<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="data-paper">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ESSD</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Earth System Science Data</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ESSD</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Earth Syst. Sci. Data</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1866-3516</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/essd-18-1089-2026</article-id><title-group><article-title>Integrating Global Ocean Profiles and Altimetry-Derived Eddies</article-title><alt-title>Integrating Global Ocean Profiles Data and Altimetry-Derived Eddies</alt-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff3">
          <name><surname>Simoes-Sousa</surname><given-names>Iury</given-names></name>
          <email>iury@whoi.edu</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2484-510X</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Rocha</surname><given-names>Cesar</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Tandon</surname><given-names>Amit</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7124-1512</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Schmidt</surname><given-names>Andre</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Massachusetts Dartmouth,  Dartmouth, MA, United States</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Instituto Oceanográfico, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>a</label><institution>now at: Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, MA, United States</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Iury Simoes-Sousa (iury@whoi.edu)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>10</day><month>February</month><year>2026</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>18</volume>
      <issue>2</issue>
      <fpage>1089</fpage><lpage>1101</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>19</day><month>January</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>6</day><month>February</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>26</day><month>August</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>29</day><month>August</month><year>2025</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2026 Iury Simoes-Sousa et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/essd-18-1089-2026.html">This article is available from https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/essd-18-1089-2026.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/essd-18-1089-2026.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/essd-18-1089-2026.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d2e125">Satellite altimetry has revolutionized our understanding of ocean physics by providing global sea-surface height data. These measurements reveal the intricate dynamics of ocean mesoscale strain and vortices, and their interactions with multiple physical scales in the oceans. Although surface dynamics has been extensively studied, investigating the vertical structure of mesoscale eddies globally remains a computational challenge. In this study, we combine the comprehensive World Ocean Database (WOD) with a database of Eulerian mesoscale eddies (META3.2 DT). We pre-process and filter the WOD data, selecting quality controlled profiles at local depths greater than 100 m. By integrating WOD data with altimetry-derived mesoscale eddies, we aim to facilitate future studies on the role of mesoscale vortices in multiple processes, such as heat, mass and nutrient transport, and water-mass subduction. The analysis is performed using high-performance computing resources, with Python packages for parallel processing of the data and analysis of more than 4.2 million profiles with more than 35 million vortex observations. The dataset is available for download from Zenodo at <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17425853" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.17425853</ext-link> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33" id="paren.1"/> and by direct access through an OPeNDAP/HTTP server and an S3 bucket in icechunk format. Additionally, we provide the code for performing the vortex-profile matching, along with an example of use to facilitate future updates to the code and merged data. This dataset supports further research on eddy vertical structure, biogeochemical processes, and their role in climate systems across different regions and time periods.</p>
  </abstract>
    
<funding-group>
<award-group id="gs1">
<funding-source>Office of Naval Research</funding-source>
<award-id>N0014-18-1-2799</award-id>
<award-id>N00014-23-1-2054</award-id>
<award-id>N00014-20-1-2849</award-id>
<award-id>N00014-22-1-2012</award-id>
<award-id>N0001418-1-2255</award-id>
</award-group>
<award-group id="gs2">
<funding-source>National Science Foundation</funding-source>
<award-id>2146729</award-id>
</award-group>
</funding-group>
</article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d2e143">Satellite altimetry missions such as ERS-1, TOPEX/Poseidon, ERS-2, Jason-1, Envisat, and Jason-2 have transformed our understanding of ocean circulation. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="paren.2"/>. These missions have provided unprecedented sea-surface height data since 1992, showing that 80 %–90 % of the ocean kinetic energy is accounted for by mesoscale variability due to linear Rossby waves, nonlinear waves, and eddies. This variability occurs with lateral scales of tens to hundreds of kilometers and timescales longer than a few days  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="paren.3"/>. In other words, through satellite altimetry, we have come to realize that the ocean mesoscale is characterized by a rich field of stirring features with waves and vortices. These findings have deepened our understanding of the ocean's role in climate variability and have shed light on the intricate interactions between mesoscale features and the larger-scale oceanic processes.</p>
      <p id="d2e152">Ocean mesoscale refers to the spatial scales at which the planetary vorticity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mi>sin⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> represents Earth's angular velocity and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> denotes the latitude, greatly exceeds the relative vorticity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ζ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mi>u</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> represent the zonal and meridional velocity components, respectively. This condition is expressed by the Rossby number <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ζ</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>≪</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In essence, the ocean mesoscale is characterized by a balance between the pressure gradient force and Earth's rotation, known as geostrophic balance, wherein isolines of sea-surface height align with streamlines. Consequently, variations in sea-surface height become indicative of the underlying flow patterns and provide valuable insights into the distribution and dynamics of mesoscale features.</p>
      <p id="d2e250">The definition of mesoscale is closely tied to the internal Rossby deformation radius, which quantifies the scale at which geostrophy is the dominant balance. This radius varies with latitude, water column depth, and stratification (e.g. see Sect. 3.1 from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="altparen.4"/>). Towards the poles, where the planetary vorticity is larger, the internal Rossby deformation radius becomes smaller. In contrast, regions closer to the equator experience larger deformation radii <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="paren.5"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>, leading to the prevalence of larger-scale mesoscale structures. For comparison, these mesoscale eddies have a radius of approximately 8 km at high latitudes and 100 km at low latitudes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="paren.6"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>.</p>
      <p id="d2e266">With significant advances made possible by altimetry satellites, most global studies on ocean mesoscales tend to focus on surface dynamics and structures (e.g. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7 bib1.bibx8" id="altparen.7"/>). There are also different ways to define mesoscale eddies, depending on the specific research objectives. These approaches may consider factors such as the size, shape, and intensity of the vortices, and for how much time they trap waters in their interior, a.k.a. Lagrangian coherence <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="paren.8"/>. Different studies have focused on refining these definitions and employing advanced algorithms to detect and track vortices in the vast amount of available altimetry and profile data <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6 bib1.bibx24 bib1.bibx25 bib1.bibx21" id="paren.9"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e279">In this study, we define mesoscale eddies as long-lived swirling structures that are identified as localized extrema in snapshots of sea-surface height maps <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="paren.10"><named-content content-type="pre">cf.,</named-content></xref>. Most eddies tracked this way are nonlinear and their particle velocities are much larger than their propagation speeds, and thus they possibly trap fluid for weeks to months <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8 bib1.bibx25" id="paren.11"/>. But these eddies may not be formally coherent by other metrics (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1 bib1.bibx21" id="altparen.12"/>) and, for this reason, we can also call them simply as Eulerian eddies and avoid referring to them as “coherent eddies” or “Lagrangian coherent structures”.  This conservative wording, however, should not downplay the relevance of these eddies for circulation, dynamics, and biogeochemistry.</p>
      <p id="d2e293">Although it is relatively easier to study ocean surface data using satellites, investigating the vertical structure of mesoscale eddies globally remains a computational challenge. The vertical structure of these mesoscale eddies plays a crucial role in various ocean processes, such as heat and mass transport, nutrient dispersion, the formation of subsurface water masses, and even the behavior of the macrofauna <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23 bib1.bibx19 bib1.bibx38 bib1.bibx12 bib1.bibx4" id="paren.13"/>. To gain a deeper understanding of the vertical structure of mesoscale vortices globally, we integrate vertical profiles from the World Ocean Database (WOD) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="paren.14"/> with altimetry-derived mesoscale eddies data from an Eulerian mesoscale eddies atlas (META3.2 DT) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="paren.15"/>. This interdisciplinary approach allows for a more comprehensive understanding of the ocean's behavior, facilitating future studies on the interactions between vortices and other oceanic features across different regions and time periods.</p>
      <p id="d2e305">This paper is structured as follows: Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2"/> provides an overview of the computer resources used in this project. In Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3"/>, we detail the datasets used and outline the methods for their processing and combination. Next, in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4"/>, we discuss how these data are accessible for download or directly from a server, and in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S5"/>, we present examples of use for the dataset. In Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S6"/>, we present potential avenues for future research, and finally in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S8"/>, we summarize the key findings and draw our final conclusions.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Computer resources</title>
      <p id="d2e329">The analysis in this study requires substantial computational resources to process and analyze large datasets. The computations are performed on a high-performance computing cluster. The CARNiE (Collaborative Advanced Research Numerical Environment) cluster consists of queues like short-single, long-single, large-parallel, and power-single, which have varying numbers of nodes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="paren.16"/>. The compute nodes in the cluster (node1 to node50) are powered by Intel Skylake processors, providing 24 cores, 48 threads, 48 Gb of memory, and 1 Tb of SSD space each. Additionally, power nodes power1 and power2 utilize IBM POWER9 processors, offering 32 cores, 128 threads, 128 Gb of memory, and 1 Tb of SSD space each. While all nodes in the cluster are equipped with GPUs, they are not used for this project. This cluster provided the computing power necessary to handle large-scale data processing tasks efficiently.</p>
      <p id="d2e335">The software tools we use for the analysis include different Python packages for data pre-processing, filtering, and statistical calculations. The Python environment with all of this project's packages is available along with the code for reproducibility. The data processing and analysis procedures involve complex algorithms and require substantial human and computational time. Despite having access to the vast resources from CARNiE, substantial effort is dedicated to testing different methods of chunking the data to optimize the analyses in parallel. This involved experimenting with different ways to allocate memory resources and balance the computational load. We explore various chunk sizes, overlapping chunks, and parallelization strategies to speed up the analyses. Two essential tools for the analyses are the Dask and Dask-JobQueue Python packages <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9 bib1.bibx10" id="paren.17"/>, used to integrate our analysis into CARNiE's job queueing system (Slurm). Dask and Dask-JobQueue facilitate running parallel processes in Python by automatically submitting jobs and distributing tasks to multiple workers. Dask is also integrated with XArray by default, which is the most complete data analysis library for multi-dimensional arrays in Python <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="paren.18"/>. This integration allows us to efficiently manipulate and analyze large datasets within the CARNiE framework. Furthermore, Dask has a dashboard client that allows us to easily monitor and track the progress of parallelized processes.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Datasets and processing</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SSx1" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Ocean profiles data</title>
      <p id="d2e357">The World Ocean Database (WOD) is a globally extensive and unrestricted collection of ocean profile data maintained by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="paren.19"/>. It encompasses a wide range of parameters, including temperature, salinity, chlorophyll, dissolved oxygen, and nutrient concentrations, recorded at various depths throughout the world's oceans <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="paren.20"/>. With quality control flags attached to the data, the WOD ensures the reliability and accuracy of the measurements. WOD covers different data types and instruments. For this study, we used instruments carried by elephant seals (APB), traditional high-resolution CTD and XCTD casts (CTD), glider data (GLD), profiling float data (e.g., Argo floats) (PFL) and XBT casts (XBT) from 1993 to 2022 (overlapping with satellite altimetry data). See Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1"/> for the full description for all data types.</p>

<table-wrap id="T1" specific-use="star"><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d2e371">Data types and instruments.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="2">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="justify" colwidth="15cm"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Acronym</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Description</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">APB<sup>*</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Autonomous Pinniped Bathythermograph – Time-Temperature-Depth recorders and CTDs attached to elephant seals</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CTD<sup>*</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">High-resolution Conductivity-Temperature-Depth (CTD) and high-resolution XCTD data</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">DRB</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Drifting buoy data from surface drifting buoys with thermistor chains and from ice-tethered profilers</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">GLD<sup>*</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Glider data</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MBT</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Mechanical Bathythermograph (MBT) data, Digital BT (DBT), micro-BT (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>BT)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MRB</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Moored buoy data mainly from the Equatorial buoy arrays – TAO</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">OSD</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Bottle, low-resolution Conductivity-Temperature-Depth (CTD), low-resolution XCTD data, and plankton data</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PFL<sup>*</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Profiling float data, mainly from the Argo program</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SUR</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Surface only data (bucket, thermosalinograph)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">UOR</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Undulating Oceanographic Recorder data from a Conductivity/Temperature/Depth probe mounted on a towed undulating vehicle</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">XBT<sup>*</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Expendable (XBT) data</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d2e374"> The data types marked with an asterisk (<sup>*</sup>) are the ones used in this study.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <p id="d2e557">The WOD data are structured in ragged arrays in netCDF format (<uri>https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/netcdf-ragged-array-format</uri>, last access: 29 June 2023). The structure also adheres to the CF standard conventions (<uri>https://cfconventions.org/</uri>, last access: 29 June 2023), ensuring widespread accessibility of the data. The ragged-array format is suitable for ocean profile data collections, such as WOD, where different casts can have varying counts of depth/variable pairs and different numbers of measured properties, which allows for efficient representation of oceanographic casts while minimizing file size.</p>
      <p id="d2e566">In the ragged-array format, all profiles of a variable are represented by a one-dimensional array that contains all measurements. There is also a counting array called <monospace>VAR_row_size</monospace>, which indicates the number of measurements for each cast. To access the variable measurements for a specific cast, the <monospace>VAR_row_size</monospace> counts are summed, and the pointer in the array for that variable is moved accordingly. The subsequent <monospace>VAR_row_size(N)</monospace> elements correspond to the variable measurements for cast <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d2e586">For example, if a file contains five oceanographic CTD casts with different profiles of depth/temperature, depth/salinity, and depth/oxygen, the variables <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, Temperature, and Salinity will have consistent measurements across all casts. However, the Oxygen variable may be absent in some of the casts, indicated by a zero value in the corresponding <monospace>Oxygen_row_size</monospace>. To read the data for a specific cast, the appropriate elements in the arrays are accessed based on the <monospace>VAR_row_size</monospace> counts.</p>
      <p id="d2e602">We select profiles with a local depth greater than 100 m and exclude open-ocean profiles that did not reach 300 m in depth. Additionally, we exclude any data deeper than 2000 m. The WOD dataset includes flags for expeditions, instruments, and observations within each profile. We specifically consider profiles and observations with flag 0, indicating successful completion of all quality tests. Furthermore, we include profiles and observations with flag 2, which, despite passing other quality tests, shows density inversions. While density inversions are not commonly used for climatology calculations, they play a crucial role in methods such as fine-scale parameterization and Thorpe scale for estimating vertical mixing (e.g. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22 bib1.bibx36" id="altparen.21"/>).</p>
      <p id="d2e608">In the pursuit of storage optimization, trade-offs often arise that can impact data usability and analysis. For example, the ragged-array format proves useful in conserving storage space by accommodating profiles of varying sizes for different properties. However, this format presents challenges when it comes to analyzing the profiles, such as performing calculations on vertical derivatives, obtaining integrated values, and comparing different properties within the same cast. To address this issue, our study develops an algorithm that facilitates the downloading, interpretation, and rearrangement of WOD data into a more user-friendly structure. The new arrangement organizes the data into two dimensions: one dimension representing the casts (<monospace>casts</monospace>), and a dummy dimension representing the number of levels or depths (<monospace>levels</monospace>). The variable <monospace>z</monospace>, then, depends on both <monospace>levels</monospace> and <monospace>casts</monospace>, as the vertical resolution of the measurements depends on each cast and instrument. This optimization of data structure strikes a balance between storage efficiency and enhanced usability.</p>
      <p id="d2e626">The code for downloading, filtering, and restructuring the WOD dataset creates a Dask delayed object for each year. A Dask delayed object is a lazy representation of a computation. Instead of computing its result immediately, the computation is encapsulated in this object, allowing one to defer the computation until explicitly requested. This is a way to parallelize the code without an immediate evaluation; e.g. computation occurs only when <monospace>compute()</monospace> method is called, distributing over requested workers. In our case, we used 40 single-core Dask workers with 30 Gb of memory each.</p>
      <p id="d2e632">After filtering and selecting profiles within the specified time range, we have retained a total of 4.2 million profiles. Each profile can obtain measurements for any of the selected variables: temperature, salinity, oxygen, chlorophyll, pH, and nitrate. The variables were chosen to capture both physical processes and their interactions with biogeochemical cycles, providing crucial information on the role of eddies in the regulation of climate and ecosystem health.</p>
      <p id="d2e635">From 1993 to 2003, there are approximately 50 thousand profiles per year. From 2004 onward, the number of profiles per year increased to more than 150 thousand. The occurrence of each data type exhibits variability across different years and months (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1"/>). CTD casts consistently contribute around 10 000 profiles per year throughout the entire selected time series. GLD profiles, on the other hand, were less common initially but experienced substantial growth since 2002, reaching approximately 40 thousand profiles in the last four years. In the 1990s, XBT profiles were the most prevalent, representing more than 90 % of the profiles. However, their frequency has significantly decreased, with less than 10 thousand profiles per year in the most recent four-year period. APB profiles exhibit significant variations over the years, with the majority occurring between 2004 and 2010. They were particularly abundant in 2005, surpassing 200 000 profiles, making APB the most common data type at that time. PFL profiles were relatively infrequent in the 1990s but have become the most prevalent data type since 2010, consistently surpassing 150 000 profiles from 2014 onward.</p>
      <p id="d2e641">GLD, CTD, and XBT profiles do not display strong seasonality, although their occurrence is slightly reduced during holiday periods at the end and beginning of the year (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1"/>). PFL profiles, despite appearing to exhibit some seasonality, remain relatively constant throughout the months. This apparent pattern is mainly influenced by the order of the cumulative plots. The only data type that shows a distinct seasonality is APB. Most APB profiles occur in March, April, July, and August, probably due to the seasonal behavior of the tagged animals.</p>

      <fig id="F1"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d2e648">Cumulative distribution of WOD profiles by data type varying with years <bold>(a)</bold> and months <bold>(b)</bold>. Each bar in <bold>(b)</bold> represents a week, and the major ticks mark the first week of each month.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/18/1089/2026/essd-18-1089-2026-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e666">The global distribution of profiles exhibits distinct characteristics for each data type. PFL profiles demonstrate a significantly more homogeneous distribution, with the exception of the region close to Antarctica (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/>a). In contrast, XBT profiles reveal well-defined routes corresponding to commercial ships, predominantly observed in the North Atlantic (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/>b). The distribution of GLD data is notably concentrated in specific regions with a high density of profiles (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/>c). The CTD casts mainly concentrate in the Kuroshio and Gulf Stream regions, with additional profiles observed in the equatorial region (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/>d). APB profiles, on the other hand, are prominently concentrated in the Northeast Pacific and in the Antarctic Circumpolar region south of the Indian Ocean (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/>e).</p>

      <fig id="F2"><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d2e681">Global distribution of WOD profiles for PFL <bold>(a)</bold>, XBT <bold>(b)</bold>, GLD <bold>(c)</bold>, CTD <bold>(d)</bold>, APB <bold>(e)</bold>, META3.2 DT cyclonic eddy observations <bold>(f)</bold> and  anticyclonic eddy observations <bold>(g)</bold>. The data shown here is after quality-control steps and application of filters described in the text.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/18/1089/2026/essd-18-1089-2026-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SSx2" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Mesoscale eddy atlas</title>
      <p id="d2e718">The central component of this study is the characterization of the mesoscale eddies identified in the sea-level data. For this purpose, we employ the Mesoscale Eddy Trajectory Atlas META3.2 DT, a new eddy tracking census that replaces previous products distributed by AVISO<fn id="Ch1.Footn1"><p id="d2e721">AVISO stands for “Archiving, Validation and Interpretation of Satellite Oceanographic data”.</p></fn> or CMEMS<fn id="Ch1.Footn2"><p id="d2e725">CMEMS stands for “Copernicus Marine and Environment Monitoring Service”.</p></fn>. Specifically, we use the delayed-time all-satellite atlas (META3.2 DT all-satellites, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.24400/527896/a01-2022.005.210802" ext-link-type="DOI">10.24400/527896/a01-2022.005.210802</ext-link>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="altparen.22"/>), which identifies a total of 36 522 562 cyclonic eddy observations and 34 521 490 anticyclonic eddy observations in the CMEMS product described above. Here, we refer to the META3.2 DT product as Eddy Atlas.</p>
      <p id="d2e735"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="text.23"/> describes a beta version of META3.2 DT Eddy Atlas, the META3.1exp product, and compares it with META2.0 and other atlases <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8 bib1.bibx24" id="paren.24"/>. Eddies are identified as closed sea-surface height contours around local extrema, and tracked through time based on spatial overlap and similarity of their geometric properties across consecutive days, as described in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="text.25"/>. This results in persistent eddy identifiers that enable the reconstruction of full eddy lifetimes. Only a few minor changes were made from the experimental version 3.1 to the current version 3.2 DT, and the description of 3.1exp in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="text.26"/> is generally valid for 3.2. A main novelty in META3.2 DT compared to META 2.0 is the identification of Eulerian mesoscale eddies as closed contours of spatially high-pass filtered sea-surface height in lieu of closed contours of filtered sea-level anomaly. The use of sea-surface height allows for better detection of eddies near strong currents and steep topography, and is key to a good representation of eddies that grow locally on top of standing meanders. META3.2 DT also changed the eddy detection from Chelton et al.'s eddy-tracking lineage of algorithms to an upgraded version of the algorithm by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="text.27"/>. META3.2 DT further implemented a few minor changes to error thresholds, filtering of large-scale signals (reducing the half-power scale from 1000 km to 700 km), a reduced sea-level interval to search for the eddy edges, etc. Globally, META3.2 DT has an increased number of eddies compared to META2.0, but most of these extra eddies are small, short-lived eddies and will not be considered in our analysis.</p>

      <fig id="F3" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d2e754">Illustrative example of the eddy characteristics associated with a cyclone in the northern hemisphere. <bold>(a)</bold> Top view: Solid lines indicate two sea-surface height contours (effective and speed contours) encompassing the local extremum, which represents the eddy center. Dashed lines represent circle approximations of each contour, determining the radii. Arrows depict the tangential velocity profile within the eddy. <bold>(b)</bold> Side view: The solid line represents the sea-surface height, with the amplitude calculated as the sea-surface height difference between the effective contour and the eddy center.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/18/1089/2026/essd-18-1089-2026-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e769">In addition to basic eddy characteristics (e.g., trajectories, amplitude, swirl speed, and size), META3.2 DT provides details for each eddy observation, including the coordinates for sea-level contours <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="paren.28"/>. (A difference between 3.1exp and 3.2 DT is that 20-point contours instead of 50-point contours are now provided.)  These added details on the eddy shape allow us to match the WOD profiles with META3.2 DT. For reference, it is helpful to define a few eddy properties that are already included in META3.2 DT (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/> as reference): <list list-type="bullet"><list-item>
      <p id="d2e779"><italic>Effective contour</italic>:  outermost high-pass filtered closed contour of sea-surface height detected from a search starting at the localized sea-level extremum.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e785"><italic>Speed contour</italic>:  high-pass filtered closed contour of sea-surface height associated with maximum azimuthally averaged velocity detected from a search starting the localized sea-level extremum.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e791"><italic>Effective radius</italic>:  eddy radius obtained by fitting a circle to the effective contour.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e797"><italic>Speed radius</italic>:  eddy radius obtained by fitting a circle to the speed contour.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e803"><italic>Eddy center</italic>:  coordinates (longitude, latitude) of the high-pass filtered extremum of sea-surface height obtained from fitting a circle to the speed contour.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e809"><italic>Amplitude</italic>: difference in sea-surface height between the effective contour and the local extremum.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e815"><italic>Effective velocity profile</italic>:  profile of azimuthally averaged velocity from eddy center to effective radius.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e821"><italic>Speed velocity profile</italic>:  profile of azimuthally averaged velocity from eddy center to speed radius.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e827"><italic>Average speed</italic>:  azimuthally averaged speed associated with the speed radius.</p></list-item></list></p>
      <p id="d2e833">We also add other eddy properties, such as the Rossby number <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>: defined by the maximum azimuthal velocity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mi>U</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), local planetary vorticity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) and speed radius (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
      <p id="d2e881">We employ a series of filtering criteria to extract significant eddy observations from the datasets based on <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="text.29"/>. Firstly, we discard eddies whose time-mean amplitudes are smaller than 2.5 cm and whose first detection is centered at depths shallower than 200 m to avoid variability related to sampling noise and defective tidal corrections on the shelf. Next, we remove eddies with a duration of less than 30 d, focusing on long-lived eddies that potentially play a more substantial role in ocean dynamics. To facilitate subsequent analysis and data subset selection, we save the observations of the filtered eddies in separate NetCDF files. Each file corresponds to a specific year and month, enabling a more efficient and organized approach for further investigation using parallel processes. To accelerate the filtering process, we partition the data into approximately 120 chunks, each containing around 300 000 vortex observations. These chunks are processed using 60 single-core Dask workers, each allocated 5 GB of memory.</p>
      <p id="d2e887">We retain a total of 18 785 117 cyclonic eddy observations and 17 933 921 anticyclonic eddy observations used to combine with the profiles. This leads to a total of 205 770 and 190 031 unique cyclones and anticyclones, respectively. For clarity, throughout the manuscript, we refer to eddy observations as individual daily detections of eddies (i.e., one snapshot per eddy per day), while unique eddies denote the complete trajectories of those eddies over time, encompassing all daily observations from formation to dissipation. Each unique eddy is assigned a persistent identifier in the META3.2 DT atlas, enabling the temporal association of multiple profiles with the same eddy over its full lifetime.</p>
      <p id="d2e890">Observations of anticyclones are slightly less common than those of cyclones, with an average of 616 309 observations per year compared to 645 569 observations of cyclones per year. On a global scale, there is no significant difference in the occurrence between cyclones and anticyclones (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/>f–g). However, we observe distinct patterns at local scales. Anticyclones tend to be more frequent offshore in proximity to western-boundary currents, while cyclones are more common inshore to these currents. Both cyclones and anticyclones are more frequent in regions characterized by strong meandering currents, such as the Northwest Atlantic and Brazil-Malvinas.</p>
      <p id="d2e895">During our filtering process, we exclude low-amplitude eddies, resulting in a decrease in eddy occurrence within an equatorial latitudinal band of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. The Northeast Pacific has traditionally been considered an “eddy desert” with low eddy occurrence <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="paren.30"/>. However, recent studies have revealed that this region is, in fact, rich in Lagrangian eddies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="paren.31"/>. It is noteworthy that this particular region exhibits a high concentration of APB profiles in our dataset. In future releases, there is potential to expand our analysis by combining the WOD dataset with the Lagrangian eddy atlas, enabling a more comprehensive exploration of this region.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SSx3" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Combining datasets</title>
      <p id="d2e924">This study introduces a novel contribution in the form of the global vortex-profile matching dataset. Currently, we employ the eddy effective (most external) contour to delineate the boundaries of the eddies. Users can restrict the analysis to the speed core of the eddy by filtering out profiles within a radius of speed.</p>
      <p id="d2e927">For each matched profile–eddy pair, we include the full set of eddy properties at the time of observation – such as eddy center coordinates, effective and speed radii, amplitude, average velocity, and Rossby number – along with the unique eddy identifier. Because this identifier persists throughout the eddy’s lifetime, it allows users to reconstruct the full eddy trajectory and time series of properties. The dataset also retains the profile's original location, depth, timestamp, and instrument metadata, enabling composite analyses of the vertical and temporal structure of long-lived eddies.</p>
      <p id="d2e930">The matching algorithm we developed enables parallelization for each year, encompassing both profile data and eddy observations. For each profile data type, e.g. CTD, we iterate through each cast and examine whether it resides within the effective contour of any eddy located in a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> square centered around the profile. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> search area reduces computational time by matching only vortices close to the profile. Our decision to iterate over the profiles rather than the eddy observations stems from the fact that, by definition, an eddy observation can comprise multiple profiles, whereas a profile can only be associated with a single eddy. If the profile falls within an eddy, we append all eddy parameters to the cast.</p>
      <p id="d2e961">The parallelization is done by using a Dask delayed function applied for each year and month, generating a list of delayed objects that are further parallelized to multiple cluster workers. In our case, we use 100 single-core workers with 5 Gb of memory each, totaling 500 Gb of simultaneous memory allocated.</p>

      <fig id="F4"><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d2e967">Global distribution of WOD profiles on 4 March  2020. Each data type is represented by a specific marker: circle (PFL), diamond (APB), triangle (CTD), square (GLD), and X (XBT). Profiles within anticyclones are marked in red, profiles within cyclones in blue, and background profiles in gray. Zoomed panels highlight six regions: Kuroshio, Gulf Stream, Bay of Bengal, Chilean coast, Brazil-Malvinas, and Agulhas. The panels display profiles and eddy speed contours, with thicker lines indicating eddies containing at least one profile. An animated version is available at <uri>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9xzhtrzLRdo</uri> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="paren.32"/>.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/18/1089/2026/essd-18-1089-2026-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e982">Our comparison of the WOA climatology with our own climatology based on the background profiles reveals no discernible differences (not shown). One plausible hypothesis is that, while numerous, the eddies do not cover a large relative area of the ocean's surface. For example, in 2015, the average area covered by the long-lived eddies was only 13 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2 % of the total ocean surface from 60° S–60° N, which ballparks the 12.6 % of the total drifting profiles (PFL) located within the eddies. This is further corroborated by the low percentage of PFL profiles found in unique vortices (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/>). Although only 5 % of the unique vortices contain more than 10 PFL profiles, there is still a significant number of trapping events, with 2462 unique anticyclones and 2295 unique cyclones each having at least 10 profiles during their lifetime. These events lend themselves to specific case studies that follow individual eddies.</p>

      <fig id="F5" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d2e996">Cumulative distribution for the absolute <bold>(a)</bold> and relative <bold>(b)</bold> total number of PFL profiles over the full lifetime of unique anticyclones (red) and cyclones (blue).</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/18/1089/2026/essd-18-1089-2026-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e1011">To provide a comprehensive representation, we present the vortex-profile matching on a global scale (center panel, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>). Although certain geographic regions display a high occurrence of eddies, most of the profiles lie outside them, even in highly energetic areas such as the Kuroshio, Gulf Stream, Brazil-Malvinas, and Agulhas (as shown in the zoomed-in panels in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>).</p>
      <p id="d2e1018">Following the successful matching of each profile to its respective eddy, we consolidate all profiles and store the combined dataset based on the variable and the inclusion of profiles within eddies. In other words, for each dataset and variable, we generate two distinct files: one containing profiles within eddies, and another file for background profiles.</p>
      <p id="d2e1022">Following the recommendations of TEOS-10 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17" id="paren.33"/>, the dataset stores only measurements on-site, avoiding storing derived variables. However, we added an example of how to compute the conservative temperature and absolute salinity anomalies referenced to the climatology in the code repository.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Dataset availability</title>
      <p id="d2e1037">The dataset is available through the Open Source Project for a Network Data Access Protocol (OPeNDAP) server at the University of Massachusetts Dartmouth (UMassD) and at Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI). We also provide a faster option for users to access the data through an Amazon Web Services (AWS) S3 bucket in icechunk format. Users have the flexibility to subset the dataset based on their desired time range and region by directly accessing it with software such as Python XArray.</p>
      <p id="d2e1040">Using an OPeNDAP server and an S3 bucket to store the dataset offers several advantages. First, it provides a convenient and efficient means of data access, enabling users to retrieve subsets instead of having to download the entire dataset and subset it locally. This reduces the need for large data transfers and storage requirements on the user's end. Additionally, these options support remote data access, allowing researchers to access and analyze the dataset from different locations, promoting collaboration, and facilitating data sharing within the scientific community. Moreover, an OPeNDAP server enables future on-the-fly data processing, such as subsetting, aggregation, and interpolation, which can be advantageous for large and complex datasets, as it reduces the need for pre-processing and minimizes storage demands. Additionally, we also provide the vortex-profile dataset to download from an HTTP server.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5">
  <label>5</label><title>Data Validation</title>
      <p id="d2e1052">One of the preliminary results of this dataset is the global distribution of temperature, salinity, and density anomalies. In this analysis, the combined dataset is partitioned into manageable chunks, each comprising approximately 800 casts. To handle the computational demands efficiently, we parallelize the analysis, employing 50 single-core workers, each provisioned with 3 Gb of memory. We take advantage of the capabilities of the  XHistogram (<uri>https://xhistogram.readthedocs.io/en/latest/index.html</uri>, last access: 8 December 2025) package to compute the distribution of anomalies. This package seamlessly integrates with both XArray and Dask for computing multi-dimensional histograms. For enhanced granularity in our estimations, the distributions are calculated at intervals of every 25 m in depth and spatially over <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> grid boxes.</p>
      <p id="d2e1072">Generally, anticyclones appear to be more intense than cyclones in thermal and saline anomalies, and the patterns in the vertically-averaged anomalous properties highlight the strongly energetic boundary-current regions. As anticipated, cyclones, being low-pressure systems, generate upward displacement of the isopycnals and are strongly associated with negative temperature anomalies (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6"/>a). Conversely, anticyclones, as high-pressure systems, are linked to positive temperature anomalies (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6"/>b). The patterns in global eddy salinity anomalies are less apparent and likely depend on the distribution of water masses across the globe and the rotational sense of the eddies, sometimes compensating temperature anomalies, and, sometimes strengthening them. For most oceans, cyclones are accompanied by compensating negative salinity anomalies, with the exception of the Mediterranean Sea (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6"/>c). Salinity anomalies in anticyclones exhibit regional variations, with western boundary currents displaying positive anomalies and other regions exhibiting both positive and negative anomalies (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6"/>d). Cyclones show weaker negative temperature anomalies and more negative salinity anomalies compared to anticyclones, resulting in a weaker signal in the potential density anomalies (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6"/>e, f), with some unexpected positive anomalies observed in a few regions.</p>

      <fig id="F6"><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d2e1087">Global distributions of anomalies in conservative temperature (°C, panels <bold>(a)</bold> and <bold>(b)</bold>), absolute salinity (g kg<sup>−1</sup>, <bold>(g)</bold>, <bold>(c)</bold> and <bold>(d)</bold>), and potential density (kg m<sup>−3</sup>, <bold>(e)</bold> and <bold>(f)</bold>) within cyclones <bold>(a, c,  e)</bold> and anticyclones <bold>(b, d,  f)</bold>. The anomalies correspond to median profiles computed within <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> boxes subsequently averaged between depths of 50 and 500 m. The black solid lines indicate the regions where the vertical distribution of properties was analyzed. Boxes with less than 10 profiles are masked.</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/18/1089/2026/essd-18-1089-2026-f06.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d2e1164">The expected positive temperature anomalies for anticyclones and negative temperature anomalies for cyclones serve as a reliable quality control measure for the vortex profile matching method. Despite the intriguing unexpected patterns observed in the anomalous salinity of the eddy, the stratification of the ocean is mostly dominated by temperature changes, and the consistency of temperature anomalies within the eddies confirms the accuracy and robustness of the method.</p>

      <fig id="F7"><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d2e1169">Median anomalous vertical profile conservative temperature (°C, panels <bold>(a)</bold> and <bold>(d)</bold>), absolute salinity (g kg<sup>−1</sup>, <bold>(b)</bold> and <bold>(e)</bold>), and potential density (kg m<sup>−3</sup>, <bold>(d)</bold> and <bold>(f)</bold>) within cyclones <bold>(a, b, c)</bold> and anticyclones <bold>(d, e, f)</bold> for the Gulf Stream region. Black solid lines represent the 20th, 50th and 80th percentiles.</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/18/1089/2026/essd-18-1089-2026-f07.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d2e1227">Next, we expand our perspective and analyze the vertical distribution of anomalies for the first 1000 m in different regions. The regions are chosen based on the intensity of vortical activity (Gulf Stream and Kuroshio Current) or due to their exceptional patterns of temperature and salinity (Bay of Bengal and Mediterranean Sea). The anomalies in the Gulf Stream extend to the whole 1000 m range for both cyclones and anticyclones. The general median temperature anomalies reach 1.5 °C around 600 m with the 80th percentile around 4 °C for both cyclones (negative) and anticyclones (positive), although the distribution for anticyclones is bimodal, showing a branch peaking at 5 °C around 500 m (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>a, d). The salinity anomalies corroborate the patterns shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6"/>, with negative values within cyclones and positive within anticyclones (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>b, e). The median peaks around 0.2 g kg<sup>−1</sup> at 600 m with the 80th percentile reaching 0.5 g kg<sup>−1</sup>. The density anomalies follow the expected patterns of the combined effect of temperature and salinity (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>c, f). The vertical structure and anomalies associated with anticyclones (warm core rings) are corroborated by a recent study that employed a totally independent method (see Fig. 7 from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="altparen.34"/>). The description and analysis of mesoscale eddies in the Gulf Stream encompass a wide variety of applications, including the behavior of the top predators. For example, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="text.35"/> reveals the extensive use of anticyclones (warm-core rings) by mature white sharks, suggesting that anomalies make prey more accessible and energetically profitable.</p>

      <fig id="F8"><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d2e1271">Median anomalous vertical profile conservative temperature (°C, panels <bold>(a)</bold> and <bold>(d)</bold>), absolute salinity (g kg<sup>−1</sup>, <bold>(b)</bold> and <bold>(e)</bold>), and potential density (kg m<sup>−3</sup>, <bold>(d)</bold> and <bold>(f)</bold>) within cyclones <bold>(a, b,  c)</bold> and anticyclones <bold>(d, e, f)</bold> for the Kuroshio Current region. Black solid lines represent the 20th, 50th and 80th percentiles.</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/18/1089/2026/essd-18-1089-2026-f08.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d2e1329">Turning our attention to Kuroshio, we find negative temperature anomalies for cyclones, with a median value of approximately <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1 °C (80th percentile around <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3 °C), extending to depths of around 800 m (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8"/>a). In contrast, anticyclones exhibit predominantly positive temperature anomalies, with a median value of around 2 °C (80th percentile around 3.5 °C), more concentrated near the surface and shallower in depth compared to cyclones (approximately 500 m) (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8"/>d). The salinity anomalies of the cyclones show negative values that intensify near the surface, with a median of approximately <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.15 g kg<sup>−1</sup> (80th percentile of around <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.4 g kg<sup>−1</sup>), extending to depths of 700 m (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8"/>b). Within anticyclones, the salinity anomaly patterns exhibit a bimodal distribution, with a branch that transitions from positive values on the surface to a negative peak around 500 m (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8"/>e). The median anticyclonic salinity anomalies range from negative to positive values around 0.2 g kg<sup>−1</sup>, with the 80th percentile approximately 0.4 g kg<sup>−1</sup>. The peak values and the vertical structure corroborate the findings reported in a recent study conducted in the region <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34" id="paren.36"/>, although notable salinity inversions are not observed in our analysis for cyclones. Within cyclones, the density anomalies exhibit a slightly positive median (less than 0.1 kg m<sup>−3</sup>), with the 20th percentile showing negative anomalies at the surface around <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.2 kg m<sup>−3</sup> (extending to 300 m). The 80th percentile demonstrates positive anomalies, extending to 1000 m with a typical value of 0.3 kg m<sup>−3</sup>. In contrast, anticyclones display a negative median density anomaly (around <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.2 kg m<sup>−3</sup>), peaking at approximately 400 m depth. The 80th percentile also reveals negative anomalies, extending to 1000 m with a typical value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.3 kg m<sup>−3</sup>.</p>

      <fig id="F9"><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d2e1506">Median anomalous vertical profile conservative temperature (°C, panels <bold>(a)</bold> and <bold>(d)</bold>), absolute salinity (g kg<sup>−1</sup>, <bold>(b)</bold> and <bold>(e)</bold>), and potential density (kg m<sup>−3</sup>, <bold>(d)</bold> and <bold>(f)</bold>) within cyclones <bold>(a, b, c)</bold> and anticyclones <bold>(d, e,  f)</bold> for the Bay of Bengal region. Black solid lines represent the 20th, 50th and 80th percentiles.</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/18/1089/2026/essd-18-1089-2026-f09.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d2e1564">The vortices in the Bay of Bengal are shallower than in other regions (approximately 300 m) and exhibit a temperature and density peak around 100 m depth (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9"/>). The signals and vertical structure of the temperature and density anomalies support a recent study that used regional vortex-profile matching <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20" id="text.37"/>. However, the absolute salinity values presented by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20" id="text.38"/> are more intense and less spread, likely due to their consideration of the profile position relative to the vortex center, which is not taken into account in our analyses. The greater variability of salinity anomalies near the surface is also characteristic of the region, which features multiple river plume fronts and monsoonal rainfall that can generate surface freshwater lenses <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13 bib1.bibx18 bib1.bibx28" id="paren.39"/>. Understanding the dynamics of mesoscale vortices is crucial for predicting salinity transport pathways in the Bay of Bengal and its exchanges with the Equatorial Indian Ocean and Arabian Sea <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18 bib1.bibx14" id="paren.40"/>.</p>

      <fig id="F10"><label>Figure 10</label><caption><p id="d2e1583">Median anomalous vertical profile conservative temperature (°C, panels <bold>(a)</bold> and <bold>(d)</bold>), absolute salinity (g kg<sup>−1</sup>, <bold>(b)</bold> and <bold>(e)</bold>), and potential density (kg m<sup>−3</sup>, <bold>(d)</bold> and <bold>(f)</bold>) within cyclones <bold>(a, b,  c)</bold> and anticyclones <bold>(d, e,  f)</bold> for the Mediterranean Sea region. Black solid lines represent the 20th, 50th and 80th percentiles.</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/18/1089/2026/essd-18-1089-2026-f10.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d2e1641">Mesoscale eddies play a significant role in shaping the dynamics of the Mediterranean Sea, contributing substantially to sea-surface height variability and kinetic energy at various depths (50 %–60 %, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2" id="altparen.41"/>). In this region, the temperature structure of cyclones exhibits a broad distribution, with a median around zero, indicating the presence of both warm-core and cold-core cyclones (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F10"/>a). While temperature does not seem to heavily influence density anomalies in the region, anticyclonic anomalies show a slightly positive curve, extending to a depth of 400 m with temperature values below 1 °C (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F10"/>). On the other hand, salinity anomalies have a greater impact in the Mediterranean Sea compared to temperature anomalies. Cyclonic salinity anomalies display an exponential-like decay, with a median of 0.2 g kg<sup>−1</sup> at the surface, declining to zero at 300 m (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F10"/>b). The 80th percentile reaches 0.4 g kg<sup>−1</sup> at the surface. For anticyclones, salinity anomalies remain relatively constant at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.1 g kg<sup>−1</sup> for the first 200 m (with the 80th percentile around <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.3 g kg<sup>−1</sup>) before decreasing to zero at 300 m (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F10"/>e). Despite anticyclones exhibiting shallower salinity anomalies compared to cyclones, the combined effect of slightly positive temperature anomalies and negative salinity anomalies leads to stronger and deeper density anomalies (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F10"/>c, f). The vertical structure of mesoscale eddies in the Mediterranean Sea varies regionally and seasonally, yet the overall patterns described here align with recent findings, which illustrate that anticyclones extend to greater depths (up to 400 m) than cyclones (first 200 m) in the region (see Fig. 10 from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2" id="altparen.42"/>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6">
  <label>6</label><title>Future directions and potential applications</title>
      <p id="d2e1732">The analyses in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S5"/> serve a dual purpose: firstly, to perform a quality check on the dataset by comparing the results with published literature, and secondly, to demonstrate the potential of the dataset for conducting global analyses of the vertical structure of mesoscale eddies. It is important to acknowledge that the current version of the analyses presented in this study focuses primarily on temperature, salinity, and density anomalies, not taking into account other biogeochemical variables, the radial distance of the profiles from the eddy center, as well as seasonal and interannual variability. However, it is worth noting that these additional properties are available within the dataset and hold great potential for future investigations. By incorporating these variables into our analyzes, we can gain a more comprehensive understanding of the complex dynamics and drivers underlying the behavior of mesoscale eddies.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S7">
  <label>7</label><title>Code and data availability</title>
      <p id="d2e1745">The dataset used in this study is publicly available  at <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17425853" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.17425853</ext-link> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33" id="paren.43"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e1754">Updated links and the status of the servers, including access through Amazon Web Services S3 bucket, are listed in the GitHub repository. The code for processing and analyzing the dataset, including the vortex-profile matching algorithm, is available on Zenodo <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="paren.44"><named-content content-type="post"><ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14681279" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.14681279</ext-link></named-content></xref> and GitHub (<uri>https://github.com/iuryt/vortex_profile_matching</uri>, last access:  8 December 2025). Users can access the data and code for reproducibility and further research.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S8" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>8</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d2e1774">In this study, we construct a unique dataset by combining temperature, salinity and biogeochemical profiles from the World Ocean Database (WOD) with Eulerian mesoscale eddies identified and tracked using altimetry data (META3.2 DT). We have demonstrated the potential dataset's utility to explore global characteristics of mesoscale eddies, including their vertical extension and salinity compensation to temperature anomalies.</p>
      <p id="d2e1777">The primary objective of this work is to develop a comprehensive global dataset for studying the vertical structure of mesoscale eddies identified through altimetry data. We are committed to the principles of open, transparent, and accessible science, with a strong focus on reproducibility. To facilitate spatial, temporal, and source-based subset analyses, we have organized the data in a manner that supports on-the-fly remote data analysis through an OPeNDAP server, AWS S3 bucket, as well as through direct download by HTTP.</p>
      <p id="d2e1780">This dataset represents a powerful tool for advancing our understanding of ocean processes, enabling detailed studies on mesoscale eddy dynamics, their role in biogeochemical cycles, and their influence on regional and global ocean circulation. By integrating in situ measurements with satellite-derived eddy tracking, this resource provides a foundation for addressing fundamental questions in oceanography and offers broad potential for applications in climate science, ecosystem modeling, and operational oceanography.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="videosupplement"><title>Video supplement</title>

      <p id="d2e1787">Global distribution of WOD profiles from 1 January 1993 to 31 December 2021. Each data type is represented by a specific marker: circle (PFL), diamond (APB), triangle (CTD), square (GLD), and X (XBT). Profiles within anticyclones are marked in red, profiles within cyclones in blue, and background profiles in gray. Zoomed panels highlight six regions: Kuroshio, Gulf Stream, Bay of Bengal, Chilean coast, Brazil-Malvinas, and Agulhas. The panels display profiles and eddy speed contours, with thicker lines indicating eddies containing at least one profile (<uri>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9xzhtrzLRdo</uri>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="altparen.45"/>).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d2e1799">ITS: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Validation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Data Curation, Writing – Original Draft, Writing – Review &amp; Editing and Visualization. CBR: Conceptualization, Methodology and Writing – Review &amp; Editing. AT: Conceptualization, Methodology, Resources, Writing – Review &amp; Editing, Supervision, Project administration and Funding acquisition. AS: Software and Writing – Review &amp; Editing.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d2e1805">The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d2e1812">Publisher’s note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d2e1818">We sincerely thank the reviewers, the editor, and the following individuals for their valuable contributions to this project. Geoff Cowles deserves our appreciation for the discussions on the usage of the OPeNDAP server, which greatly facilitate data accessibility. We are grateful to Agata Braga for her insightful discussions about data visualization. Additionally, we extend our thanks to Collin Capano, Geoff Cowles, Ben Burnett, and Connor Kenyon for their invaluable assistance with the setup of the CARNiE cluster for this project.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d2e1823">Office of Naval Research (ONR) DURIP grant N0001418-1-2255, which funded the CARNiE computing cluster used to develop the research results reported within this paper. The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support for this research provided by the Office of Naval Research (ONR) under grants N001418-1-2799, N00014-23-1-2054, MUST II – N00014-20-1-2849 and MUST III – N00014-22-1-2012. CR acknowledges support from NSF (award 2146729).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d2e1829">This paper was edited by Alberto Ribotti and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><label>Abernathey and Haller(2018)</label><mixed-citation> Abernathey, R. and Haller, G.: Transport by lagrangian vortices in the Eastern Pacific, Journal of Physical Oceanography, 48, 667–685, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><label>Bonaduce et al.(2021)Bonaduce, Cipollone, Johannessen, Staneva, Raj, and Aydogdu</label><mixed-citation>Bonaduce, A., Cipollone, A., Johannessen, J. A., Staneva, J., Raj, R. P., and Aydogdu, A.: Ocean Mesoscale Variability: A Case Study on the Mediterranean Sea From a Re-Analysis Perspective, Frontiers in Earth Science, 9, 724879, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2021.724879" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3389/feart.2021.724879</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><label>Boyer et al.(2018)Boyer, Baranova, Coleman, Garcia, Grodsky, Locarnini, Mishonov, Paver, Reagan, Seidov, Smolyar, Weathers, and Zweng</label><mixed-citation>Boyer, T., Baranova, O., Coleman, C., Garcia, H., Grodsky, A., Locarnini, R., Mishonov, A., Paver, C., Reagan, J., Seidov, D., Smolyar, I., Weathers, K., and Zweng, M.: World Ocean Database 2018, Tech. Rep. 87, NOAA Atlas NESDIS, <uri>https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/sites/default/files/2020-04/wod_intro_0.pdf</uri> (last access: 14 August 2023), 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><label>Carvalho et al.(2024)Carvalho, Simoes-Sousa, Santos, Choi-Lima, Pereira, Alves, Carrero, Santander, and Carvalho</label><mixed-citation>Carvalho, C. C. D., Simoes-Sousa, I. T., Santos, L. P., Choi-Lima, K. F., Pereira, L. G., Alves, M. D. D. O., Carrero, A., Santander, J. C., and Carvalho, V. L.: The longest documented travel by a West Indian manatee, Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 104, e99, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025315424000894" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/S0025315424000894</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><label>Center for Scientific Computing and Data Science Research(2023)</label><mixed-citation>Center for Scientific Computing and Data Science Research: CARNiE Wiki, <uri>https://gitlab.com/cscvr/carnie-wiki/-/wikis/home</uri> (last access: 14 August 2023), 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><label>Chelton et al.(2001)Chelton, Ries, Haines, Fu, and Callahan</label><mixed-citation>Chelton, D. B., Ries, J. C., Haines, B. J., Fu, L.-L., and Callahan, P. S.: Chapter 1: Satellite Altimetry, in: Satellite Altimetry and Earth Sciences, edited by: Fu, L.-L. and Cazenave, A., vol. 69,  International Geophysics,  Academic Press, 1–131, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0074-6142(01)80146-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0074-6142(01)80146-7</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><label>Chelton et al.(2007)Chelton, Schlax, Samelson, and de Szoeke</label><mixed-citation>Chelton, D. B., Schlax, M. G., Samelson, R. M., and de Szoeke, R. A.: Global observations of large oceanic eddies, Geophysical Research Letters, 34, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL030812" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007GL030812</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><label>Chelton et al.(2011)Chelton, Schlax, and Samelson</label><mixed-citation> Chelton, D. B., Schlax, M. G., and Samelson, R. M.: Global observations of nonlinear mesoscale eddies, Progress in Oceanography, 91, 167–216, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><label>Dask Development Team(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Dask Development Team: Dask: Library for dynamic task scheduling, <uri>https://dask.org</uri> (last access: 14 August 2023), 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><label>Dask-JobQueue Development Team(2023)</label><mixed-citation>Dask-JobQueue Development Team: Dask-JobQueue: Easily deploy Dask on job queuing systems like PBS, Slurm, MOAB, SGE, LSF, and HTCondor, <uri>https://jobqueue.dask.org</uri> (last access: 14 August 2023), 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><label>Ferrari and Wunsch(2009)</label><mixed-citation>Ferrari, R. and Wunsch, C.: Ocean Circulation Kinetic Energy: Reservoirs, Sources, and Sinks, Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 41, 253–282, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fluid.40.111406.102139" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1146/annurev.fluid.40.111406.102139</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><label>Gaube et al.(2018)Gaube, Braun, Lawson, McGillicuddy, Penna, Skomal, Fischer, and Thorrold</label><mixed-citation>Gaube, P., Braun, C. D., Lawson, G. L., McGillicuddy, D. J., Penna, A. D., Skomal, G. B., Fischer, C., and Thorrold, S. R.: Mesoscale eddies influence the movements of mature female white sharks in the Gulf Stream and Sargasso Sea, Scientific Reports, 8, 1–8, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-25565-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41598-018-25565-8</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><label>Gordon et al.(2016)Gordon, Shroyer, Mahadevan, Sengupta, and Freilich</label><mixed-citation>Gordon, A. L., Shroyer, E. L., Mahadevan, A., Sengupta, D., and Freilich, M.: Bay of Bengal: 2013 Northeast Monsoon Upper-Ocean Circulation, Oceanography, 29, 82–91, <uri>http://www.jstor.org/stable/24862672</uri> (last access: 14 August 2023), 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><label>Hormann et al.(2019)Hormann, Centurioni, and Gordon</label><mixed-citation>Hormann, V., Centurioni, L. R., and Gordon, A. L.: Freshwater export pathways from the Bay of Bengal, Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography, 168, 104645, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2019.104645" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.dsr2.2019.104645</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><label>Houry et al.(1987)Houry, Dombrowsky, De Mey, and Minster</label><mixed-citation>Houry, S., Dombrowsky, E., De Mey, P., and Minster, J.-F.: runt-Väisälä Frequency and Rossby Radii in the South Atlantic , Journal of Physical Oceanography, 17, 1619–1626, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1987)017&lt;1619:BVFARR&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0485(1987)017&lt;1619:BVFARR&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><label>Hoyer and Hamman(2017)</label><mixed-citation>Hoyer, S. and Hamman, J.: xarray: N-D labeled arrays and datasets in Python, Journal of Open Research Software, 5, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5334/jors.148" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5334/jors.148</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><label>IOC, SCOR and IAPSO(2010)</label><mixed-citation>IOC, SCOR and IAPSO: The international thermodynamic equation of seawater – 2010: Calculation and use of thermodynamic properties, IOC/2010/MG/56 Rev., UNESCO, <uri>https://www.teos-10.org/pubs/TEOS-10_Manual.pdf</uri> (last access: 14 August 2023), 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><label>Jensen et al.(2016)Jensen, Wijesekera, Nyadjro, Thoppil, Shriver, Sandeep, and Pant</label><mixed-citation>Jensen, T. G., Wijesekera, H. W., Nyadjro, E. S., Thoppil, P. G., Shriver, J. F., Sandeep, K., and Pant, V.: Modeling Salinity Exchanges Between the Equatorial Indian Ocean and the Bay of Bengal, Oceanography, 29, 92–101, <uri>http://www.jstor.org/stable/24862673</uri> (last access: 14 August 2023), 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><label>Lévy(2008)</label><mixed-citation>Lévy, M.: The Modulation of Biological Production by Oceanic Mesoscale Turbulence, in: Transport and Mixing in Geophysical Flows,  Springer, Berlin, Germany,  219–261, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75215-8_9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/978-3-540-75215-8_9</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><label>Lin et al.(2019)Lin, Qiu, and Sun</label><mixed-citation>Lin, X., Qiu, Y., and Sun, D.: Thermohaline Structures and Heat/Freshwater Transports of Mesoscale Eddies in the Bay of Bengal Observed by Argo and Satellite Data, Remote Sensing, 11, 2989, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11242989" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/rs11242989</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><label>Liu and Abernathey(2023)</label><mixed-citation>Liu, T. and Abernathey, R.: A global Lagrangian eddy dataset based on satellite altimetry, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 1765–1778, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-1765-2023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/essd-15-1765-2023</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><label>MacDonald et al.(2013)MacDonald, Carlson, and Goodman</label><mixed-citation>MacDonald, D. G., Carlson, J., and Goodman, L.: On the heterogeneity of stratified-shear turbulence: Observations from a near-field river plume, Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 118, 6223–6237, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JC008891" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2013JC008891</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><label>Mahadevan and Archer(2000)</label><mixed-citation>Mahadevan, A. and Archer, D.: Modeling the impact of fronts and mesoscale circulation on the nutrient supply and biogeochemistry of the upper ocean, Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 105, 1209–1225, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JC900216" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/1999JC900216</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><label>Mason et al.(2014)Mason, Pascual, and McWilliams</label><mixed-citation> Mason, E., Pascual, A., and McWilliams, J. C.: A new sea surface height–based code for oceanic mesoscale eddy tracking, Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 31, 1181–1188, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><label>Pegliasco et al.(2022a)Pegliasco, Delepoulle, Mason, Morrow, Faugère, and Dibarboure</label><mixed-citation>Pegliasco, C., Delepoulle, A., Mason, E., Morrow, R., Faugère, Y., and Dibarboure, G.: META3.1exp: a new global mesoscale eddy trajectory atlas derived from altimetry, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 1087–1107, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-1087-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/essd-14-1087-2022</ext-link>, 2022a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><label>Pegliasco et al.(2022b)</label><mixed-citation>Pegliasco, S., Delepoulle, A., Mason, E., Morrow, R., Faugère, Y., and Dibarboure, G.: META3.2 DT all-satellite mesoscale eddy trajectory product, AVISO+/SSALTO-DUACS [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.24400/527896/a01-2022.005.210802" ext-link-type="DOI">10.24400/527896/a01-2022.005.210802</ext-link>, 2022b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><label>Rocha and Simoes-Sousa(2022)</label><mixed-citation>Rocha, C. B. and Simoes-Sousa, I. T.: Compact Mesoscale Eddies in the South Brazil Bight, Remote Sensing, 14, 5781, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14225781" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/rs14225781</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><label>Shroyer et al.(2021)Shroyer, Tandon, Sengupta, Fernando, Lucas, Farrar, Chattopadhyay, de Szoeke, Flatau, Rydbeck et al.</label><mixed-citation>Shroyer, E., Tandon, A., Sengupta, D., Fernando, H. J. S., Lucas, A. J., Farrar, J. T., Chattopadhyay, R., de Szoeke, S., Flatau, M., Rydbeck, A., Wijesekera, H., McPhaden, M., Seo, H., Subramanian, A., Venkatesan, R., Joseph, J., Ramsundaram, S., Gordon, A. L., Bohman, S. M., Pérez, J., Simoes-Sousa, I. T., Jayne, S. R., Todd, R. E., Bhat, G. S., Lankhorst, M., Schlosser, T., Adams, K., Jinadasa, S. U. P., Mathur, M., Mohapatra, M., Rama Rao, E. P., Sahai, A. K., Sharma, R., Lee, C., Rainville, L., Cherian, D., Cullen, K., Centurioni, L. R., Hormann, V., MacKinnon, J., Send, U., Anutaliya, A., Waterhouse, A., Black, G. S., Dehart, J. A., Woods, K. M., Creegan, E., Levy, G., Kantha, L. H., and Subrahmanyam, B.: Bay of Bengal Intraseasonal Oscillations and the 2018 Monsoon Onset, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society,   1–44, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-20-0113.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/BAMS-D-20-0113.1</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><label>Silver et al.(2022)Silver, Gangopadhyay, Gawarkiewicz, Andres, Flierl, and Clark</label><mixed-citation>Silver, A., Gangopadhyay, A., Gawarkiewicz, G., Andres, M., Flierl, G., and Clark, J.: Spatial Variability of Movement, Structure, and Formation of Warm Core Rings in the Northwest Atlantic Slope Sea, Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 127, e2022JC018737, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JC018737" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2022JC018737</ext-link>, 2022. </mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><label>Simoes-Sousa(2025)</label><mixed-citation>Simoes-Sousa, I.: iuryt/vortex_profile_matching: submitted version, Zenodo [code], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14681280" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.14681280</ext-link>, 2025a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><label>Simoes-Sousa(2025)</label><mixed-citation>Simoes-Sousa, I. T.: Matching World Ocean Database with Eulerian Altimetry-Based Eddies, YouTube [video], <uri>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9xzhtrzLRdo</uri>, last access: 8 December 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><label>Simoes-Sousa et al.(2021)Simoes-Sousa, Silveira, Tandon, Flierl, Ribeiro, and Martins</label><mixed-citation>Simoes-Sousa, I. T., Silveira, I. C. A., Tandon, A., Flierl, G. R., Ribeiro, C. H., and Martins, R. P.: The Barreirinhas Eddies: Stable energetic anticyclones in the near-equatorial South Atlantic, Frontiers in Marine Science, 8, 28, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2021.617011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3389/fmars.2021.617011</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><label>Simoes-Sousa et al.(2025)</label><mixed-citation>Simoes-Sousa, I. T., Tandon, A., B Rocha, C., and Schmidt, A.: Dataset for “Integrating Global Ocean Profiles Data and Altimetry-Derived Eddies”, published at ESSD (1.0.0), Zenodo [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17425853" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.17425853</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><label>Sun et al.(2017)Sun, Dong, Wang, Liu, and Yu</label><mixed-citation>Sun, W., Dong, C., Wang, R., Liu, Y., and Yu, K.: Vertical structure anomalies of oceanic eddies in the Kuroshio Extension region, Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 122, 1476–1496, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JC012226" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016JC012226</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><label>Szuts et al.(2012)Szuts, Blundell, Chidichimo, and Marotzke</label><mixed-citation>Szuts, Z. B., Blundell, J. R., Chidichimo, M. P., and Marotzke, J.: A vertical-mode decomposition to investigate low-frequency internal motion across the Atlantic at 26° N, Ocean Sci., 8, 345–367, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/os-8-345-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/os-8-345-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><label>Whalen et al.(2012)Whalen, Talley, and MacKinnon</label><mixed-citation>Whalen, C. B., Talley, L. D., and MacKinnon, J. A.: Spatial and Temporal Variability of Global Ocean Mixing Inferred from Argo Profiles: GLOBAL OCEAN MIXING INFERRED FROM ARGO, Geophysical Research Letters, 39, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL053196" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012GL053196</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><label>Whalen et al.(2018)Whalen, MacKinnon, and Talley</label><mixed-citation>Whalen, C. B., MacKinnon, J. A., and Talley, L. D.: Large-Scale Impacts of the Mesoscale Environment on Mixing from Wind-Driven Internal Waves, Nature Geoscience, 11, 842–847, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-018-0213-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41561-018-0213-6</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><label>Yamamoto et al.(2018)Yamamoto, Palter, Dufour, Griffies, Bianchi, Claret, Dunne, Frenger, and Galbraith</label><mixed-citation>Yamamoto, A., Palter, J. B., Dufour, C. O., Griffies, S. M., Bianchi, D., Claret, M., Dunne, J. P., Frenger, I., and Galbraith, E. D.: Roles of the Ocean Mesoscale in the Horizontal Supply of Mass, Heat, Carbon, and Nutrients to the Northern Hemisphere Subtropical Gyres, Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 123, 7016–7036, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JC013969" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018JC013969</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Integrating Global Ocean Profiles and Altimetry-Derived Eddies</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>Abernathey and Haller(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Abernathey, R. and Haller, G.: Transport by lagrangian vortices in the Eastern
Pacific, Journal of Physical Oceanography, 48, 667–685, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>Bonaduce et al.(2021)Bonaduce, Cipollone, Johannessen, Staneva, Raj,
and Aydogdu</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bonaduce, A., Cipollone, A., Johannessen, J. A., Staneva, J., Raj, R. P., and
Aydogdu, A.: Ocean Mesoscale Variability: A Case Study on the
Mediterranean Sea From a Re-Analysis Perspective, Frontiers in Earth
Science, 9, 724879, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2021.724879" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2021.724879</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>Boyer et al.(2018)Boyer, Baranova, Coleman, Garcia, Grodsky,
Locarnini, Mishonov, Paver, Reagan, Seidov, Smolyar, Weathers, and
Zweng</label><mixed-citation>
      
Boyer, T., Baranova, O., Coleman, C., Garcia, H., Grodsky, A., Locarnini, R.,
Mishonov, A., Paver, C., Reagan, J., Seidov, D., Smolyar, I., Weathers, K.,
and Zweng, M.: World Ocean Database 2018, Tech. Rep. 87, NOAA Atlas NESDIS,
<a href="https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/sites/default/files/2020-04/wod_intro_0.pdf" target="_blank"/>
(last access: 14 August 2023), 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>Carvalho et al.(2024)Carvalho, Simoes-Sousa, Santos, Choi-Lima,
Pereira, Alves, Carrero, Santander, and Carvalho</label><mixed-citation>
      
Carvalho, C. C. D., Simoes-Sousa, I. T., Santos, L. P., Choi-Lima, K. F.,
Pereira, L. G., Alves, M. D. D. O., Carrero, A., Santander, J. C., and
Carvalho, V. L.: The longest documented travel by a West Indian manatee,
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 104, e99,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025315424000894" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025315424000894</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>Center for Scientific Computing and Data Science
Research(2023)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Center for Scientific Computing and Data Science Research: CARNiE Wiki,
<a href="https://gitlab.com/cscvr/carnie-wiki/-/wikis/home" target="_blank"/> (last access:
14 August 2023), 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>Chelton et al.(2001)Chelton, Ries, Haines, Fu, and
Callahan</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chelton, D. B., Ries, J. C., Haines, B. J., Fu, L.-L., and Callahan, P. S.:
Chapter 1: Satellite Altimetry, in: Satellite Altimetry and Earth Sciences,
edited by: Fu, L.-L. and Cazenave, A., vol. 69,  International
Geophysics,  Academic Press, 1–131,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0074-6142(01)80146-7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0074-6142(01)80146-7</a>, 2001.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>Chelton et al.(2007)Chelton, Schlax, Samelson, and
de Szoeke</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chelton, D. B., Schlax, M. G., Samelson, R. M., and de Szoeke, R. A.: Global
observations of large oceanic eddies, Geophysical Research Letters, 34, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL030812" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL030812</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>Chelton et al.(2011)Chelton, Schlax, and Samelson</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chelton, D. B., Schlax, M. G., and Samelson, R. M.: Global observations of
nonlinear mesoscale eddies, Progress in Oceanography, 91, 167–216, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>Dask Development Team(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Dask Development Team: Dask: Library for dynamic task scheduling,
<a href="https://dask.org" target="_blank"/> (last access: 14 August 2023), 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>Dask-JobQueue Development Team(2023)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Dask-JobQueue Development Team: Dask-JobQueue: Easily deploy Dask on
job queuing systems like PBS, Slurm, MOAB, SGE, LSF, and HTCondor,
<a href="https://jobqueue.dask.org" target="_blank"/> (last access: 14 August 2023), 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>Ferrari and Wunsch(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ferrari, R. and Wunsch, C.: Ocean Circulation Kinetic Energy: Reservoirs,
Sources, and Sinks, Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 41, 253–282,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fluid.40.111406.102139" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fluid.40.111406.102139</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>Gaube et al.(2018)Gaube, Braun, Lawson, McGillicuddy, Penna, Skomal,
Fischer, and Thorrold</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gaube, P., Braun, C. D., Lawson, G. L., McGillicuddy, D. J., Penna, A. D.,
Skomal, G. B., Fischer, C., and Thorrold, S. R.: Mesoscale eddies influence
the movements of mature female white sharks in the Gulf Stream and Sargasso
Sea, Scientific Reports, 8, 1–8, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-25565-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-25565-8</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>Gordon et al.(2016)Gordon, Shroyer, Mahadevan, Sengupta, and
Freilich</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gordon, A. L., Shroyer, E. L., Mahadevan, A., Sengupta, D., and Freilich, M.:
Bay of Bengal: 2013 Northeast Monsoon Upper-Ocean Circulation,
Oceanography, 29, 82–91,
<a href="http://www.jstor.org/stable/24862672" target="_blank"/> (last access: 14 August 2023),
2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>Hormann et al.(2019)Hormann, Centurioni, and Gordon</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hormann, V., Centurioni, L. R., and Gordon, A. L.: Freshwater export pathways
from the Bay of Bengal, Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in
Oceanography, 168, 104645, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2019.104645" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2019.104645</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>Houry et al.(1987)Houry, Dombrowsky, De Mey, and
Minster</label><mixed-citation>
      
Houry, S., Dombrowsky, E., De Mey, P., and Minster, J.-F.:
runt-Väisälä Frequency and Rossby Radii in the South Atlantic , Journal of Physical
Oceanography, 17, 1619–1626,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1987)017&lt;1619:BVFARR&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1987)017&lt;1619:BVFARR&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 1987.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>Hoyer and Hamman(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hoyer, S. and Hamman, J.: xarray: N-D labeled arrays and datasets in
Python, Journal of Open Research Software, 5, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5334/jors.148" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5334/jors.148</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>IOC, SCOR and IAPSO(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
      
IOC, SCOR and IAPSO: The international thermodynamic equation of seawater
– 2010: Calculation and use of thermodynamic properties, IOC/2010/MG/56 Rev., UNESCO,
<a href="https://www.teos-10.org/pubs/TEOS-10_Manual.pdf" target="_blank"/> (last access: 14 August 2023),
2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>Jensen et al.(2016)Jensen, Wijesekera, Nyadjro, Thoppil, Shriver,
Sandeep, and Pant</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jensen, T. G., Wijesekera, H. W., Nyadjro, E. S., Thoppil, P. G., Shriver,
J. F., Sandeep, K., and Pant, V.: Modeling Salinity Exchanges Between the
Equatorial Indian Ocean and the Bay of Bengal, Oceanography, 29, 92–101,
<a href="http://www.jstor.org/stable/24862673" target="_blank"/> (last access: 14 August 2023),
2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>Lévy(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lévy, M.: The Modulation of Biological
Production by Oceanic Mesoscale Turbulence, in: Transport and Mixing in
Geophysical Flows,  Springer, Berlin, Germany,  219–261,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75215-8_9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75215-8_9</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>Lin et al.(2019)Lin, Qiu, and Sun</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lin, X., Qiu, Y., and Sun, D.: Thermohaline Structures and Heat/Freshwater
Transports of Mesoscale Eddies in the Bay of Bengal Observed by Argo and
Satellite Data, Remote Sensing, 11, 2989, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11242989" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11242989</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>Liu and Abernathey(2023)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Liu, T. and Abernathey, R.: A global Lagrangian eddy dataset based on satellite altimetry, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 1765–1778, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-1765-2023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-1765-2023</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>MacDonald et al.(2013)MacDonald, Carlson, and
Goodman</label><mixed-citation>
      
MacDonald, D. G., Carlson, J., and Goodman, L.: On the heterogeneity of
stratified-shear turbulence: Observations from a near-field river plume,
Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 118, 6223–6237,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JC008891" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JC008891</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>Mahadevan and Archer(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mahadevan, A. and Archer, D.: Modeling the impact of fronts and mesoscale
circulation on the nutrient supply and biogeochemistry of the upper ocean,
Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 105, 1209–1225,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JC900216" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JC900216</a>, 2000.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>Mason et al.(2014)Mason, Pascual, and McWilliams</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mason, E., Pascual, A., and McWilliams, J. C.: A new sea surface height–based
code for oceanic mesoscale eddy tracking, Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic
Technology, 31, 1181–1188, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>Pegliasco et al.(2022a)Pegliasco, Delepoulle, Mason, Morrow,
Faugère, and Dibarboure</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pegliasco, C., Delepoulle, A., Mason, E., Morrow, R., Faugère, Y., and Dibarboure, G.: META3.1exp: a new global mesoscale eddy trajectory atlas derived from altimetry, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 1087–1107, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-1087-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-1087-2022</a>, 2022a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>Pegliasco et al.(2022b)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pegliasco, S., Delepoulle, A., Mason, E., Morrow, R., Faugère, Y., and Dibarboure, G.: META3.2 DT all-satellite mesoscale eddy trajectory product, AVISO+/SSALTO-DUACS [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.24400/527896/a01-2022.005.210802" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.24400/527896/a01-2022.005.210802</a>, 2022b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>Rocha and Simoes-Sousa(2022)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Rocha, C. B. and Simoes-Sousa, I. T.: Compact Mesoscale Eddies in the South
Brazil Bight, Remote Sensing, 14, 5781, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14225781" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14225781</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>Shroyer et al.(2021)Shroyer, Tandon, Sengupta, Fernando, Lucas,
Farrar, Chattopadhyay, de Szoeke, Flatau, Rydbeck et al.</label><mixed-citation>
      
Shroyer, E., Tandon, A., Sengupta, D., Fernando, H. J. S., Lucas, A. J., Farrar, J. T., Chattopadhyay, R., de Szoeke, S., Flatau, M., Rydbeck, A., Wijesekera, H., McPhaden, M., Seo, H., Subramanian, A., Venkatesan, R., Joseph, J., Ramsundaram, S., Gordon, A. L., Bohman, S. M., Pérez, J., Simoes-Sousa, I. T., Jayne, S. R., Todd, R. E., Bhat, G. S., Lankhorst, M., Schlosser, T., Adams, K., Jinadasa, S. U. P., Mathur, M., Mohapatra, M., Rama Rao, E. P., Sahai, A. K., Sharma, R., Lee, C., Rainville, L., Cherian, D., Cullen, K., Centurioni, L. R., Hormann, V., MacKinnon, J., Send, U., Anutaliya, A., Waterhouse, A., Black, G. S., Dehart, J. A., Woods, K. M., Creegan, E., Levy, G., Kantha, L. H., and Subrahmanyam, B.:
Bay of Bengal Intraseasonal Oscillations and the 2018 Monsoon Onset,
Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society,   1–44,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-20-0113.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-20-0113.1</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>Silver et al.(2022)Silver, Gangopadhyay, Gawarkiewicz, Andres,
Flierl, and Clark</label><mixed-citation>
      
Silver, A., Gangopadhyay, A., Gawarkiewicz, G., Andres, M., Flierl, G., and
Clark, J.: Spatial Variability of Movement, Structure, and Formation of Warm
Core Rings in the Northwest Atlantic Slope Sea, Journal of Geophysical
Research: Oceans, 127, e2022JC018737, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JC018737" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JC018737</a>, 2022.


    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>Simoes-Sousa(2025)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Simoes-Sousa, I.: iuryt/vortex_profile_matching: submitted version, Zenodo [code],
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14681280" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14681280</a>, 2025a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>Simoes-Sousa(2025)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Simoes-Sousa, I. T.: Matching World Ocean Database with Eulerian Altimetry-Based Eddies, YouTube [video], <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9xzhtrzLRdo" target="_blank"/>, last access: 8 December 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>Simoes-Sousa et al.(2021)Simoes-Sousa, Silveira, Tandon, Flierl,
Ribeiro, and Martins</label><mixed-citation>
      
Simoes-Sousa, I. T., Silveira, I. C. A., Tandon, A., Flierl, G. R., Ribeiro,
C. H., and Martins, R. P.: The Barreirinhas Eddies: Stable energetic
anticyclones in the near-equatorial South Atlantic, Frontiers in Marine
Science, 8, 28, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2021.617011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2021.617011</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>Simoes-Sousa et al.(2025)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Simoes-Sousa, I. T., Tandon, A., B Rocha, C., and Schmidt, A.: Dataset for “Integrating Global Ocean Profiles Data and Altimetry-Derived Eddies”, published at ESSD (1.0.0), Zenodo [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17425853" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17425853</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>Sun et al.(2017)Sun, Dong, Wang, Liu, and Yu</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sun, W., Dong, C., Wang, R., Liu, Y., and Yu, K.: Vertical structure anomalies
of oceanic eddies in the Kuroshio Extension region, Journal of Geophysical
Research: Oceans, 122, 1476–1496, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JC012226" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JC012226</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>Szuts et al.(2012)Szuts, Blundell, Chidichimo, and
Marotzke</label><mixed-citation>
      
Szuts, Z. B., Blundell, J. R., Chidichimo, M. P., and Marotzke, J.: A vertical-mode decomposition to investigate low-frequency internal motion across the Atlantic at 26° N, Ocean Sci., 8, 345–367, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/os-8-345-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/os-8-345-2012</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>Whalen et al.(2012)Whalen, Talley, and MacKinnon</label><mixed-citation>
      
Whalen, C. B., Talley, L. D., and MacKinnon, J. A.: Spatial and Temporal
Variability of Global Ocean Mixing Inferred from Argo Profiles: GLOBAL
OCEAN MIXING INFERRED FROM ARGO, Geophysical Research Letters, 39,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL053196" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL053196</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>Whalen et al.(2018)Whalen, MacKinnon, and Talley</label><mixed-citation>
      
Whalen, C. B., MacKinnon, J. A., and Talley, L. D.: Large-Scale Impacts of the
Mesoscale Environment on Mixing from Wind-Driven Internal Waves, Nature
Geoscience, 11, 842–847, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-018-0213-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-018-0213-6</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>Yamamoto et al.(2018)Yamamoto, Palter, Dufour, Griffies, Bianchi,
Claret, Dunne, Frenger, and Galbraith</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yamamoto, A., Palter, J. B., Dufour, C. O., Griffies, S. M., Bianchi, D.,
Claret, M., Dunne, J. P., Frenger, I., and Galbraith, E. D.: Roles of the
Ocean Mesoscale in the Horizontal Supply of Mass, Heat, Carbon, and Nutrients
to the Northern Hemisphere Subtropical Gyres, Journal of Geophysical
Research: Oceans, 123, 7016–7036, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JC013969" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JC013969</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
