the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
GLC_FCS30D: The first global 30-m land-cover dynamic monitoring product with a fine classification system from 1985 to 2022 using dense time-series Landsat imagery and continuous change-detection method
Xiao Zhang
Tingting Zhao
Hong Xu
Wendi Liu
Jinqing Wang
Xidong Chen
Abstract. Land cover change has been identified as an important cause or driving force of global climate change and is a significant research topic. Over the past few decades, global land-cover mapping has progressed, however, long time-series global land-cover change monitoring data are still sparse, especially at 30-m resolution. In this study, GLC_FCS30D is described as the first global 30-m land-cover dynamic monitoring dataset, containing 35 land-cover subcategories and covering the period of 1985–2022 with 26 time-steps (maps updated every five years before 2000 and annually after 2000). GLC_FCS30D has been developed using continuous change detection and all available Landsat imagery based on the Google Earth Engine platform. In specific, we first take advantage of the continuous change-detection model and full time-series Landsat observations to capture the time-points of changed pixels and identify the temporally stable areas. Then, we apply a spatiotemporal refinement method to derive the globally distributed and high-confidence training samples from these temporally stable areas. Next, locally adaptive classification models are used to update the land-cover information for the changed pixels, and a temporal-consistency optimization algorithm is adopted to improve their temporal stability and suppress some false changes. Further, the GLC_FCS30D product is validated using 84,526 globally distributed validation samples in 2020 and achieves an overall accuracy of 80.88 % (±0.27 %) for the basic classification system (10 major land-cover types) and 73.24 % (±0.30 %) for the LCCS level-1 validation system (17 LCCS land-cover types). Meanwhile, two third-party time-series validation datasets in the United States and Europe Union are also collected for analyzing accuracy variations, and the results show that the GLC_FCS30D offers significant stability for time-series accuracy variation and achieves the mean accuracies of 79.50 % (±0.50 %) and 81.91 % (±0.09 %) over the two regions. Last, we conclude the global land-cover change information from GLC_FCS30D dataset, namely, the forest and cropland variations dominate global land cover change over past 37 years, and net loss of forests reaches about 2.5 million km2 and net gain in cropland area is approximately 1.3 million km2. Therefore, the novel GLC_FCS30D is an accurate time-series land-cover dynamic monitoring product benefiting from its diverse classification system, high spatial resolution and the long time span of 1985–2022, thus, it will effectively support global climate change research and promote sustainable development analysis. The GLC_FCS30D datasets are available via https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8239305 (Liu et al, 2023).
- Preprint
(3122 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Xiao Zhang et al.
Status: open (until 07 Oct 2023)
-
RC1: 'Comment on essd-2023-320', Anonymous Referee #1, 27 Sep 2023
reply
This paper greatly attempts to map the annual global land cover change using all Landsat observations and the CCD approach. The paper is well written with clear logic, while some issues need to be clarified for publication as a scientific data paper.
- The CCDC approach is very sensitive to the parameters adopted, which may identify pseudo changes. This may directly relate to the derived temporal stable regions, and further impact the results of global changed areas (as well as the statistics). As a scientific data paper, this part should be enhanced with quantitative analysis, especially the uncertainty of change detection across different cover types.
- As a global land cover change dataset, the accuracy assessment regarding those changed pixels should be significantly improved. The confusion matrix just shows the accuracy in 2020, while those changes in different years with field samples as well as global product comparison (e.g., ESACCI and MODIS) should be given and discussed.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2023-320-RC1 -
RC2: 'Comment on essd-2023-320', Anonymous Referee #2, 02 Oct 2023
reply
The authors present a very detailed manuscript on the generation of a global 30-m land cover product. It is original in the spatio-temporal density of Landsat satellite imagery used to generate annual maps over nearly 30 years. I recommend this paper for publication. There is one major issue that needs to be addressed and a number of minor or editorial issues to address:
Major change:
Both the Continuous Change Detection and Classification (CCDC) Algorithm and the Random Forest Algorithm for subsequent land cover classification use several hyperparameters. Both models will be sensitive to the hyperparameters selected. As a minimum, the hyperparameters selected for both models need to be clearly defined and justified (this is already partially done for the CCDC algorithm). However, to fully justify the use of hyperparameters, sensitivity analysis should be provided of the values used, and validation that the optimum or a favourable set of hyperparameter values have been selected.
Minor or editorial changes:
Introduction/ methods – various mentions of model ‘accuracy’ is used. This includes, but is not limited to lines 31-32, 69 and 155. Please be specific on the accuracy metric(s) used.
Line 24- The use of the phrase ‘In specific’ is awkward and I suggest changing e.g. ‘Specifically’ or ‘In particular…’
Line 201- ‘The first time series validation set was assessed the performance…’ remove ‘was’.
Line 205- Change ‘It developed by combining…’ to ‘It was developed by combining…’
Figure 2: This Figure is very useful for help the reader understand the main processes carried out in this project. Please add the shortened names of each dataset to the flow chart to make it even easier for the reader to follow the text.
Figure 2: You refer to masking ‘poor quality’ pixels. Please be more specific on this. Does this just include applying a cloud mask, or does it also consider issues with the Scan Line Corrector on Landsat 7, for example. What cloud mask was used. How did you account for pixels that may be under light cloud/ haze which may not be picked up by a cloud mask (e.g. does the CCDC intend to overcome this?)
Table 1: Please add the abbreviations for each land cover type to this table (at later points you refer to Table 1 as containing these).
Line 357- please provide more information on the indicator function, or at least a reference.
Figure 7- the very thick lines corresponding to pixels with a stable land cover overwhelm this image and make it difficult for the reader to decipher the most dominant types of land cover change. Please either rescale the image or consider removing the lines corresponding to no land cover change to make it easier for the reader to assess the dominant types of land cover change.
Table 2 and 3- please use a method to highlight the relative performance of your algorithms. For example use a colour ramp or make particular values bold.
Results and discussion are very thorough although there is no mention to coastal regions which will be areas of major change detectable at 30 m resolution.
Overall, I enjoyed reading this paper. The analysis was very thorough and easy to follow.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2023-320-RC2
Xiao Zhang et al.
Data sets
GLC_FCS30D: global 30-m land-cover dynamic monitoring product with a fine classification system from 1985 to 2022 Liangyun Liu https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8239305
Xiao Zhang et al.
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
487 | 173 | 13 | 673 | 5 | 15 |
- HTML: 487
- PDF: 173
- XML: 13
- Total: 673
- BibTeX: 5
- EndNote: 15
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1