<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ESSD</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Earth System Science Data</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ESSD</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Earth Syst. Sci. Data</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1866-3516</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus GmbH</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/essd-7-137-2015</article-id><title-group><article-title>A long-term Northern Hemisphere snow cover extent data record for climate studies and monitoring</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{A long-term Northern Hemisphere snow cover extent data record}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{T. W.~Estilow et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Estilow</surname><given-names>T. W.</given-names></name>
          <email>thomas.estilow@rutgers.edu</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Young</surname><given-names>A. H.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Robinson</surname><given-names>D. A.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Department of Geography, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey,
54 Joyce Kilmer Ave, Piscataway,<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> NJ 08854, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>NOAA's National Climatic Data Center (NCDC), 151 Patton Ave,
Asheville, NC 28801, USA</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">T. W. Estilow (thomas.estilow@rutgers.edu)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>18</day><month>June</month><year>2015</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>7</volume>
      <issue>1</issue>
      <fpage>137</fpage><lpage>142</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>30</day><month>September</month><year>2014</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>21</day><month>November</month><year>2014</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>19</day><month>May</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>29</day><month>May</month><year>2015</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/7/137/2015/essd-7-137-2015.html">This article is available from https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/7/137/2015/essd-7-137-2015.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/7/137/2015/essd-7-137-2015.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/7/137/2015/essd-7-137-2015.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>This paper describes the long-term, satellite-based visible snow cover extent
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) climate data record
(CDR) currently available for climate studies, monitoring, and model
validation. This environmental data product is developed from weekly Northern
Hemisphere snow cover extent data that have been digitized from snow cover
maps onto a Cartesian grid draped over a polar stereographic projection. The
data have a spatial resolution of 190.6 km at 60<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> latitude, are
updated monthly, and span the period from 4 October 1966 to the present. The data comprise
the longest satellite-based CDR of any environmental variable. Access to the
data is provided in Network Common Data Form (netCDF) and archived by NOAA's
National Climatic Data Center (NCDC) under the satellite Climate Data Record
Program (<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.7289/V5N014G9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.7289/V5N014G9</ext-link>). The basic characteristics, history, and
evolution of the data set are presented herein. In general, the CDR provides
similar spatial and temporal variability to its widely used predecessor
product. Key refinements included in the CDR improve the product's grid
accuracy and documentation and bring metadata into compliance with current
standards for climate data records.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Annual and interannual variations in continental snow and sea ice extent are
major factors in the earth–atmosphere energy balance and serve as key
indicators of climate change (e.g., Cavalieri et al., 1997; Robinson et al.,
1993; Robinson, 1997). Understanding their variability is critical to
identify climate–cryosphere interactions known to be largely expressed via
snow– and ice–albedo feedbacks. However, along with other cryospheric
components, such as permafrost and land ice, other feedbacks that involve
the regulation of soil moisture storage, latent heat flux, and the insulation of
the underlying surface threaten Arctic and Antarctic ecosystem structure and
stability (Stieglitz et al., 2003).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1"><caption><p>Satellites and date of incorporation into snow mapping analysis for
the NH SCE CDR. Primary platforms include the Environmental Science Services
Administration (ESSA) series, NOAA Polar-orbiting Operational Environmental
Satellites (POES), NOAA Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellites
(GOES), the Defense Meteorological Satellite Program (DMSP) series, the
Meteosat series, Geostationary Meteorological Satellites (GMS), Aqua, Terra,
and the Multi-functional Transport Satellites (MTSAT).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="2">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Platform</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">First used for CDR</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">ESSA</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Oct 1966</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NOAA POES</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Oct 1972</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NOAA GOES</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">May 1975</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">DMSP</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Jun 1977</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Meteosat</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Feb 1988</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">GMS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Jan 1989</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Aqua/Terra</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Feb 2004</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MTSAT</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Nov 2005</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p>To evaluate cryospheric changes and their impacts, it is highly important to
understand the data that are used for these critical investigations. The
goal of this paper is to describe the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA) Northern Hemisphere (NH) snow cover extent (SCE)
climate data record (CDR), which was recently added to NOAA's suite of
cryospheric CDR products. This SCE CDR constitutes the longest running
satellite-based record of any environmental variable. Even prior to its
transition to a well-defined CDR product, its data have been used for a
wide variety of regional-scale climate studies to evaluate spatial snow
cover variability, climate and weather prediction models, changes in snow
cover onset and retreat, and to diagnose trends in NH snow cover growth and
decline. The SCE product has also been used in atmospheric teleconnection
studies, analyses of snow cover feedbacks and surface albedo, and to
estimate snow melt runoff (e.g., Mote and Kutney, 2012; Yang et al., 2009;
Déry and Brown, 2007; Gong et al., 2007). Ongoing and future analyses
will benefit from this more sophisticated data product.</p>
      <p>To provide the SCE product in a more accessible format and make the
documentation more transparent to users, these data were transitioned from
research to operational production per the guidelines of NOAA's CDR Program
(CDRP, 2011a, b). The resulting CDR product has met all software, product
validation, documentation, data archive, and access requirements by achieving
sufficient maturity in both science and applications according to NCDC's CDR
maturity matrix (Bates and Privette, 2012; Peng et al., 2013). This paper
highlights various aspects of the NH SCE CDR, especially in relation to its
historical beginnings, comparison with its predecessor product, data set
description, access, applications, and its seasonal and spatial
characteristics.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Historical description of data product</title>
      <p>The NOAA visible satellite SCE product consists of weekly snow cover
boundaries over Northern Hemisphere land surfaces, which are manually derived
by trained meteorological analysts. Analysts use multiple satellite
observations (Table 1), information from the previous snow cover map, and
ancillary knowledge, such as surface elevation and vegetation, to create the
snow cover product in a near-consistent manner without a formal algorithm.
The high albedo of surface snow extent in visible-band satellite imagery
makes delineation between snow-covered and snow-free land relatively simple
over many land surfaces (Frei et al., 2011). Delineation of the seasonal snow
line in areas with patchy snow or obscured by persistent cloud cover requires
the use of the analyst's judgment. Thus, map quality relies on the expertise
of the trained analyst and the availability of cloud-free visible satellite
imagery (Ramsay, 1998). NOAA analysts have produced the SCE record in this
manner for almost 5 decades and improvements to satellite instrumentation
and variations in SCE mapping methods have occurred over time. While
inconsistencies related to these changes cannot be fully eliminated, they are
likely small compared to seasonal and interannual variations in
continental-scale SCE (Brown and Robinson, 2011).</p>
      <p>The earliest part of the CDR time series begins in 1966 and is comprised of
hand-drawn weekly SCE maps (Fig. 1) based on shortwave imagery from
meteorological satellites with a subpoint resolution of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4 km. These
maps were operationally digitized onto an 89 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 89 Cartesian grid
laid over an NH polar stereographic projection, and used in National Weather
Service numerical forecasting models. Grid cells were designated as snow
covered when <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 % of their land surface was snow covered,
resulting in a 190.6 km resolution binary (snow/no snow) mask.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><caption><p>NOAA hand-drawn SCE analysis corresponding to week 15 of 1993.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/7/137/2015/essd-7-137-2015-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p>After October 1972, SCE data production increasingly relied on satellite
imagery from the Very High Resolution Radiometer (VHRR), which had a spatial
resolution of 1.0 km. The inclusion of higher-resolution data considerably
improved snow charting (Kukla and Robinson, 1981). Over time, additional
products utilized in the mapping of SCE included earth-observing satellite
imagery from instruments such as the Advanced Very
High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) and Visible Infrared Spin-Scan Radiometer
(VISSR).</p>
      <p>A land mask was developed to resolve inconsistencies found in the coastal
land and sea mapping in digitized SCE maps produced by NOAA analysts (Robinson
et al., 1993). This correction has been applied to the CDR time series and
results in a consistent coastline for the entire period of record.</p>
      <p>Each weekly map shows snow boundaries on the last day the land surface was
observed in a given region (Robinson and Frei, 2000). Using this approach,
weekly SCE maps are heavily weighted towards the end of the mapping week.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Transition to daily snow charting</title>
      <p>In 1997, the National Ice Center (NIC) introduced the Interactive Multisensor
Snow and Ice Mapping System (IMS). Inputs for IMS evolved to a more diverse
set of products including satellite imagery, snow and ice analysis maps,
National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) model data, and surface
observations. Among these inputs, time sequenced satellite imagery improved
the discrimination between snow and clouds following the assumption that any
short-term changes in reflectance can only be introduced by clouds (Lyapustin
et al., 2008; Gafurov and Bárdossy, 2009). Since its inception, the IMS
has served as a more effective and modernized approach to snow mapping
compared to the historical approach. Using the IMS tool, snow extent output
has been produced at spatial and temporal resolutions corresponding to a
24 km daily product (Ramsay, 1998; Helfrich et al., 2007).</p>
      <p>Both the historical weekly SCE maps and the higher-resolution IMS products
were independently produced during a 2-year overlap period from June 1997 to
May 1999. To generate a pseudo-weekly product using daily IMS SCE (to ensure
continuity in evaluating the full satellite-era snow extent record), it was
necessary to compare the two independently produced versions generated during
the overlap period. SCE area calculations performed with these data revealed
that Monday IMS output best matched the corresponding weekly product output.
A reduction in the 24 km IMS maps to 190.6 km resolution was also performed
using a threshold to determine the location of SCE. To designate a weekly
grid cell as snow covered, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 42 % of the IMS land pixels falling
within the cell must indicate snow. This threshold provided the best match
between weekly SCE areas and Monday IMS SCE areas during the overlap period.
While a longer overlap period may have improved the analysis, the 2-year
sample provided by NOAA was invaluable to preserving continuity in the CDR
time series.</p>
      <p>Starting in June 1999 the CDR is completely derived in this manner, reducing
the spatial resolution of IMS output to produce weekly granules conforming to
the historical weekly SCE product. Although the IMS data used in this process
are dated Monday, satellite imagery from the 36 h leading up to the analysis
time can be used to more accurately delineate SCE boundaries (Robinson et
al., 1999).</p>
      <p>The transition from weekly to daily maps has not resulted in an artificial
step change in spring continental-scale SCE (Brown and Robinson, 2011;
Robinson et al., 1999). More research is needed to determine whether SCE
analysis in mountainous regions (e.g., the Tibetan Plateau) shows systematic
change during this time period. While there are differences in the
production of the historical data compared with IMS, the conversion of IMS
snow output to weekly SCE maps is automated and reproducible.</p>
      <p>To date, the weekly SCE data product has been widely used by the cryospheric
community. The CDR is an improved version of the data series, with efforts to
achieve CDR status described in the following sections.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Data set description</title>
      <p>The combination of both the historical and IMS-derived data records forms a
continuous record of NH SCE that extends from October 1966 to the present.
The CDR is a complete record with the exception of 9 months falling within
the summer and fall seasons that are missing satellite imagery, namely
July 1968, June–October 1969, and July–September 1971.</p>
      <p>Starting from the beginning of the record on Tuesday, 4 October 1966, each
weekly CDR granule represents 7 days spanning from Tuesday to Monday. The
primary CDR variable is SCE, which is provided as a binary value (snow/no
snow) in each grid pixel. Ancillary variables are also provided, including
pixel areas in square kilometres, pixel center point latitude and longitude
coordinates, and a binary land mask (land/water).</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>File format and metadata standards applied</title>
      <p>The weekly data are available in Network Common Data Form (netCDF), which is
self-describing, platform independent, and archivable. All weekly CDR
granules are stored in a single netCDF-4 file. Metadata elements comply with
climate and forecast (CF-1.6) conventions, and collection-level metadata
adheres to ISO 19115-2 standards for geographic information to facilitate
data set discovery. These netCDF file metadata are structured following
guidelines recommended by the NCDC satellite Climate Data Record Program
(CDRP, 2011b).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Definition of the CDR grid</title>
      <p>The latest CDR product includes refinements to the NH Cartesian grid
previously distributed by NOAA's Satellite and Information Service. Cell
center geographic coordinates were evaluated against a regular grid in polar
stereographic coordinates (PSC) with a cell size of
190.6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 190.6 km. The total calculated area of the two grids agreed
within <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.74 % indicating that the grid provided by NOAA (B. Ramsay,
personal communication, 1998) and released in an earlier version of the CDR
slightly underestimates total area. Except for three grid cells located over
the pole, the longitude and latitude coordinates were found to be accurate to
within <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>26 km, and cell areas were accurate to within <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>459 km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
(J. Biard, personal communication, 2012). All geographic coordinates and cell
areas in the latest version of the CDR product have been corrected to
correspond to the regular grid in PSC. These refinements do not impact the
presence or absence of snow at these grid locations since the determination
of snow is made in row and column space, not by latitude and longitude
coordinates.</p>
      <p>Cell areas range from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 700 km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> near the Equator to
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 41 800 km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> near the pole. To generate the CDR, values from an
88 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 88 subset of the historical weekly 89 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 89 SCE
matrices are used to populate the SCE variable in the netCDF-4 binary file.
This allows the CDR product to provide data only for grid cells that lie
entirely north of the Equator.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <title>Basic characterization of the CDR</title>
      <p>SCE area values for the full period of record have been calculated in a
consistent manner at Rutgers University for over 2 decades using the
Rutgers routine (Robinson et al., 1993). The area summation of all grid
pixels that indicate snow in a given week generates the weekly snow cover
extent for the entire Northern Hemisphere.</p>
      <p>From the weekly data, monthly and seasonal maps can be produced. Figure 2
shows seasonal variability, with maximum mean SCE occurring in winter.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><caption><p>Mean spatial distribution of seasonal SCE over Northern Hemisphere
lands. Each season is calculated using 3-month
means. These maps illustrate seasonal variability,
with maximum mean SCE occurring in winter. The data period used to calculate
means spans the period from January 1981 to December 2010.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/7/137/2015/essd-7-137-2015-f02.png"/>

      </fig>

<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <title>Annual SCE variability</title>
      <p>Mean NH snow cover extent reaches its maximum in January and minimum in
August, ramping up quickly in the fall and melting at a slower pace in the
spring. The mean annual CDR SCE is 25.1 million km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, with a standard
deviation (SD) of 0.9 million km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Mean annual maximum SCE totals
47.4 million km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (SD <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.5), which is 44.4 million km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> more
extensive than the mean annual minimum of 3.0 million km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
(SD <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.7). The highest annual maximum SCE occurred in February 1978,
totaling 51.3 million km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. At the opposite end of the rankings, the
lowest annual minimum SCE of 2.1 million km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> was observed in
August 1968 (Table 2).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2"><caption><p>NH SCE CDR monthly statistics (and year of max/min) in millions of
square kilometres. Calculated using a data period spanning November 1966 to
July 2014. Missing months (July 1968, June–October 1969,
July–September 1971) are not included.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Month</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Mean</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Max (year)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Min (year)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">SD</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Jan</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">47.09</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">50.28 (2008)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">41.89 (1981)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.57</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Feb</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">46.07</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">51.32 (1978)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">42.67 (1995)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.84</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mar</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">40.62</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">44.28 (1985)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">37.12 (1990)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.82</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Apr</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">30.57</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">34.61 (1979)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">28.00 (1968)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.69</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">May</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">19.34</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">23.09 (1974)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">15.38 (2010)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.93</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Jun</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">9.80</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">14.97 (1978)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4.92 (2012)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.34</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Jul</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4.06</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">8.21 (1967)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.33 (2012)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.24</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Aug</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3.03</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5.31 (1967)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.09 (1968)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.74</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sep</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5.32</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">7.76 (1972)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.84 (1990)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.93</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Oct</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">18.08</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">25.72 (1976)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">12.78 (1988)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.54</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Nov</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">33.91</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">38.60 (1993)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">28.28 (1979)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.04</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Dec</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">43.68</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">46.85 (2012)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">37.44 (1980)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.93</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p>The CDR shows 1978 as the snowiest year (i.e., September 1977 to
August 1978), with an annual mean SCE of 27.2 million km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. In
contrast, annual mean SCE in 1989 was the lowest, totaling
23.5 million km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. During the most recent 27 years of the CDR, mean
annual SCE has continued to exhibit lower snow extents relative to the data
period ending in mid-1987. This step change in NH SCE was first identified by
Robinson and Dewey (1990).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <title>Long-term trends apparent in CDR snow extent</title>
      <p>Seasonal trends observed in the CDR include a pronounced decline in SCE
during the spring melt season (Fig. 3). Fall and winter show an opposite
trend towards increased extent, with winter SCE growing
0.19 million km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> per decade. Fall seasonal SCE means have increased by
0.26 km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> per decade. By contrast, spring SCE has decreased by
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.58 million km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> per decade, declining at 3 times the pace of
the winter trend. This has also left the summer season with less snow on the
ground, with summer SCE decreasing by <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.81 million km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> per decade.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><caption><p>Seasonal SCE areas and linear least squares trends for the Northern
Hemisphere in millions of square kilometres. Each season is calculated using
3-month means. Summer and fall are calculated from
June 1972 onwards, due to missing months in the years 1968–1969 and 1971. No
winter or spring months are missing.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/7/137/2015/essd-7-137-2015-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>Brown and Derksen (2013) found that over Eurasia the positive trend in fall
SCE is internal to the CDR and is likely a result of improved snow detection
during the October snow onset period. SCE observations from other sources
compared in the study exhibit a reduction in October SCE from 1982 to 2011,
which is consistent with warming fall surface temperatures observed during
this period.</p>
      <p>Conversely, the negative trend in spring SCE shown by the CDR has been
corroborated using observations from multiple independent data sources
(Brown et al., 2010; Brown and Robinson, 2011). While the data sets show
different areas of Arctic SCE, all data sources including the CDR exhibit
similar SCE anomalies, which indicate significant reductions in Arctic SCE
over the period 1967–2008.</p>
      <p>Brown and Robinson (2011) derived estimates of uncertainty through the
statistical analysis and comparison of multiple SCE data sources. The results
indicate that the 95 % confidence interval in March and April continental
SCE is <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3–5 % during the satellite era beginning in 1967. The
analysis also shows larger uncertainties in spring SCE monitoring over
Eurasia compared to North America, in part due to larger variability between
data sources over northern Europe and north-central Russia.</p>
      <p>The CDR excels at portraying regional SCE in areas with high illumination,
stable snow cover, and frequently clear skies. Despite the CDR's general
homogeneity, difficulties in historical SCE charting over the Tibetan Plateau
due to frequent cloud cover resembling patchy snow on the surface have
resulted in higher uncertainty over this region. Positive biases have been
shown in SCE mapping during summer months in the Canadian Arctic; this also
relates to frequent cloud cover over the area (Wang et al., 2005; Brown et
al., 2007).</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p>A long-term, satellite-based visible snow cover extent CDR is currently
available for climate studies, monitoring, and model validation. The CDR is
provided in netCDF format with CF-1.6 compliant metadata. Trends and spatial
variability are consistent with the predecessor NOAA weekly SCE product.
Version 1 revision 1 provides improved grid accuracy and an 88 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 88
subset of pixels falling entirely within the NH. CDR documentation and
product traceability meet current guidelines for climate data records. The
generation of the weekly CDR from June 1999 onwards using the NIC IMS snow
output is reproducible.</p>
      <p>The CDR is a foundational product, used in other data products such as the
Northern Hemisphere EASE-Grid 2.0 Weekly Snow Cover and Sea Ice Extent,
Version 4, available at the National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC). Two
data products from the NASA Making Earth System Data Records for Use in
Research Environments (MEaSUREs) program also incorporate the CDR: MEaSUREs
Northern Hemisphere Terrestrial Snow Cover Extent Weekly 100 km
EASE-Grid 2.0, and MEaSUREs Northern Hemisphere State of Cryosphere Weekly
100 km EASE-Grid 2.0 both published at NSIDC. Due to its relatively coarse
spatial resolution, the CDR remains best suited for continental-scale and
large regional studies.</p>
      <p>IMS version 3 will incorporate additional upgrades to analyst workstations
and snow output (S. Helfrich, personal communication, 2014). As SCE inputs
continue to evolve, the need to ensure the ongoing homogeneity of these data
records is critical to the identification and tracking of changes in this
part of the cryosphere. Future improvements to the CDR will seek to increase
product maturity according to NCDC's CDR Maturity Matrix and may include
source code or metadata optimizations as well as additional validation work.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SSx1" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Data set availability</title>
      <p>The NOAA climate data record of Northern Hemisphere snow cover extent,
Version 1, is archived and distributed by NCDC's satellite Climate Data
Record Program. The CDR can be downloaded via FTP or from the NCDC THREDDS
data server (<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.7289/V5N014G9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.7289/V5N014G9</ext-link>). The CDR is forward processed
operationally every month, along with figures and tables made available at
the website <uri>http://climate.rutgers.edu/snowcover/</uri>.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The NOAA/NCDC Climate Data Record Program funded this project. The authors
wish to thank D. Wunder, H. Brown, C. Hutchins, S. Ansari, R. McFadden and
the entire Snow Cover Integrated Product Team (IPT) at NCDC for supporting
the Research to Operations (R2O) process. Special appreciation goes to
J. Biard for his review of the CDR and technical assistance with reprocessing
the NOAA grid and to R. Brown whose helpful comments improved this
manuscript.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Edited by: D. Carlson</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Bates, J. J. and Privette, J. L.: A maturity model for assessing the
completeness of climate data records, EOS T. Am. Geophys. Un., 93, p. 441,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2012EO440006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012EO440006</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Brown, R., Derksen, C., and Wang, L.: Assessment of spring snow cover
duration variability over northern Canada from satellite datasets, Remote
Sens. Environ., 111, 367–381, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2006.09.035" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.rse.2006.09.035</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Brown, R., Derksen, C., and Wang, L.: A multi-data set analysis of
variability and change in Arctic spring snow cover extent, 1967–2008, J.
Geophys. Res., 115, D16111, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010JD013975" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010JD013975</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Brown, R. D. and Derksen, C.: Is Eurasian October snow cover extent
increasing?, Environ. Res. Lett., 8, 024006,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/024006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/024006</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Brown, R. D. and Robinson, D. A.: Northern Hemisphere spring snow cover
variability and change over 1922–2010 including an assessment of
uncertainty, The Cryosphere, 5, 219–229, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/tc-5-219-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-5-219-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Cavalieri, D. J., Glowersen, P., Parkinson, C. L., Comiso, J. C., and Zwally, H. J.:
Observed hemispheric asymmetry in global sea ice changes, Science, 278,
1104–1106, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Climate Data Record Program (CDRP): NetCDF Metadata Guidelines for IOC NOAA
Climate Data Records, NOAA's NCDC CDR Program, CDRP-GUID-0042, Asheville,
North Carolina, USA, 22 pp., 2011a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Climate Data Record Program (CDRP): Transitioning CDRs from Research to
Operations, NOAA's NCDC CDR Program, CDRPPLAN-0017, Asheville, North
Carolina, USA, 28 pp., 2011b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Déry, S. J. and Brown, R. D.: Recent Northern Hemisphere snow cover
extent trends and implications for the snow-albedo feedback, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 34, L22504, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007GL031474" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007GL031474</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Frei, A., Tedesco, M., Lee, S., Foster, J., Hall, D. K., Kelly, R., and
Robinson, D. A.: A review of global satellite-derived snow products, Adv.
Space Res., 50, 1007–1029, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2011.12.021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.asr.2011.12.021</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Gafurov, A. and Bárdossy, A.: Cloud removal methodology from MODIS snow
cover product, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 1361–1373,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/hess-13-1361-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-13-1361-2009</ext-link>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Gong, G., Cohen J., Entekhabi, D., and Ge, Y.: Hemispheric-scale climate
response to Northern Eurasia land surface characteristics and snow anomalies,
Global Planet. Change, 56, 359–370, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2006.07.025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.gloplacha.2006.07.025</ext-link>,
2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Helfrich, S. R., McNamara, D., Ramsay, B. H., Baldwin, T., and Kasheta, T.:
Enhancements to, and forthcoming developments in the Interactive Multisensor
Snow and Ice Mapping System (IMS), Hydrol. Process., 21, 1576–1586,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6720" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/hyp.6720</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Kukla, G. and Robinson, D. A.: Accuracy of snow and ice monitoring, Snow Watch
1980, Glaciological Data, Report GD-5, 91–97, 1981.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Lyapustin, A., Wang, Y., and Frey, R.: An Automatic Cloud Mask Algorithm
Based on Time Series of MODIS Measurements, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D16207,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009641" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007JD009641</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Mote, T. L. and Kutney, E. R.: Regions of autumn Eurasian snow cover and
associations with North American winter temperatures, Int. J. Climatol., 32,
1164–1177, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/joc.2341" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/joc.2341</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Peng, G., Meier, W. N., Scott, D. J., and Savoie, M. H.: A long-term and
reproducible passive microwave sea ice concentration data record for climate
studies and monitoring, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 5, 311–318,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/essd-5-311-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/essd-5-311-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Ramsay, B. H.: The interactive multisensor snow and ice mapping
system, Hydrol. Process., 12, 1537–1546,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(199808/09)12:10/11&lt;1537::AID-HYP679&gt;3.0.CO;2-A" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(199808/09)12:10/11&lt;1537::AID-HYP679&gt;3.0.CO;2-A</ext-link>,
1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Robinson, D. A.: Hemispheric snow cover and surface albedo for model
validation, Ann. Glaciol., 25, 241–245, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Robinson, D. A. and Dewey, K. F.: Recent secular variations in the extent of
Northern Hemisphere snow cover, Geophys. Res. Lett., 17, 1557–1560, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Robinson, D. A. and Frei, A.: Seasonal variability of Northern Hemisphere
snow extent using visible satellite data, Prof. Geogr., 52, 307–315, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Robinson, D. A., Dewey, F., and Heim Jr., R.: Global Snow Cover Monitoring:
An update, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 74, 1689–1696, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Robinson, D. A., Tarpley, J. D., and Ramsay, B.: Transition from NOAA weekly to
daily hemispheric snow charts. Proceedings of the 10th Symposium on Global
Change, Dallas, TX, Am. Meteorol. Soc., 487–490, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Stieglitz, M., Déry, S. J., Romanovsky, V. E., and Osterkamp, T. E.: The
role of snow cover in the warming of arctic permafrost, Geophys. Res. Lett.,
30, 1721, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2003GL017337" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003GL017337</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Wang, L., Sharp, M., Brown, R., Derksen, C., and Rivard, B.: Evaluation of
spring snow covered area depletion in the Canadian Arctic from NOAA snow
charts, Remote Sensing of Environment, 95, 453–463,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2005.01.006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.rse.2005.01.006</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Yang, D., Zhao, Y., Armstrong, R., and Robinson, D. A.: Yukon River streamflow
response to seasonal snow cover changes, Hydrol. Process., 23, 109–121,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7216" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/hyp.7216</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    </article>
