the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
30 m Map of Young Forest Age in China
Yuelong Xiao
Qunming Wang
Xiaohua Tong
Peter Atkinson
Abstract. Young forest age mapping at a fine spatial resolution is important for increasing the accuracy of estimating land-atmosphere carbon fluxes and guiding forest management practices. In recent decades, China has actively conducted afforestation and forest protection projects, thereby, laying the foundation for the realization of carbon neutrality. However, very few studies have been conducted which map the ages of young forests for the whole of China at a fine spatial resolution. In this research, a continuous change detection and classification (CCDC)-based method suitable for large-scale forest age mapping is proposed, and used to estimate young forest ages across China in 2020 at a spatial resolution of 30 m. First, a 10 m spatial resolution land cover dataset (WorldCover2020) from the European Space Agency (ESA) was used to determine the forest cover areas in 2020. Then, the CCDC algorithm was used to identify stand-replacing disturbances to determine the stand age based on 436,967 Landsat tiles across China from 1990 to 2020. A validation sample set composed of multiple land use/land cover (LULC) products was used to calculate the overall accuracy (OA) of the 2020 young forest age (1–31 years) map of China, and the OA was 90.28 %. The reliability and applicability of the proposed CCDC-based forest age mapping method was validated by comparing the forest age map with Hansen’s forest change dataset, Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry (MPI-BGC) 1 km global forest age datasets and field measurements. The CCDC-based method has strong application potential in real-time mapping of the age of young forests at the global scale. The produced forest age map provides a basic dataset for research on the forest carbon cycle and forest ecosystem services, and important guidance for government departments, such as the National Forestry and Grassland Administration and National Development and Reform Commission in China.
Yuelong Xiao et al.
Status: final response (author comments only)
-
RC1: 'Comment on essd-2022-415', Zhen Yu, 13 Jan 2023
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://essd.copernicus.org/preprints/essd-2022-415/essd-2022-415-RC1-supplement.pdf
- AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Q. Wang, 22 Mar 2023
- AC2: 'Reply on RC1', Q. Wang, 22 Mar 2023
-
CC1: 'Comment on essd-2022-415', Xudong Lin, 14 Feb 2023
Publisher’s note: the content of this comment was removed on 14 February 2023 since the comment was posted by mistake.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2022-415-CC1 -
CC2: 'Comment on essd-2022-415', Anonymous community, 14 Feb 2023
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement
-
AC4: 'Reply on CC2', Q. Wang, 22 Mar 2023
We thank you for using our dataset and giving the above positive comments and nice suggestions. We have carefully considered your comments and have responded as follows.
First, this issue is mainly about the set of values for years larger than 31. Specifically, by classifying the pixels with values >31 into one category and then displaying forest age, the problem of spatial discontinuity you mentioned can be resolved. In the next version of the dataset, we will share it after resolving this issue.
Second, as you mentioned, there are some CCDC-family algorithms, which may be more suitable for turbulence monitoring and/or classification of land cover. We use CCDC to track the breakpoints of Landsats time series, for the three main reasons: (1) CCDC is the classical algorithm in turbulence detection. We considered using it to estimate the age of forest and the results in this paper already demonstrated that it is an acceptable choice; (2) other CCDC-family algorithms might be sensitive to detect breakpoints. In future research, we will examine whether the use of other versions will necessarily further increase the accuracy; (3) GEE cloud platform provided the basic CCDC in its official algorithm libraries, which is more suitable for large-scale mapping than other CCDC-family algorithms currently.
Third, the differences you mentioned may come from three parts: (1) Differences in statistical time. The ninth national forest inventory (NFI) of China is covering the period 2014–2018, however, our dataset is covering the period 1990–2020; (2) Differences in the methods of forest age statistics. The NFI classified the forest into five forest classes (such as young, mid-aged, near-mature, mature, and over-mature forests), and the age range of each class is vary with tree types. For example, the natural Pinus massoniana Lamb less than 20 years old belongs to the young stage, while the natural Abies fabri less than 40 years old also belongs to the young forest. However, we definite the 1-31-year-old forests as young forests; (3) Mapping error. As mentioned in Section 5.4 of the manuscript, there are still uncertainties in estimating the age of forests.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2022-415-AC4
-
AC4: 'Reply on CC2', Q. Wang, 22 Mar 2023
-
RC2: 'Comment on essd-2022-415', Anonymous Referee #2, 16 Mar 2023
In this manuscript a continuous change detection and classification (CCDC)-based method for large-scale forest age mapping is proposed, and used to estimate young forest ages across China in 2020 at a spatial resolution of 30 m. This is of interest to the scientific community. The reliability and applicability of the proposed CCDC-based forest age mapping method has been validated by comparing the forest age map with 20 Hansen’s forest change dataset, Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry (MPI-BGC) 1 km global forest age datasets and field measurements. This study would be very helpful to reduce the uncertainties in the research of forest carbon cycle. It only needs a minor revisions as follows:
1) Line 518: “of should be” should be replaced with “should be”.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2022-415-RC2 -
AC3: 'Reply on RC2', Q. Wang, 22 Mar 2023
Thank you very much for your positive comments and suggestions to improve our manuscript. We have carefully considered your comments and revised the paper accordingly. We have modified the sentence in Line 518.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2022-415-AC3
-
AC3: 'Reply on RC2', Q. Wang, 22 Mar 2023
Yuelong Xiao et al.
Yuelong Xiao et al.
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
550 | 155 | 31 | 736 | 4 | 5 |
- HTML: 550
- PDF: 155
- XML: 31
- Total: 736
- BibTeX: 4
- EndNote: 5
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1