1 Metadata QC

1.1 Quick summary

NOTE: Metadata Quality Checks are under continous development. Checks made and results presentation can change in the future to adapt to new insights in data digesting processes

1.2 Metadata columns

Information about metadata variables (presence, class and NA)

1.3 Metadata factor variables value

Information about factor variables values

1.4 Contributors email

Information about email directions provided

1.5 Coordinates check and fix

Information about site coordinates provided

1.6 Species names

Information about species names

1.7 Plant treatments check

Information about declared plant treatments

1.8 Environmental variables

Information about environmental variables and their presence in metadata and data

1.9 Metadata Remarks

List of remarks provided by the contributor/s

Site level remarks

Stand level remarks

Species level remarks

No remarks

Plant level remarks

Sapflow measurements actually start in 2009. First years suffer from instrument failures leaving large gaps. I decided to supply only the years 2012-2015. These years show also data gaps, mainly due to power shortage and mainly in winter and during nights. Therefore a window of 1 week has been used to determine Tmax. Sapwood area is calculated from DBH following Santi&Jans 1997. For sapwood area per hectare I have 2 numbers: 16.425 (Santi&Jans 1997) and 23.534 (Alex Soudant 2009). Sapflux supplied is per tree. Sapflux is calculated following Granier 1987. We have 6 trees instrumented with 2 sensors each, one on the North side and one on the South. The supplied data is an average of these two. Time stamps are at the END of the interval. Time is in CET, no summertime., NA, NA, NA, NA, NA

Environmental remarks

2 Data QC

2.1 Quick Summary

NOTE: Data Quality Checks are under continous development. Checks made and results presentation can change in the future to adapt to new insights in data digesting processes

Quality Check for NLD_LOO

SAPFLUXNET Project

2016-12-05 16:24:07