the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
HiQ-LAI: A High-Quality Reprocessed MODIS LAI Dataset with Better Spatio-temporal Consistency from 2000 to 2022
Jingrui Wang
Rui Peng
Kai Yang
Xiuzhi Chen
Gaofei Yin
Jinwei Dong
Marie Weiss
Jiabin Pu
Ranga B. Myneni
Abstract. Leaf Area Index (LAI) is a crucial parameter for characterizing vegetation canopy structure and energy absorption capacity. The Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) LAI has played a significant role in landmark studies due to its clear theoretical basis, extensive historical time series, reliable validation results, and open accessibility. However, MODIS LAI retrievals are calculated independently for each pixel and a specific day, resulting in high noise levels in the time series and limiting its applications. Existing reprocessing studies for MODIS LAI predominantly rely on temporal information to achieve smoother LAI profiles, with little use of spatial information. This may not only easily ignore genuine LAI anomalies but also likely lead to certain overfitting issues. To address these problems, we designed the Spatio-Temporal Information Compositing Algorithm (STICA) for the reprocessing of MODIS LAI products. This method integrates information from multiple dimensions, including pixel quality information, spatio-temporal correlation, and original retrieval, and thus enables both "reprocessing" and "data value-added" of the existing MODIS LAI products, leading to the development of the High-Quality LAI (HiQ-LAI) dataset. Compared to ground measurements, HiQ-LAI shows better performance than the original MODIS product with Root-Mean-Square Error (RMSE) / Bias decreased from 0.87 / -0.17 to 0.78 / -0.06. This is due to the improvement of HiQ-LAI in capturing the seasonality of vegetation phenology and in reducing time-series abnormal fluctuations. The Time-series Stability (TSS) index which represents temporal stability, indicated that the area with smooth LAI time-series expanded from 31.8 % (MODIS) to 78.8 % (HiQ) globally, and this improvement is more obvious in equatorial regions where optical remote sensing usually cannot achieve good performance. We found that the HiQ-LAI demonstrates superior continuity and consistency compared to raw MODIS LAI from both spatial and temporal perspectives. We anticipate that the global HiQ-LAI time-series, generated by the STICA procedure on the Google Earth Engine (GEE) platform, will significantly enhance support for diverse global LAI time-series applications. The 500 m/5 km-8 days HiQ-LAI dataset from 2000 to 2022 is available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8296768 (Yan et al., 2023).
- Preprint
(2807 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(1219 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Kai Yan et al.
Status: open (until 09 Dec 2023)
-
RC1: 'Comment on essd-2023-410', Anonymous Referee #1, 21 Nov 2023
reply
This manuscript introduces the newly generated global High-Quality LAI (HiQ-LAI) Product at 500 m/5 km and 8 days resolution from 2000 to 2022. This product was generated on the GEE platform using a well-validated Spatio-Temporal Information Composition Algorithm (STICA). The HiQ-LAI can be considered as a reprocessed and value-add version of the raw official MODIS LAI products. Evaluation results demonstrate a significant improvement compared to raw MODIS LAI in terms of RMSE and Bias, enhanced temporal stability, and superior continuity especially in equatorial regions where optical remote sensing typically struggle to achieve good performance. HiQ-LAI keeps the same data format and similar quality control information with MODIS LAI, which is very convenient for data users. For me, this paper is well organized and the new product should be useful to the community of Climate Data Record (CDR). This new version of global LAI has the potential to better replace the MODIS raw product (MOD15A2) for most applications and thus desires to be published. However, there are still some minor points that need to be modified to improve the paper. Please improve these issues as follows:
- Authors are encouraged to employ precise terminology when addressing uncertainty and accuracy in the manuscript. According to GCOS/CEOS, accuracy is defined as the proximity between the product and the reference values (doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.03.018).
- As the manuscript said, most existing filtering methods could artificially remove land surface real disturbances (e.g., forest fire, land cover change). In such cases, how does HiQ-LAI perform?
- In the abstract “However, MODIS LAI retrievals are calculated independently for each pixel and a specific day, resulting in high noise levels in the time series and limiting its applications.” Can the expression here be more precise, for example, in the regions of XXX.
- Page 2, Lines 50-55: “The long time series MODIS LAI dataset has made significant contributions to landmark studies on "Greening the Earth" phenomena”, suggest replace ‘long time series’ to ‘long-time series’, ‘on "Greening the Earth" phenomena’ to ‘on the "Greening the Earth" phenomena’.
- Page 4, Figure 1: suggest adding a schematic representation of the study area's location of Section 5.3 on this global map.
- Page 7, Lines 190-195: “we utilized the GBOV LAI measurements from a total of 29 sites spanning from 2013 to 2021 as our ground reference LAI.”, add reference here.
- Page 7, Lines 195-205: “Furthermore, we compared MODIS LAI and HiQ-LAI in 2021 using the BELMANIP V2.1 sites (445 in total).”, “Additionally, we used DIRECT V2.1 ground measurements in this research.” Please add reference here too.
- Page11, Table 1: the decimal places are not consistent, suggest changing them and unifying them. Besides, if there is insufficient data to compute RMSE and R2 for a particular site, it is recommended to fill the table with ‘—’ rather than ‘0.00’.
- Page13, Lines 260-265: “the R2 for other pure vegetation types exceeds 0.88, and B1 and B3 surpassed 0.95. The consistency of mixed pixels is also relatively high, as indicated by an RMSE of 0.42 and an R2 of 0.86. However, B5 exhibits a significant disparity, with an R2 value of 0.15.” please modify these ‘R2’ to ‘R2’.
- Page15, Lines 285-290: the usage procedures for Theil–Sen’s slope (TS) method and the Mann-Kendall (MK) test are not sufficiently clear, please provide a more detailed description and relevant mathematical formulas for Theil–Sen’s slope (TS) method and the Mann-Kendall (MK) test in Section of the methodology.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2023-410-RC1
Kai Yan et al.
Data sets
A High-Quality Reprocessed MODIS Leaf Area Index Dataset (HiQ-LAI) Kai Yan, Jingrui Wang, Marie Weiss, Ranga B. Myneni https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8296768
Kai Yan et al.
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
271 | 85 | 5 | 361 | 12 | 2 | 5 |
- HTML: 271
- PDF: 85
- XML: 5
- Total: 361
- Supplement: 12
- BibTeX: 2
- EndNote: 5
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1