the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Global Marine Gravity Gradient Tensor Inverted from Altimetry-derived Deflection of the Vertical: CUGB2023GRAD
Richard Fiifi Annan
Xiaoyun Wan
Ruijie Hao
Fei Wang
Abstract. Geodetic applications of altimetry have largely been inversions of gravity anomaly. Literatures wherein Earth’s gravity gradient tensor has been studied mostly presented only the vertical gravity gradient. However, there are six unique signals that constitute the gravity gradient tensor. Gravity gradients are signals suitable for detecting short-wavelength topographic and tectonic features. They are derived from double differentiation of the geoid (or disturbing potential); and hence, are susceptible to noise amplification which was exacerbated by low across-track resolution of altimetry data in the past. However, current generation of altimetry observations have improved spatial resolutions, with some better than 5 km. Therefore, this study takes advantage of current high-resolution altimetry datasets to present CUGB2023GRAD, a global (latitudinal limits of ±80º) 1 arc-minute model of Earth’s gravity gradient tensor over the oceans using deflection of the vertical as inputs in the wavenumber domain. The results are first assessed via Laplace’s equation; whereby the resultant residual gradient is virtually zero everywhere except at high latitudes – icy environments known for contaminating altimetry observations. Due to the absence of similar models from other institutions, the results are further assessed by comparing the vertical tensor component, Tzz, with equivalent models from Scripps Institution of Oceanography (SIO) and Technical University of Denmark (DTU). The DTU equivalents were derived by multiplying their gravity anomalies by 2 πk in the wavenumber domain. Analysis showed that the inverted Tzz averagely deviates from the DTU and SIO equivalents by 0.09 and 0.18 E with corresponding standard deviations of 3.55 and 6.96 E, respectively. Bathymetric coherence analysis of Tzz over a section of the western Pacific showed comparable results with the reference models. This study proves that current generation of altimetry geodetic missions can effectively resolve Earth’s gravity gradient tensor. The CUGB2023GRAD model data can be freely accessed at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7710254 (Annan et al., 2023).
- Preprint
(3196 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Richard Fiifi Annan et al.
Status: open (until 29 Oct 2023)
-
CC1: 'Comment on essd-2023-85', Jinyun Guo, 30 Jun 2023
reply
Marine gravity gradient tensor is one important gravity over global ocean. The model in the manuscript is derived from GM data of 5 altimetry satellite missions. The model can be used in marine geodesy and geophysics.
- Line 6: Here what are literatures?
- Line 41: Some altimetry satellite missions consider their GM phase in their start or middle life of satellites, not all end of life.
- Line 49: Here should be geoid model instead of geoid.
- Line 58: Here what are literatures?
- Section 2: Only GM data of 5 satellite missions are used in the study. Why not use the other satellite altimeter data include ERM data? What errors are corrected in SSHs? How to assess the precision of SSHs? How to distinguish SSHs’ frequencies?
- Line 93: What earth gravity field model is used in the MDT model? Not egm08??
- Line 110: What are x and y?
- Line 112: How to precisely determine weight?
- Line 119: Why to use 2 degrees?
- Line 125: How to define the local reference frame in detail? One local reference frame is only used in one small area.
- Line 128: Here normal gravity should be normal gravity in geoid.
- Line 143: How to calculate λ? How about λ=0?
- (11): In eq. (9), normal gravity is a function with respective to latitude.
- Line 159: How about north and east components of DOV?
- Line 165: How to construct the eq.?
- Line 173: Jason GM?
- Line 178: What are both weighting approaches?
- Line 185: SIO can provide DOV model. But DTU not provide directly DOV model.
- (17): δg is generally for gravity disturbance, not gravity anomaly.
- Line 130: The Laplacian equation only holds true outside the earth.
- Line 235: The number of decimal separator may be more.
- Line 255: How to distinguish wave lengths?
- Figure 1: Here should be GMs.
- Figure 3: The resolution of the figure is low.
- Figure 5: The resolution of the figure is low.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2023-85-CC1 -
CC2: 'Reply on CC1', Xiaoyun Wan, 18 Sep 2023
reply
Kindly see the attachment for our responses to the community comment.
-
RC1: 'Comment on essd-2023-85', Walter Smith, 03 Jul 2023
reply
My comments are in the attached PDF Supplement.
-
RC2: 'Comment on essd-2023-85', Anonymous Referee #2, 12 Aug 2023
reply
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://essd.copernicus.org/preprints/essd-2023-85/essd-2023-85-RC2-supplement.pdf
Richard Fiifi Annan et al.
Data sets
Global Marine Gravity Gradient Tensor Inverted from Altimetry-derived Deflection of the Vertical: CUGB2023GRAD Richard Fiifi Annan; Xiaoyun Wan; Ruijie Hao; Fei Wang https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7710254
Richard Fiifi Annan et al.
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
280 | 50 | 16 | 346 | 5 | 7 |
- HTML: 280
- PDF: 50
- XML: 16
- Total: 346
- BibTeX: 5
- EndNote: 7
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1