the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Global Nitrous Oxide Budget 1980–2020
Naiqing Pan
Rona L. Thompson
Josep G. Canadell
Parvadha Suntharalingam
Pierre Regnier
Eric A. Davidson
Michael Prather
Philippe Ciais
Marilena Muntean
Shufen Pan
Wilfried Winiwarter
Sönke Zaehle
Feng Zhou
Robert B. Jackson
Hermann W. Bange
Sarah Berthet
Zihao Bian
Daniele Bianchi
Alexander F. Bouwman
Erik T. Buitenhuis
Geoffrey Dutton
Minpeng Hu
Akihiko Ito
Atul K. Jain
Aurich Jeltsch-Thömmes
Fortunat Joos
Sian Kou-Giesbrecht
Paul B. Krummel
Angela Landolfi
Ronny Lauerwald
Ya Li
Chaoqun Lu
Taylor Maavara
Manfredi Manizza
Dylan B. Millet
Jens Mühle
Prabir K. Patra
Glen P. Peters
Xiaoyu Qin
Peter Raymond
Laure Resplandy
Judith A. Rosentreter
Daniele Tonina
Francesco N. Tubiello
Guido R. van der Werf
Nicolas Vuichard
Junjie Wang
Kelley C. Wells
Luke M. Western
Chris Wilson
Jia Yang
Yuanzhi Yao
Yongfa You
Qing Zhu
Abstract. Nitrous oxide (N2O) is a long-lived potent greenhouse gas and stratospheric ozone-depleting substance, which has been accumulating in the atmosphere since the pre-industrial period. The mole fraction of atmospheric N2O has increased by nearly 25 % from 270 parts per billion (ppb) in 1750 to 336 ppb in 2022, with the fastest annual growth rate since 1980 of more than 1.3 ppb yr-1 in both 2020 and 2021. As a core component of our global greenhouse gas assessments coordinated by the Global Carbon Project (GCP), we present a global N2O budget that incorporates both natural and anthropogenic sources and sinks, and accounts for the interactions between nitrogen additions and the biochemical processes that control N2O emissions. We use Bottom-Up (BU: inventory, statistical extrapolation of flux measurements, process-based land and ocean modelling) and Top-Down (TD: atmospheric measurement-based inversion) approaches. We provide a comprehensive quantification of global N2O sources and sinks in 21 natural and anthropogenic categories in 18 regions between 1980 and 2020. We estimate that total annual anthropogenic N2O emissions increased 40 % (or 1.9 Tg N yr-1) in the past four decades (1980–2020). Direct agricultural emissions in 2020, 3.9 Tg N yr−1 (best estimate) represent the large majority of anthropogenic emissions, followed by other direct anthropogenic sources (including ‘Fossil fuel and industry’, ‘Waste and wastewater’, and ‘Biomass burning’ (2.1 Tg N yr−1), and indirect anthropogenic sources (1.3 Tg N yr−1). For the year 2020, our best estimate of total BU emissions for natural and anthropogenic sources was 18.3 (lower-upper bounds: 10.5–27.0) Tg N yr-1, close to our TD estimate of 17.0 (16.6–17.4) Tg N yr-1. For the period 2010–2019, the annual BU decadal-average emissions for natural plus anthropogenic sources were 18.1 (10.4–25.9) Tg N yr-1 and TD emissions were 17.4 (15.8–19.20 Tg N yr-1. The once top emitter Europe has reduced its emissions since the 1980s by 31 % while those of emerging economies have grown, making China the top emitter since the 2010s. The observed atmospheric N2O concentrations in recent years have exceeded projected levels under all scenarios in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6), underscoring the urgency to reduce anthropogenic N2O emissions. To evaluate mitigation efforts and contribute to the Global Stocktake of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, we propose establishing a global network for monitoring and modeling N2O from the surface through the stratosphere. The data presented in this work can be downloaded from https://doi.org/10.18160/RQ8P-2Z4R (Tian et al. 2023).
- Preprint
(5582 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(543 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Hanqin Tian et al.
Status: open (until 23 Dec 2023)
-
CC1: 'Comment on essd-2023-401, Figure 1', Leon Simons, 11 Oct 2023
reply
Great work!
It's not immediately clear from the Figure 1 if e.g. the change in atmospheric abundance is positive or negative, though it's clear from the rest of the gigure and paper.
You could turn the half circles into upward arrows, for example.
Best regards,
Leon
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2023-401-CC1 -
RC1: 'Comment on essd-2023-401', Stephen Del Grosso, 24 Nov 2023
reply
The paper is very comprehensive and provides the most complete and accurate N2O budget published to date. Estimates for almost all known sources/sinks are included and disaggregated spatially and temporally. One of the main strengths is various bottom up and different top down inversion methods are used and it is encouraging that the estimates are mostly consistent. The information presented is very useful and anticipate that this work will be well cited. Some relatively minor points of clarification/suggestions for improvement:
Lines 131-132 are #s based on BU or TD?
Line 143 and elsewhere manure should be mature
Figure 3, why no anthropogenic source for coastal?
Lines 447 and 1170 were FAOSTAT emission factors for N additions based on the 2006 guidelines or the 2019 refinement?
Line 481 does this mean that 56% of N inputs were assumed to be anthropogenic and consequently 56% of total N2O from this source is anthropogenic?
Line 489 define book keeping approach; is it the same as mass balance?
Line 503 does the 5 Tg N refer to NOx?
Figure 13 state that blue is BU and red TD
Line 795 replace The sections followed with The following sections
Figure 13 KAJ seems low. Perhaps this is related to Figure 15, the green bar for TD shows a net sink; this does not seem correct, please double check.
Figure 14 does ensemble include BU and TD?
Figure 15 I think (blue) should be (red) and (yellow) should be (green)
Figure 16b why is non-ag error bar so large? 16d what are A B C D E and why such large bars for A?
Line 1177 mentions higher tier estimates. In this context, mention that the USA uses a Tier 3 approach for most agricultural soils.
Supplement line 15 says 6 models accounted for manure N but line 69 says 5 models
Line 87 equation is missing
Line 126 use more descriptive text than intense. Perhaps state if microbes or plant roots have 1st shot at available N
Lines 294 and 303 - 2006 guidelines or 2019 refinement?
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2023-401-RC1
Hanqin Tian et al.
Data sets
Data supplement to: Tian et al, 2023. Global N2O Budget 1980-2020. ESSD Hanqin Tian et al. https://doi.org/10.18160/RQ8P-2Z4R
Hanqin Tian et al.
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
819 | 304 | 14 | 1,137 | 40 | 13 | 23 |
- HTML: 819
- PDF: 304
- XML: 14
- Total: 1,137
- Supplement: 40
- BibTeX: 13
- EndNote: 23
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1