<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ESSD</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Earth System Science Data</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ESSD</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Earth Syst. Sci. Data</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1866-3516</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/essd-9-809-2017</article-id><title-group><article-title>Volcanic stratospheric sulfur injections and aerosol optical depth from 500 BCE to 1900 CE</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Volcanic stratospheric sulfur injections and aerosol optical depth from 500\,BCE to 1900\,CE}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{M.~Toohey and M.~Sigl}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Toohey</surname><given-names>Matthew</given-names></name>
          <email>mtoohey@geomar.de</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7070-405X</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2 aff3">
          <name><surname>Sigl</surname><given-names>Michael</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Laboratory of Environmental Chemistry, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232 Villigen, Switzerland</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Oeschger Centre for Climate Change Research, 3012 Bern, Switzerland</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Matthew Toohey (mtoohey@geomar.de)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>6</day><month>November</month><year>2017</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>9</volume>
      <issue>2</issue>
      <fpage>809</fpage><lpage>831</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>24</day><month>April</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>18</day><month>September</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>11</day><month>September</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>19</day><month>June</month><year>2017</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/9/809/2017/essd-9-809-2017.html">This article is available from https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/9/809/2017/essd-9-809-2017.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/9/809/2017/essd-9-809-2017.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/9/809/2017/essd-9-809-2017.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>The injection of sulfur into the stratosphere by explosive volcanic eruptions is the cause of significant climate variability. Based
on sulfate records from a suite of ice cores from Greenland and Antarctica, the eVolv2k database includes estimates of the
magnitudes and approximate source latitudes of major volcanic stratospheric sulfur injection (VSSI) events from 500 BCE to 1900 CE,
constituting an update of prior reconstructions and an extension of the record by 1000 years. The database
incorporates improvements to the ice core records (in terms of synchronisation and dating) and refinements to the methods used to estimate VSSI from
ice core records, and it includes first estimates of the random uncertainties in VSSI values. VSSI estimates for many of the largest
eruptions, including Samalas (1257), Tambora (1815), and Laki (1783), are within 10 % of prior estimates. A number of strong events
are included in eVolv2k which are largely underestimated or not included in earlier VSSI reconstructions, including events in 540,
574, 682, and 1108 CE. The long-term annual mean VSSI from major volcanic eruptions is estimated to be <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % greater than a prior reconstruction due to the identification of more events and an
increase in the magnitude of many intermediate events. A long-term latitudinally and monthly resolved stratospheric aerosol optical
depth (SAOD) time series is reconstructed from the eVolv2k VSSI estimates, and the resulting global mean SAOD is found to be similar
(within 33 %) to a prior reconstruction for most of the largest eruptions. The long-term (500 BCE–1900 CE) average global mean
SAOD estimated from the eVolv2k VSSI estimates including a constant “background” injection of stratospheric sulfur is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.014</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 30 % greater than a prior reconstruction. These new long-term reconstructions of past VSSI and SAOD variability give
context to recent volcanic forcing, suggesting that the 20th century was a period of somewhat weaker than average volcanic forcing,
with current best estimates of 20th century mean VSSI and SAOD values being 25 and 14 % less, respectively, than the mean of the
500 BCE to 1900 CE period. The reconstructed VSSI and SAOD data are available at <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1594/WDCC/eVolv2k_v2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1594/WDCC/eVolv2k_v2</ext-link>.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>The injection of sulfur into the stratosphere by explosive volcanic eruptions has important ramifications for the Earth's climate.
Sulfur-containing gases emitted by volcanic eruptions, including <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, lead to the formation of liquid sulfate
aerosols. In the stratosphere, sulfate aerosols have a lifetime on the order of years. These aerosols scatter incoming solar radiation
and absorb infrared radiation, leading to a net decrease in radiation reaching the Earth's surface and associated cooling (Robock,
2000).</p>
      <p>Reconstructions of the history of climatic forcing by past eruptions have a long history (Lamb, 1970) and are an important ingredient
in an understanding of past climate variability. Volcanic reconstructions have been extensively used to understand climate variability
in instrumental and proxy-based climate records (Crowley et al., 2008; Hegerl et al., 2007; Masson-Delmotte et al., 2013; Sigl et al.,
2015) and have been used to show that volcanism is the dominant natural driver of climate variability in the Earth's recent past
(Schurer et al., 2013). Volcanic reconstructions are also increasingly being used to understand the role of sudden climate changes in
the evolution of past societies as recorded in documentary and archaeological archives (Ludlow et al., 2013; Oppenheimer, 2011; Toohey
et al., 2016a).</p>
      <p>Volcanic forcing reconstructions provide essential boundary conditions for climate model simulations which aim to reproduce past
climate variability.  In one commonly used methodology, climate models take as input reconstructed volcanic forcing datasets, which
prescribe certain physical aspects of the volcanic stratospheric sulfate aerosol. More recently, climate models have been coupled with
prognostic aerosol microphysical modules, which allow for the explicit simulation of the growth, transport, and removal of stratospheric
aerosols (e.g. English et al., 2013; Mills et al., 2016; Timmreck, 2012; Toohey et al., 2011). For these models, simulating the
effects of volcanic eruptions on climate requires estimates of the amount of sulfur injected into the stratosphere and the time and
location of that injection.  Prognostic aerosol modelling, however, comes with an associated computational expense, and many model
simulations continue to use prescribed aerosol forcing sets as input. The Easy Volcanic Aerosol (EVA) forcing generator is a simple and
flexible module which produces stratospheric aerosol properties for use in climate models when given the sulfur injection magnitude,
time, and approximate location (Toohey et al., 2016b). EVA therefore provides the bridge necessary to allow different types of models to
use time series of volcanic stratospheric sulfur injection (VSSI) as a common basis for volcanic forcing.</p>
      <p>For eruptions since approximately 1979, VSSIs can be estimated based on satellite observations of the initial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> plume (Bluth
et al., 1997; Carn et al., 2016; Clerbaux et al., 2008; Guo et al., 2004; Höpfner et al., 2015; Read et al., 1993). Prior to the
satellite era, information on the sulfur injection can be inferred from different records, including optical measurements (Sato
et al., 1993; Stothers, 1996, 2001), geologic information on the on the eruptive magnitude and volatile content of the erupted magma
(Metzner et al., 2012; Scaillet et al., 2003; Self, 2004; Self and King, 1996), and ice cores (Ammann et al., 2003; Clausen and Hammer,
1988; Robock and Free, 1995; Zielinski, 1995). Ice cores in particular provide long records with unequalled temporal accuracy and
precision of volcanic eruptions from around the globe (Cole-Dai, 2010; Robock and Free, 1995).</p>
      <p>Ice cores were first used to estimate the stratospheric sulfate aerosol mass burden following explosive volcanic eruptions by Clausen
and Hammer (1988). Zielinski (1995) used similar techniques to estimate the sulfate aerosol loading resulting from eruptions spanning
2100 years based on chemical analysis of the Greenland GISP2 ice core. Robock and Free (1995) constructed an index of volcanic
climate forcing from a compilation of multiple polar ice cores from both hemispheres.  Based on a larger
compilation of ice cores, Gao et al. (2008) reconstructed both stratospheric sulfur injections and reconstructions of the
spatio-temporal spread of aerosol mass in the stratosphere over the time period 501–2000. Other volcanic reconstructions (e.g. Ammann
et al., 2003; Crowley and Unterman, 2013) have provided estimates of the radiative impacts of past eruptions based on analysis of ice
cores without explicitly estimating sulfate aerosol masses or sulfur injections.</p>
      <p>Recent improvements to the ice core record of past volcanism (Plummer et al., 2012; Sigl et al., 2014, 2015) motivate a revision and
extension of sulfur injection reconstructions. The record of volcanism preserved in Antarctic ice has been improved based on the
compilation of a larger set of ice cores, extending back to 500 BCE, with a largely static number of cores used to compile an Antarctic
average for the past 2000 years (Sigl et al., 2014). An adjustment to previous age models used to date past volcanic events has
resulted in better agreement between ice core sulfate signals and cooling signals preserved in tree rings, improving confidence in the
accuracy of the new ice core record dating (Sigl et al., 2015).</p>
      <p>This paper describes the construction of a new sulfur injection database from ice core records based on newly compiled ice core
sulfate composites. It presents the justification for a modification to the method used to convert ice core sulfate fluxes to VSSI
compared to past works.  Finally, we present estimates of stratospheric aerosol optical depth (SAOD) translated from the VSSI estimates presented here using the EVA forcing
generator and compare the resulting record with prior reconstructions. Together, the resulting VSSI and SAOD datasets represent
significant updates and improvements to the volcanic forcing datasets (Crowley and Unterman, 2013; Gao et al., 2008) used in numerous
prior climate model simulations, including those used in the Paleoclimate Modelling Intercomparison Project (PMIP) Phases 2 and 3 (Schmidt
et al., 2011).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Method</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Ice core data</title>
      <p>Sulfate (or sulfur) in ice cores can have several sources, of which marine biogenic emissions of dimethyl sulfide and volcanic
sulfur emissions are the most important contributions during the pre-industrial era (Cole-Dai, 2010). All reconstructions of volcanic
sulfate mass deposition from ice cores agree in the general methodology, in which the non-volcanic (or background) contribution to the
total sulfate (or sulfur) at the ice core site is assumed to be slowly varying and thus can be well approximated by simple functions
such as splines, running medians, or a constant value. Upon subtracting the estimated background from the total concentrations, the
remaining excess concentrations are attributed to volcanic origin (Gao et al., 2006, 2008; Sigl et al., 2014; Traufetter et al., 2004;
Zielinski, 1995).</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1.SSS1">
  <title>Ice core sulfate composites</title>
      <p>As the basis of the volcanic reconstruction, we used an existing compilation of synchronised volcanic sulfate records from ice cores
in Greenland and Antarctica (Sigl et al., 2015) complemented with the GISP2 ice core record from Greenland (Zielinski, 1996) to
improve the sampling density, especially during the earlier period of our reconstruction. The compilations use only sulfur and sulfate
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) concentration measurements and exclude measurements of electrical conductivity or acidity since other species than
sulfur (e.g.  chlorine, fluorine, nitrate, carboxylic acids) may also contribute to the total measured acidity (Clausen et al., 1997;
Pasteris et al., 2014). A list of ice cores used is included in Table S1. In summary, the reconstruction is based on ice cores from
three sites in Greenland, including NEEM (Sigl et al., 2014, 2015), NGRIP (Plummer et al., 2012), and GISP2 (Zielinski, 1995, 1996) and
between 8 and 17 individual ice cores from Antarctica included in the AVS-2k composite over the Common Era (Sigl et al., 2014)
extended to earlier dates by the WDC (from 394 BCE) and B40 (from 500 BCE) ice cores (Sigl et al., 2015).</p>
      <p>Volcanic sulfate flux is non-uniform over Greenland and Antarctica, and the shortest ice core records (in time) usually have the
largest deposition rates (Gao et al., 2007; Sigl et al., 2014). Taking account of changes in the sample size and pattern over time is
a challenging issue in the construction of long-term ice sheet average fluxes. To simplify this process and improve the long-term
stability of the resulting records, we preferentially used the longest ice core records currently available, resulting in a relatively
constant sample size over most of the Common Era (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; 200–1900 CE). With the addition of GISP2, only one ice core record has
been included into the composite which was not part of the Sigl et al. (2015) database but which has been used in previous
compilations (Crowley and Unterman, 2013; Gao et al., 2008). Synchronisation to the NS1-2011 chronology was performed against the NEEM
sulfur record, and 85 common stratigraphic age markers (averaging one every 30 years) have been identified (Figs. S1–S3). Over the
past 2500 years, the GISP2 sulfate record contains some missing data sections encompassing in total 160 years (6 %), including
the time period 532–606 AD, which includes some of the largest volcanic eruptions in historic times.</p>
      <p>Our estimates of the timing of volcanic sulfate enrichment in the ice cores are based on the most recently updated ice core
chronologies for Greenland and Antarctica (NS1-2011 and WD2014, respectively; see Sigl et al., 2015, 2016) and represent the first
year in which a sulfate anomaly was detected in the glacio-chemical records. Small adjustments were made in cases in which bipolar
eruptions had slightly different ages in Greenland and Antarctica to derive a unified chronology (Sigl et al., 2015). Since the
Greenland ice core chronology (NS1-2011) was constrained with more absolute age markers than that from Antarctica (WD2014), a stronger
weight was usually given to the Greenland ages. For known historic eruptions – some of which are verified by identifying and
characterising tephra in ice cores (Abbott and Davies, 2012; Jensen et al., 2014; Sun et al., 2014) – the exact timing (calendar date,
month, season) of the eruptions was used. For the majority of the volcanic events over the past 2500 years, the exact timing of the
eruption cannot be constrained with the ice core records alone, since volcanic sulfate has different atmospheric residence times
depending on such details as the latitude, season, and injection height of the eruption.  Thus the time lag between stratospheric
injection at the source and deposition at the ice core site can vary between a few weeks up to a year (Robock, 2000; Toohey et al.,
2013).</p>
      <p>For each ice core used, deposited <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mass (or “flux”, in units kg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was previously estimated for all
volcanic events exceeding a predefined detection threshold by integrating the sulfate flux exceeding the natural background over the
time span of its deposition (Plummer et al., 2012; Sigl et al., 2013, 2014, 2015; Zielinski, 1995, 1996). While major
volcanic signals related to eruptions such as Samalas (1257), Tambora (1815), Huyanaputina (1600), or Krakatau (1883) are clearly
identified in all ice cores taken from a larger network, the smaller volcanic events may in some cases not be picked up by all
ice cores equally. For example, analysis of the GISP2 ice core, which was measured at biannual resolution (Zielinski, 1995), detected
fewer volcanic events than in comparably long but higher-resolved ice cores from NEEM and NGRIP. Low annual snowfall rates present in
some areas in Antarctica can also occasionally lead to post-depositional changes in the original volcanic sulfate signature, as was
shown in the example of the Tambora 1815 event using five ice cores from Dome C (Gautier et al., 2016). Even under such extreme
climate conditions present at some areas of East Antarctica, the loss of volcanic signatures from individual ice core records by wind
erosion is rather the exception than the rule given that the major volcanic signatures of even much smaller events are continuously
captured in virtually all ice cores over Antarctica (Sigl et al., 2014). The large number of ice cores included in the AVS-2k network
not only allowed for the firm detection of false positives and more precise quantification of total sulfate flux, but also for a reduction of the
detection limit and the identification of additional events that would not exceed the threshold limits set for a single sulfate
record. By using an alternative detection approach (AVS-2k<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) based on extracting the event flux directly from a stacked
sulfate concentration record characterised by increased signal-to-noise ratios compared to the more noisy individual ice core records,
Sigl et al. (2014) extracted an additional 46 volcanic events with sulfate fluxes as low as 1–4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, whereas the
detection limits for the individual ice core sulfate series were close to 3–5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. With no comparable large network
available from Greenland, the detection limit for the three Greenland ice cores in pre-industrial times is typically in the range of
3–6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. After approximately 1900 AD, the increased anthropogenic release of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> into the troposphere from
industrial processes masks many of the volcanic signatures during the 20th century in Greenland (Fig. S3). For this reason, we have
constrained the present reconstruction to the period before 1900. For the period thereafter, we recommend the use of estimates
utilising larger networks of Greenland ice cores (Crowley and Unterman, 2013; Gao et al., 2008) or from other multi-proxy
reconstructions (Neely and Schmidt, 2016).</p>
      <p>Antarctic and Greenland ice sheet average flux values were then computed based on the available ice core measurements for each
volcanic event. In the AVS-2k compilation, individual ice cores were weighted in the overall average in order to account for the
spatial variability of deposition over the ice sheet. This was accomplished by first averaging flux values for pre-defined regions or
depositional regimes and then averaging the values over the different regions (Sigl et al., 2014). For Greenland, a simple average of
the three ice cores was used, since the ice cores show no evidence of systematic differences in their measured values for 48 volcanic
events common to all three cores (Fig. S4). In cases when volcanic sulfate was not detected in all three Greenland cores, sulfate
flux was set to 50 % of the detection limit for those ice cores without a strong signal.  This is motivated by the fact that visual
inspection of the data for such cases often revealed the presence of a volcanic signal which did not exceed the detection
threshold. These cases only include comparably small volcanic signals: the largest 40 events recorded in the Greenland ice cores since
200 CE all have signals in all three ice cores (providing no gaps in the records). Apparently, the detection threshold had been set
differently for the individual ice cores so that many volcanic events detected in NEEM and/or NGRIP have not been extracted for the
GISP2 record. NEEM also seems to extract slightly fewer events than NGRIP, potentially owing to the greater background variability of
sulfur due to the closer proximity of the ice core site to the ocean emitting biogenic sulfur species. Situated in the centre of
Greenland, the NGRIP record has arguably the best ability to capture the atmospheric excess sulfate content from volcanic
eruptions,
and we thus argue that the simple arithmetic mean is the most realistic metric to describe the true sulfate deposition over
Greenland. For Antarctica, occasionally missing values in individual cores have also not been set to “zero” prior to averaging, but
the influence on the overall composite value is minimal, as is evident by the comparison with the alternatively stacked composite
AVS-2k<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Sigl et al., 2014).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1.SSS2">
  <title>Ice core uncertainties</title>
      <p>Uncertainty in the timing of volcanic events in ice core records arises from uncertainties in the annual-layer interpretation when
establishing the layer counted chronologies. Absolute age uncertainties in the ice core records used in eVolv2k are believed to be on
average better than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2 years during the past 1500 years and better than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5 years some 2500 years ago based on
comparison to well-dated tree ring records (Adolphi and Muscheler, 2016; Sigl et al., 2015, 2016).</p>
      <p>Since the composites for Greenland (in general) and Antarctica (prior to the Common Era) are based on a few ice cores only, we explore
in the following how well large-scale sulfate flux over Greenland and Antarctica is reproduced in individual records or pairs of
ice core records. For this we use 48 events that are common to all three ice core records in Greenland and 48 events that are
recorded in at least 10 ice core records from Antarctica. In both cases, this threshold is more or less equivalent to eruptions with more than
6–7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of average sulfate flux (Fig. S4).</p>
      <p>For Antarctica, individual ice core records such as B40 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.88</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and WDC (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.91</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) are strongly correlated with the
ice-sheet-wide flux values based on a large number (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of individual ice cores (Fig. S4). A composite of only the B40 and WDC
records – which is the sample used here prior to the Common Era in Antarctica – produces quite reasonable agreement with the full
Antarctic composite for the 48 common events, with a correlation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.93</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Similarly, for Greenland, a composite of NEEM
and
GISP2 shows close correlation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.98</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) with the three-ice-core Greenland composite, and correlations of single ice core values
vs. the full composite are only slightly smaller, with GISP2 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.76</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) showing the weakest agreement with the overall composite
and NGRIP (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.89</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) having the highest correlation. The high level of correlation – especially over Antarctica where a large
number of individual records contributes to the composite – indicates that the lack of replication of the Tambora signal observed
at Dome C (Gautier et al., 2016) is most likely a phenomenon specific to the wind-exposed Antarctic plateau and that, in general,
individual ice core records are able to capture a large portion of the large-scale sulfate flux. In other words, the strong
correlations between ice sheet composites and the single-site records support the idea that valuable information on large-scale
sulfate flux and therefore stratospheric aerosol burdens can be extracted even from a small number of ice cores from well-placed
sites.</p>
      <p>Uncertainties in the Antarctic composite sulfate fluxes in AVS-2k are taken as reported by Sigl et al. (2015). From 1–2000 CE, the
uncertainty in the Antarctic mean is quantified by the standard error of the mean (SEM) of the individual ice core flux values. Typical
(root mean square) uncertainties for this period in the Antarctic composites are approximately 13 %. Before 1 CE, when only two ice
cores are used in the construction of the Antarctic composite, a constant uncertainty value of 26 % is assumed based on regression
analysis between AVS-2k (the ice sheet average) and the composite of WDC and B40 over the 1–2000 CE period (see Sigl et al., 2015).</p>
      <p>Special consideration is paid to uncertainties in the Greenland composite sulfate flux due to the small sample size. Assuming that the
fluxes retrieved from each ice core represent the true ice sheet average plus some normally distributed independent random error,
estimates of the error variance for each ice core can be estimated (Appendix A). This analysis produces estimates of 46, 45, and
33 % for NEEM, NGRIP, and GISP2, respectively (Fig. S5). Using standard error propagation rules, we estimate that when all three ice
cores are used in an ice sheet composite, the resulting uncertainty is approximately 22 % and two-core composites take
uncertainties of approximately 32 % (NEEM plus NGRIP), 28 % (NEEM plus GISP2), and 28 % (NGRIP plus GISP2).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Proposed matches of ice core sulfate signals to volcanic eruptions.
Matches are based on those listed by Sigl et al. (2013), with appropriate
time shift applied due to updated ice core timescales (Sigl et al., 2015),
except where noted. Volcano names, eruption dates, and eruption numbers are
taken from the Volcanoes of the World database provided online by the Global
Volcanism Program (2013), except where noted.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="8">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ice</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Eruption</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Eruption</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Eruption</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Volcano</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Volcano</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">VEI</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">GVP</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">year</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">year</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">month</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">day</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">latitude</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">name</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">eruption</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">number</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1887</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1886</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>38.12</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Okataina (Tarawera)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">14 506</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1884</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1883</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">27</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>6.10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Krakatau</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">15 589</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1875</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1875</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">65.03</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Askja<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Öskjuvatn Caldera)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">12 911</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1873</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1873</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">64.40</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Grímsvötn</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">12 818</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1862</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1861</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">12</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">28</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.32</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Makian</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">16 685</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1856</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1856</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">25</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">42.06</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Hokkaido-Komagatake<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">18 567</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1853</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1853</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">22</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">42.50</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Toya (O-Usu)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">18 598</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1836</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1835</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">20</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">12.98</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Cosigüina</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">15 718</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1832</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1831</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">19.52</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Babuyan Claro</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">16 880</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1823</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1822</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>7.25</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Galunggung</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">15 718</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1815</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1815</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>8.25</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Tambora<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">16 231</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1783</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1783</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">64.40</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Grímsvötn (Laki)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">12 809</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1766</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1766</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">63.98</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Hekla (Bjallagigar)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">12 745</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1756</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1755</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">17</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">63.63</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Katla</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">12 674</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1739</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1739</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">19</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">42.69</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Shikotsu (Tarumai)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">18 612</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1721</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1721</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">63.63</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Katla<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">12 673</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1708</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1707</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">12</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">16</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">35.36</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Fujisan</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">17 452</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1673</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1673</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">20</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.38</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Gamkonora</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">16 584</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1667</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1667</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">23</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">42.69</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Shikotsu (Tarumai)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">18 610</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1641</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1640</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">12</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">26</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Parker</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">16 694</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1601</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1600</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">17</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>16.61</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Huaynaputina</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">11 795</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1595</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1595</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4.89</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Nevado del Ruiz</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">11 279</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1585</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1585</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">19.51</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Colima</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">10 414</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1512</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1510</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">25</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">63.98</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Hekla</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">12 739</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1477</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1477</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">64.63</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Bárðarbunga (Veidivötn)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">12 865</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1258</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1257</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">7 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>8.42</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Rinjani (Samalas)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">20 843</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">946</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">946</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">11 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">41.98</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Changbaishan<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">19 644</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">939</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">939</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">63.63</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Katla (Eldgjá)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">19 938</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">879</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">64.63</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Bárðarbunga (Vatnaöldur)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">12 854</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">853</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">61.38</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Churchill<inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">20 422</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">236</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">15 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>20)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>38.82</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Taupo<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">14 553</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p><inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Newly proposed match.<?xmltex \hack{\\}?><inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Date of most explosive phase of eruption, from Sigurdsson and Carey (1989).<?xmltex \hack{\\}?><inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Date of most explosive phase of eruption, from Thordarson and Self (2003).<?xmltex \hack{\\}?><inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Attribution and date estimate from Lavigne et al. (2013).<?xmltex \hack{\\}?><inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Attribution from Sun et al. (2014). Date based on inference from historical
documents (Hayakawa and Koyama, 1998; Xu et al., 2013).<?xmltex \hack{\\}?><inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Date (including estimate of season) from Oppenheimer et al. (2017).
<?xmltex \hack{\\}?><inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Attribution from Jensen et al. (2014).<?xmltex \hack{\\}?><inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Eruption season derived from dendrochronological evidence (Hogg et al., 2012).
</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Injection locations and dates</title>
      <p>The locations and dates of stratospheric sulfur injections can be assigned based on matching ice core sulfate signals with observed
historic eruptions. Here, following prior work (e.g. Crowley and Unterman, 2013; Plummer et al., 2012; Sigl et al., 2013), we use the
Volcanoes of the World online eruption database (Global Volcanism Program, 2013) and other sources of information to assign locations
and dates to a number of events in the combined Greenland and Antarctic sulfate event inventory (Table 1). Such matches carry some
degree of uncertainty and subjectivity. In some cases, the matches can be made with a high degree of confidence based on the temporal
coincidence of exceptional sulfate signals with similarly exceptional eruptions, e.g. Tambora (1815) and Laki (1783). Chemical
analysis of tephra extracted from ice cores has been used to strengthen the matches for cases like Samalas (1257, Lavigne et al., 2013)
and Changbaishan (946, Sun et al., 2014). In other cases, matches are based on little more than temporal coincidence between an ice
core sulfate signal and an identified major eruption – such matches are prone to reexamination when ice core timescales are adjusted
or the eruption catalogue is updated. For this exercise, we have attempted to err on the side of caution and have discarded some
matches used in prior work. For example, the large mid-15th century ice core sulfate signal originally attributed to 1452/53 (Gao
et al., 2006) and recently refined by independent annual-layer counting to 1458 (Plummer et al., 2012; Sigl et al., 2013) often
attributed to the Kuwae caldera, Vanuatu (17<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S) is considered unidentified here.</p>
      <p>For the remaining majority of ice core sulfate signals which are not easily matched to a known eruption, approximate eruption
latitudes are assigned based on the presence or lack of simultaneous signals in both Greenland and Antarctic ice core
composites. Signals occurring synchronously (given small possible dating uncertainties) in both Greenland and Antarctic composites are
attributed to tropical eruptions, while those with signals in only one hemisphere are assumed to be extratropical in origin following
Sigl et al. (2015). Representative latitudes for unidentified eruptions can be based on the latitudinal distribution of identified
eruptions. Based on the Holocene eruption database (Global Volcanism Program, 2013), we find average latitudes of extratropical
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced close="|" open="|"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">φ</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), VEI <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> eruptions of 48<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N and 42<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S, and an average tropical eruption latitude
of 2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N. For simplicity and symmetry, we adopt a convention of assigning unknown tropical eruptions a latitude of
0<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N and extratropical eruptions a latitude of 45<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N or S. Consistent with Crowley and Unterman (2013), unknown
eruptions are assigned an eruption date of 1 January.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <title>Stratospheric sulfate injection estimation</title>
      <p>The mass of sulfur injected into the stratosphere by an eruption (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is eventually deposited onto the Earth's
surface. Assuming all injected sulfur is converted to sulfate aerosols before deposition, the mass of total sulfate flux to the
surface (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is simply <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> due to the ratio of the molecular mass of S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to the atomic mass of
sulfur. From ice cores, the sulfate “flux” (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is derived, which represents the local accumulated sulfate mass
density in units of kg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. If this flux was uniform over the Earth, estimating <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (and thereby
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) would simply require multiplying the flux by the surface area of the Earth. Since the deposition is not spatially uniform,
a transfer function is required to convert flux values from any location or area to estimates of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to account for
the spatial inhomogeneity of deposition (Gao et al., 2007; Toohey et al., 2013).  Assuming that the deposition pattern is consistent
for all events for any location or region on Earth, a transfer function, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mtext>global</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, can be defined as

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M75" display="block"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msup><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mtext>global</mml:mtext></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          Clausen and Hammer (1988) derived the first global transfer functions based on analysis of the radioactive products of nuclear weapons
testing (NWT) in the 1950s and 1960s, with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mtext>global</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> defined by the ratio of the estimated release of radioactive material and
estimates of the radioactive flux from analysis of ice cores. Clausen and Hammer (1988) then used the global transfer functions to
estimate the sulfate aerosol loading from a number of past eruptions by applying the transfer function for each ice core individually to
the volcanic fluxes for each core and averaging the result for a best estimate.</p>
      <p>Gao et al. (2007) suggested that the sulfate fluxes to Greenland and Antarctica can be used separately as proxies for the Northern
Hemisphere (NH) and Southern Hemisphere (SH) sulfate loading. In this methodology, transfer functions are required to connect the ice
sheet sulfate fluxes from Greenland and Antarctica (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">G</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively, with the subscript
“<inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>” discarded hereafter for brevity) to the total hemispheric deposited sulfate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>NH</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>SH</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). By defining a variable, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, which represents the ratio of NH to global deposited sulfate and therefore
the proportion of the total sulfur injection, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is transported to and deposited over the
NH,

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M84" display="block"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>NH</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>global</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>SH</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>global</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          we can write transfer functions for the ice sheets of each hemisphere:

                <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M85" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E3"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msup><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">G</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>NH</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">G</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">G</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E4"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msup><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>SH</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            <?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>From Eqs. (3) and (4), we can write an expression for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as a function
of the measured Greenland and Antarctic fluxes and the transfer functions:

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M87" display="block"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">G</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">G</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          While the hemispheric partitioning coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is not required to calculate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> via Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E5"/>), it can be
used as a proxy for the hemispheric asymmetry of the volcanic radiative forcing. In practice, the eVolv2k database includes the ratio
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) of the estimated NH to SH deposited sulfate:

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E6" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M91" display="block"><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">G</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">G</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is simply related to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>Gao et al. (2007) derived values of the hemispheric transfer functions <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">G</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> separately for tropical
and extratropical eruptions. For tropical eruptions, Gao et al. (2007) used measurements of nuclear radioactivity from ice cores
(Clausen and Hammer, 1988) and revised estimates of the stratospheric injection of radioactive fallout from NWT.  Since the
partitioning of radioactive material between the NH and SH after the NWT in the tropics is uncertain, Gao et al. (2007) assumed that
between 1/2 to 2/3 of the radioactive material was transported into the Northern Hemisphere (i.e. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.66</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), which lead to
estimates for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">G</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ranging from 0.75 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. For <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Gao et al. (2007) used
estimates of the sulfur injection by the 1991 eruption of Pinatubo and measured sulfate in Antarctic ice cores. We revisit that
calculation here based on updated data. According to analysis of satellite retrievals (Guo et al., 2004), Pinatubo injected <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> into the lower tropical stratosphere, amounting to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> [S].  Satellite records also show
a fairly even transport of aerosol between the NH and SH, suggesting <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The Antarctic average sulfate flux
following Pinatubo is approximately 11 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Crowley and Unterman, 2013; Sigl et al., 2014). Using these values in
Eq. (4) leads to an estimate of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or approximately 0.9–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This calculation is only slightly changed when considering the potential impact of the August 1991 Cerro Hudson
eruption in Chile, which injected an estimated 0.75 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> [S] into the stratosphere (Bluth et al., 1997). In this case, again
noting that the observed SAOD after Pinatubo was balanced between the NH and SH, we infer that the SH loading was about half of the
total sulfur injection by Pinatubo and Cerro Hudson, around <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which leads to a value for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>The hemispheric transfer function estimates from the NWT results (for Greenland) and the Pinatubo case study (for Antarctica) are both
consistent with a value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. There is no reason that the transfer functions should need to be the same
for both Greenland and Antarctica – in fact, given the spatial variability of simulated sulfate deposition patterns over the globe
(Gao et al., 2007; Toohey et al., 2013), it would perhaps be surprising that the values are the same. On the other hand, ice-core-derived flux estimates for identified tropical eruptions cluster around equal values for Antarctica and Greenland (Toohey
et al., 2016a); therefore applying equal weight to the two hemispheric ice sheets in the estimation of the global total seems to be
a justifiable simplification.</p>
      <p>A transfer function value for tropical eruptions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is numerically identical to that derived by Gao
et al. (2007); however, there is a subtle difference in our implementation. Our interpretation is that this transfer function relates
the sulfate flux values with atmospheric sulfate mass (either the hemispheric deposited sulfate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
or,
equivalently, the theoretical maximum sulfate mass loading <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). In contrast, Gao et al. (2007) used the same value to
estimate the volcanic sulfate aerosol mass loading, which is different since sulfate aerosols include not only the mass of sulfate,
but also that of water, as sulfate aerosols in the stratosphere are usually assumed to be 25 % water by mass. To calculate the
mass of sulfate aerosols from the mass of sulfate requires scaling by a factor of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; therefore, our revised transfer function
estimate is effectively 33 % larger than that of Gao et al. (2007).</p>
      <p>For extratropical eruptions, Gao et al. (2007) introduced a transfer function of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">G</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.57</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> based on analysis of ice core radioactivity resulting from NWT at high latitudes and on output from volcanic
sulfate transport simulations with a general circulation model. The use of a smaller transfer function for extratropical eruptions
seems appropriate since a larger proportion of the sulfate from such eruptions is likely to be deposited in the extratropics compared
to tropical eruptions, necessitating a smaller transfer function to estimate the global deposited sulfate (or injected mass). We
retain the value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.57</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> here, but again interpret it rather as a transfer function between ice-core-derived sulfate flux and sulfate loading (not sulfate aerosol loading), producing an effective 33 % increase in the
transfer function compared to that of Gao et al. (2007). The threshold latitude separating tropical and extratropical eruptions is set
to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>25<inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> based on satellite-based estimates of the “edges” of the stratospheric tropical pipe (Neu et al., 2003).</p>
      <p>While it is thought that the majority of sulfate aerosol arising from extratropical eruptions is contained within the hemisphere of
the eruption (Oman et al., 2006), it does seem possible that in some cases sulfate from extratropical eruptions may cross the Equator
in large enough quantities to be recorded in the ice sheets of the opposite hemisphere. Modelling results suggest that extratropical
eruptions can lead to ice sheet flux in the opposite hemisphere of the eruption around 10 % that of the hemisphere of eruption,
which is likely to produce detectable signals only for the largest such eruptions (Toohey et al., 2016a). In such cases, we used the
extratropical transfer function to estimate the sulfate injection of the hemisphere of the eruption and the tropical transfer
function to estimate the injection to the other hemisphere. In the current eVolv2k version, the only significant eruption for which
this rule applies is the 236 CE Taupo event, for which sulfate signals in both Antarctica and Greenland are attributed to the SH
eruption.</p>
      <p>It should also be noted that the method introduced above assumes that the ice core sulfate flux is directly proportional to the
stratospheric injection. In reality, some of the sulfate deposited on ice sheets may come from volcanic sulfur emissions into the
troposphere. Of particular importance are effusive (i.e. non-explosive) eruptions from Iceland, which under the right meteorological
conditions may produce large sulfate deposition over Greenland even when the stratospheric injection is minimal.  Crowley and
Unterman (2013) adjusted the Greenland flux values for the 1783 Laki eruption, deriving a ratio of stratospheric to total sulfate flux
of 0.15 based on analysis of the “far-field” Mt. Logan ice core. The proportion of Laki's stratospheric sulfur injection is indeed
highly uncertain (Lanciki et al., 2012; Schmidt et al., 2012), and to date little quantitative information on the
stratospheric-to-tropospheric partitioning of sulfur injection is available for other Icelandic eruptions of the past
2500 years. Geological records suggest that purely effusive eruptions in Iceland are rare and that the eruption of Laki was
characterised by both explosive and effusive phases (Thordarson and Larsen, 2007). Until an objective criterion can be established to
quantify the proportion of ice core sulfate representing the stratospheric sulfate burden, we have chosen to maintain the assumption
that all sulfate is stratospheric but stress that this is a rather important potential source of uncertainty.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS1">
  <title>Uncertainty in VSSI</title>
      <p>The VSSI estimates carry significant uncertainty due to errors in the ice core flux measurements and, more importantly, uncertainties
in the transfer functions used to convert the ice core flux composites to estimates of VSSI.</p>
      <p>Systematic uncertainties describe potential errors that are static, leading to overall bias in the estimated quantity. The most likely
source of systematic error in the VSSI estimates comes from the uncertainty in the transfer functions <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">G</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. For <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">G</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the uncertain distribution of NWT radioactive material between the NH and SH leads to an
uncertainty of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %, although this uncertainty could be larger if one allows for the possibility of a larger range of
possible hemispheric partitioning ratios. Uncertainty in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">G</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is also strongly connected to uncertainties in the amount of
radioactive material released by NWT and its partitioning between the stratosphere and troposphere. For <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, uncertainty
arises due to the uncertainty in the VSSI produced by the 1991 Pinatubo eruption.  Systematic uncertainties in the transfer functions
for extratropical eruptions, currently based mostly on the climate model simulations of Gao et al. (2007), are difficult to quantify
but likely larger than those of tropical eruptions.</p>
      <p>Random errors in the VSSI estimates may be present because of finite sampling in the estimation of the ice sheet average flux from
a finite sample of ice cores and because the ice sheets sample only a portion of the overall hemispheric deposited sulfate, which might
vary from case to case because of variability in atmospheric transport and deposition processes. Using standard error propagation
rules, the random error in the total sulfur injection <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> due to random errors in the ice sheet composites and
the transfer functions is given by
<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>

                  <disp-formula id="Ch1.E7" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M140" display="block"><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced close="}" open="{"><mml:mtable class="array" columnalign="center"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><?xmltex \vspace*{2mm}?><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">G</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">G</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">G</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">G</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">G</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">G</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            The relative uncertainties in the composite ice sheet fluxes (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">G</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) are as described
in Sect. 2.1.2. The random error of the transfer functions (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">G</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is
presently impossible to estimate from observations. Model simulations of volcanic sulfur injection and its evolution suggest that the
proportion of sulfur injected into the stratosphere and later deposited on ice sheets can vary substantially due to variations in the
meteorological state (Toohey et al., 2013). We take model-based estimates of this variability quantified at the 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> level as 16
and 9 % for Greenland and Antarctica, respectively, as the present best estimates of this representativeness error (Toohey et al.,
2013).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <title>Aerosol optical depth estimation</title>
      <p>The Easy Volcanic Aerosol (EVA) version 1 forcing generator (Toohey et al., 2016b) is used here to translate sulfur injections into
spatio-temporally resolved estimates of the optical properties of volcanic aerosols. We focus here on the variation in stratospheric
aerosol optical depth (SAOD) at the mid-visible wavelength of 550 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>The EVA module takes stratospheric sulfur injection estimates as input and outputs vertically and latitudinally varying aerosol
optical properties designed for easy implementation in climate models. The spatio-temporal structure of the EVA output fields is based
on a simple three-box model of stratospheric transport, with timescales of mixing and transport based on fits to satellite observations of
the 1991 Pinatubo eruption. Vertical and horizontal shape functions are assigned to each of the three boxes, again based on the
observed extinction of Pinatubo aerosols. Internally, EVA first calculates the transport of sulfate mass between the three
regions and
then applies a scaling procedure to translate sulfate mass into mid-visible SAOD. This scaling is linear for most eruptions and is
based on retrievals of SAOD and total sulfur injection from the 1991 Pinatubo eruption.  Following Crowley and Unterman (2013), a non-linear scaling is applied
for very large eruptions: in EVA, the non-linear scaling applies only to eruptions greater in magnitude than Tambora. EVA allows also
for the consideration of a constant, non-zero stratospheric sulfur injection representing the cross-tropopause transport of naturally
produced gases, including carbonyl sulfide (Crutzen, 1976; Kremser et al., 2016), which gives rise to the “background” stratospheric
sulfate aerosol layer (Junge et al., 1961). The smallest satellite-observed SAOD, which occurred around the year 2000, is used to
estimate a constant background sulfur injection of 0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which agrees well with other estimates (Sheng et al.,
2015).</p>
      <p>The SAOD results shown hereafter, produced by the EVA forcing generator using the eVolv2k VSSI database, are denoted as
“EVA(eVolv2k)”. This naming convention is used to emphasise the two-step nature of the SAOD reconstruction and encourage clarity in
future cases when e.g. EVA is used with other input datasets. SAOD results are shown in terms of either monthly, annual, or centennial
means – it should be noted that peak SAOD values can vary substantially depending on the temporal resolution of the record.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5">
  <title>Comparison datasets</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5.SSS1">
  <title>Ice sheet composite sulfate flux</title>
      <p>The ICI reconstruction (Crowley and Unterman, 2013) provides ice-core-based composite fluxes for the NH and SH over the period
800–2000 CE. SH fluxes are based on ice core records from Antarctica, while NH fluxes come from Greenland cores plus one core from
Mt. Logan, Alaska. We rescaled the sulfate flux reported for Laki (1783) to undo the correction applied by the authors to account for
tropospheric vs. stratospheric injection by dividing by a factor of 0.15. The IVI2 database (Gao et al., 2008) does not directly
provide ice core composite fluxes. However, by inverting the scaling procedure described by Gao et al. (2007), we have reproduced
hemispheric composite fluxes based on the reported estimates of stratospheric sulfate aerosol injection over the period 500–2000. We
validated these results by comparing with the few sample fluxes reported by Gao et al. (2007).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5.SSS2">
  <title>Volcanic stratospheric sulfur injection</title>
      <p>Global VSSI estimates over the period 501–2000 are extracted from the IVI2 database (Gao et al., 2008) by first summing the reported hemispheric stratospheric
sulfate aerosol injections. The sulfate aerosol masses of IVI2 are computed assuming 25 % water content, so
multiplication by a factor of 0.75 is required to convert sulfate aerosol mass into sulfate mass.  Finally, conversion from sulfate
mass to sulfur mass is computed based on the ratio of molecular weights.</p>
      <p>The VolcanEESM database (Mills et al., 2016; Neely and Schmidt, 2016) contains estimates of total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions by volcanic
eruptions from 1850 to 2015. For the pre-satellite era (1850 to 1979), the dataset combines the most recent volcanic sulfate flux
datasets from ice cores with volcanological and, where applicable, petrological estimates of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mass emitted
and
historical records of large-magnitude volcanic eruptions. In the satellite era, volcanic emissions were primarily derived from remotely
sensed observations. The database also includes the locations of each eruption and estimates of the maximum and minimum plume
height. To estimate the mass of sulfur injected into the stratosphere, we take the estimated plume heights and compare to the
climatological tropopause height at the latitude of each eruption. If the maximum plume height is greater than the climatological
tropopause, we assume that the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emitted is in fact injected to the stratosphere. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions from eruptions with
maximum plume heights below the altitude of the local tropopause are thus ignored. Conversion from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to sulfur mass is
performed by multiplication by the ratio of molecular weights.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5.SSS3">
  <title>Stratospheric aerosol optical depth</title>
      <p>The ICI reconstruction (Crowley and Unterman, 2013) contains estimates of zonal mean SAOD at 550 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for four equal-area latitude
bands over the period 800–2000. The reconstruction is based on a scaling of Greenland and Antarctic ice core composites to measured
SAOD after the Mt. Pinatubo eruption of 1991. Here, we take the ICI SAOD estimates as they are provided and simply average the
four
equal-area bands into a global annual mean SAOD.</p>
      <p>For the 1850–2000 period, the CMIP6 (version 2) stratospheric aerosol forcing reconstruction
(<uri>ftp://iacftp.ethz.ch/pub_read/luo/CMIP6/</uri>, Luo, 2016) has been
constructed based on a combination of satellite- and ground-based optical measurements and aerosol model results (Arfeuille
et al., 2014) using VSSI estimates from IVI2. While the dataset contains estimates of many physical and optical properties of the
aerosols, we focus here on estimates of SAOD at 550 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.  Aerosol extinction from the CMIP6 forcing files is integrated above
the climatological tropopause at each latitude, and a simple area-weighted average is used to compute the global mean.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Composite sulfate fluxes derived from ice cores for (left)
Antarctica and (right) Greenland (or NH). Values from the eVolv2k (this work)
and IVI2 (Gao et al., 2008) reconstructions are plotted vs. composite values
from the ICI reconstruction (Crowley and Unterman, 2013) for event matches
defined in Table S2. Linear fits to the scatter plots are included, with best
fit slopes and intercepts as included in the legends.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/9/809/2017/essd-9-809-2017-f01.pdf"/>

          </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Volcanic stratospheric sulfur injection (VSSI) from the IVI2 and
eVolv2k reconstructions. Values exceeding the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-axis limits are denoted as
text. Years are shown using the ISO 8601 standard, which includes a year
zero.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/9/809/2017/essd-9-809-2017-f02.pdf"/>

          </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><caption><p>Scatter plot of matched eVolv2k vs. IVI2 VSSI estimates for events
spanning 501–1900 CE with VSSI <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> [S]. Matches are defined
in Table S3, and labels show the year of each event according to the eVolv2k
reconstruction. Vertical bars indicate the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uncertainty in the
eVolv2k VSSI estimates. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> line is shown in black, with dark and light
grey shading denoting the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>10 and 33 % range around <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/9/809/2017/essd-9-809-2017-f03.pdf"/>

          </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><caption><p><bold>(a)</bold> Centennial mean volcanic stratospheric sulfur
injections (VSSI) from the IVI2 and eVolv2k reconstructions. <bold>(b)</bold> The
number of volcanic events per century included in the eVolv2k and IVI2
reconstructions. Years are shown using the ISO 8601 standard, which includes
a year zero.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/9/809/2017/essd-9-809-2017-f04.pdf"/>

          </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Global mean annual mean stratospheric aerosol optical depth (SAOD)
from the EVA(eVolv2k) and ICI reconstructions. Years are shown using the ISO
8601 standard, which includes a year zero.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/9/809/2017/essd-9-809-2017-f05.pdf"/>

          </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><caption><p>Scatter plot of matched EVA(eVolv2k) vs. ICI estimates of 3-year
cumulative global mean SAOD for events with values greater than 0.2. Matches
are defined in Table S4. Labels show the eVolv2k date of each event. Vertical
bars indicate the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uncertainty in the EVA(eVolv2k) SAOD estimates.
The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> line is shown in black, with dark and light grey shading denoting
the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 33 % range around <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/9/809/2017/essd-9-809-2017-f06.pdf"/>

          </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Centennial global mean SAOD from the ICI and EVA(eVolv2k)
reconstructions. A version of the EVA reconstruction which includes no
background sulfur injection, EVA(eVolv2k, nb), is shown by the dashed line.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=327.206693pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/9/809/2017/essd-9-809-2017-f07.pdf"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Ice sheet sulfate flux composites</title>
      <p>Greenland and Antarctic composite sulfate fluxes from eVolv2k are compared to composites from the IVI2 (Gao et al., 2008) and ICI
(Crowley and Unterman, 2013) reconstructions in Fig. 1. For this comparison, we have focused on unambiguous matches between the three
sets of composites between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1590</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 2000, also including the 1257/8 Samalas signal, listed in Table S2. Flux composites for
eVolv2k and the IVI2 datasets are plotted against the ICI reconstruction in Fig. 1.</p>
      <p>The eVolv2k composite fluxes show rather close agreement with the values reported by ICI. Linear fits of the eVolv2k vs. ICI composite
fluxes were computed using the OLS bisector method (Isobe et al., 1990), resulting in slopes of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.89</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.14</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for Greenland
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.87</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for Antarctica. On the other hand, the IVI2 flux values show a significant bias compared to ICI, with a slope of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.33</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.14</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for Greenland and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.30</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.26</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for Antarctica. Fits of the IVI2 fluxes against the eVolv2k fluxes (not shown) result in
bias estimates of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.49</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.21</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for Greenland and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.50</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.28</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for Antarctica.</p>
      <p>The apparent bias in the IVI2 fluxes compared to ICI and eVolv2k is primarily due to the reported fluxes for the largest events. When
the linear fits are repeated after removing the largest events (1783, 1258, and 1815 for Greenland and 1258 and 1695 for Antarctica), the
bias of the IVI2 fluxes compared to eVolv2k reduces to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.90</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.34</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for Greenland and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for Antarctica. For Greenland,
IVI2 used a large number of supplemental ice cores in the estimates for Tambora and Laki (Clausen and Hammer, 1988; Mosley-Thompson
et al., 1993), which increased the composite estimates for these events significantly compared to values originally reported using
only the long-term ice core records (Gao et al., 2006). Over Antarctica, the large IVI2 composite flux for 1257 is likely a result of
the very strong flux recorded by the SP01 ice core from the South Pole (Budner and Cole-Dai, 2003), which was not reproduced by another
ice core record from the same site (SP04, Ferris et al., 2011) and consequently was not included in the AVS-2k composite (Sigl et al.,
2014).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Volcanic stratospheric sulfur injection</title>
      <p>The eVolv2k global VSSI time series is shown in Fig. 2 in comparison to the values from the IVI2 reconstruction. Over the 1500–1900
time period, the two reconstructions are very similar in terms of the timing and magnitude of most events, including Tambora (1815) and
Laki (1783). The eVolv2k VSSI estimates for Huyanaputia (1600), Parker (1640), and the unidentified eruption of 1809 are slightly larger
than those of IVI2.</p>
      <p>Within the 1000–1500 CE time period, the two reconstructions agree reasonably well in terms of the timing and magnitude of the great
1257 Samalas eruption and the eruptions of 1276 and 1286. A major difference between the reconstructions is the timing of the great
mid-15th century eruption, which differs by 6 years. Before <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1250</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> CE, there is a notable shift in the timing of events,
reaching about 6 years, and most events are of a somewhat larger magnitude in the eVolv2k reconstruction.  Between 500 and 1000 CE,
there is very little correlation between the two reconstructions. The eVolv2k reconstruction contains strong VSSI events, including
events at 540, 574, 682, and 1108 CE, which are missing or largely underestimated in the IVI2 reconstruction. Of particular note, the
eVolv2k reconstruction includes a sequence of very large eruptions in the sixth century, including a NH extratropical eruption in 536 CE
and tropical eruptions in 540 and 574 CE, which is consistent with timings inferred in earlier studies (Baillie, 2008; Baillie and McAneney,
2015; Toohey et al., 2016a) and confirmed by Sigl et al. (2015), with VSSI magnitudes 25–30 % larger than estimated by Toohey
et al. (2016a). The extension of VSSI estimates back to 500 BCE reveals two large events: a Samalas-magnitude injection in 426 BCE and
an event of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> sulfur (30 % greater than Tambora) in 44 BCE.</p>
      <p>Global VSSI magnitudes for the major events common to the eVolv2k and IVI2 datasets over the 500–1900 CE period are compared in more
detail in Fig. 3. Major events were defined here as those with VSSI values greater than 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Lists were compiled of
major events from both datasets, and matches between the two datasets were found based on coincidence in time (Table S3), allowing for
a drift in time in the early portion of the overlap period consistent with recent updates to the ice core dating (Sigl et al.,
2015). If no match was found for a strong event in one dataset, a VSSI value of 0 was specified for the other dataset.</p>
      <p>VSSI estimates from eVolv2k and IVI2 for many of the largest events, including the 1257, 1783, and 1815 events, agree to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % (Fig. 3). This agreement reflects compensation between changes in the ice core sulfate flux composites used in the two
reconstructions (see Fig. 1) and the 33 % increase in effective transfer function used in the construction of eVolv2k. If the 1452
event from IVI2 was matched to the 1458 event of eVolv2k, they would also agree to within 10 %, yet this agreement is largely
coincidental, since the IVI2 value is based on combining values from two likely disparate events in 1452 and 1458 (Cole-Dai et al.,
2013; Plummer et al., 2012; Sigl et al., 2013). A handful of other smaller events agree between the two datasets to within 33 %,
including events in 536, 1182, 1276, 1286, and 1835. Five events (1230, 1171, 1600, 1640, and 1809 CE) have VSSI values 33–40 %
larger in eVolv2k, representing the impact of the increased transfer functions on similar ice sheet composite fluxes. Around 10 events
in eVolv2k have VSSI values significantly more than 33 % larger than in the IVI2 reconstruction. Some of these events appear to be
missing (682, 1108) or significantly underestimated (540, 574, 626, 939) in IVI2, likely due to a lack of synchronisation of the
underlying ice core records.  Relative increases of 33–60 % for other events (e.g. 1695 and 1831) reflect in part the
identification of bipolar ice core signals and therefore the assignment of a tropical source for the eruption rather than an extratropical
source assumed by IVI2.</p>
      <p>Estimated random uncertainties in the VSSI values are displayed as vertical error bars in Fig. 3. Uncertainties for VSSI greater than
20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> range from about 15 to 30 % (Fig. S6). Due to relatively uniform sulfate fluxes over the Greenland and Antarctica
ice core samples, VSSI estimates for the 1458 event and Tambora (1815) are among the most tightly constrained, with uncertainties of 15
and 16 %, respectively. The VSSI uncertainty for Samalas (1257) is 18 %, while the large events of 540 CE and Laki (1783) have
larger uncertainties, with estimated values of 24 and 34 %, respectively.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>The top 20 eruptions from the past 2500 years in terms of volcanic
stratospheric sulfur injection (VSSI) in the eVolv2k reconstruction. Matched
stratospheric sulfur injections from the IVI2 reconstruction (Gao et al.,
2008), when available, are included for comparison.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col2" nameend="col3" align="center">eVolv2k </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col4" nameend="col5" align="center">IVI2 </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Eruption</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Year (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>BCE</mml:mtext><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mtext>CE</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">VSSI (Tg [S])</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Year</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">VSSI (Tg [S])</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Samalas</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1257</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">59.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1258</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">64.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Unidentified</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>426</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">59.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Unidentified</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>44</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">38.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Unidentified</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1458</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">33.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1459<inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1452</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">5.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>34.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Unidentified</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">540</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">31.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">541</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">10.6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Tambora</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1815</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">28.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1815</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">27.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Unidentified</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">682</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">27.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">No match</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Unidentified</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">574</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">24.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">567</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Unidentified</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1230</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">23.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1227</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">16.9</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Unidentified</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">266</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">21.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Grímsvötn (Laki)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1783</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">20.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1783</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">23.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Unidentified</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1809</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">19.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1809</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">13.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Unidentified</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1108</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">19.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">No match</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Huaynaputina</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1600</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">19.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1600</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">14.1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Unidentified</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">536</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">18.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">529</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">16.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Parker</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1640</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">18.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1641</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">12.9</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Unidentified</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1171</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">18.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1167</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">13.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Unidentified</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>168</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">17.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Katla (Eldgjá)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">939</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">16.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">933</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">8.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Unidentified</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">433</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">15.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p>Centennial-scale variations in the eVolv2k and IVI2 VSSI reconstructions are shown in Fig. 4. Centennial average VSSI values (Fig. 4a)
are dominated by the largest events: maximum centennial averages occur in the 6th, 13th, and 19th centuries, which together contain 7 of
the top 20 VSSI events of the eVolv2k dataset (Table 2). Minimum centennial mean VSSI is found during a “Roman Quiet Period” in the
first century CE, with a mean value of about 0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, a full order of magnitude less than that of the maximum
century (1200–1300 CE) and less than one-third of the long-term average. The century with the second lowest level of volcanism is
1000–1100 CE, corresponding with the “Medieval Quiet Period” (Bradley et al., 2016). Compared to IVI2, eVolv2k VSSI averages are
larger for all centuries, with large differences occurring near the beginning of the period of overlap (e.g. the 6th, 7th, and 10th
centuries) but also in the more recent centuries (e.g. 17th and 19th centuries). The eVolv2k reconstruction also contains generally
more events than that of IVI2 (Fig. 4b), with an average of 10.6 events per century compared to 6.7 events per century in the IVI2
dataset. The centennial event frequency in eVolv2k is also slightly more uniform with time, with a coefficient of variation of 0.24,
compared to 0.37 for IVI2. The largest increase in the number of events identified in the eVolv2k database compared to IVI2 is in the
years 500–1000 CE when eVolv2k includes 12.0 events per century compared to 5.5 events per century in IVI2.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <title>Stratospheric aerosol optical depth</title>
      <p>Time series of global mean SAOD from the EVA(eVolv2k) and ICI reconstructions are shown in Fig. 5 (zonal mean SAOD is shown for the
full EVA(eVolv2k) reconstruction in Fig. S7). Similar to the VSSI comparisons, the timing and magnitudes of major SAOD perturbations in
the two reconstructions are similar from 1250 to 1900 CE and significantly different before around 1200 CE.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Global mean SAOD (top) from the ICI, EVA(eVolv2k), and CMIP6 version
2 reconstructions for the 1850–1900 time period of overlap.  Zonal
mean SAOD (bottom) from the three reconstructions as labelled for the same time
period.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=298.753937pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/9/809/2017/essd-9-809-2017-f08.pdf"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Long-term average annual VSSI estimates from different reconstructions.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="center"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Time period</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">eVolv2k VSSI</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">IVI2 VSSI</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">VolcEESM VSSI</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>500–1900</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.49</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">501–1900</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.54</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.35</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1901–2000</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.25</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.37</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T4" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Long-term average SAOD from different reconstructions. Results are
listed for both the standard EVA(eVolv2k) SAOD reconstruction and
a version with no background stratospheric sulfur injection denoted
EVA(eVolv2k, nb).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="center"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Time period</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">EVA(eVolv2k)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">EVA(eVolv2k, nb)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">ICI</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">CMIP6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">SAOD</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">SAOD</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">SAOD</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">SAOD</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>500–1900</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.014</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.010</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">801–1900</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.015</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.011</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.011</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1901–2000</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.009</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.012</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p>A comparison of the magnitude of matched strong events in the eVolv2k and ICI SAOD reconstructions (Table S4) is shown in
Fig. 6. Maximum values of 3-year cumulative SAOD are compared to reduce differences due to the different temporal evolutions or assumed
starting dates of events in the two reconstructions. Most of the largest SAOD events agree to within 33 %, including the 1230,
1257, 1458, 1600, 1640, 1809, and 1815 events. Tambora is a notable case, with EVA(eVolv2k) cumulative SAOD approximately 25 %
smaller than that of the ICI reconstruction. Laki (1783) and other NH extratropical eruptions (e.g. 939, 1182) have much larger SAOD in
the eVolv2k reconstruction, a result of not applying a correction for effusive tropospheric eruptions as done in the ICI. Other
apparent outliers can be understood to result from the inclusion of the then unsynchronised Plateau Remote and Taylor Dome ice cores
in the ICI reconstruction.  Contributing 40–50 % weight to the mean Antarctic S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> flux composite before 1200 CE,
the unsynchronised series from these two ice cores generally reduced the mean sulfate values for real volcanic events while falsely
generating apparent volcanic signals not observed by those ice cores that had been correctly synchronised (see Sigl et al., 2014, SOM
for details).</p>
      <p>Centennial mean SAOD estimates (Fig. 7) show larger mean values for EVA(eVolv2k) compared to ICI in all centuries. This difference is
almost entirely due to the inclusion of a non-zero background SAOD in the EVA(eVolv2k) reconstruction: an alternate version with no
background sulfur injection, EVA(eVolv2k, nb), shows closer agreement with the centennial-scale variation of ICI. The much stronger mean
SAOD in the EVA(eVolv2k) reconstruction in the 18th century can be understood to result from the much larger estimate for Laki
(1783). The stronger estimated mean SAOD for the 800–1200 time period is due to the identification of a number of events that are
missing or have much smaller estimates in the ICI reconstruction.</p>
      <p>The 1850–1900 period is included in the long-term EVA(eVolv2k) and ICI SAOD reconstructions as well as the CMIP6 historical
(1850–2015) period forcing reconstruction, which is based on a mixture of observations and aerosol model results using VSSI estimates
of the IVI2 reconstruction (Arfeuille et al., 2014). Over the overlapping 1850–1900 period, the EVA(eVolv2k) and CMIP6 reconstructions
agree to within 20 % in their estimation of the cumulative global mean SAOD for the 1883 Krakatau eruption (Fig. 8). In contrast,
the ICI reconstruction's cumulative SAOD for Krakatau is 25 % larger than that of the EVA(eVolv2k) and CMIP6 estimates. Based on
matching Greenland and Antarctic sulfate signals, eVolv2k and ICI attribute a signal in 1862 to a tropical eruption, and
the reconstructed SAOD in both reconstructions is roughly twice as large as that of CMIP6, in which it is assumed to be
extratropical. Figure 8 also shows the consistency in the background SAOD reconstructed in the eVolv2k and CMIP6 datasets in contrast
to the zero-level background assumed in the ICI reconstruction.  Zonal mean SAOD from the ICI, EVA(eVolv2k), and CMIP6 reconstructions
is shown in Fig. 8 over the same 1850–1900 period. The EVA(eVolv2k) reconstruction includes a smooth latitudinal structure based on
the observed evolution of aerosol after the 1991 Pinatubo eruption (Toohey et al., 2016b), avoiding the strong localised gradients in
SAOD present in the four-band structure of the ICI reconstruction. As in the ICI reconstruction, the EVA(eVolv2k) SAOD also reproduces
hemispheric asymmetry in the SAOD based on the ratio of ice core fluxes from both hemispheres, avoiding potential biases related to
purely simulated aerosol transport, which for example appear to be creating a strong NH bias in the CMIP6 SAOD representation of the
Krakatau eruption.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <title>A long-term context to 20th century volcanic forcing</title>
      <p>Long-term mean VSSI and SAOD estimates from eVolv2k and other reconstructions are listed in Tables 3 and 4 for different time periods,
allowing for a comparison with recent estimates for the 20th century.</p>
      <p>The overall long-term (500 BCE–1900 CE) mean VSSI from the eVolv2k reconstruction is 0.49 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This estimate is
consistent with the estimate from Pyle et al. (1996) based on satellite observations and compiled estimates of global eruption
frequencies over the last <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">200</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> years, although their estimate discounted the impact of the largest eruptions. A mean VSSI
rate of 0.49 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is about 2.5 times larger than the best estimate of the yearly natural “background” input of
sulfur to the stratosphere by the cross-tropopause transport of aerosols and their precursors (Sheng et al., 2015).</p>
      <p>Over the common period of overlap (500–1900), the eVolv2k VSSI injection mean is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % larger than that of the IVI2
reconstruction.  As discussed earlier, this is due to the identification of more moderate eruptions, especially early in the time
period, and an enhancement of the estimated magnitude of a number of moderate events.</p>
      <p>The long-term (500 BCE–1900 CE) mean SAOD in EVA(eVolv2k) is 0.014.  A version with no background sulfur injection produces a mean of
0.010; therefore, major volcanic sulfur injections contribute approximately two-thirds of the long-term mean SAOD. The EVA(eVolv2k)
version with no background injection shows very close agreement with the long-term mean of the ICI SAOD reconstruction: the larger mean
SAOD in eVolv2k compared to ICI can thus be understood to be the result of the background injection. The CMIP6 20th century mean SAOD
is about 14 % lower than the long-term EVA(eVolv2k) reconstruction. The fact that the difference between 20th century and long-term
mean SAOD is smaller than that for VSSI is expected due to the inclusion of the constant background sulfur injection in the SAOD
reconstruction.</p>
</sec>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability">

      <p>The eVolv2k volcanic stratospheric sulfur injection and
EVA(eVolv2k) stratospheric aerosol optical depth datasets described herein
are available through the World Data Center for
Climate in netCDF format (<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1594/WDCC/eVolv2k_v2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1594/WDCC/eVolv2k_v2</ext-link>; Toohey and Sigl,
2017).</p>

      <p>Comprehensive stratospheric aerosol optical properties useful for climate
model simulations are readily obtained through the use of the EVA forcing
generator (Toohey et al., 2016) and eVolv2k dataset. Output from EVA includes
aerosol extinction, scattering asymmetry factor, and single scattering albedo
as a function of time, latitude, height, and wavelength, which is consistent in format
with the volcanic radiative forcing reconstruction recommended for use in the
CMIP6 historical experiment. The necessary code modules, data, and
instructions for their use are available for download through the
Paleoclimate Modelling Intercomparison Project Phase 4 Last Millennium
experimental design webpage
(<uri>https://pmip4.lsce.ipsl.fr/doku.php/exp_design:lm</uri>).</p>
  </notes>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusions and discussion</title>
      <p>This paper presents a new reconstruction of the climatic influence of major volcanic eruptions over the time span from 500 BCE to
1900 CE. The eVolv2k reconstructions of volcanic VSSI and SAOD presented here represent, first and foremost, the results of improved
dating, resolution, and synchronisation of ice core sulfate records from Antarctica and Greenland (Sigl et al., 2014, 2015). Given the
improvements in methodologies used to date and synchronise ice core records – including automated synchronising and absolute dating
through the matching of signatures of cosmogenic isotopes in ice cores and tree rings in the eighth century (Sigl et al., 2015) – the eVolv2k
reconstruction can be confidently assumed to be a more accurate estimate of volcanic forcing compared to prior reconstructions,
particularly for time periods before <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1250</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> CE. This assertion is supported by strong correlation between the newly compiled
volcanic ice core records and instances of sudden large-scale cooling from dendrochronological climate reconstructions (Sigl et al.,
2015).</p>
      <p>The eVolv2k reconstruction provides the input data for climate model simulations which aim to include external climate forcing agents
as far back in time as 500 BCE. Volcanic stratospheric sulfur injection (VSSI) estimates can be directly ingested by suitable aerosol
climate models.  Alternatively, the EVA forcing generator (Toohey et al., 2016b) can be used to produce stratospheric aerosol optical
properties, including the stratospheric aerosol optical depth (SAOD) based on the VSSI record. Aerosol optical properties can then be
used as boundary conditions for model simulations. The eVolv2k reconstruction is the recommended volcanic forcing for transient
simulations within the Paleoclimate Modelling Intercomparison Project (PMIP; Jungclaus et al., 2016) and therefore represents an update to
the reconstructions most often used in prior palaeo-simulations, including the IVI2 (Gao et al., 2008) and ICI (Crowley and Unterman, 2013)
forcing datasets.</p>
      <p>The eVolv2k VSSI estimates and the related SAOD perturbations produced via the EVA forcing generator show broad agreement with the
IVI2 and ICI reconstructions over the 1250–1900 period in terms of the magnitudes of the largest volcanic events. For VSSI, agreement
between eVolv2k and IVI2 is the product of compensatory differences, including generally smaller ice core flux estimates and a larger
effective transfer function used to scale ice core sulfate fluxes into VSSI estimates. For the SAOD reconstructions, agreement between
the EVA(eVolv2k) and ICI reconstructions reflects relative consistency in the ice core composites (after <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1250</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) constructed in
both efforts and a related methodology, wherein observations following the 1991 Pinatubo eruption are used to define the scaling from
ice core sulfate to SAOD. Before 1250 CE, the eVolv2k VSSI and SAOD reconstructions include a number of events which are comparatively
underestimated or completely missing in prior reconstructions. These updated estimates promise improvements in the attribution of
forced and unforced climate variability before 1250 CE.</p>
      <p>In general, estimates of long-term mean VSSI and SAOD in eVolv2k are larger than prior reconstructions. For VSSI, this reflects an
increase in the number of identified events and an increase in the estimated magnitude for a number of moderate to strong events. The
relative increase in long-term mean SAOD compared to prior work is primarily due to the inclusion of a non-zero minimum (or background)
SAOD, which is consistent with the minimum in stratospheric SAOD observed by satellite sensors around the year 2000 CE.  The long-term
estimates of VSSI and SAOD evolution give context to the best current estimates of 20th century volcanic forcing. An independent
estimate of 20th century mean VSSI is about 25 % smaller than the long-term eVolv2k mean. Assuming stationarity of global eruption
frequencies, it is therefore more likely than not that the 21st century mean volcanic forcing will be greater than that of the 20th
century.</p>
      <p>For the first time, the eVolv2k reconstruction provides estimates of the uncertainty in volcanic VSSI estimates based on estimated
uncertainty in the ice core sulfate composites and the error inherent in using ice sheet average fluxes as a proxy for the full
hemispheric sulfate deposition (and therefore the hemispheric atmospheric sulfate loading). These error estimates depend on the
number of ice cores used in the composite and the degree of variation seen between the ice cores. For most of the largest volcanic
events, the estimated uncertainty is around 20–30 %, while for smaller events the estimated error reaches values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %.
Systematic errors are also significant, representing the possibility that VSSI or SAOD estimates are biased in the long-term
average. The construction of transfer functions from the NWT of the 1950s and 1960s and from the single data point of the 1991
Pinatubo eruption carries significant uncertainties regarding the injection magnitudes and injection heights.  Observational estimates
of the VSSI of Pinatubo have uncertainties of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % (Guo et al., 2004), and recent modelling studies have argued for a VSSI
from Pinatubo half that of the usual estimates (e.g.  Dhomse et al., 2014). An important uncertainty in the reconstruction of volcanic
forcing stems from the inability to differentiate between ice core sulfate from vast, stratospheric sulfate clouds and that from relatively
local effusive eruptions. Icelandic eruptions with large effusive emissions, like Laki or the 2014–2015 Holuhraun eruption (Schmidt
et al., 2015), could theoretically lead to large sulfate fluxes to the Greenland ice sheets with little to no significant stratospheric
injection. VSSI and SAOD estimates then based on the raw Greenland sulfate records would produce large overestimates of the global
effects of the eruptions. This issue led Crowley and Unterman (2013) to mute the impact of Greenland sulfate fluxes for signals that
could be attributed to Icelandic eruptions in the ICI reconstruction. On the other hand, the vertical distribution of the sulfur
emissions by Laki are still under debate (Lanciki et al., 2012; Schmidt et al., 2012), and while it seems likely that the Greenland
sulfate signal for Laki does contain some component related to tropospheric emissions, the proportion of tropospheric to stratospheric
injections is very unclear. For these reasons, we have not implemented a correction to the VSSI estimates of Laki or other known or
suspected Icelandic eruptions. Uncertainties in the scaling procedures used within the EVA forcing generator certainly add another
level of uncertainty to the SAOD estimates: for example, uncertainty in the measured SAOD after Pinatubo translates directly into
systematic uncertainty in the SAOD estimated by EVA.</p>
      <p>Future work should be able to further refine the estimates of VSSI and SAOD
presented here. First, a larger network of high-quality ice core sulfate
records from Greenland should reduce random errors in the composite flux due
to limited sampling. Reducing uncertainty in the transfer functions used to
link atmospheric sulfate content and ice core sulfate fluxes would greatly
improve estimates of volcanic forcing. Studies with atmospheric models show
some promise (Gao et al., 2007; Toohey et al., 2013; Marshall et al., 2017),
but inter-model differences in stratospheric sulfate evolution highlight
substantial uncertainties in the physical processes controlling aerosol
growth and transport (Zanchettin et al., 2016). Emerging techniques to
differentiate sulfur from tropospheric vs. stratospheric origin (e.g. Lanciki
et al., 2012) offer potential strategies for reducing uncertainties in future
volcanic forcing reconstructions. Finally, the continued extension of ice
core volcanic records to the present should soon provide important
information, since anthropogenic sulfate flux over Greenland – contaminated
over much of the 20th century by anthropogenic sulfur emissions – has now
almost reached pre-industrial levels, allowing for the detection of moderate
volcanic eruptions in Greenland.</p><?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?>
</sec><app-group>

<app id="App1.Ch1.S1">
  <title>Greenland ice core flux uncertainty analysis</title>
      <p>Simple statistical models can often be useful tools for estimating biases and errors in measured datasets (Dunn, 1989; Toohey and
Strong, 2007).  Given the apparent lack of bias between the three Greenland ice core sulfate records used in the eVolv2k Greenland
composite (Fig. S4), we assume here a simple model, wherein the sulfate flux recorded by a single ice core (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and its
relationship with the ice-sheet-wide average flux (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) can be written
as

              <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M204" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is assumed to be a zero-mean, normally distributed random variable with error variance <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. We
assume here that the measured values <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> have constant relative errors, and thus the total error (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is proportional
to the ice sheet average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>Further measurements, e.g. from other sites on the ice sheet, can be similarly modelled:

              <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M210" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="App1.Ch1.E2"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="App1.Ch1.E3"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

          Under this model, the variance of each measurement set can be written as

              <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M211" display="block"><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the expected value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The covariance between two measurements sets – assuming no correlation between the
random errors – is given by

              <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M214" display="block"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        Solving Eq. (A4) for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and replacing the population variances <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with the sample
variances <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> produces an expression for the estimated error variance <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>:

              <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.E6" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M221" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msubsup><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="false">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        <?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?><?xmltex \hack{\noindent}?>Equivalent expressions can be constructed for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false" mathvariant="normal">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false" mathvariant="normal">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The covariance terms
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> all act as estimates of the true ice sheet average variance <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> but will give different values with finite
sample sizes. A conservative estimate for each of the measurement error variances is produced by using the
minimum values from the three covariances, which we have done here. Similarly, we use the minimum value from the means of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> as the conservative estimate of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>We used Eq. (A6) (and the equivalent expressions for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false" mathvariant="normal">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false" mathvariant="normal">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) to estimate error
variances for the Greenland NEEM, NGRIP, and GISP2 datasets based on volcanic
events with sulfate flux values in all three cores. Since variances and
covariances can be very sensitive to the largest values within their input
fields, we computed the error variances iteratively, beginning with the full
dataset and removing the event with the largest mean flux value over the
three cores for each iteration. The resulting error variance estimates
fluctuate considerably after the removal of the first few largest values and
then reach relatively stable values (Fig. S5). We took the mean values for
each error estimate over the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> range of 3–11, over which the estimates are
rather stable, but utilise almost the full dataset. This analysis resulted in
estimates for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> errors of 46 % for NEEM, 45 % for NGRIP, and
33 % for GISP2.</p>
      <p>For any composite flux record calculated as the mean of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> individual flux records with uncertainties <inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, we compute the
composite uncertainty <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> according to standard rules of error propagation, i.e.

              <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.E7" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M239" display="block"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p><?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?><supplementary-material position="anchor"><p><bold>The Supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-9-809-2017-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-9-809-2017-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</bold></p></supplementary-material>
</app>
  </app-group><notes notes-type="competinginterests">

      <p>The authors declare that they have no conflict of
interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The authors thank reviewers Raymond Bradley and Chaochao Gao for their
helpful comments. Matthew Toohey acknowledges support by the Deutsche
Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) in the framework of the priority programme
“Antarctic Research with comparative investigations in Arctic ice areas”
through grant TO 967/1-1. Computations were carried out at the German
Climate Computing Centre (DKRZ). This work benefitted greatly as a result of
the authors' participation in the Past Global Changes (PAGES) Volcanic
Impacts on Climate and Society (VICS) working group.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
The article processing charges for this open-access <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> publication  were covered by a Research <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Centre of the Helmholtz Association.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Edited by: David Carlson <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Reviewed by: Chaochao Gao and Raymond Bradley</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Abbott, P. M. and Davies, S. M.: Volcanism and the Greenland ice-cores: the tephra record, Earth-Sci. Rev., 115, 173–191,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2012.09.001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.earscirev.2012.09.001</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Adolphi, F. and Muscheler, R.: Synchronizing the Greenland ice core and radiocarbon timescales over the Holocene –
Bayesian wiggle-matching of cosmogenic radionuclide records, Clim. Past, 12, 15–30, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-12-15-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-12-15-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Ammann, C. M., Meehl, G. A., Washington, W. M., and Zender, C. S.: A monthly and latitudinally varying volcanic forcing
dataset in simulations of 20th century climate, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, 59–1, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL016875" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003GL016875</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Arfeuille, F., Weisenstein, D., Mack, H., Rozanov, E., Peter, T., and Brönnimann, S.: Volcanic forcing for climate
modeling: a new microphysics-based data set covering years 1600–present, Clim. Past, 10, 359–375, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-10-359-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-10-359-2014</ext-link>,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Baillie, M. G. L.: Proposed re-dating of the European ice core chronology by seven years prior to the 7th century AD,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L15813, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL034755" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008GL034755</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Baillie, M. G. L. and McAneney, J.: Tree ring effects and ice core acidities clarify the volcanic record of the first
millennium, Clim. Past, 11, 105–114, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-11-105-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-11-105-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Bluth, G. J. S., Rose, W. I., Sprod, I. E., and Krueger, A. J.: Stratospheric loading of sulfur from explosive volcanic
eruptions, J. Geol., 105, 671–684, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1086/515972" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1086/515972</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Bradley, R. S., Wanner, H., and Diaz, H. F.: The medieval quiet period, The Holocene, 26, 990–993,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1177/0959683615622552" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1177/0959683615622552</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation> Budner, D. and Cole-Dai, J.: The number and magnitude of large explosive volcanic eruptions between 904 and 1865 A.D.:
Quantitative evidence from a new South Pole ice core, American Geophysical Union,
165–176, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Carn, S. A., Clarisse, L., and Prata, A. J.: Multi-decadal satellite measurements of global volcanic degassing,
J. Volcanol. Geoth. Res., 311, 99–134, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2016.01.002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2016.01.002</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation> Clausen, H. B. and Hammer, C. U.: The Laki and Tambora eruptions as revealed in Greenland ice cores from 11 locations,
Ann. Glaciol., 10, 16–22, 1988.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Clausen, H. B., Hammer, C. U., Hvidberg, C. S., Dahl-Jensen, D., Steffensen, J. P., Kipfstuhl, J., and Legrand, M.:
A comparison of the volcanic records over the past 4000 years from the Greenland Ice Core Project and Dye 3 Greenland ice
cores, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 102, 26707–26723, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/97JC00587" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/97JC00587</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Clerbaux, C., Coheur, P.-F., Clarisse, L., Hadji-Lazaro, J., Hurtmans, D., Turquety, S., Bowman, K., Worden, H., and
Carn, S. A.: Measurements of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> profiles in volcanic plumes from the NASA Tropospheric Emission Spectrometer (TES),
Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L22807, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL035566" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008GL035566</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Cole-Dai, J.: Volcanoes and climate, WIREs Clim. Change, 1, 824–839, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.76" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/wcc.76</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Cole-Dai, J., Ferris, D. G., Lanciki, A. L., Savarino, J., Thiemens, M. H., and McConnell, J. R.: Two likely stratospheric
volcanic eruptions in the 1450s C.E. found in a bipolar, subannually dated 800 year ice core record, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118,
7459–7466, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50587" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/jgrd.50587</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Crowley, T. J. and Unterman, M. B.: Technical details concerning development of a 1200 yr proxy index for global
volcanism, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 5, 187–197, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-5-187-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/essd-5-187-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation> Crowley, T., Zielinski, G., Vinther, B. M., Udisti, R., Kreutz, K., Cole-Dai, J., and Castellano, E.: Volcanism and the
little ice age, PAGES Newsl., 16, 22–23, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Crutzen, P. J.: The possible importance of CSO for the sulfate layer of the stratosphere, Geophys. Res. Lett., 3, 73–76,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/GL003i002p00073" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/GL003i002p00073</ext-link>, 1976.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Dhomse, S. S., Emmerson, K. M., Mann, G. W., Bellouin, N., Carslaw, K. S., Chipperfield, M. P., Hommel, R., Abraham,
N. L., Telford, P., Braesicke, P., Dalvi, M., Johnson, C. E., O'Connor, F., Morgenstern, O., Pyle, J. A., Deshler, T., Zawodny,
J. M., and Thomason, L. W.: Aerosol microphysics simulations of the Mt. Pinatubo eruption with the UM-UKCA composition-climate model,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 11221–11246, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-11221-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-11221-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation> Dunn, G.: Design and analysis of reliability studies: The statistical evaluation of measurement errors, New York: Oxford University Press, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>English, J. M., Toon, O. B., and Mills, M. J.: Microphysical simulations of large volcanic eruptions: Pinatubo and
Toba, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 1–16, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50196" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/jgrd.50196</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Ferris, D. G., Cole-Dai, J., Reyes, A. R., and Budner, D. M.: South Pole ice core record of explosive volcanic eruptions
in the first and second millennia A. D., and evidence of a large eruption in the tropics around 535 A.D., J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 116,
D17308, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD015916" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011JD015916</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Gao, C., Robock, A., Self, S., Witter, J. B., Steffenson, J. P., Clausen, H. B., Siggaard-Andersen, M.-L., Johnsen, S.,
Mayewski, P. A., and Ammann, C.: The 1452 or 1453 A. D. Kuwae eruption signal derived from multiple ice core records: greatest
volcanic sulfate event of the past 700 years, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 111, D12107, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006710" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005JD006710</ext-link>,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006710" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005JD006710</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Gao, C., Oman, L., Robock, A., and Stenchikov, G. L.: Atmospheric volcanic loading derived from bipolar ice cores:
accounting for the spatial distribution of volcanic deposition, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, D09109,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007461" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006JD007461</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Gao, C., Robock, A., and Ammann, C.: Volcanic forcing of climate over the past 1500 years: an improved ice core-based
index for climate models, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113,  D23111,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010239" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008JD010239</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Gautier, E., Savarino, J., Erbland, J., Lanciki, A., and Possenti, P.: Variability of sulfate signal in ice core records
based on five replicate cores, Clim. Past, 12, 103–113, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-12-103-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-12-103-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Global Volcanism Program: Volcanoes of the World, v. 4.5.0, in Smithsonian Institution, edited by: Venzke, E., available
at: <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5479/si.GVP.VOTW4-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5479/si.GVP.VOTW4-2013</ext-link>, last access: 12 April 2016, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Guo, S., Bluth, G. J. S., Rose, W. I., Watson, I. M., and Prata, A. J.: Re-evaluation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> release of the 15
Jun 1991 Pinatubo eruption using ultraviolet and infrared satellite sensors, Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 5, Q04001, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GC000654" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003GC000654</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation> Hayakawa, Y. and Koyama, M.: Dates of two major eruptions from Towada and Baitoushan in the 10th century,
B. Volcanol. Soc. Japan, 43, 403–407, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Hegerl, G. C., Crowley, T. J., Allen, M., Hyde, W. T., Pollack, H. N., Smerdon, J., and Zorita, E.: Detection of human
influence on a new, validated 1500-year temperature reconstruction, J. Climate, 20, 650–666, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI4011.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JCLI4011.1</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Hogg, A., Lowe, D. J., Palmer, J., Boswijk, G., and Ramsey, C. B.: Revised calendar date for the Taupo eruption derived by
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> wiggle-matching using a New Zealand kauri <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C calibration data set, Holocene, 22, 439–449,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1177/0959683611425551" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1177/0959683611425551</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Höpfner, M., Boone, C. D., Funke, B., Glatthor, N., Grabowski, U., Günther, A., Kellmann, S., Kiefer, M., Linden,
A., Lossow, S., Pumphrey, H. C., Read, W. G., Roiger, A., Stiller, G., Schlager, H., von Clarmann, T., and Wissmüller, K.: Sulfur
dioxide (SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) from MIPAS in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere 2002–2012, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 7017–7037,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-7017-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-7017-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Isobe, T., Feigelson, E. D., Akritas, M. G., and Babu, G. J.: Linear regression in astronomy, Astrophys. J., 364, 104,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1086/169390" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1086/169390</ext-link>, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Jensen, B. J. L., Pyne-O'Donnell, S., Plunkett, G., Froese, D. G., Hughes, P. D. M., Sigl, M., McConnell, J. R.,
Amesbury, M. J., Blackwell, P. G., van den Bogaard, C., Buck, C. E., Charman, D. J., Clague, J. J., Hall, V. A., Koch, J.,
Mackay, H., Mallon, G., McColl, L., and Pilcher, J. R.: Transatlantic distribution of the Alaskan White River Ash, Geology, 42,
875–878, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1130/G35945.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1130/G35945.1</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Jungclaus, J. H., Bard, E., Baroni, M., Braconnot, P., Cao, J., Chini, L. P., Egorova, T., Evans, M., González-Rouco,
J. F., Goosse, H., Hurtt, G. C., Joos, F., Kaplan, J. O., Khodri, M., Klein Goldewijk, K., Krivova, N., LeGrande, A. N., Lorenz,
S. J., Luterbacher, J., Man, W., Meinshausen, M., Moberg, A., Nehrbass-Ahles, C., Otto-Bliesner, B. I., Phipps, S. J., Pongratz, J.,
Rozanov, E., Schmidt, G. A., Schmidt, H., Schmutz, W., Schurer, A., Shapiro, A. I., Sigl, M., Smerdon, J. E., Solanki, S. K.,
Timmreck, C., Toohey, M., Usoskin, I. G., Wagner, S., Wu, C.-Y., Yeo, K. L., Zanchettin, D., Zhang, Q., and Zorita, E.: The PMIP4
contribution to CMIP6 – Part 3: the Last Millennium, Scientific Objective and Experimental Design for the PMIP4 past1000
simulations, Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2016-278" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-2016-278</ext-link>, in press,
2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Junge, C. E., Chagnon, C. W., Manson, J. E., Junge, C. E., Chagnon, C. W., and Manson, J. E.: Stratospheric aerosols,
J. Meteorol., 18, 81–108, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1961)018&lt;0081:SA&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0469(1961)018&lt;0081:SA&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1961.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Kremser, S., Thomason, L. W., von Hobe, M., Hermann, M., Deshler, T., Timmreck, C., Toohey, M., Stenke, A.,
Schwarz, J. P., Weigel, R., Fueglistaler, S., Prata, F. J., Vernier, J.-P., Schlager, H., Barnes, J. E., Antuña-Marrero, J.-C.,
Fairlie, D., Palm, M., Mahieu, E., Notholt, J., Rex, M., Bingen, C., Vanhellemont, F., Bourassa, A., Plane, J. M. C., Klocke, D.,
Carn, S. A., Clarisse, L., Trickl, T., Neely, R., James, A. D., Rieger, L., Wilson, J. C., and Meland, B.: Stratospheric aerosol –
observations, processes, and impact on climate, Rev. Geophys., 54, 278–335,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015RG000511" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015RG000511</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation> Lamb, H. H.: Volcanic dust in the atmosphere; with a chronology and assessment of its meteorological significance,
Philos. T. Roy. Soc. A, 266, 425–533, 1970.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Lanciki, A., Cole-Dai, J., Thiemens, M. H., and Savarino, J.: Sulfur isotope evidence of little or no stratospheric impact
by the 1783 Laki volcanic eruption, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L01806,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL050075" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011GL050075</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Lavigne, F., Degeai, J.-P., Komorowski, J.-C., Guillet, S., Robert, V., Lahitte, P., Oppenheimer, C., Stoffel, M.,
Vidal, C. M., Surono, Pratomo, I., Wassmer, P., Hajdas, I., Hadmoko, D. S., and de Belizal, E.: Source of the great A.D. 1257 mystery
eruption unveiled, Samalas volcano, Rinjani Volcanic Complex, Indonesia, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 110, 16742–16747,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1307520110" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1307520110</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Ludlow, F., Stine, A. R., Leahy, P., Murphy, E., Mayewski, P. A., Taylor, D., Killen, J., Baillie, M. G. L., Hennessy, M.,
and Kiely, G.: Medieval Irish chronicles reveal persistent volcanic forcing of severe winter cold events, 431–1649 CE,
Environ. Res. Lett., 8, 24035, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/024035" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/024035</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Luo, B.: Stratospheric aerosol data for use in CMIP6 models, available at: <uri>ftp://iacftp.ethz.ch/pub_read/luo/CMIP6/</uri>, last access: 21 November
2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Marshall, L., Schmidt, A., Toohey, M., Carslaw, K. S., Mann, G. W., Sigl, M.,
Khodri, M., Timmreck, C., Zanchettin, D., Ball, W., Bekki, S., Brooke, J. S.
A., Dhomse, S., Johnson, C., Lamarque, J.-F., LeGrande, A., Mills, M. J.,
Niemeier, U., Poulain, V., Robock, A., Rozanov, E., Stenke, A., Sukhodolov,
T., Tilmes, S., Tsigaridis, K., and Tummon, F.: Multi-model comparison of the
volcanic sulfate deposition from the 1815 eruption of Mt. Tambora, Atmos.
Chem. Phys. Discuss., in review, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation> Masson-Delmotte, V., Schulz, M., Abe-Ouchi, A., Beer, J., Ganopolski, A., Gonzalez Rouco, J. F., Jansen, E., Lambeck, K.,
Luterbacher, J., Naish, T., Osborn, T., Otto-Bliesner, B., Quinn, T., Ramesh, R., Rojas, M., Shao, X., and Timmermann, A.:
Information from Paleoclimate Archives, in: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the
Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Stocker, T. F., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K.,
Tignor, M., Allen, S. K., Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., and Midgley, P. M., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
and New York, NY, USA, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Metzner, D., Kutterolf, S., Toohey, M., Timmreck, C., Niemeier, U., Freundt, A., and Krüger, K.: Radiative forcing and
climate impact resulting from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> injections based on a 200,000-year record of Plinian eruptions along the Central American
Volcanic Arc, Int. J. Earth Sci., 103, 2063–2079,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00531-012-0814-z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00531-012-0814-z</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Mills, M. J., Schmidt, A., Easter, R., Solomon, S., Kinnison, D. E., Ghan, S. J., Neely, R. R., Marsh, D. R., Conley, A.,
Bardeen, C. G., and Gettelman, A.: Global volcanic aerosol properties derived from emissions, 1990–2014, using CESM1(WACCM),
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, 2332–2348, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024290" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015JD024290</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Mosley-Thompson, E., Thompson, L. G., Dai, J., Davis, M., and Lin, P. N.: Climate of the last 500 years: high resolution
ice core records, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 12, 419–430, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-3791(05)80006-X" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0277-3791(05)80006-X</ext-link>, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Neely III, R. R. and Schmidt, A.: VolcanEESM: Global volcanic sulphur dioxide
(SO2) emissions database from 1850 to present – Version 1.0. Centre for
Environmental Data Analysis, 4 February 2016, available at:
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5285/76ebdc0b-0eed-4f70-b89e-55e606bcd568" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5285/76ebdc0b-0eed-4f70-b89e-55e606bcd568</ext-link> (last access: January 2016), 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Neu, J. L., Sparling, L. C., and Plumb, R. A.: Variability of the subtropical “edges” in the
stratosphere, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, 4482, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002706" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002JD002706</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Oman, L., Robock, A., Stenchikov, G. L., Thordarson, T., Koch, D., Shindell, D. T., and Gao, C.: Modeling the distribution
of the volcanic aerosol cloud from the 1783–1784 Laki eruption, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 111, D12209, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006899" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005JD006899</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation> Oppenheimer, C.: Eruptions That Shook the World, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Oppenheimer, C., Orchard, A., Stoffel, Newfield, T. P., M., Guillet, S., Corona, C., Sigl, M., and Büntgen, U.: Timing and consequences of the Eldgjá lava flood eruption,
Iceland, in preparation, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Pasteris, D., McConnell, J. R., Edwards, R., Isaksson, E., and Albert, M. R.: Acidity decline in Antarctic ice cores
during the Little Ice Age linked to changes in atmospheric nitrate and sea salt concentrations, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119,
5640–5652, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD020377" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2013JD020377</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Plummer, C. T., Curran, M. A. J., van Ommen, T. D., Rasmussen, S. O., Moy, A. D., Vance, T. R., Clausen, H. B., Vinther,
B. M., and Mayewski, P. A.: An independently dated 2000-yr volcanic record from Law Dome, East Antarctica, including a new
perspective on the dating of the 1450s CE eruption of Kuwae, Vanuatu, Clim. Past, 8, 1929–1940, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-8-1929-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-8-1929-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>Pyle, D. M., Beattie, P. D., and Bluth, G. J. S.: Sulphur emissions to the stratosphere from explosive volcanic eruptions,
B. Volcanol., 57, 663–671, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s004450050119" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s004450050119</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>Read, W. G., Froidevaux, L., and Waters, J. W.: Microwave limb sounder measurement of stratospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from the
Mt. Pinatubo Volcano, Geophys. Res. Lett., 20, 1299, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/93GL00831" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/93GL00831</ext-link>, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>Robock, A.: Volcanic eruptions and climate, Rev. Geophys., 38, 191–219, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1998RG000054" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/1998RG000054</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Robock, A. and Free, M. P.: Ice cores as an index of global volcanism from 1850 to the present, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 100,
11549–11567, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/95JD00825" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/95JD00825</ext-link>, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>Sato, M., Hansen, J. E., McCormick, M. P., and Pollack, J. B.: Stratospheric aerosol optical depths,
1850–1990, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 98, 22987–22994, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/93JD02553" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/93JD02553</ext-link>, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation> Scaillet, B., Luhr, J. F., and Carroll, M. R.: Petrological and volcanological constraints on volcanic sulfur emissions to
the atmosphere, in Volcanism and the Earth's Atmosphere, vol. 139, edited by: Robock, A., Oppenheimer, C., American Geophysical
Union, Washington, D. C., 11–40, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>Schmidt, G. A., Jungclaus, J. H., Ammann, C. M., Bard, E., Braconnot, P., Crowley, T. J., Delaygue, G., Joos, F., Krivova,
N. A., Muscheler, R., Otto-Bliesner, B. L., Pongratz, J., Shindell, D. T., Solanki, S. K., Steinhilber, F., and Vieira, L. E. A.:
Climate forcing reconstructions for use in PMIP simulations of the last millennium (v1.0), Geosci. Model Dev., 4, 33–45,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-4-33-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-4-33-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>Schmidt, A., Thordarson, T., Oman, L. D., Robock, A., and Self, S.: Climatic impact of the long-lasting 1783 Laki
eruption: inapplicability of mass-independent sulfur isotopic composition measurements, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117, D23116,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD018414" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012JD018414</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>Schmidt, A., Leadbetter, S., Theys, N., Carboni, E., Witham, C. S., Stevenson, J. A., Birch, C. E., Thordarson, T.,
Turnock, S., Barsotti, S., Delaney, L., Feng, W., Grainger, R. G., Hort, M. C., Höskuldsson, Á., Ialongo, I., Ilyinskaya, E.,
Jóhannsson, T., Kenny, P., Mather, T. A., Richards, N. A. D., and Shepherd, J.: Satellite detection, long-range transport, and
air quality impacts of volcanic sulfur dioxide from the 2014–2015 flood lava eruption at Bárðarbunga
(Iceland), J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 9739–9757, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023638" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015JD023638</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>Schurer, A. P., Hegerl, G. C., Mann, M. E., Tett, S. F. B., and Phipps, S. J.: Separating forced from chaotic climate
variability over the past millennium, J. Climate, 26, 6954–6973, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00826.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00826.1</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>Self, S.: Magma volume, volatile emissions, and stratospheric aerosols from the 1815 eruption of Tambora,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L20608, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL020925" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004GL020925</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>Self, S. and King, A. J.: Petrology and sulfur and chlorine emissions of the 1963 eruption of Gunung Agung, Bali,
Indonesia, B. Volcanol., 58, 263–285, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s004450050139" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s004450050139</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>Sheng, J.-X., Weisenstein, D. K., Luo, B.-P., Rozanov, E., Stenke, A., Anet, J., Bingemer, H., and Peter, T.: Global
atmospheric sulfur budget under volcanically quiescent conditions: aerosol-chemistry-climate model predictions and
validation, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 256–276, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD021985" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014JD021985</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>Sigl, M., McConnell, J. R., Layman, L., Maselli, O., McGwire, K., Pasteris, D., Dahl-Jensen, D., Steffensen, J. P.,
Vinther, B., Edwards, R., Mulvaney, R., and Kipfstuhl, S.: A new bipolar ice core record of volcanism from WAIS Divide and NEEM and
implications for climate forcing of the last 2000 years, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 1151–1169, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD018603" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012JD018603</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>Sigl, M., McConnell, J. R., Toohey, M., Curran, M., Das, S. B., Edwards, R., Isaksson, E., Kawamura, K., Kipfstuhl, S.,
Krüger, K., Layman, L., Maselli, O. J., Motizuki, Y., Motoyama, H., Pasteris, D. R., and Severi, M.: Insights from Antarctica on
volcanic forcing during the Common Era, Nat. Clim. Change, 4, 693–697, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2293" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nclimate2293</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>Sigl, M., Winstrup, M., McConnell, J. R., Welten, K. C., Plunkett, G., Ludlow, F., Büntgen, U., Caffee, M.,
Chellman, N., Dahl-Jensen, D., Fischer, H., Kipfstuhl, S., Kostick, C., Maselli, O. J., Mekhaldi, F., Mulvaney, R., Muscheler, R.,
Pasteris, D. R., Pilcher, J. R., Salzer, M., Schüpbach, S., Steffensen, J. P., Vinther, B. M., and Woodruff, T. E.: Timing and
climate forcing of volcanic eruptions for the past 2,500 years, Nature, 523, 543–549, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14565" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature14565</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>Sigl, M., Fudge, T. J., Winstrup, M., Cole-Dai, J., Ferris, D., McConnell, J. R., Taylor, K. C., Welten, K. C., Woodruff,
T. E., Adolphi, F., Bisiaux, M., Brook, E. J., Buizert, C., Caffee, M. W., Dunbar, N. W., Edwards, R., Geng, L., Iverson, N.,
Koffman, B., Layman, L., Maselli, O. J., McGwire, K., Muscheler, R., Nishiizumi, K., Pasteris, D. R., Rhodes, R. H., and Sowers,
T. A.: The WAIS Divide deep ice core WD2014 chronology – Part 2: Annual-layer counting (0–31 ka BP), Clim. Past, 12, 769–786,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-12-769-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-12-769-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>Sigurdsson, H. and Carey, S.: Plinian and co-ignimbrite tephra fall from the 1815 eruption of Tambora volcano,
B. Volcanol., 51, 243–270, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01073515" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/BF01073515</ext-link>, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>Stothers, R. B.: Major optical depth perturbations to the stratosphere from volcanic eruptions: pyrheliometric period,
1881–1960, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 101, 3901–3920, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/95JD03237" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/95JD03237</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>Stothers, R. B.: Major optical depth perturbations to the stratosphere from volcanic eruptions: stellar extinction period,
1961–1978, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 106, 2993–3003, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900652" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2000JD900652</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>Sun, C., Plunkett, G., Liu, J., Zhao, H., Sigl, M., McConnell, J. R., Pilcher, J. R., Vinther, B., Steffensen, J. P., and
Hall, V.: Ash from Changbaishan Millennium eruption recorded in Greenland ice: implications for determining the eruption's timing and
impact, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 694–701, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013GL058642" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2013GL058642</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>Thordarson, T. and Larsen, G.: Volcanism in Iceland in historical time: volcano types, eruption styles and eruptive
history, J. Geodyn., 43, 118–152, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jog.2006.09.005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jog.2006.09.005</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>Thordarson, T. and Self, S.: Atmospheric and environmental effects of the 1783–1784 Laki eruption: a review and
reassessment, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, 4011, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD002042" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001JD002042</ext-link>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>Timmreck, C.: Modeling the climatic effects of large explosive volcanic eruptions, WIREs Clim. Change, 3, 545–564,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.192" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/wcc.192</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>Toohey, M. and Sigl, M.: Reconstructed volcanic stratospheric sulfur
injections and aerosol optical depth, 500 BCE to 1900 CE, version 2, World
Data Center for Climate (WDCC) at DKRZ, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1594/WDCC/eVolv2k_v2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1594/WDCC/eVolv2k_v2</ext-link> (last access: 17 May 2017),
2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>Toohey, M. and Strong, K.: Estimating biases and error variances through the comparison of coincident satellite
measurements, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, D13306, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD008192" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006JD008192</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>Toohey, M., Krüger, K., Niemeier, U., and Timmreck, C.: The influence of eruption season on the global aerosol
evolution and radiative impact of tropical volcanic eruptions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 12351–12367, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-12351-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-12351-2011</ext-link>,
2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>Toohey, M., Krüger, K., and Timmreck, C.: Volcanic sulfate deposition to Greenland and Antarctica: a modeling
sensitivity study, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 4788–4800, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50428" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/jgrd.50428</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>Toohey, M., Krüger, K., Sigl, M., Stordal, F., and Svensen, H.: Climatic and societal impacts of a volcanic double
event at the dawn of the Middle Ages, Climatic Change, 136, 401–412, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-016-1648-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10584-016-1648-7</ext-link>, 2016a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>Toohey, M., Stevens, B., Schmidt, H., and Timmreck, C.: Easy Volcanic Aerosol (EVA v1.0): an idealized forcing generator
for climate simulations, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 4049–4070, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-4049-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-9-4049-2016</ext-link>, 2016b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>Traufetter, F., Oerter, H., Fischer, H., Weller, R., and Miller, H.: Spatio-temporal variability in volcanic sulphate
deposition over the past 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kyr</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in snow pits and firn cores from Amundsenisen, Antarctica, J. Glaciol., 50, 137–146, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>Xu, J., Pan, B., Liu, T., Hajdas, I., Zhao, B., Yu, H., Liu, R., and Zhao, P.: Climatic impact of the Millennium eruption
of Changbaishan volcano in China: new insights from high-precision radiocarbon wiggle-match dating, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 54–59,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL054246" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012GL054246</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>Zanchettin, D., Khodri, M., Timmreck, C., Toohey, M., Schmidt, A., Gerber, E. P., Hegerl, G., Robock, A., Pausata,
F. S. R., Ball, W. T., Bauer, S. E., Bekki, S., Dhomse, S. S., LeGrande, A. N., Mann, G. W., Marshall, L., Mills, M., Marchand, M.,
Niemeier, U., Poulain, V., Rozanov, E., Rubino, A., Stenke, A., Tsigaridis, K., and Tummon, F.: The Model Intercomparison Project on
the climatic response to Volcanic forcing (VolMIP): experimental design and forcing input data for CMIP6, Geosci. Model Dev., 9,
2701–2719, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-2701-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-9-2701-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation>Zielinski, G. A.: Stratospheric loading and optical depth estimates of explosive volcanism over the last 2100 years
derived from the Greenland Ice Sheet Project 2 ice core, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 100, 20937–20955, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/95JD01751" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/95JD01751</ext-link>, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><mixed-citation>Zielinski, G.: A 110,000-Yr record of explosive volcanism from the GISP2 (Greenland) ice core, Quaternary Res., 45,
109–118, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1006/qres.1996.0013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1006/qres.1996.0013</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Volcanic stratospheric sulfur injections and aerosol optical depth from 500 BCE to 1900 CE</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p class="p">The injection of sulfur into the stratosphere by explosive volcanic eruptions is the cause of significant climate variability. Based
on sulfate records from a suite of ice cores from Greenland and Antarctica, the eVolv2k database includes estimates of the
magnitudes and approximate source latitudes of major volcanic stratospheric sulfur injection (VSSI) events from 500 BCE to 1900 CE,
constituting an update of prior reconstructions and an extension of the record by 1000 years. The database
incorporates improvements to the ice core records (in terms of synchronisation and dating) and refinements to the methods used to estimate VSSI from
ice core records, and it includes first estimates of the random uncertainties in VSSI values. VSSI estimates for many of the largest
eruptions, including Samalas (1257), Tambora (1815), and Laki (1783), are within 10 % of prior estimates. A number of strong events
are included in eVolv2k which are largely underestimated or not included in earlier VSSI reconstructions, including events in 540,
574, 682, and 1108 CE. The long-term annual mean VSSI from major volcanic eruptions is estimated to be  ∼ 0.5 Tg [S] yr<sup>−1</sup>,  ∼ 50 % greater than a prior reconstruction due to the identification of more events and an
increase in the magnitude of many intermediate events. A long-term latitudinally and monthly resolved stratospheric aerosol optical
depth (SAOD) time series is reconstructed from the eVolv2k VSSI estimates, and the resulting global mean SAOD is found to be similar
(within 33 %) to a prior reconstruction for most of the largest eruptions. The long-term (500 BCE–1900 CE) average global mean
SAOD estimated from the eVolv2k VSSI estimates including a constant <q>background</q> injection of stratospheric sulfur is  ∼ 0.014, 30 % greater than a prior reconstruction. These new long-term reconstructions of past VSSI and SAOD variability give
context to recent volcanic forcing, suggesting that the 20th century was a period of somewhat weaker than average volcanic forcing,
with current best estimates of 20th century mean VSSI and SAOD values being 25 and 14 % less, respectively, than the mean of the
500 BCE to 1900 CE period. The reconstructed VSSI and SAOD data are available at <a href="https://doi.org/10.1594/WDCC/eVolv2k_v2" title="" class="ref DOI">10.1594/WDCC/eVolv2k_v2</a>.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation> Abbott, P. M. and Davies, S. M.: Volcanism and the Greenland ice-cores: the tephra record, Earth-Sci. Rev., 115, 173–191,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2012.09.001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2012.09.001</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation> Adolphi, F. and Muscheler, R.: Synchronizing the Greenland ice core and radiocarbon timescales over the Holocene –
Bayesian wiggle-matching of cosmogenic radionuclide records, Clim. Past, 12, 15–30, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-12-15-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-12-15-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation> Ammann, C. M., Meehl, G. A., Washington, W. M., and Zender, C. S.: A monthly and latitudinally varying volcanic forcing
dataset in simulations of 20th century climate, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, 59–1, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL016875" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL016875</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation> Arfeuille, F., Weisenstein, D., Mack, H., Rozanov, E., Peter, T., and Brönnimann, S.: Volcanic forcing for climate
modeling: a new microphysics-based data set covering years 1600–present, Clim. Past, 10, 359–375, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-10-359-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-10-359-2014</a>,
2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation> Baillie, M. G. L.: Proposed re-dating of the European ice core chronology by seven years prior to the 7th century AD,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L15813, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL034755" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL034755</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation> Baillie, M. G. L. and McAneney, J.: Tree ring effects and ice core acidities clarify the volcanic record of the first
millennium, Clim. Past, 11, 105–114, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-11-105-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-11-105-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation> Bluth, G. J. S., Rose, W. I., Sprod, I. E., and Krueger, A. J.: Stratospheric loading of sulfur from explosive volcanic
eruptions, J. Geol., 105, 671–684, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1086/515972" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1086/515972</a>, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation> Bradley, R. S., Wanner, H., and Diaz, H. F.: The medieval quiet period, The Holocene, 26, 990–993,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1177/0959683615622552" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1177/0959683615622552</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation> Budner, D. and Cole-Dai, J.: The number and magnitude of large explosive volcanic eruptions between 904 and 1865 A.D.:
Quantitative evidence from a new South Pole ice core, American Geophysical Union,
165–176, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation> Carn, S. A., Clarisse, L., and Prata, A. J.: Multi-decadal satellite measurements of global volcanic degassing,
J. Volcanol. Geoth. Res., 311, 99–134, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2016.01.002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2016.01.002</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation> Clausen, H. B. and Hammer, C. U.: The Laki and Tambora eruptions as revealed in Greenland ice cores from 11 locations,
Ann. Glaciol., 10, 16–22, 1988.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation> Clausen, H. B., Hammer, C. U., Hvidberg, C. S., Dahl-Jensen, D., Steffensen, J. P., Kipfstuhl, J., and Legrand, M.:
A comparison of the volcanic records over the past 4000 years from the Greenland Ice Core Project and Dye 3 Greenland ice
cores, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 102, 26707–26723, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/97JC00587" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/97JC00587</a>, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation> Clerbaux, C., Coheur, P.-F., Clarisse, L., Hadji-Lazaro, J., Hurtmans, D., Turquety, S., Bowman, K., Worden, H., and
Carn, S. A.: Measurements of SO<sub>2</sub> profiles in volcanic plumes from the NASA Tropospheric Emission Spectrometer (TES),
Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L22807, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL035566" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL035566</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation> Cole-Dai, J.: Volcanoes and climate, WIREs Clim. Change, 1, 824–839, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.76" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.76</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation> Cole-Dai, J., Ferris, D. G., Lanciki, A. L., Savarino, J., Thiemens, M. H., and McConnell, J. R.: Two likely stratospheric
volcanic eruptions in the 1450s C.E. found in a bipolar, subannually dated 800 year ice core record, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118,
7459–7466, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50587" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50587</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation> Crowley, T. J. and Unterman, M. B.: Technical details concerning development of a 1200 yr proxy index for global
volcanism, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 5, 187–197, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-5-187-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-5-187-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation> Crowley, T., Zielinski, G., Vinther, B. M., Udisti, R., Kreutz, K., Cole-Dai, J., and Castellano, E.: Volcanism and the
little ice age, PAGES Newsl., 16, 22–23, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation> Crutzen, P. J.: The possible importance of CSO for the sulfate layer of the stratosphere, Geophys. Res. Lett., 3, 73–76,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/GL003i002p00073" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/GL003i002p00073</a>, 1976.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation> Dhomse, S. S., Emmerson, K. M., Mann, G. W., Bellouin, N., Carslaw, K. S., Chipperfield, M. P., Hommel, R., Abraham,
N. L., Telford, P., Braesicke, P., Dalvi, M., Johnson, C. E., O'Connor, F., Morgenstern, O., Pyle, J. A., Deshler, T., Zawodny,
J. M., and Thomason, L. W.: Aerosol microphysics simulations of the Mt. Pinatubo eruption with the UM-UKCA composition-climate model,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 11221–11246, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-11221-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-11221-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation> Dunn, G.: Design and analysis of reliability studies: The statistical evaluation of measurement errors, New York: Oxford University Press, 1989.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation> English, J. M., Toon, O. B., and Mills, M. J.: Microphysical simulations of large volcanic eruptions: Pinatubo and
Toba, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 1–16, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50196" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50196</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation> Ferris, D. G., Cole-Dai, J., Reyes, A. R., and Budner, D. M.: South Pole ice core record of explosive volcanic eruptions
in the first and second millennia A. D., and evidence of a large eruption in the tropics around 535 A.D., J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 116,
D17308, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD015916" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD015916</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation> Gao, C., Robock, A., Self, S., Witter, J. B., Steffenson, J. P., Clausen, H. B., Siggaard-Andersen, M.-L., Johnsen, S.,
Mayewski, P. A., and Ammann, C.: The 1452 or 1453 A. D. Kuwae eruption signal derived from multiple ice core records: greatest
volcanic sulfate event of the past 700 years, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 111, D12107, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006710" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006710</a>,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006710" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006710</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation> Gao, C., Oman, L., Robock, A., and Stenchikov, G. L.: Atmospheric volcanic loading derived from bipolar ice cores:
accounting for the spatial distribution of volcanic deposition, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, D09109,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007461" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007461</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation> Gao, C., Robock, A., and Ammann, C.: Volcanic forcing of climate over the past 1500 years: an improved ice core-based
index for climate models, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113,  D23111,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010239" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010239</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation> Gautier, E., Savarino, J., Erbland, J., Lanciki, A., and Possenti, P.: Variability of sulfate signal in ice core records
based on five replicate cores, Clim. Past, 12, 103–113, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-12-103-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-12-103-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation> Global Volcanism Program: Volcanoes of the World, v. 4.5.0, in Smithsonian Institution, edited by: Venzke, E., available
at: <a href="https://doi.org/10.5479/si.GVP.VOTW4-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5479/si.GVP.VOTW4-2013</a>, last access: 12 April 2016, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation> Guo, S., Bluth, G. J. S., Rose, W. I., Watson, I. M., and Prata, A. J.: Re-evaluation of SO<sub>2</sub> release of the 15
Jun 1991 Pinatubo eruption using ultraviolet and infrared satellite sensors, Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 5, Q04001, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GC000654" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GC000654</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation> Hayakawa, Y. and Koyama, M.: Dates of two major eruptions from Towada and Baitoushan in the 10th century,
B. Volcanol. Soc. Japan, 43, 403–407, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation> Hegerl, G. C., Crowley, T. J., Allen, M., Hyde, W. T., Pollack, H. N., Smerdon, J., and Zorita, E.: Detection of human
influence on a new, validated 1500-year temperature reconstruction, J. Climate, 20, 650–666, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI4011.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI4011.1</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation> Hogg, A., Lowe, D. J., Palmer, J., Boswijk, G., and Ramsey, C. B.: Revised calendar date for the Taupo eruption derived by
<sup>14</sup>C wiggle-matching using a New Zealand kauri <sup>14</sup>C calibration data set, Holocene, 22, 439–449,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1177/0959683611425551" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1177/0959683611425551</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation> Höpfner, M., Boone, C. D., Funke, B., Glatthor, N., Grabowski, U., Günther, A., Kellmann, S., Kiefer, M., Linden,
A., Lossow, S., Pumphrey, H. C., Read, W. G., Roiger, A., Stiller, G., Schlager, H., von Clarmann, T., and Wissmüller, K.: Sulfur
dioxide (SO<sub>2</sub>) from MIPAS in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere 2002–2012, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 7017–7037,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-7017-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-7017-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation> Isobe, T., Feigelson, E. D., Akritas, M. G., and Babu, G. J.: Linear regression in astronomy, Astrophys. J., 364, 104,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1086/169390" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1086/169390</a>, 1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation> Jensen, B. J. L., Pyne-O'Donnell, S., Plunkett, G., Froese, D. G., Hughes, P. D. M., Sigl, M., McConnell, J. R.,
Amesbury, M. J., Blackwell, P. G., van den Bogaard, C., Buck, C. E., Charman, D. J., Clague, J. J., Hall, V. A., Koch, J.,
Mackay, H., Mallon, G., McColl, L., and Pilcher, J. R.: Transatlantic distribution of the Alaskan White River Ash, Geology, 42,
875–878, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1130/G35945.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1130/G35945.1</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation> Jungclaus, J. H., Bard, E., Baroni, M., Braconnot, P., Cao, J., Chini, L. P., Egorova, T., Evans, M., González-Rouco,
J. F., Goosse, H., Hurtt, G. C., Joos, F., Kaplan, J. O., Khodri, M., Klein Goldewijk, K., Krivova, N., LeGrande, A. N., Lorenz,
S. J., Luterbacher, J., Man, W., Meinshausen, M., Moberg, A., Nehrbass-Ahles, C., Otto-Bliesner, B. I., Phipps, S. J., Pongratz, J.,
Rozanov, E., Schmidt, G. A., Schmidt, H., Schmutz, W., Schurer, A., Shapiro, A. I., Sigl, M., Smerdon, J. E., Solanki, S. K.,
Timmreck, C., Toohey, M., Usoskin, I. G., Wagner, S., Wu, C.-Y., Yeo, K. L., Zanchettin, D., Zhang, Q., and Zorita, E.: The PMIP4
contribution to CMIP6 – Part 3: the Last Millennium, Scientific Objective and Experimental Design for the PMIP4 past1000
simulations, Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2016-278" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2016-278</a>, in press,
2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation> Junge, C. E., Chagnon, C. W., Manson, J. E., Junge, C. E., Chagnon, C. W., and Manson, J. E.: Stratospheric aerosols,
J. Meteorol., 18, 81–108, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1961)018&lt;0081:SA&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1961)018&lt;0081:SA&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 1961.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation> Kremser, S., Thomason, L. W., von Hobe, M., Hermann, M., Deshler, T., Timmreck, C., Toohey, M., Stenke, A.,
Schwarz, J. P., Weigel, R., Fueglistaler, S., Prata, F. J., Vernier, J.-P., Schlager, H., Barnes, J. E., Antuña-Marrero, J.-C.,
Fairlie, D., Palm, M., Mahieu, E., Notholt, J., Rex, M., Bingen, C., Vanhellemont, F., Bourassa, A., Plane, J. M. C., Klocke, D.,
Carn, S. A., Clarisse, L., Trickl, T., Neely, R., James, A. D., Rieger, L., Wilson, J. C., and Meland, B.: Stratospheric aerosol –
observations, processes, and impact on climate, Rev. Geophys., 54, 278–335,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015RG000511" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015RG000511</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation> Lamb, H. H.: Volcanic dust in the atmosphere; with a chronology and assessment of its meteorological significance,
Philos. T. Roy. Soc. A, 266, 425–533, 1970.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation> Lanciki, A., Cole-Dai, J., Thiemens, M. H., and Savarino, J.: Sulfur isotope evidence of little or no stratospheric impact
by the 1783 Laki volcanic eruption, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L01806,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL050075" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL050075</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation> Lavigne, F., Degeai, J.-P., Komorowski, J.-C., Guillet, S., Robert, V., Lahitte, P., Oppenheimer, C., Stoffel, M.,
Vidal, C. M., Surono, Pratomo, I., Wassmer, P., Hajdas, I., Hadmoko, D. S., and de Belizal, E.: Source of the great A.D. 1257 mystery
eruption unveiled, Samalas volcano, Rinjani Volcanic Complex, Indonesia, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 110, 16742–16747,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1307520110" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1307520110</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation> Ludlow, F., Stine, A. R., Leahy, P., Murphy, E., Mayewski, P. A., Taylor, D., Killen, J., Baillie, M. G. L., Hennessy, M.,
and Kiely, G.: Medieval Irish chronicles reveal persistent volcanic forcing of severe winter cold events, 431–1649 CE,
Environ. Res. Lett., 8, 24035, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/024035" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/024035</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Luo, B.: Stratospheric aerosol data for use in CMIP6 models, available at: <a href="ftp://iacftp.ethz.ch/pub_read/luo/CMIP6/" target="_blank">ftp://iacftp.ethz.ch/pub_read/luo/CMIP6/</a>, last access: 21 November
2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Marshall, L., Schmidt, A., Toohey, M., Carslaw, K. S., Mann, G. W., Sigl, M.,
Khodri, M., Timmreck, C., Zanchettin, D., Ball, W., Bekki, S., Brooke, J. S.
A., Dhomse, S., Johnson, C., Lamarque, J.-F., LeGrande, A., Mills, M. J.,
Niemeier, U., Poulain, V., Robock, A., Rozanov, E., Stenke, A., Sukhodolov,
T., Tilmes, S., Tsigaridis, K., and Tummon, F.: Multi-model comparison of the
volcanic sulfate deposition from the 1815 eruption of Mt. Tambora, Atmos.
Chem. Phys. Discuss., in review, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation> Masson-Delmotte, V., Schulz, M., Abe-Ouchi, A., Beer, J., Ganopolski, A., Gonzalez Rouco, J. F., Jansen, E., Lambeck, K.,
Luterbacher, J., Naish, T., Osborn, T., Otto-Bliesner, B., Quinn, T., Ramesh, R., Rojas, M., Shao, X., and Timmermann, A.:
Information from Paleoclimate Archives, in: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the
Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Stocker, T. F., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K.,
Tignor, M., Allen, S. K., Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., and Midgley, P. M., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
and New York, NY, USA, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation> Metzner, D., Kutterolf, S., Toohey, M., Timmreck, C., Niemeier, U., Freundt, A., and Krüger, K.: Radiative forcing and
climate impact resulting from SO<sub>2</sub> injections based on a 200,000-year record of Plinian eruptions along the Central American
Volcanic Arc, Int. J. Earth Sci., 103, 2063–2079,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00531-012-0814-z" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00531-012-0814-z</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation> Mills, M. J., Schmidt, A., Easter, R., Solomon, S., Kinnison, D. E., Ghan, S. J., Neely, R. R., Marsh, D. R., Conley, A.,
Bardeen, C. G., and Gettelman, A.: Global volcanic aerosol properties derived from emissions, 1990–2014, using CESM1(WACCM),
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, 2332–2348, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024290" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024290</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation> Mosley-Thompson, E., Thompson, L. G., Dai, J., Davis, M., and Lin, P. N.: Climate of the last 500 years: high resolution
ice core records, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 12, 419–430, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-3791(05)80006-X" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-3791(05)80006-X</a>, 1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Neely III, R. R. and Schmidt, A.: VolcanEESM: Global volcanic sulphur dioxide
(SO2) emissions database from 1850 to present – Version 1.0. Centre for
Environmental Data Analysis, 4 February 2016, available at:
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5285/76ebdc0b-0eed-4f70-b89e-55e606bcd568" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5285/76ebdc0b-0eed-4f70-b89e-55e606bcd568</a> (last access: January 2016), 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation> Neu, J. L., Sparling, L. C., and Plumb, R. A.: Variability of the subtropical “edges” in the
stratosphere, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, 4482, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002706" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002706</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation> Oman, L., Robock, A., Stenchikov, G. L., Thordarson, T., Koch, D., Shindell, D. T., and Gao, C.: Modeling the distribution
of the volcanic aerosol cloud from the 1783–1784 Laki eruption, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 111, D12209, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006899" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006899</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation> Oppenheimer, C.: Eruptions That Shook the World, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Oppenheimer, C., Orchard, A., Stoffel, Newfield, T. P., M., Guillet, S., Corona, C., Sigl, M., and Büntgen, U.: Timing and consequences of the Eldgjá lava flood eruption,
Iceland, in preparation, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation> Pasteris, D., McConnell, J. R., Edwards, R., Isaksson, E., and Albert, M. R.: Acidity decline in Antarctic ice cores
during the Little Ice Age linked to changes in atmospheric nitrate and sea salt concentrations, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119,
5640–5652, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD020377" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD020377</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation> Plummer, C. T., Curran, M. A. J., van Ommen, T. D., Rasmussen, S. O., Moy, A. D., Vance, T. R., Clausen, H. B., Vinther,
B. M., and Mayewski, P. A.: An independently dated 2000-yr volcanic record from Law Dome, East Antarctica, including a new
perspective on the dating of the 1450s CE eruption of Kuwae, Vanuatu, Clim. Past, 8, 1929–1940, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-8-1929-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-8-1929-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation> Pyle, D. M., Beattie, P. D., and Bluth, G. J. S.: Sulphur emissions to the stratosphere from explosive volcanic eruptions,
B. Volcanol., 57, 663–671, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s004450050119" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s004450050119</a>, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation> Read, W. G., Froidevaux, L., and Waters, J. W.: Microwave limb sounder measurement of stratospheric SO<sub>2</sub> from the
Mt. Pinatubo Volcano, Geophys. Res. Lett., 20, 1299, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/93GL00831" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/93GL00831</a>, 1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation> Robock, A.: Volcanic eruptions and climate, Rev. Geophys., 38, 191–219, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1998RG000054" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/1998RG000054</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation> Robock, A. and Free, M. P.: Ice cores as an index of global volcanism from 1850 to the present, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 100,
11549–11567, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/95JD00825" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/95JD00825</a>, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation> Sato, M., Hansen, J. E., McCormick, M. P., and Pollack, J. B.: Stratospheric aerosol optical depths,
1850–1990, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 98, 22987–22994, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/93JD02553" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/93JD02553</a>, 1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation> Scaillet, B., Luhr, J. F., and Carroll, M. R.: Petrological and volcanological constraints on volcanic sulfur emissions to
the atmosphere, in Volcanism and the Earth's Atmosphere, vol. 139, edited by: Robock, A., Oppenheimer, C., American Geophysical
Union, Washington, D. C., 11–40, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation> Schmidt, G. A., Jungclaus, J. H., Ammann, C. M., Bard, E., Braconnot, P., Crowley, T. J., Delaygue, G., Joos, F., Krivova,
N. A., Muscheler, R., Otto-Bliesner, B. L., Pongratz, J., Shindell, D. T., Solanki, S. K., Steinhilber, F., and Vieira, L. E. A.:
Climate forcing reconstructions for use in PMIP simulations of the last millennium (v1.0), Geosci. Model Dev., 4, 33–45,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-4-33-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-4-33-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation> Schmidt, A., Thordarson, T., Oman, L. D., Robock, A., and Self, S.: Climatic impact of the long-lasting 1783 Laki
eruption: inapplicability of mass-independent sulfur isotopic composition measurements, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117, D23116,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD018414" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD018414</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation> Schmidt, A., Leadbetter, S., Theys, N., Carboni, E., Witham, C. S., Stevenson, J. A., Birch, C. E., Thordarson, T.,
Turnock, S., Barsotti, S., Delaney, L., Feng, W., Grainger, R. G., Hort, M. C., Höskuldsson, Á., Ialongo, I., Ilyinskaya, E.,
Jóhannsson, T., Kenny, P., Mather, T. A., Richards, N. A. D., and Shepherd, J.: Satellite detection, long-range transport, and
air quality impacts of volcanic sulfur dioxide from the 2014–2015 flood lava eruption at Bárðarbunga
(Iceland), J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 9739–9757, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023638" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023638</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation> Schurer, A. P., Hegerl, G. C., Mann, M. E., Tett, S. F. B., and Phipps, S. J.: Separating forced from chaotic climate
variability over the past millennium, J. Climate, 26, 6954–6973, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00826.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00826.1</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation> Self, S.: Magma volume, volatile emissions, and stratospheric aerosols from the 1815 eruption of Tambora,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L20608, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL020925" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL020925</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation> Self, S. and King, A. J.: Petrology and sulfur and chlorine emissions of the 1963 eruption of Gunung Agung, Bali,
Indonesia, B. Volcanol., 58, 263–285, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s004450050139" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s004450050139</a>, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation> Sheng, J.-X., Weisenstein, D. K., Luo, B.-P., Rozanov, E., Stenke, A., Anet, J., Bingemer, H., and Peter, T.: Global
atmospheric sulfur budget under volcanically quiescent conditions: aerosol-chemistry-climate model predictions and
validation, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 256–276, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD021985" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD021985</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation> Sigl, M., McConnell, J. R., Layman, L., Maselli, O., McGwire, K., Pasteris, D., Dahl-Jensen, D., Steffensen, J. P.,
Vinther, B., Edwards, R., Mulvaney, R., and Kipfstuhl, S.: A new bipolar ice core record of volcanism from WAIS Divide and NEEM and
implications for climate forcing of the last 2000 years, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 1151–1169, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD018603" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD018603</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation> Sigl, M., McConnell, J. R., Toohey, M., Curran, M., Das, S. B., Edwards, R., Isaksson, E., Kawamura, K., Kipfstuhl, S.,
Krüger, K., Layman, L., Maselli, O. J., Motizuki, Y., Motoyama, H., Pasteris, D. R., and Severi, M.: Insights from Antarctica on
volcanic forcing during the Common Era, Nat. Clim. Change, 4, 693–697, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2293" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2293</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation> Sigl, M., Winstrup, M., McConnell, J. R., Welten, K. C., Plunkett, G., Ludlow, F., Büntgen, U., Caffee, M.,
Chellman, N., Dahl-Jensen, D., Fischer, H., Kipfstuhl, S., Kostick, C., Maselli, O. J., Mekhaldi, F., Mulvaney, R., Muscheler, R.,
Pasteris, D. R., Pilcher, J. R., Salzer, M., Schüpbach, S., Steffensen, J. P., Vinther, B. M., and Woodruff, T. E.: Timing and
climate forcing of volcanic eruptions for the past 2,500 years, Nature, 523, 543–549, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14565" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14565</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation> Sigl, M., Fudge, T. J., Winstrup, M., Cole-Dai, J., Ferris, D., McConnell, J. R., Taylor, K. C., Welten, K. C., Woodruff,
T. E., Adolphi, F., Bisiaux, M., Brook, E. J., Buizert, C., Caffee, M. W., Dunbar, N. W., Edwards, R., Geng, L., Iverson, N.,
Koffman, B., Layman, L., Maselli, O. J., McGwire, K., Muscheler, R., Nishiizumi, K., Pasteris, D. R., Rhodes, R. H., and Sowers,
T. A.: The WAIS Divide deep ice core WD2014 chronology – Part 2: Annual-layer counting (0–31 ka BP), Clim. Past, 12, 769–786,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-12-769-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-12-769-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation> Sigurdsson, H. and Carey, S.: Plinian and co-ignimbrite tephra fall from the 1815 eruption of Tambora volcano,
B. Volcanol., 51, 243–270, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01073515" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01073515</a>, 1989.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation> Stothers, R. B.: Major optical depth perturbations to the stratosphere from volcanic eruptions: pyrheliometric period,
1881–1960, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 101, 3901–3920, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/95JD03237" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/95JD03237</a>, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation> Stothers, R. B.: Major optical depth perturbations to the stratosphere from volcanic eruptions: stellar extinction period,
1961–1978, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 106, 2993–3003, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900652" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900652</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation> Sun, C., Plunkett, G., Liu, J., Zhao, H., Sigl, M., McConnell, J. R., Pilcher, J. R., Vinther, B., Steffensen, J. P., and
Hall, V.: Ash from Changbaishan Millennium eruption recorded in Greenland ice: implications for determining the eruption's timing and
impact, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 694–701, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013GL058642" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2013GL058642</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation> Thordarson, T. and Larsen, G.: Volcanism in Iceland in historical time: volcano types, eruption styles and eruptive
history, J. Geodyn., 43, 118–152, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jog.2006.09.005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jog.2006.09.005</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation> Thordarson, T. and Self, S.: Atmospheric and environmental effects of the 1783–1784 Laki eruption: a review and
reassessment, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, 4011, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD002042" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD002042</a>, 2003.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation> Timmreck, C.: Modeling the climatic effects of large explosive volcanic eruptions, WIREs Clim. Change, 3, 545–564,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.192" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.192</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>
Toohey, M. and Sigl, M.: Reconstructed volcanic stratospheric sulfur
injections and aerosol optical depth, 500 BCE to 1900 CE, version 2, World
Data Center for Climate (WDCC) at DKRZ, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1594/WDCC/eVolv2k_v2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1594/WDCC/eVolv2k_v2</a> (last access: 17 May 2017),
2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation> Toohey, M. and Strong, K.: Estimating biases and error variances through the comparison of coincident satellite
measurements, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, D13306, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD008192" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD008192</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation> Toohey, M., Krüger, K., Niemeier, U., and Timmreck, C.: The influence of eruption season on the global aerosol
evolution and radiative impact of tropical volcanic eruptions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 12351–12367, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-12351-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-12351-2011</a>,
2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation> Toohey, M., Krüger, K., and Timmreck, C.: Volcanic sulfate deposition to Greenland and Antarctica: a modeling
sensitivity study, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 4788–4800, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50428" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50428</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation> Toohey, M., Krüger, K., Sigl, M., Stordal, F., and Svensen, H.: Climatic and societal impacts of a volcanic double
event at the dawn of the Middle Ages, Climatic Change, 136, 401–412, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-016-1648-7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-016-1648-7</a>, 2016a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation> Toohey, M., Stevens, B., Schmidt, H., and Timmreck, C.: Easy Volcanic Aerosol (EVA v1.0): an idealized forcing generator
for climate simulations, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 4049–4070, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-4049-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-4049-2016</a>, 2016b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation> Traufetter, F., Oerter, H., Fischer, H., Weller, R., and Miller, H.: Spatio-temporal variability in volcanic sulphate
deposition over the past 2 kyr in snow pits and firn cores from Amundsenisen, Antarctica, J. Glaciol., 50, 137–146, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation> Xu, J., Pan, B., Liu, T., Hajdas, I., Zhao, B., Yu, H., Liu, R., and Zhao, P.: Climatic impact of the Millennium eruption
of Changbaishan volcano in China: new insights from high-precision radiocarbon wiggle-match dating, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 54–59,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL054246" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL054246</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation> Zanchettin, D., Khodri, M., Timmreck, C., Toohey, M., Schmidt, A., Gerber, E. P., Hegerl, G., Robock, A., Pausata,
F. S. R., Ball, W. T., Bauer, S. E., Bekki, S., Dhomse, S. S., LeGrande, A. N., Mann, G. W., Marshall, L., Mills, M., Marchand, M.,
Niemeier, U., Poulain, V., Rozanov, E., Rubino, A., Stenke, A., Tsigaridis, K., and Tummon, F.: The Model Intercomparison Project on
the climatic response to Volcanic forcing (VolMIP): experimental design and forcing input data for CMIP6, Geosci. Model Dev., 9,
2701–2719, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-2701-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-2701-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation> Zielinski, G. A.: Stratospheric loading and optical depth estimates of explosive volcanism over the last 2100 years
derived from the Greenland Ice Sheet Project 2 ice core, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 100, 20937–20955, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/95JD01751" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/95JD01751</a>, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><mixed-citation> Zielinski, G.: A 110,000-Yr record of explosive volcanism from the GISP2 (Greenland) ice core, Quaternary Res., 45,
109–118, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1006/qres.1996.0013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1006/qres.1996.0013</a>, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
