Cao, Kang-En Huang, Boyang Zheng, and Yichuan Wang https://github.com/YuanyuanWu-NJU/Cloud-morphology-dataset
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
295 | 57 | 11 | 363 | 36 | 11 | 9 |
- HTML: 295
- PDF: 57
- XML: 11
- Total: 363
- Supplement: 36
- BibTeX: 11
- EndNote: 9
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1