the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Mapping of peatlands in the forested landscape of Sweden using LiDAR-based terrain indices
Lukas Rimondini
Thomas Gumbricht
Anders Ahlström
Gustaf Hugelius
Abstract. Globally, northern peatlands are major carbon deposits with important implications for the climate system. It is therefore crucial to understand their spatial occurrence, especially in the context of peatland degradation by land cover and climate change. This study was aimed at mapping peatlands in the forested landscape of Sweden by modelling soil data against LiDAR-based terrain indices. Machine learning methods were used to produce nation-wide raster maps at 10 m spatial resolution indicating presence-or-not of peatlands. Four different definitions of peatlands were examined: 30, 40, 50 and 100 cm thickness of the organic horizon. Depending on peatland definition, testing with a hold-out dataset indicated Accuracy of 0.89–0.91 and Matthew’s correlation coefficient of 0.79–0.81. The final maps showed a national forest peatland extent of 60,726–72,604 km2, estimates which are in range with previous studies employing traditional soil maps. In conclusion, these results emphasize the possibilities of mapping boreal peatlands with LiDAR-based terrain indices. The final peatland maps are publicly available and may be employed for spatial planning, estimating carbon stocks and evaluate climate change mitigation strategies.
Lukas Rimondini et al.
Status: final response (author comments only)
-
RC1: 'Comment on essd-2023-77', Anonymous Referee #1, 15 May 2023
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://essd.copernicus.org/preprints/essd-2023-77/essd-2023-77-RC1-supplement.pdf
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Lukas Rimondini, 29 May 2023
Thank you for your valuable comments!
We agree that the product should exclude Gotland and Öland. We propose that they should be masked in the next version and that the paragraph regarding the reliability of their mapping should be lightly revisioned and moved from "Discussions" to "Methods".
We appreciate the minor corrections you pointed out.
With regards,
Rimondini et al.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2023-77-AC1
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Lukas Rimondini, 29 May 2023
-
RC2: 'Comment on essd-2023-77', Anonymous Referee #2, 26 May 2023
The manuscript describes an approach for countrywide peatland classification based on LiDAR-based terrain indices. For the classification, different ML methods were tested. For training and validation an extensive in-situ data set was used.
The paper is well written and easy to understand. The topic is interesting and important for the ongoing carbon stock estimation.
It is mentioned that the reference data has some spatial inaccuracy. Unfortunately, this topic is no longer covered in the discussion. It is strongly recommended to discuss the potential influence of the spatial inaccuracies on the derived result.
For the used formulas, please add unit information to all used variables.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2023-77-RC2 -
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Lukas Rimondini, 29 May 2023
Thank you for your valuable comments.
We agree that it would be of interested to further discuss how the spatial inaccuracy may affect the results. We will add text on this to the manuscript. In brief, we believe that the spatial inaccuracy of the soil data mostly concerns the SGU peat archive. We believe that it is of minor importance for our results, as the data from the SGU archive mostly includes points from the inner parts of peatlands with an O-layer depth > 100 cm and a relatively narrow value range in the geodata used as features. We have visually checked if this is the case by comparison against a land cover dataset (NMD2018), and conclude that ~100 points part from this pattern (mostly in the Stockholm area). This means that only a small portion of the points may lead to any important errors in the features. This will be reflected in the updated manuscript.
We appreciate your comment on the inclusion of unit information for all variables in the formulas. We interpret that your comment concerns the DTW formula, and will add the information accordingly in the next version of the manuscript.
With regards,
Rimondini et al."
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2023-77-AC2
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Lukas Rimondini, 29 May 2023
Lukas Rimondini et al.
Data sets
Maps of peatlands in the forested landscape of Sweden Lukas Rimondini, Gustaf Hugelius, Thomas Gumbricht, and Anders Ahlström https://doi.org/10.17043/rimondini-2023-peatlands-1
Lukas Rimondini et al.
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
274 | 90 | 14 | 378 | 3 | 5 |
- HTML: 274
- PDF: 90
- XML: 14
- Total: 378
- BibTeX: 3
- EndNote: 5
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1