the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
U-Surf: A Global 1 km spatially continuous urban surface property dataset for kilometer-scale urban-resolving Earth system modeling
Abstract. High-resolution urban climate modeling has faced substantial challenges due to the absence of a globally consistent, spatially continuous, and accurate dataset to represent the spatial heterogeneity of urban surfaces and their biophysical properties. This deficiency has long obstructed the development of urban-resolving Earth System Models (ESMs) and ultra-high-resolution urban climate modeling, particularly at large scales. Here, we present a first-of-its-kind 1km-resolution present-day (circa-2020) global continuous urban surface parameter dataset – U-Surf. Using the urban canopy model (UCM) in the Community Earth System Model as a base model for developing dataset requirements, U-Surf leverages the latest advances in remote sensing, machine learning, and cloud computing to provide the most relevant urban surface biophysical parameters, including radiative, morphological, and thermal properties, for UCMs at the facet- and canopy-level. Our high-resolution U-Surf dataset significantly improves the representation of the urban land heterogeneity both within and across cities globally. U-Surf provides essential, high-fidelity surface biophysical constraints to urban-resolving ESMs, enables detailed city-to-city comparisons across the globe, and supports the next-generation kilometer-resolution Earth system modeling across scales. U-Surf parameters can be easily converted or adapted to various types of UCMs, such as those embedded in weather and regional climate models, as well as air quality models. The fundamental urban surface constraints provided by U-Surf are also relevant as features for machine learning models and can have other broad-scale applications for socioeconomic, public health, and urban planning contexts. We expect U-Surf to promote the research frontier on urban systems science, climate-sensitive urban design, and coupled human-Earth systems in the future. The dataset is publicly available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11247599 (Cheng et al., 2024).
- Preprint
(13552 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(24600 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: final response (author comments only)
- CC1: 'Comment on essd-2024-416', Yong Wang, 04 Nov 2024
- RC1: 'Comment on essd-2024-416', Yong Wang, 04 Nov 2024
-
RC2: 'Comment on essd-2024-416', Anonymous Referee #2, 19 Nov 2024
Dear authors,
High-quality urban surface property dataset is vital for high-resolution urban climate modeling, this study use a series of mature methods to generate a global spatially continuous dataset (named as: U-Surf) from multisourced remote sensing observations and products, which contains radiative, morphological, and thermal properties. Overall, the methodological framework is complete and the generated products are valuable. However, there are still some issues should be solved:
- The method descriptions should be totally strengthened.
- For example, in Section 2.2.1, I don’t know how to use the ASTER and Sentinel-2 imagery (the yearly-composited imagery or all available imagery) to calculate the single or time-series emissivity and albedo.
- As for the Eq. (4), how to determine the parameter of wf, which follows the normal distribution? Equal distribution?
- As for the albedo and emissivity model in Eq. (2-3), how to consider their uncertainty? How do these models perform on a global scale?
Similarly, some details should be added in the Section 2.2.2 and 2.2.3.
- My major concern is the quality of the U-Surf. Although the authors emphasized that “validating urban surface parameters on the global scale is extremely challenging primarily due to the lack of globally consistent measurement networks”, I don’t think the Table 3 can support the accuracy analysis of the U-Surf. My concerns come from that 1) the synthesized data products only part of the parameters of the retrieved models in Section 2.2, i.e., how to quantify the transformed error of synthesized data in the retrieved models; 2) as a user of the U-Surf, I also want to know its absolute accuracy not that its better than the previous data. I hope that the authors can strength the accuracy assessment.
- The comparisons and analysis in the Figure 4 and 5 are interesting, meanwhile, I hope that authors can add some quantitative statistics. For example, in the line of 453-454, the author stated “the Global South (Latin America, Africa, and parts of Asia) generally shows lower values for these parameters and higher pervious surface fractions”. If the further statistics and analysis can be added, it may be interesting.
- The descriptions about the TBD, HD, MD and LD should be strengthen, which has been mentioned several times in the results section.
In summary, the U-Surf dataset provides important support in urban climate modeling, and shows great advantages over the previous dataset (such as: CLMU and J2010), which meets the high-quality of the ESSD journal. I hope that above comments will help to improve the quality of this article.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2024-416-RC2
Data sets
U-Surf: A Global 1km spatially continuous urban surface property dataset for kilometer-scale urban-resolving Earth system modeling Yifan Cheng et al. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11247599
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
564 | 104 | 104 | 772 | 26 | 4 | 9 |
- HTML: 564
- PDF: 104
- XML: 104
- Total: 772
- Supplement: 26
- BibTeX: 4
- EndNote: 9
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1