the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
An update of data compilation on the biological response to ocean acidification and overview of the OA-ICC data portal
Abstract. Studies investigating the effects of ocean acidification on marine organisms and communities are increasing every year. Results are not easily comparable since the carbonate chemistry and ancillary data are not always reported in similar units and scales, and calculated using similar sets of constants. To facilitate data comparison, a data compilation hosted at the data publisher PANGAEA was initiated in 2008 and is updated on a regular basis (https://doi.pangaea.de/10.1594/PANGAEA.962556, Ocean Acidification International Coordination Centre, 2023). By November 2023, a total of 1501 data sets (over 25 million data points) from 1554 papers have been archived. To easily filter and access relevant biological response data from this compilation, a user-friendly portal was launched (https://oa-icc.ipsl.fr) in 2018. Here we present the updates of this data compilation since its second description by Yang et al. (2016) and provide an overview of the “OA-ICC portal for ocean acidification biological response data” launched in 2018. Most of the study sites from which data have been archived are in the North Atlantic Ocean, North Pacific Ocean, South Pacific Ocean and Mediterranean Sea, while polar oceans are still relatively poorly represented. Mollusca and Cnidaria are still the best represented taxonomic groups. The biological processes most reported in the datasets were growth and morphology. Other variables that can potentially be affected by ocean acidification and are often reported include calcification/dissolution, primary production/photosynthesis, and biomass/abundance. The majority of the compiled datasets have considered ocean acidification as a single stressor, but their relative contribution decreased from 68 % before 2015 to 57 % today, showing a clear tendency towards more data archived from multifactorial studies.
- Preprint
(1267 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(218 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 30 May 2024)
-
RC1: 'Comment on essd-2023-456', Anonymous Referee #1, 08 Apr 2024
reply
Overview paragraph/general comments:
Overall this is a good paper that describes the data collection and curation of this useful biological dataset. Moving forward the research community is going from individual experiments to meta analyses and data sets/compilations like the one described in this paper are very important to streamline/standardize those efforts. The data quality is good, methods used follow best practices and are plausible with no detectable faults. The data presentation is good and the authors use freely available python code to interrogate the data. Below are a few minor revisions for the authors to consider.
Individual scientific questions/issues/specific comments:
The definition of OA given in the first sentence of “rapid change” is qualitative and while there are citations at the end of the sentence none of those citations specifically state what “rapid change” means. I suggest either clarifying that the author is referring to rapid on the geologic scale or striking the word rapid in the first sentence all together.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-47064-3.pdf I realize that this article just came out however I think it is relevant and suggest the authors consider including this reference in their discussion. Perhaps in line 235.
Technical comments:
Line 218 “has grown substantially in the last years…” Suggest adding in the number of years you are referencing to make this statement more specific
Same with line 220 “significantly in the last few years” can you state explicitly what you mean by few? It appears from the text you mean between 2015 and 2023. Please clarify this in the text.
Line 222 “(datasets are requested to the authors…) suggest revising to read (dataset requests are sent to the authors….)
Line 224-225 “…co-authors is possible but add to the time lapses and the efforts necessary to archive data…” suggest revising to “…co-authors is possible but significantly adds to the time and effort required to archive data,…”
Line 226 “…obtain all relevant data.” Suggest adding and metadata to the end of this sentence to read “…obtain all relevant data and metadata.”
Line 227 should be optimize not optimizing
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2023-456-RC1 -
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Yan Yang, 11 Apr 2024
reply
We thank referee #1 for his/her comments and suggestions. Our replies, in italics, are below.
Overview paragraph/general comments:
Overall this is a good paper that describes the data collection and curation of this useful biological dataset. Moving forward the research community is going from individual experiments to meta analyses and data sets/compilations like the one described in this paper are very important to streamline/standardize those efforts. The data quality is good, methods used follow best practices and are plausible with no detectable faults. The data presentation is good and the authors use freely available python code to interrogate the data. Below are a few minor revisions for the authors to consider.
We appreciate the positive comments from the referee.
Individual scientific questions/issues/specific comments:
The definition of OA given in the first sentence of “rapid change” is qualitative and while there are citations at the end of the sentence none of those citations specifically state what “rapid change” means. I suggest either clarifying that the author is referring to rapid on the geologic scale or striking the word rapid in the first sentence all together.
Accepted. We will delete “rapid” in the first sentence as “Ocean acidification refers to the change of seawater chemistry, …”
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-47064-3.pdf I realize that this article just came out however I think it is relevant and suggest the authors consider including this reference in their discussion. Perhaps in line 235.
Accepted. We will add the citation of the suggested reference in line 235 as “...no efforts at the international level have been done on compiling all relevant data on the marine biological response to some of the most studied environmental drivers, ocean warming and deoxygenation (e.g. Alter et al., 2024; Sampaio et al., 2021),...”
Technical comments:
Line 218 “has grown substantially in the last years...” Suggest adding in the number of years you are referencing to make this statement more specific
Accepted. We will specify the number of years in the statement as “The amount of data archived in our database has grown substantially in the last 15 years following the important increase of studies conducted in this field of research.”
Same with line 220 “significantly in the last few years” can you state explicitly what you mean by few? It appears from the text you mean between 2015 and 2023. Please clarify this in the text.
Accepted. We will modify the statement as “However, while until 2015, 53% of the relevant papers could be included in the compilation, this proportion has dropped significantly in the last 8 years, reaching 42% until 2023.”
Line 222 “(datasets are requested to the authors...) suggest revising to read (dataset requests are sent to the authors....)
Accepted. This sentence will be rephrased as “Although data curation is a fairly fast process (dataset requests are sent to the authors a few weeks to a few months after publication), ...”
Line 224-225 “...co-authors is possible but add to the time lapses and the efforts necessary to archive data...” suggest revising to “...co-authors is possible but significantly adds to the time and effort required to archive data,...”
Accepted. This sentence will be rephrased as “This is, most of the time, not unsolvable as finding the email addresses of co-authors is possible but significantly adds to the time and effort required to archive data,...”
Line 226 “...obtain all relevant data.” Suggest adding and metadata to the end of this sentence to read “...obtain all relevant data and metadata.”
Accepted. We will add “metadata” to the end of the sentence as “... as receiving data usually requires sending one or more reminders and several email exchanges with the author to obtain all relevant data and metadata.”
Line 227 should be optimize not optimizing
Accepted. We will revise the sentence as “Adding the contact email of a permanent researcher in the published manuscript could definitely help optimize the process.”
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2023-456-AC1
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Yan Yang, 11 Apr 2024
reply
Data sets
Data compilation on the biological response to ocean acidification: 2008-2023 Ocean Acidification International Coordination Centre https://doi.pangaea.de/10.1594/PANGAEA.962556
Interactive computing environment
PBrockmann/PANGAEA_Scraping: 20231110 Patrick Brockmann https://zenodo.org/records/8366844
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
314 | 50 | 22 | 386 | 25 | 17 | 17 |
- HTML: 314
- PDF: 50
- XML: 22
- Total: 386
- Supplement: 25
- BibTeX: 17
- EndNote: 17
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1