the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
cigFacies: a massive-scale benchmark dataset of seismic facies and its application
Abstract. Seismic facies classification is crucial for seismic stratigraphic interpretation and hydrocarbon reservoir characterization but remains a tedious and time-consuming task that requires significant manual effort. The data-driven deep learning approaches are highly promising to automate the seismic facies classification with high efficiency and accuracy, as they have already achieved significant success in similar image classification tasks within the field of computer vision (CV). However, unlike the CV domain, the field of seismic exploration lacks a comprehensive benchmark dataset for seismic facies, severely limiting the development, application, and evaluation of deep learning approaches in seismic facies classification. To address this gap, we propose a comprehensive workflow to construct a massive-scale benchmark dataset of seismic facies and evaluate its effectiveness in training a deep learning model. Specifically, we first develop a knowledge graph of seismic facies based on the geological concepts and seismic reflection configurations. Guided by the graph, we then implement three strategies of field seismic data curation, knowledge-guided synthesization, and GAN-based generation to construct a benchmark dataset of 8000 diverse samples for five common seismic facies. Finally, we use the benchmark dataset to train a network and then apply it on two 3-D seismic data for automatic seismic facies classification. The predictions are highly consistent with expert interpretation results, demonstrating the diversity and representativeness of our benchmark dataset is sufficient to train a network that can generalize well in seismic facies classification across field data. We have made this dataset, the trained model and associated codes publicly available for further research and validation of intelligent seismic facies classification.
- Preprint
(16617 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 09 Dec 2024)
-
RC1: 'Comment on essd-2024-337', Lorenzo Lipparini, 10 Nov 2024
reply
The work presented appear quite robust, complete and reported with a good understanding of the matter. The complex tasks needed to reach the aim of the study have been discussed in sufficient detail and solved. The presented workflow is a good, non-unique possible approach to the topic, which is of general interest.
However, in order to improve the manuscript and get to publish it, I would suggest:
- avoid repetitions (some concepts are reported 2 to 4 times)
- limit the introduction to introduce the work only, not to describe it all in summary. Lines from 46 ("Initially, ...) to 50 should be better used to introduce the "Methodology" part (2)
- expand a bit the discussion and the comparison between predicted results and expert interpretation, as this would be of strong interest for readers, after all the work done to get there. More examples, in section, map and 3D view would be a benefit to the article.
- discuss a bit how the scale of observation and the scale of the observed/classified objects have been considered within the workflow.
- more clearly separate discussion from conclusion
- the sentences at line 222 (Although the predicted results are roughly consistent with the human interpretation results), and line 249 (..achieves notable performance in seismic facies classification across two distinct 3-D field datasets), appear quite different from the one in line 12 (The predictions are highly consistent with expert interpretation results), and line 221 (Our final sedimentary facies result ... is highly consistent with the expert interpretation of sedimentary facies shown in Fig. 12e). Please consider these inconsistencies
- the conclusion could be improved, as they appear as a summary of the work done, not really a conclusion, while part of the conclusion and future developements are reported in the discussions. Please revise
Best
LL
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2024-337-RC1
Data sets
cigFacies: a massive-scale benchmark dataset of seismic facies Hui Gao, Xinming Wu, Xiaoming Sun, Mingcai Hou, Hang Gao, Guangyu Wang, and Hanlin Sheng https://zenodo.org/records/10777460
Model code and software
cigFaciesNet Hui Gao, Xinming Wu, Xiaoming Sun, Mingcai Hou, Hang Gao, Guangyu Wang, and Hanlin Sheng https://zenodo.org/records/13150879
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
156 | 81 | 13 | 250 | 4 | 7 |
- HTML: 156
- PDF: 81
- XML: 13
- Total: 250
- BibTeX: 4
- EndNote: 7
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1