the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
AlgaeTraits: a trait database for (European) seaweeds
Marine Robuchon
Stefanie Dekeyzer
Ignacio Bárbara
Inka Bartsch
Aurélie Blanfuné
Charles-François Boudouresque
Wim Decock
Christophe Destombe
Bruno Reviers
Pilar Díaz-Tapia
Anne Herbst
Romain Julliard
Rolf Karez
Priit Kersen
Stacy A. Krueger-Hadfield
Ralph Kuhlenkamp
Akira F. Peters
Viviana Peña
Cristina Piñeiro-Corbeira
Fabio Rindi
Florence Rousseau
Jan Rueness
Hendrik Schubert
Kjersti Sjøtun
Marta Sansón
Dan Smale
Thierry Thibaut
Myriam Valero
Leen Vandepitte
Bart Vanhoorne
Alba Vergés
Marc Verlaque
Christophe Vieira
Line Gall
Frederik Leliaert
Olivier Clerck
Abstract. The analysis of biological and ecological traits has a long history in evolutionary and ecological research. However, trait data are often scattered and standardised terminology that transcends taxonomic and biogeographical context are generally missing. As part of the development of a global trait database of marine species, we collated trait information for European seaweeds and structured the data within the standardised framework of the World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS). We collected 45,175 records for 21 biologically and ecologically relevant traits of seaweeds. This resulted in a trait database for 1,745 European seaweed species of which more than half (56 %) of the records were documented at the species level, while the remaining 44 % was documented at a higher taxonomic level and subsequently inherited at lower levels. The trait database for European seaweeds will serve as a foundation for future research on diversity and evolution of seaweeds, and their responses to global changes. The data will contribute to developing detailed trait-based ecosystem models, and will be an important tool to inform marine conservation policies. The data is publicly accessible through the AlgaeTraits portal, algaetraits.org, doi: https://doi.org/10.14284/574, (AlgaeTraits, 2022).
Sofie Vranken et al.
Status: final response (author comments only)
-
RC1: 'Comment on essd-2022-329', Anonymous Referee #1, 03 Nov 2022
Dear editor and authors,
The manuscript "AlgaeTraits: a trait database for (European) seaweeds" has been carefully reviewed considering the originality and content of the work. The present work developed a database platform with information on traits from different seaweed taxa. The review was carried out using data from an extensive bibliography and aimed to complement some gaps within this theme. The present study and its database platform will strongly contribute to future works, it will help in the interpretation of ecological, biodiversity, and biological data, as well as contribute to the advancement of functional studies within the area of marine algae. Therefore, through this, I recommend accepting the article. I leave just a few small doubts and suggestions.
Abstract: what do you mean by record (5th line)? record of what? species?
Table A1: I suggest including species/genus examples for each trait in a new column.
Results: As well as in Table A1 I suggest starting with the ecological traits or changing the order in the table.
Best regards,
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2022-329-RC1 -
RC2: 'Comment on essd-2022-329', Annalisa Minelli, 08 Mar 2023
The research is well positioned and contextualized with the state of the art. The dataset really fills a gap in knowledge about algae traits in Europe and dataset is well describe in quality and quality. Data is shared via a persistent repository in a standardized way.
* Row 117: It would be interesting to have the survey filled by experts as an annex to this article
* Row 119: insert the reference to Aphia here (first time named)
* Row 334: Is the online editing interface already in place? If yes, it could be nice to have a reference (link) in the text.
An observation about shared data: even if upload process in WORMS or AlgaeBase follows a specific workflow and don’t take into account the format of uploaded files, material made available as “Archived data” should be checked in content, since there are some seemingly auxiliary columns (such as “Check_Sofie_and_Marine_17_March_2020” – column T of the file “3_Macroalgae_traits_additional_to_upload_final_annotation_complete.xlsx”) which are not standardized, have scarce meaning in the frame of the database and could surely be converted into more valuable information such as a binary column “checked” to evidence that some quality checks have been made before publishing data.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2022-329-RC2
Sofie Vranken et al.
Data sets
AlgaeTraits: a trait database for (European) seaweeds AlgaeTraits editors https://doi.org/10.14284/574
Sofie Vranken et al.
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
603 | 193 | 20 | 816 | 8 | 13 |
- HTML: 603
- PDF: 193
- XML: 20
- Total: 816
- BibTeX: 8
- EndNote: 13
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1