the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
A post-processed carbon flux dataset for 34 eddy covariance flux sites across the Heihe River Basin, China
Abstract. The eddy covariance (EC) technique is currently the most widely used method for measuring carbon exchange between terrestrial ecosystems and the atmosphere at the ecosystem scale. Using this technique, a regional carbon flux network comprising a total of 34 sites has been established in the Heihe River Basin (HRB) in Northwest China. This network has been measuring the net ecosystem exchange (NEE) of CO2 for a variety of vegetation types. In this study, we compiled and post-processed half-hourly flux data from these 34 EC flux sites in the HRB to create a continuous, homogenized time series dataset. We employed standardized processing procedures to fill data gaps in meteorological and NEE measurements at half-hourly intervals. NEE measurements were also partitioned into gross primary production (GPP) and ecosystem respiration (Reco). Furthermore, half-hourly meteorological and NEE data were aggregated to daily, weekly, monthly, and yearly timescales. As a result, we produced a continuous carbon flux and auxiliary meteorological dataset, which includes 18 sites with continuous multi-year observations and 16 sites observed only during the 2012 growing season, amounting to a total of 1,513 site-months. Using the post-processed dataset, we explored the temporal and spatial characteristics of carbon exchange in the HRB. In the diurnal variation curve, GPP, NEE, and Reco peak later for ecosystems in the artificial oasis (cropland and wetland) compared to those outside the artificial oasis (grassland, forest, woodland, and Gobi/desert). Seasonal NEE, GPP, and Reco peak in early July for grassland, forest, woodland, and cropland but remain close to zero throughout the year for gobi/desert. In the last decade, NEE of wetlands significantly increased, while NEE for other ecosystems did not exhibit significant trends. Annual NEE, GPP, and Reco are significantly higher for sites inside the artificial/natural oasis compared to those outside the oasis. This post-processed carbon flux dataset has numerous applications, including exploring the carbon exchange characteristics of alpine and arid ecosystems, analyzing ecosystem responses to climate extremes, conducting cross-site synthesis from regional to global scales, supporting regional and global upscaling studies, interpreting and calibrating remote sensing products, and evaluating and calibrating carbon cycle models.
- Preprint
(2644 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: final response (author comments only)
-
CC1: 'Comment on essd-2024-370', Fei Li, 28 Nov 2024
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://essd.copernicus.org/preprints/essd-2024-370/essd-2024-370-CC1-supplement.pdf
- AC1: 'Reply on CC1', Xufeng Wang, 01 Jan 2025
- AC4: 'Reply on CC1', Xufeng Wang, 01 Jan 2025
-
RC1: 'Comment on essd-2024-370', Zheng Fu, 27 Dec 2024
In this manuscript, Wang et al compiled and post-processed half-hourly flux data from these 34 EC flux sites in the Heihe River Basin to create a continuous, homogenized time series dataset. This work filled the gaps in carbon flux data and auxiliary meteorological data of the Heihe carbon flux network, and generated a carbon flux dataset. Then the half-hourly NEE measurements were partitioned into GPP and Reco. The diurnal, seasonal, and inter-annual variabilities of carbon flux across diverse ecosystems in the Heihe River Basin were explored based on the gap-filled and partitioned dataset. This post-processed carbon flux dataset with a total of 34 EC sites in the Heihe River Basin is very valuable and important.
Â
Overall, I find the paper compelling and fit for publication after minor revision. I only have a few comments as below:
Â
- ERA5-Land dataset is a reanalysis dataset. It would be great if some evaluation for variables from ERA5-land vs observations can be added.
- If possible, comparing the MDS with RF results will be interesting.
- The RF model was used for meteorological and carbon-flux data post-processing. The readers will be curious to know the construction and parameter selection of the RF model.
- Please give some explanation why only Rg, Ta, and VPD are selected as input of the RF model to predict NEE.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2024-370-RC1 - AC2: 'Reply on RC1', Xufeng Wang, 01 Jan 2025
- AC3: 'Reply on RC1', Xufeng Wang, 01 Jan 2025
- AC5: 'Reply on RC1', Xufeng Wang, 01 Jan 2025
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
402 | 73 | 16 | 491 | 17 | 15 |
- HTML: 402
- PDF: 73
- XML: 16
- Total: 491
- BibTeX: 17
- EndNote: 15
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1