the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
An integrated high-resolution bathymetric model for the Danube Delta system
Abstract. Acting as a buffer between the Danube and the Black Sea, the Danube Delta plays an important role in regulating the hydro-biochemical flows of this land-sea continuum. Despite its importance, very few studies have focused on the impact of the Danube Delta on the different fluxes between the Danube and the Black Sea. One of the first step to characterize this land-sea continuum is to describe the bathymetry of the Delta. However, there is no complete, easily accessible bathymetric data on all three branches of the Delta to support hydrodynamic, biogeochemical or ecological studies. In this study, we aim to fill this gap by combining 4 different datasets, three in the river and one for the riverbanks, each varying in density and spatial distribution, to create a high-resolution bathymetry dataset. The bathymetric data was interpolated on a hybrid curvilinear-unstructured mesh with an anisotropic Inverse Distance Weighting (IDW) interpolation method. The resulting product offers resolutions ranging from 2 m in a connection zone to 100 m in one of the straight unidirectional channel. Cross validation of the dataset underlined the importance of the data source spatial pattern, with average Root Mean Square Error (RRMSE) of 0.55 %, 6.3 % and 27.6 %, for river segments covered by the densest to the coarsest dataset. These error rates are comparable to those observed in bathymetry interpolation in rivers with similar source datasets. The bathymetry presented in this study is the first unique, high-resolution, comprehensive and easily accessible bathymetric model covering all three branches of the Danube Delta. It will serve as an input in a hydrodynamic model of the Danube Delta, with the aim of better understanding the role of the Delta in the land-sea continuum between the Danube and the Black Sea. The dataset is available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14055741 (Alaerts et al., 2024).
- Preprint
(9227 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: final response (author comments only)
-
RC1: 'Comment on essd-2024-529', Anonymous Referee #1, 28 Feb 2025
The collection of high-accuracy and robust bathymetric data is of paramount interest for any hydraulic and coastal study. Moreover, because of the complex morphology of river deltas, the bathymetry collection and interpolation are challenging. The paper presents well the analysis of different datasets and their interpolation in the river branches of the Danube Delta. The paper is well written and well structured, and results are clearly presented, with relevant figures and tables. I compliment the authors for their data collection and analysis work.
I recommend publication, subject to the authors addressing the comments made below. I strongly recommend focusing abstract, section Application (4.4) and Conclusions on the topic of this dataset without digressing on future work on land-sea (modelling) studies (which can be the subject of another paper). Moreover, I suggest the author mention that such a dataset could be further improved including the bathymetry of the coastal area in front of the delta.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2024-529-RC1 -
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Lauranne Alaerts, 17 Mar 2025
We thank RC 1 for their reviews
Please find attached our responses. In the attached document,
- comments by RC1 are written in italics and numbered,
- our responses are in plain text and preceeded by a "Response" in bold font,
- extracts from the manuscript showing modfcations are in green font,
- line numbers referenced to in our responses correspond to the updated manuscript.
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Lauranne Alaerts, 17 Mar 2025
-
RC2: 'Comment on essd-2024-529', Giovanni Scicchitano, 08 Mar 2025
The study presents a well-structured and methodologically rigorous approach to high-resolution bathymetric modeling of the Danube Delta, effectively integrating multiple datasets and employing an adaptive interpolation framework to capture the complex morphology of the river system. The scientific methodology is sound, particularly in the use of a curvilinear, non-structured coordinate system combined with an anisotropic Inverse Distance Weighting (IDW) interpolation method, which enhances the spatial accuracy of the final dataset. Despite the inherent limitation of integrating multiple bathymetric databases, the authors adopt a sufficiently rigorous technical and scientific approach to ensure a consistent and methodologically robust expansion of the dataset over such an extensive and complex study area.
In my opinion, one of the primary limitations of the study lies in the relatively low resolution of the topographic data extracted from the Copernicus DEM (30m resolution). This may introduce uncertainties in the precise delineation of the shoreline and the transition between land and water. Given the importance of accurate topographic information for hydrodynamic and flood modeling applications, the use of a higher-resolution DEM could significantly enhance the reliability of the dataset. If such high-resolution topographic models are not available for this region, it would be beneficial for the authors to explicitly acknowledge this limitation in the text, clarifying whether finer-scale topographic data were considered but deemed unavailable or providing a justification for the choice of the Copernicus dataset.
Another key issue arises from the temporal mismatch between bathymetric and topographic data sources. River deltas are highly dynamic environments subject to morphological changes due to sediment deposition, erosion, and anthropogenic interventions, which may not be fully captured in the compiled dataset. The use of more temporally consistent datasets could improve the accuracy of hydrodynamic modeling. If no such datasets are available, the authors should explicitly state this limitation, specifying whether efforts were made to identify topographic data closer in time to the bathymetric surveys and explaining the rationale behind the chosen dataset.
In terms of readability, the paper is generally accessible, though some sections—particularly those describing interpolation techniques and coordinate transformations—could benefit from greater clarity and conciseness. While the technical language is appropriate, in some instances, overly complex phrasing may hinder comprehension for non-specialist readers. The use of English is strong overall, with only minor grammatical or stylistic issues that do not significantly affect readability.
The figures and illustrations are well-designed and effectively support the text, providing valuable visual representations of the dataset, methodology, and results. However, some maps and graphs could benefit from higher contrast or improved labeling to enhance readability and interpretation.
Given the relevance and potential applications of this dataset, the authors could consider including, as a prospective future development, the dissemination of their dataset through WebGIS platforms. This could be explicitly discussed in the Discussion or Conclusions section as a logical extension of their work. Implementing a WebGIS service would allow users to visualize, query, and analyze the dataset interactively, thereby significantly improving its accessibility and usability. Such an approach would expand the dataset’s reach beyond the scientific community, making it a valuable resource for policymakers, environmental managers, and other stakeholders engaged in hydrodynamic modeling, flood risk assessment, and coastal zone management in the Danube Delta. By facilitating broader access and integration into decision-making processes, such an initiative would maximize the dataset’s impact and further support interdisciplinary environmental assessments and planning efforts.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2024-529-RC2 -
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Lauranne Alaerts, 17 Mar 2025
We thank Giovanni Scicchitano for his reviews
Please find attached our responses. In the attached document,
- his comments are written in italics and numbered,
- our responses are in plain text and preceeded by a "Response" in bold font,
- extracts from the manuscript showing modfcations are in green font,
- line numbers referenced to in our responses correspond to the updated manuscript.
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Lauranne Alaerts, 17 Mar 2025
Data sets
Comprehensive bathymetry of the Danube Delta three branches Lauranne Alaerts, Jonathan Lambrechts, Ny Riana Randresihaja, Luc Vandenbulcke, Olivier Gourgue, Emmanuel Hanert, and Marilaure Grégoire https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14055740
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
295 | 52 | 13 | 360 | 14 | 14 |
- HTML: 295
- PDF: 52
- XML: 13
- Total: 360
- BibTeX: 14
- EndNote: 14
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1