the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
A strontium isoscape of southwestern Australia and progress toward a national strontium isoscape
Abstract. Strontium isotopes (87Sr/86Sr) are widely used tracers in the geosciences. Here we exploit an opportunity to determine 87Sr/86Sr ratios on archived fluvial sediment samples from the low-density National Geochemical Survey of Australia. The present study targeted the Yilgarn Craton in southwestern Australia. One hundred and seven new samples were taken from a depth of ~ 60–80 cm in floodplain deposits at or near the outlet of large catchments (drainage basins). A coarse (< 2 mm) grain-size fraction was air-dried, sieved, milled then digested (hydrofluoric acid + nitric acid followed by aqua regia) to release total Sr. The Sr was then separated by chromatography and its 87Sr/86Sr ratio determined by multicollector-inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Results demonstrate a wide range of quite elevated Sr isotopic values (0.7152 to 1.0909, median 0.7560) over the survey area, reflecting a large diversity of source rock lithologies, geological processes and bedrock ages. Spatial distribution of 87Sr/86Sr shows coherent (multi-point anomalies and smooth gradients), large-scale (> 100 km) patterns that appear to be broadly consistent with surface geology, regolith/soil type, and/or nearby outcropping bedrock. The most radiogenic sediment values in the Yilgarn region (87Sr/86Sr > 0.8) all come from sites underlain by Archaean bedrock (2500–4000 Ma) and almost exclusively felsic intrusive lithologies. Conversely, almost all sites underlain by younger and non-granitic bedrock have outlet sediments of a less radiogenic character (87Sr/86Sr < 0.8). Sampling sites underlain by mafic and ultramafic bedrock yield unradiogenic Sr sediment signatures despite their Archaean age. Several sediment 87Sr/86Sr results were validated by comparison to previously published whole-rock data from their catchment, for both unradiogenic and radiogenic cases. The new Sr isotopic data are also interrogated in terms of the mineral occurrences (i.e., mineral deposits and/or operating mines) found in their catchment. Several catchments containing mineral resources across a range of commodities stand out as high 87Sr/86Sr outliers (87Sr/86Sr > 0.8), whilst over half of the registered mineral resources come from an intermediate, yet still elevated, catchment sediment 87Sr/86Sr range (87Sr/86Sr = 0.728–0.767). Avenues for future work are proposed, including a national-scale Sr isoscape for Australia. Such isoscape could be useful in future geological, forensic, archaeological, paleontological and ecological studies. The new spatial Sr isotope dataset for the southwestern Australia region is publicly available (de Caritat et al., 2024; https://dx.doi.org/10.26186/149755).
- Preprint
(2518 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(1491 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on essd-2024-352', Ian Moffat, 19 Sep 2024
The manuscript "A strontium isoscape of southwestern Australia and progress toward a national strontium isoscape" provides a timely and important contribution to understanding the, terribly under-researched, regional distribution of strontium isotope values in Australia. The authors present robust geochemical data in a useful and accessible fashion, which should be of wide interest for researchers from a range of fields. I hope that these authors continue their important work (begun as de Caritat et al. 2022 and de Caritat et al. 2023) to continue mapping these values throughout Australia.
My only minor suggestion is that the authors provide more details of how they tested the Rb level in the samples (detailed in lines 191-194). This doesn't change the substance of the paper in any way, but provides a useful methodological point for other studies.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2024-352-RC1 - AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Patrice de Caritat, 13 Nov 2024
-
RC2: 'Comment on essd-2024-352', Jodie Pritchard, 22 Oct 2024
- Excellent work, great and useful data and well presented
- 3rd instalment in series of Sr isotope data around Australia including: de Caritat et al., 2022, 2023
- Provides comprehensive, detailed, high quality data set and publication for a geographical region where very little was previously known.
- Significant and valuable dataset for strontium isoscape work
- Minor question: Figure 3 labelling. Legend says SE Aus, caption northern Australia. Should these both be SW Australia?
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2024-352-RC2 - AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Patrice de Caritat, 13 Nov 2024
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on essd-2024-352', Ian Moffat, 19 Sep 2024
The manuscript "A strontium isoscape of southwestern Australia and progress toward a national strontium isoscape" provides a timely and important contribution to understanding the, terribly under-researched, regional distribution of strontium isotope values in Australia. The authors present robust geochemical data in a useful and accessible fashion, which should be of wide interest for researchers from a range of fields. I hope that these authors continue their important work (begun as de Caritat et al. 2022 and de Caritat et al. 2023) to continue mapping these values throughout Australia.
My only minor suggestion is that the authors provide more details of how they tested the Rb level in the samples (detailed in lines 191-194). This doesn't change the substance of the paper in any way, but provides a useful methodological point for other studies.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2024-352-RC1 - AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Patrice de Caritat, 13 Nov 2024
-
RC2: 'Comment on essd-2024-352', Jodie Pritchard, 22 Oct 2024
- Excellent work, great and useful data and well presented
- 3rd instalment in series of Sr isotope data around Australia including: de Caritat et al., 2022, 2023
- Provides comprehensive, detailed, high quality data set and publication for a geographical region where very little was previously known.
- Significant and valuable dataset for strontium isoscape work
- Minor question: Figure 3 labelling. Legend says SE Aus, caption northern Australia. Should these both be SW Australia?
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2024-352-RC2 - AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Patrice de Caritat, 13 Nov 2024
Data sets
A strontium isoscape of southwestern Australia Patrice de Caritat et al. https://dx.doi.org/10.26186/149755
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
248 | 48 | 316 | 612 | 21 | 7 | 7 |
- HTML: 248
- PDF: 48
- XML: 316
- Total: 612
- Supplement: 21
- BibTeX: 7
- EndNote: 7
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1