the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
A European database of resources on coastal storm impacts
Abstract. Detailed information on coastal storm impacts is crucial to evaluate the degree of damages caused by floods, implementing effective recovery actions for risk prevention and preparedness, and to design appropriate coastal zone management plans. This article presents a new database containing information on extreme storm events that generated damage and flooding along European coastlines between 2010 and 2020. The storm events, associated with specific locations, define the test cases which are then used to retrieve information from different extreme coastal storms that hit the same area. The database is a workbook that collects items organised in worksheets and constitutes an inventory of resources defined as a collection of different types of information used to characterize the event (i.e., hydrodynamics, weather information) and its consequences (impacts, flood extent, etc.). The guidelines and polygons in GeoJSON format that define the domain of the sites are also provided together with the workbook. The database contains 11 coastal storm events, 26 sites, 28 test cases, and 232 resources and is designed to allow the addition of new events and resources. Descriptive statistical analyses were performed to define the types and topics addressed by the resources and the distribution of types of resources per country. Lastly, an example of application of the database to European-scale flood modelling is provided.
- Preprint
(661 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 26 Sep 2024)
-
RC1: 'Comment on essd-2024-183', Anonymous Referee #1, 01 Sep 2024
reply
The manuscript presents a new database containing information on extreme storm events that impacted European coastlines from 2010 to 2020. The database is intended to support coastal flood risk assessment and protection measures by providing hydrodynamic, meteorological information, and their associated impacts. The paper details the structure of the database, data sources, and statistical analyses, and includes an example of the database's application to European-scale flood modeling.
My major concerns are presented as follows:
- Insufficient application of the database: Currently, the database presented in the manuscript appears more like a collection of data rather than a tool actively used for future coastal flood protection in Europe. Although the data has potential value for flood risk mitigation, the manuscript does not clearly clarify how these datasets can effectively serve European-scale flood simulations. Specifically, while the manuscript claims that the database has been applied to European-scale flood modeling, the specific details and results of this application are not sufficiently demonstrated. This section should be expanded to clearly explain how the database has been utilized for flood protection and simulation, including practical examples and outcomes.
- Lack of detailed Analysis on meteorological and hydrodynamic data: The manuscript provides insufficient description of the meteorological and hydrodynamic data closely related to coastal storm surges. There is a need for a more thorough discussion on the reliability of this data and whether it can accurately reflect the processes and impacts of storm surges. I would suggest the authors enhance the analysis of these data types, including their sources, accuracy, and how they ensure the data can accurately capture the dynamics of storm surges.
- Inadequate comparison with existing databases: The manuscript does not provide a detailed comparison between the proposed dataset and existing similar databases. It is recommended that the authors include a comparison to highlight the advantages of the presented database over existing ones. This could be achieved by comparing aspects such as data completeness, update frequency, coverage, and performance in flood risk assessments.
Some other minor concerns:
- It would be beneficial to discuss the accessibility of the database to a broader audience, particularly in terms of how user-friendly the database is for various stakeholders, such as policymakers, researchers, and coastal managers. Is there a need for additional tools or interfaces to enhance the usability of the database?
- The manuscript could further explore the potential for future updates and expansions of the database. How adaptable is the database to include new storm events or incorporate additional types of data as they become available? A discussion on the sustainability of the database and its long-term utility would strengthen the manuscript.
- Another aspect that could be addressed is the validation process of the data included in the database. How do the authors ensure the accuracy and consistency of the data across different events and sources? Discussing any quality control mechanisms or peer-review processes for the data would add credibility to the database.
- While the manuscript focuses on European coastal flood risk, it could also consider the broader implications of the database. For example, could this database be a model for other regions outside of Europe? A brief discussion on the scalability of the approach or its relevance to global coastal flood risk management might add an interesting dimension to the paper.
Overall, while the database introduced in this manuscript has potential value, there is a need to strengthen the discussion around practical application, data analysis, and comparison with existing databases to better highlight the contribution and significance of this research.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2024-183-RC1
Data sets
Database of extreme events, test cases selection and available data, Deliverable 5.1-ECFAS Project (GA 101004211), www.ecfas.eu P. E. Souto-Ceccon et al. https://zenodo.org/records/7488643
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
489 | 73 | 32 | 594 | 21 | 26 |
- HTML: 489
- PDF: 73
- XML: 32
- Total: 594
- BibTeX: 21
- EndNote: 26
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1