<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="data-paper">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ESSD</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Earth System Science Data</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ESSD</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Earth Syst. Sci. Data</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1866-3516</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/essd-14-763-2022</article-id><title-group><article-title>Airborne ultra-wideband radar sounding over the shear margins and along flow lines at the onset region of the Northeast Greenland Ice Stream</article-title><alt-title>UWB radar sounding at the onset region of the NEGIS</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{UWB radar sounding at the onset region of the NEGIS}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{S.~Franke et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Franke</surname><given-names>Steven</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8462-4379</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Jansen</surname><given-names>Daniela</given-names></name>
          <email>daniela.jansen@awi.de</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4412-5820</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff9">
          <name><surname>Binder</surname><given-names>Tobias</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Paden</surname><given-names>John D.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0775-6284</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Dörr</surname><given-names>Nils</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7594-7886</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Gerber</surname><given-names>Tamara A.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0368-7229</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Miller</surname><given-names>Heinrich</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4 aff5">
          <name><surname>Dahl-Jensen</surname><given-names>Dorthe</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Helm</surname><given-names>Veit</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7788-9328</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Steinhage</surname><given-names>Daniel</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4737-9751</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff6">
          <name><surname>Weikusat</surname><given-names>Ilka</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3023-6036</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff7">
          <name><surname>Wilhelms</surname><given-names>Frank</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7688-3135</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff8">
          <name><surname>Eisen</surname><given-names>Olaf</given-names></name>
          <email>olaf.eisen@awi.de</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6380-962X</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Alfred Wegener Institute, Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Sciences, Bremerhaven, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Center for Remote Sensing of Ice Sheets (CReSIS), University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Institute of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Physics of Ice, Climate, and Earth, Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Centre for Earth Observation Science, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6"><label>6</label><institution>Department of Geosciences, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff7"><label>7</label><institution>Department of Crystallography, Geoscience Centre, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff8"><label>8</label><institution>Department of Geosciences, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany </institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff9"><label>a</label><institution>now at: Ibeo Automotive Systems, Hamburg, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Olaf Eisen (olaf.eisen@awi.de) and Daniela Jansen (daniela.jansen@awi.de)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>21</day><month>February</month><year>2022</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>14</volume>
      <issue>2</issue>
      <fpage>763</fpage><lpage>779</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>17</day><month>March</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>6</day><month>April</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>4</day><month>October</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>24</day><month>January</month><year>2022</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2022 Steven Franke et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2022</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/14/763/2022/essd-14-763-2022.html">This article is available from https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/14/763/2022/essd-14-763-2022.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/14/763/2022/essd-14-763-2022.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/14/763/2022/essd-14-763-2022.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d1e249">We present a high-resolution airborne radar data set (EGRIP-NOR-2018) for the onset region of the Northeast Greenland Ice Stream (NEGIS). The radar data were acquired in May 2018 with the Alfred Wegener Institute's multichannel ultra-wideband (UWB) radar mounted on the Polar 6 aircraft. Radar profiles cover an area of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">24</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 000 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and extend over the well-defined shear margins of the NEGIS. The survey area is centered at the location of the drill site of the East Greenland Ice-Core Project (EastGRIP), and several radar lines intersect at this location. The survey layout was designed to (i) map the stratigraphic signature of the shear margins with radar profiles aligned perpendicular to ice flow, (ii) trace the radar stratigraphy along several flow lines, and (iii) provide spatial coverage of ice thickness and basal properties. While we are able to resolve radar reflections in the deep stratigraphy, we cannot fully resolve the steeply inclined reflections at the tightly folded shear margins in the lower part of the ice column. The NEGIS is causing the most significant discrepancies between numerically modeled and observed ice surface velocities. Given the high likelihood of future climate and ocean warming, this extensive data set of new high-resolution radar data in combination with the EastGRIP ice core will be a key contribution to understand the past and future dynamics of the NEGIS. The EGRIP-NOR-2018 radar data products can be obtained from the PANGAEA data publisher (<uri>https://doi.pangaea.de/10.1594/PANGAEA.928569</uri>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="altparen.1"/>).</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<?pagebreak page764?><sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e286">The Northeast Greenland Ice Stream (NEGIS) efficiently drains a large area of the Greenland Ice Sheet and is a crucial component of the ice sheet mass balance <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17 bib1.bibx59" id="paren.2"/>. It extends from the central ice divide over more than 600 km towards the northeastern coast, where it discharges ice through the three marine-terminating glaciers (79<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> North glacier, Zachariae Isbræ, and Storstrømmen glacier). The currently prevailing hypothesis is that an anomaly of elevated geothermal heat flux (GHF) leads to extensive basal melting <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18" id="paren.3"/> and induces ice flow. The GHF at the onset of NEGIS is the most important and, at the same time, most uncertain parameter in the representation of basal melt and the subglacial hydrology in ice flow models <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx66" id="paren.4"/>. However, the large gap between observed and modeled basal melt rates <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27 bib1.bibx78 bib1.bibx48 bib1.bibx7" id="paren.5"/> inside the ice stream and in the broader surroundings of the NEGIS onset raises questions about the real thermal state at the bed. The exceptionally high GHF  proposed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18" id="text.6"/> would be non-compatible with known geological processes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38 bib1.bibx4" id="paren.7"/>. Therefore, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="text.8"/> raise the question of how fast flow at the NEGIS onset is possible without an extraordinarily high basal heat flux and melt rates.</p>
      <p id="d1e320">Unlike other ice streams in Greenland, the NEGIS lacks an extensive overdeepened bed and thus lateral topographic constraints <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40 bib1.bibx20" id="paren.9"/>. The ice stream more or less symmetrically broadens along flow, as more ice is dragged through the shear margins <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18 bib1.bibx40" id="paren.10"/>. Subglacial water routing in combination with subglacial till deformation seems to be a further controlling mechanism of ice flow at the onset of the NEGIS <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44 bib1.bibx9" id="paren.11"/>. The outlet area is characterized by an overdeepened basin covered with unconsolidated sediments <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40 bib1.bibx3" id="paren.12"/>. Ice thinning as a consequence of increasing oceanic water temperatures around Greenland could thus potentially be transmitted far upstream <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="paren.13"/>, and changes in the hydropotential might have significant effects on the ice stream geometry. The high susceptibility of NEGIS to marine-triggered discharge and the expected increase in ocean water temperatures in the years to come <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx74 bib1.bibx68" id="paren.14"/> raises questions about the future ice stream stability and its effect on the Greenland Ice Sheet mass balance.</p>
      <p id="d1e342">Large-scale ice flow models are essential tools to predict the future behavior of glaciers and ice sheets and are necessary to estimate future sea-level rise. Until today, these models fail to successfully simulate the NEGIS due to insufficient understanding of the key processes responsible for ice flow dynamics <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51 bib1.bibx63" id="paren.15"/>, limiting the prediction accuracy. The East Greenland Ice-Core Project (EastGRIP; <uri>https://eastgrip.org</uri>, last access: 17 March 2021) aims to drill a deep ice core in the upstream area of the NEGIS, providing valuable insights into the climate record, basal properties, and ice flow history at the drill site. Ice cores provide in situ information on physical and chemical properties at high resolution but are limited as being a spatial point measurement. Hence, further geophysical techniques are required to extrapolate this information to obtain a complete picture of the ice dynamic properties.</p>
      <p id="d1e351">Radio-echo sounding (RES) has long become a standard method in glaciology. The polar ice sheets as well as low-latitude glaciers and ice caps  have extensively been covered by airborne <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx67 bib1.bibx62" id="paren.16"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref> or ground-based <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx56" id="paren.17"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref> RES surveys. The transmitted electromagnetic waves are sensitive to changes in dielectric permittivity and electrical conductivity and get reflected, scattered, or refracted at interfaces of dielectric contrasts in the medium they propagate <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="paren.18"/>. The most common glaciological application is the sounding of ice thickness and bed topography <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30 bib1.bibx13 bib1.bibx67 bib1.bibx55 bib1.bibx43 bib1.bibx22" id="paren.19"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>.  Reflections within the ice column, or so-called internal reflection horizons (IRHs), are often caused by impurity layers of volcanic origin representing isochronous horizons <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="paren.20"/>. These provide valuable information on the ice flow regime and strain history <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx70 bib1.bibx37 bib1.bibx32" id="paren.21"/> and can be used to reconstruct past accumulation rates <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx58 bib1.bibx54 bib1.bibx64 bib1.bibx56 bib1.bibx53" id="paren.22"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>, match ice cores from different locations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36 bib1.bibx65 bib1.bibx31" id="paren.23"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>, and validate numerical ice flow models <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35 bib1.bibx2" id="paren.24"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. Further applications of RES include the detection of crevasses <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx77 bib1.bibx14 bib1.bibx73" id="paren.25"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>, mapping of subglacial lakes and basal hydrology <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8 bib1.bibx57 bib1.bibx75" id="paren.26"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>, identifying thermal regimes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52 bib1.bibx10" id="paren.27"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>, determining snow and firn genesis <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="paren.28"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>, and obtaining information on the crystal orientation fabric <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49 bib1.bibx15 bib1.bibx39" id="paren.29"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>.</p>
      <p id="d1e421">We present airborne radar data of the onset region of NEGIS recorded in 2018 by a multichannel ultra-wideband radar system. The data set consists of profiles oriented parallel and perpendicular to the ice flow direction. The high along-track and range resolution allows consistent isochrone tracing, providing insights into the three-dimensional structure of the ice stream. In combination with the EastGRIP ice core, this data set contributes to a better understanding of ice flow dynamics of the NEGIS. In our paper, we introduce the study site and survey design. Furthermore, we describe the radar data processing and the respective data products. The<?pagebreak page765?> data are freely available from the PANGAEA data publisher (<uri>https://doi.pangaea.de/10.1594/PANGAEA.928569</uri>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="altparen.30"/>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Survey region and previous work</title>
      <p id="d1e438">In May 2018, we recorded radar data in the vicinity of the drill site of the EastGRIP ice core. An area of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">24</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> was mapped, with 7494 km of radar profiles along flow lines and perpendicular to ice flow (Fig. 1). The survey region extends <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">150</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km upstream and downstream of the EastGRIP drill site and ranges from the central part of the ice stream up to 50 km beyond the shear margins. In our survey region, the ice stream accelerates from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to more than 80 m a<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and widens from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">55</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km. The radar data also cover the transition in the position of the shear margin as well as strongly folded internal stratigraphy outside of the ice stream (see Fig. 1). Figure 1b and c show the locations of radar profiles in relation to the ice surface velocity. Profiles extending perpendicular to ice flow have a spacing of 5 km in the region close to the drill site and 10 km further up- and downstream. Along-flow profiles either follow flow lines, which in some cases pass through the shear margins, or are constantly located inside the ice stream. Other profiles are oriented parallel to ice flow of the NEGIS but are located outside of the ice stream.</p>
      <p id="d1e516">The ice thickness in our survey region ranges from 2059 to 3092 m and shows, on average, a gradual decrease in thickness from the upstream to the downstream part <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20 bib1.bibx19" id="paren.31"/>. An analysis of the bed topography, basal roughness, and bed return echoes by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23" id="text.32"/> shows that our survey area can be divided into two different morphological regimes. The upstream part (upstream of EastGRIP) is characterized by a narrow ice stream width with accelerating ice flow velocity, a smooth bed with elongated flow-parallel subglacial landforms, and a soft till layer at the base <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="paren.33"/>. Downstream of EastGRIP, the ice stream widens, and we note an overall change to a rougher and more variable bed geomorphology. The ice stream widens up to 57 km, and ice flow velocity keeps constant and decreases locally <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23" id="paren.34"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e531">In the 2012 summer field season, a scientific consortium collected ground-based geophysical data (RES and seismic survey) as well as a shallow ice core <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx69" id="paren.35"/>. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="text.36"/> examined the ice–bed interface by means of radar and seismic data analysis. They found  high-porosity, water-saturated till, which lubricates the ice stream base and most likely facilitates ice streamflow. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="text.37"/> used the same radar data to analyze the internal radar stratigraphy and suggest that the basal hydrology controls the upstream portion of the NEGIS. By contrast, the downstream part is rather confined by the bed topography. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx60" id="text.38"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx61" id="text.39"/> analyzed the shear margins in particular and observed an increased accumulation and enhanced firn densification in the upper ice column as well as wet elongated subglacial landforms at the bed. Furthermore <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34" id="text.40"/> use RES data to evaluate 3D thermomechanical models of the NEGIS. The authors highlight the complexity of the stagnant-to-streaming ice flow transition and provide insights into the englacial heat transport. Finally, a comprehensive chemical analysis of a 67 m deep firn core was conducted by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx69" id="text.41"/>. The results demonstrated that a deep ice core at this location has the potential to retrieve a reliable record of the Holocene and last glacial cycle.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e559">Location of the EGRPI-NOR-2018 survey area in northeastern Greenland with the MEaSUREs ice surface velocity from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42" id="text.42"/> in the background. <bold>(a)</bold> The radar survey lines are centered at the EastGRIP drill site (white triangle) and extend up to 150 km upstream and downstream of the NEGIS. The locations of one along-flow radar section (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>; blue) and three cross-flow radar sections (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>; red) are shown in panel <bold>(a)</bold>. The ice flow direction of the ice stream is indicated with a white arrow. Three-dimensional images of the cross-flow profiles and along-flow profiles are shown in <bold>(b)</bold> and <bold>(c)</bold>, respectively. The radar sections are shown with a vertical exaggeration factor of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The ice surface velocity <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42" id="paren.43"/> is shown on a logarithmic scale (log10) for all of Greenland (upper left image) and on a linear scale for panels <bold>(a)</bold>, <bold>(b)</bold>, and <bold>(c)</bold>. For panels <bold>(b)</bold> and <bold>(c)</bold> the ice surface velocity is projected on top of the bed topography model from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20" id="text.44"/>. The projection for all maps is WGS 84/NSIDC Sea Ice Polar Stereographic North (EPSG:3413).</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/14/763/2022/essd-14-763-2022-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Radar data acquisition</title>
      <p id="d1e637">The ultra-wideband (UWB) airborne radar is a Multichannel Coherent Radar Depth Sounder (MCoRDS, version 5), which was developed at the Center for Remote Sensing of Ice Sheets (CReSIS) at the University of Kansas <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="paren.45"/>. It has an improved hardware design compared to predecessor radar depth sounders by CReSIS <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28 bib1.bibx71" id="paren.46"/>. The radar configuration deployed in 2018 consists of an eight-element radar array mounted under the Polar 6 Basler BT-67 aircraft's fuselage. The eight antenna elements function as transmit and receive channels using a transmit–receive switch. The total transmit power is 6 kW, and the radar can be operated within the frequency band of 150–600 MHz. The pulse repetition frequency (PRF) is 10 kHz, and the sampling frequency is 1.6 GHz. The characteristics of the transmitted waveform as well as the recording settings can be manually adjusted. We refer to the combined transmission–reception settings as <italic>waveforms</italic> in the following.</p>
      <p id="d1e649">All profiles were recorded using linear frequency-modulated chirps in the frequency band of 180–210 MHz, antenna elements oriented with the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> plane aligned with the along-track (HH polarization), and the transmit antenna beam pointed toward nadir. We used three alternating waveforms to increase the dynamic range of the system (see Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>). Short pulses (1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and low receiver gain of 11 dB are used to image the glacier surface, and longer pulses (3–10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) with higher receiver gain (48 dB) to image internal features and the ice base. Recorded traces were coherently pre-summed with zero-pi modulation in the hardware <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="paren.47"/> to reduce the data rate and to increase signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), leading to a reduced effective PRF. The pre-sum factors were selected with regard to the pulse length of the respective waveform. To reduce range side lobes without losing much signal power, the transmitted and the pulse compression filter were amplitude-tapered using a Tukey window with a taper ratio of 0.08 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46" id="paren.48"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e688">Before the data acquisition, the amplitude, phase, and time delay of the antenna elements were equalized during a test flight over open water during the transit to Greenland.<?pagebreak page766?> During data acquisition, the position of the aircraft was determined by four NovAtel DL-V3 GPS receivers, which sample at 20 Hz. The GPS system operates with dual-frequency tracking so that the position accuracy can be enhanced during post-processing.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e695">Acquisition parameters of the EGRIP-NOR-2018 radar campaign.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="2">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Parameter</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Value</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Radar system</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MCoRDS5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Frequency range</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">180–210 MHz</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Waveform signal</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1, 3, 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> chirp</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Waveform pre-sums<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2, 4, 32</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Pulse repetition frequency</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">10 kHz</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sampling frequency</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1600 MHz</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Tukey window taper ratio</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.08</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Transmit channels</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Receiving channels</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Aircraft altitude above ground</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">360</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Aircraft velocity</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">260</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e698"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Pre-sums are set for each waveform individually.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Radar data processing</title>
      <p id="d1e888">The acquired data comprised a total of 24 total radargrams, each consisting of a pairwise combination of 1 of 8 receivers and 1 of 3 waveforms. The post-flight processing goal was to create single radargrams of the profiles covering the ice<?pagebreak page767?> sheet from surface to base with high SNR, fine resolution, and high dynamic range. The main processing included pulse compression in the range dimension, synthetic aperture radar focusing in the along-track dimension, and array processing in the cross-track and elevation-angle dimension. Lastly, we vertically concatenated the radargrams of the three waveforms. The post-processing tools are implemented in the CReSIS Toolbox <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="paren.49"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e894">At first, the recorded traces were pulse-compressed using a Tukey time domain weighting on the pulse- and frequency-domain-matched filtering with a Hanning window to reduce side lobes. For this purpose, the matched filter duplicates the transmitted waveforms based on the radar transmit settings.</p>
      <p id="d1e897">Synthetic aperture radar (SAR) processing was carried out to focus the SAR radargrams in the along-track direction. The SAR processing is based on the fk (frequency–wavenumber) migration technique for layered media <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="paren.50"/>, which was adapted for radioglaciology <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="paren.51"/>. We used a two-layered velocity model with constant permittivity values for air (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">air</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and ice  (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ice</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). We consider the constant value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ice</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to be justified since the uncertainties in the propagation velocity in the firn layer have a negligible  effect on the fk migration. Furthermore, we use <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ice</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to be consistent with the value used for processing of Operation Ice Bridge (OIB) data. The air–ice interface was tracked using quick-look imagery, which is generated using 20 coherent averages followed by 5 incoherent averages by an automated threshold tracker. Platform motion compensation is applied during averaging. The SAR aperture length at each pixel was chosen to create a fixed along-track resolution of 2.5 m. A requirement for the fk migration is a uniformly sampled linear trajectory of the receivers along the SAR aperture extent.</p>
      <p id="d1e967">To estimate the flight trajectory we used Novatel OEM6 receivers at 20 Hz data rate. The precise point  positioning (PPP) post-processed accuracy (commercial software package Waypoint 8.4) is estimated to be better than 3 cm for latitude and longitude and better than 10 cm for altitude. INS data were acquired by the onboard laser gyro inertial navigation system (Honeywell LASERREF V). Its accuracy is given to be better than 0.1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for pitch and roll and better than 0.4<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for true heading (Honeywell product description). Changes in aircraft elevation, roll, pitch, and heading lead to phase errors in the migrated data and thus to decreased SNR and blurring. Processed GPS and INS data in high precision from the aircraft were used to correct these effects.</p>
      <p id="d1e989">The motion compensation consisted of (1) uniformly resampling the data in along-track using a windowed sinc interpolation, (2) fitting lines to the resampled trajectory with the length of the SAR aperture, and (3) correcting any flight path deviations from the straight lines with phase shifts in the frequency domain.</p>
      <p id="d1e992">After the along-track focusing, the channels were combined to increase the SNR and reduce the impact of surface clutter and off-nadir reflections. The delay-and-sum method allows for steering of the antenna array beam. The antenna array beam is steered toward nadir by coherently summing the data from each channel while accounting for the actual position of each measurement phase center. A total of 11 along-track averages (multilooking) are then performed to reduce speckle in the imagery.</p>
      <p id="d1e995">Finally, the different waveform images were vertically combined to increase the dynamic range of the result. The two-way travel time (TWT) at which the radargrams are combined were chosen with regard to the pulse durations of the transmitted waveforms and the surface return in order to avoid saturation of the high-gain channels due to the strong surface return. For three-waveform collection with 1, 3, and 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nadir waveforms, image 2 is combined with image 1 after 3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> after the surface reflection and image 3 with image 2 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> after the surface return (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Resolution and uncertainty analysis</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSS1">
  <label>3.3.1</label><title>Range resolution</title>
      <p id="d1e1045">The theoretical range resolution after pulse compression is
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M30" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> denotes the speed of light in a vacuum, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the real part of the ordinary relative permittivity, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> the bandwidth of the transmitted chirp, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the windowing factor due to the frequency and time domain windows. For the bandwidth of 30 MHz, the theoretical range resolution in ice with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.53</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is 4.31 m.</p>
      <p id="d1e1151">In addition, to estimate the accuracy of a specific target (internal layer or bed return), we have to consider the RMS error in the dielectric constant <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="paren.52"/>. Here we depend on the exact detection of the ice surface reflection, which is well constrained for our data.</p>
      <?pagebreak page768?><p id="d1e1157">To determine range resolution variability for the bed reflection for the radar data, we performed a crossover analysis of bed pick intersections <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20" id="paren.53"><named-content content-type="pre">see</named-content></xref> and calculated the mean deviation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. We consider an error on the order of 1 % for the dielectric constant for typical dry ice <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="paren.54"/>,
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M38" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            with the ice thickness <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and a mean value for crossover deviation, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The full analysis of the range resolution of the bed reflection is documented in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20" id="text.55"/> and shows a variability from 13 to 17 m.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSS2">
  <label>3.3.2</label><title>Bed return resolution</title>
      <p id="d1e1254">A further parameter is the size of the area illuminated by the radar wave in the bed reflection signal. Here we consider a cross-track resolution for a typical rough surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. It is constrained by the pulse-limited footprint and depends on the Tukey and Hanning window parameters,
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><label>3</label><mml:math id="M42" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msqrt><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:msqrt><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the elevation of the aircraft over the ice surface. All EGRIP-NOR-2018 flights were performed at an aircraft elevation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 365 m above ground. When off-nadir clutter is visible in the radargrams, the cross-track resolution depends on the full beam width, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, of the antenna array,
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><label>4</label><mml:math id="M46" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>arcsin⁡</mml:mi><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the wavelength at the center frequency, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the number of array elements, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the element spacing of the antennas. The cross-track resolution is now defined as
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><label>5</label><mml:math id="M50" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:msqrt><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi></mml:msqrt></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mi>tan⁡</mml:mi><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the approximate cross-track windowing factor for a Hanning window applied to a small cross-track antenna array.</p>
      <p id="d1e1454">For areas without signal layover, the cross-track footprint ranges between 300–350 m for an ice column of 2000–3000 m in our survey region <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20" id="paren.56"/>. Where layover occurs, we have to consider Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E5"/>) with a beam angle of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 21<inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Here the cross-track resolution ranges between 800 and 1100 m.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Results</title>
      <p id="d1e1488">The design of the EGRIP-NOR-2018 radar survey enables a detailed analysis of the bed and englacial stratigraphy: (i) along radar profiles which are parallel to the ice flow (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>c) and (ii) along radar profiles perpendicular to the ice flow, crossing the shear margins (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>b). In addition, several radar lines cover the location where the northern shear margin shifts its location (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>a) and an area southwest of EastGRIP where we observe patterns of strong internal ice deformation (location indicated in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>a).</p>
      <p id="d1e1499">In flow-parallel profiles, we observe three regimes showing different characteristics in the radar stratigraphy. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/> shows a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">200</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km long flow-parallel radargram extending from the far upstream end outside of the NEGIS up to 30 km downstream of EastGRIP. The area outside of the ice stream at a distance of 0–60 km shows slightly folded internal layers, which have no connection to the local basal topography. Steeply dipping internal layers are characterized by a decrease in reflectivity with depth. The part of the profile which is crossing the shear zone (at 60–90 km distance) is characterized by tight folds in the internal layers, which extend almost up to the ice surface. The folds' apparent wavelength in profile direction depends on the intersection angle with respect to the shear margin orientation. Folds are tightest in profiles oriented <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">90</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> to the shear margin fold axis. We observe the best resolution of internal layers inside the ice stream, particularly in the lower part of the ice column. All distortions in the internal stratigraphy inside the ice stream seem to be related to the underlying bed.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d1e1535">Data record properties.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.90}[.90]?><oasis:tgroup cols="2">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Parameter</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Value</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Covered area</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">25 000 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Total profile distance</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">7494 km</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Along-track resolution</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">27</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–30 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">qlook</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>/<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SAR</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>/<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SAR</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Range resolution</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4.31 m</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Data amount</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4.5 GB<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">qlook</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>/9.5 GB<inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SAR</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>/25.6 GB<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SAR</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e1741">Flow-parallel radar profile <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> composed of four frames: 20180512_01_001–004. The location is indicated in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>a and covers the area outside of the ice stream, the shear zone, and the ice stream's trunk. The position of the EastGRIP drill site is labeled and indicated with a vertical dashed white line.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=469.470472pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/14/763/2022/essd-14-763-2022-f02.png"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e1761">Radar profiles <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (frames 20180508_06_003, 20180511_01_007, and 20180514_01_011–012, respectively). The corresponding locations are shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>a. Panel <bold>(a)</bold> shows a profile located outside of the NEGIS, southeast of EastGRIP. A close-up of an anticline and other patterns of deformation are shown in panel <bold>(b)</bold>, resembling the skeleton of a dead penguin. A slice through the ice stream in the upstream region is shown in panel <bold>(c)</bold> and a radar section further downstream in <bold>(d)</bold>. The position of the shear margins (the maximum in the surface velocity gradient) is indicated with a yellow triangle and the folds in the shear margin areas with purple lines. The ice flow direction is into the page.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=469.470472pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/14/763/2022/essd-14-763-2022-f03.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e1845">Radar profiles oriented perpendicular to ice flow show a strong imprint of NEGIS' dynamics. The most striking features are tight folds in the area of the shear margins. Bright stripes characterize them in the radargrams (e.g., Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>), which represent a loss in return power due to steeply inclined internal reflectors <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33 bib1.bibx44" id="paren.57"/>. The onset of this kind of folding starts at the shear zone's outer boundary (marked by yellow triangles in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>c and d). Depending on the ice stream's location and width, these folds can be traced towards the ice stream center for up to tens of kilometers, also towards locations where no shearing at the ice surface is observed. This becomes evident by comparing the upstream and farther-downstream radargram in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>c and d.</p>
      <?pagebreak page769?><p id="d1e1857">At several locations in flow-perpendicular radargrams we observe a drawdown of the radar stratigraphy towards the shear zone's outer margin (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>c). The drawdown could be explained by temperate ice at the base <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23" id="paren.58"/>. Melting at the base at this location would be in agreement with subglacial hydrology modeling results by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx60" id="text.59"/>, who suggest that melt out of sediments within the ice column potentially creates the subglacial bedforms they identified.  In general, the stratigraphy of internal layers northwest of the NEGIS differs from the stratigraphy southeast of the NEGIS. The northwest is much more undisturbed than the southeast. A distinct example is shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>a and b. The stratigraphy is marked by long-wavelength anticlines and synclines with elevation differences of almost half of the ice column. In the anticlines' cores, we find strong englacial reflections, which have been misinterpreted before as bedrock <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20" id="paren.60"/>. We note that some of the englacial reflections appear to be attached to the basal reflection (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>a). This could be an indication that the strong englacial reflection could be due to basal material (e.g., soft sediments) that was transported upwards by the folding process. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>b shows that the deformation patterns in the anticline cores are very complex. Some of the reflection patterns (e.g., in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>b) result in connected structures similar to the isochrones in the upper part of the ice column. In addition, we find isolated patches with high reflectivity, which, however, do not show a coherent pattern (highlighted in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>b).</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <label>4.1</label><title>Data products</title>
      <p id="d1e1889">We offer three different data products of the EGRIP-NOR-2018 radar survey: (i) quick-looks (qlook), (ii) SAR-focused (SAR<inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), and (iii) SAR-focused with a large aperture (SAR<inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>). The general data record properties are shown in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>, and detailed documentation can be found in the CReSIS MCoRDS documentation (<uri>https://data.cresis.ku.edu/</uri>, last access: 17 March 2021) and  on the CReSIS Wiki website (<uri>https://ops.cresis.ku.edu/wiki/index.php/Main_Page</uri>, last access: 17 March 2021). In Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/> we provide an overview of the differences between these three data products of the radargrams.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e1923">Radargrams of a flow-perpendicular radar profile showing the three different data products: <bold>(a)</bold> quick-look (qlook) processed, <bold>(b)</bold> SAR-focused (SAR<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), and <bold>(c)</bold> SAR-focused with a larger aperture (SAR<inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>). The main difference between qlook and SAR<inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is the focusing of signals via fk migration <bold>(d, e)</bold>. In contrast to the default SAR focusing <bold>(f)</bold> a larger aperture enables a better resolution of steeply inclined internal layers <bold>(g)</bold>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=469.470472pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/14/763/2022/essd-14-763-2022-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1.SSS1">
  <label>4.1.1</label><title>qlook</title>
      <p id="d1e1985">This product uses unfocused synthetic aperture radar processing for each channel and assumes that all reflections arrive at the receiver from nadir. The data are coherently stacked in slow time, and no correction for propagation delay changes is applied. Here, no motion compensation is applied. Finally, the signals from all eight channels are averaged incoherently. The range resolution is the same as for all other products. The trace spacing is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">27</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–30 m.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1.SSS2">
  <label>4.1.2</label><?xmltex \opttitle{SAR with default settings (SAR${}_{1}$)}?><title>SAR with default settings (SAR<inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>)</title>
      <p id="d1e2017">This data product uses focused synthetic aperture radar processing (fk migration) on each channel individually. The SAR processing requires a uniformly sampled linear trajectory along the extent of the SAR aperture. Motion compensation is applied using high-precision processed GPS and INS data from the aircraft. The direction of arrival is estimated by delay-and-sum beam forming to combine the channels. A Hanning window is applied in the frequency domain to suppress side lobes. This product is comparable to the CReSIS standard data product. The trace spacing is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1.SSS3">
  <label>4.1.3</label><?xmltex \opttitle{SAR with wider angular range (SAR${}_{2}$)}?><title>SAR with wider angular range (SAR<inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>)</title>
      <p id="d1e2048">By processing at a finer SAR resolution, the SAR processor uses scattered energy from a wider angular range around nadir to form the image. Since the angle of scattered returns from a specular internal layer is proportional to the internal layer slope, the SAR processor's increased sensitivity to larger angle returns translates to an increased sensitivity to layers with larger slopes. We achieve a better resolution of<?pagebreak page770?> steeply inclined internal reflectors by changing the along-track resolution before SAR processing to 1 m (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, whereas the default setting is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>); 1 m is not the smallest possible value for processing but is within the limit to achieve a sufficiently high SNR. The SNR is smaller for larger angles because the range to the target increases for greater angles, which leads to additional signal loss (spherical spreading loss and additional signal attenuation in ice). The differences between radargrams processed with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 2.5 are shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>. The final trace spacing is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1.SSS4">
  <label>4.1.4</label><title>Individual waveforms</title>
      <p id="d1e2118">The combination of the three waveform images will increase the dynamic range of the whole radargram. However, specific analyses may require only a single waveform. Therefore, we provide the respective echogram data for each waveform separately (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>). The files are labeled with <italic>img_01</italic>, <italic>img_02</italic>, and <italic>img_03</italic> for image 1, 2, and 3, respectively.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e2134">Radargrams of the frame 20180517_01_008 subdivided into <bold>(a)</bold> waveform 1, <bold>(b)</bold> waveform 2, and <bold>(c)</bold> waveform 3 and <bold>(d)</bold> the radargram composed of all three waveforms in combination. The locations where the different waveforms are concatenated are indicated with red lines in <bold>(d)</bold>. Waveforms 1 and 2 are plotted at full range. Note the different resolution of the near-surface stratigraphy in waveforms 1 to 3.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=469.470472pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/14/763/2022/essd-14-763-2022-f05.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1.SSS5">
  <label>4.1.5</label><title>Image mode flights</title>
      <?pagebreak page771?><p id="d1e2166">In addition to the data recorded in the so-called sounding mode, the data set also contains two segments (20180510_02 and 20180515_01) recorded in the image mode (see Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="App1.Ch1.S1.T3"/>). The acquisition settings of these segments are slightly different since the transmission signals are composed of four instead of three pulses: 1 and 3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> waveforms with nadir-directed transmit beam followed by two 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> waveforms, one with the transmit beam directed to the left and one with it directed to the right, to increase the imaged swath width at the ice bottom. We processed the data in a way that the 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> left and 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> right signal are steered towards nadir during data processing. This is possible because both waveforms contain nadir information since the beams overlap at nadir. However, the reflection power from nadir is reduced because the two side-looking transmit beams have reduced gain by about 3–4 dB relative to when the beam is pointed directly at nadir. The third waveform (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>c and d) in the combined image for the two particular segments has been computed from the coherent combination of both the 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> left and 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> right return signals.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <label>4.2</label><title>Data formats</title>
      <p id="d1e2244">We provide the main radar data and auxiliary data in the following formats:
<list list-type="order"><list-item>
      <p id="d1e2249">The radar data containing a matrix of the echogram and the corresponding GPS information, such as coordinates, aircraft elevation, and timing of every trace, are stored as matfiles (HDF-5 based format). The echograms are provided for the combined waveform product as well as for the individual waveforms. Furthermore, these files contain cell arrays with information about all processing parameters used.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e2253">A set of figures for each profile, showing the radargram and its respective location in the EGRIP-NOR-2018 survey, are provided as png images.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e2257">A set of shapefiles (lines) containing the location of every frame are provided.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e2261">An Excel is provided which contains all parameter settings applied during radar data processing.</p></list-item></list>
In the Appendix we describe the data architecture and how the data are stored in the PANGAEA repository.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5">
  <label>5</label><title>Relevance of the data set</title>
      <p id="d1e2275">This radar data set provides essential observations of internal and bed reflections to determine spatial distribution of ice thickness, internal layering, and reflectivity. These observables constitute boundary conditions and elucidate properties and processes of the NEGIS. The tightly spaced survey lines allow information on the past and present ice flow dynamics to be derived, revealing the paleo-processes of the NEGIS, in particular when combined with ice core data. Hereby it might be possible to address the question of how long the NEGIS has been active in its present form. The radar data furthermore allow a systematic analysis of the return power<?pagebreak page772?> of internal layers and the bed and could potentially reveal information about the englacial temperature regimes and properties of the bed and basal hydrology <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20 bib1.bibx23" id="paren.61"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref> as well as provide crucial boundary conditions for ice flow models <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="paren.62"/>. In addition our data hold the potential to map the crystal orientation fabric (COF) and especially the horizontal anisotropy from the birefringence effects <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16 bib1.bibx76" id="paren.63"/>, e.g., at the shear margins or at intersecting radar profiles of different polarization directions. Because ice stream regimes have a strong effect upon the COF <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="paren.64"/>, it is another important, but yet poorly constrained parameter in ice flow modeling.</p>
      <p id="d1e2292">The data comprise <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7500</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km high-resolution radar data for the scientific community to use. In contrast to previous surveys in this area, the data presented here were specifically recorded over a broad spatial extent to understand the history of the NEGIS and our general understanding about ice streams. The tightly spaced radar profiles perpendicular to ice flow allow a 3D interpretation of the ice-internal stratigraphic architecture. Because most radar lines are directly or indirectly spatially connected to the location of the drill site of the EastGRIP ice core, these data are significant for various objectives regarding the ice dynamic understanding of NEGIS as well as interpretation of the climate proxy record retrievable from the ice core. With this data set the scientific community will be able to upscale the findings of the EastGRIP project from the location of the ice core to the immediate surroundings of the upstream part of the NEGIS. The prospect that parts of the ice core can be rotated back into their correct geographic direction <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx72" id="paren.65"/> also allows a systematic analysis of ice crystal orientation fabric together with the radar data. Furthermore, the data presented here can be combined with the radar data acquired during Operation Ice Bridge (OIB) to extend the large-scale understanding of glaciological properties in the Greenland Ice Sheet.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6">
  <label>6</label><title>Code and data availability</title>
      <?pagebreak page773?><p id="d1e2316">The EGRIP-NOR-2018 radar data products are available from the PANGAEA data publisher (<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.928569" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1594/PANGAEA.928569</ext-link>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="altparen.66"/>). The EGRIP-NOR-2018 bed topography <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="paren.67"/> is available under <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.907918" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1594/PANGAEA.907918</ext-link>.  The CReSIS toolbox is available under <uri>https://github.com/CReSIS/</uri> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="paren.68"/>, and the main documentation can be found at <uri>https://ops.cresis.ku.edu/wiki/</uri> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="paren.69"/>. The MEaSUREs Greenland Ice Sheet velocity map from InSAR data, Version 2, from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42" id="text.70"/>
is available from <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5067/OC7B04ZM9G6Q" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5067/OC7B04ZM9G6Q</ext-link> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41" id="paren.71"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S7" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>7</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e2361">We present a high-resolution ice-penetrating radar data set at the onset region of the NEGIS. The EGRIP-NOR-2018 radar data reveal the internal stratigraphy and bed topography of the upstream part of the NEGIS in high vertical and horizontal resolution, given the dense coverage. Several survey lines intersect at the EastGRIP drill site location, enabling a combination of both data sets. Ultimately, this data set will improve our understanding of the NEGIS in its present form and also contributes to our understanding of its genesis and evolution. Radar and auxiliary data are provided as matfiles for the combined echograms as well as for the individual waveforms. The radar data products comprise unfocused data (qlook), SAR-focused data (SAR<inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), and SAR-focused data with a wider angular range (SAR<inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>)</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><app-group>

<app id="App1.Ch1.S1">
  <?xmltex \currentcnt{A}?><label>Appendix A</label><title>Additional information for the segments</title>
      <p id="d1e2393">The data are stored in zip archives for each segment and processing product, respectively. For details on the specifications of each segment and their respective coverage, see Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="App1.Ch1.S1.T3"/> and Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.S1.F6"/>. The filenames of the archives are composed of the segment and the data product (e.g., 20180508_02_qlook.zip, 20180508_02_sar1.zip, and 20180508_02_sar2.zip for the quick-look, SAR with default settings (SAR<inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), and SAR with larger angular range data product (SAR<inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), respectively). Each zip archive contains the individual frames in the matfile format.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{h!}?><table-wrap id="App1.Ch1.S1.T3"><?xmltex \hack{\hsize\textwidth}?><?xmltex \currentcnt{A1}?><label>Table A1</label><caption><p id="d1e2422">Radar profile specifications of each segment.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Segment</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Frames</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Frequency range</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Waveforms (pulse length and direction)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Segment length</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">20180508_02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">180–210 MHz</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3 (1, 3, 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nadir)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">72 km</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">20180508_06</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">180–210 MHz</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3 (1, 3, 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nadir)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">189 km</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">20180509_01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">18</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">180–210 MHz</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3 (1, 3, 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nadir)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">852 km</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">20180510_01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">180–210 MHz</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3 (1, 3, 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nadir)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">726 km</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">20180510_02<inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">180–210 MHz</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4 (1 and 3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nadir, 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> left, 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> right)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">675 km</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">20180511_01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">13</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">180–210 MHz</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3 (1, 3, 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nadir)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">721 km</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">20180512_01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">180–210 MHz</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3 (1, 3, 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nadir)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">635 km</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">20180512_02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">14</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">180–210 MHz</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3 (1, 3, 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nadir)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">645 km</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">20180514_01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">19</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">180–210 MHz</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3 (1, 3, 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nadir)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">750 km</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">20180514_03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">180–210 MHz</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3 (1, 3, 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nadir)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">740 km</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">20180515_01 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">180–210 MHz</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4 (1 and 3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nadir, 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> left, 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> right)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">733 km</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">20180517_01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">180–210 MHz</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3 (1, 3, 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nadir)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">753 km</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e2425"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> The nadir part of all four waveforms was used for image combination.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

<?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?><?xmltex \floatpos{h!}?><fig id="App1.Ch1.S1.F6"><?xmltex \currentcnt{A1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure A1</label><caption><p id="d1e2874">Radar profile locations of the 12 segments shown in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="App1.Ch1.S1.T3"/> of the EGRIP-NOR-2018 data set. The respective segments are highlighted with a white line and the radar profiles of the complete survey with a finer black line. The background map represents ice surface velocity from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42" id="text.72"/>. The shear margin is indicated with a dashed white outline and the location of EastGRIP with a red dot.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \hack{\hsize\textwidth}?>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/14/763/2022/essd-14-763-2022-f06.png"/>

      </fig>

<?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?>
</app>

<?pagebreak page775?><app id="App1.Ch1.S2">
  <?xmltex \currentcnt{B}?><label>Appendix B</label><title>Comparison to OIB surveys</title>
      <p id="d1e2900">We evaluate the quality of the EGRIP-NOR-2018 radar data by comparing selected profiles with OIB radargrams. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.S2.F7"/>a shows two locations in our survey regions where we compare two intersecting radargrams, respectively. For the comparison, we focus on the environment outside of the ice stream in the southeast, where we observe large englacial folds (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.S2.F7"/>b), and the radar stratigraphy along the shear zones (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.S2.F7"/>c and d). In summary, the comparison shows that the EGRIP-NOR-2018 data have a comparable quality and resolution of the internal layers as well as the bed reflection. In Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.S2.F7"/>c and d we note that the steeply dipping internal layers are slightly better resolved in our data set.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{h!}?><fig id="App1.Ch1.S2.F7"><?xmltex \currentcnt{B1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure B1</label><caption><p id="d1e2913">Comparison of selected AWI ultra-wideband (UWB) radargrams with OIB radargrams. <bold>(a)</bold> Three-dimensional view of the EGRIP-NOR-2018 survey highlighting the location of <bold>(b)</bold> two intersecting radargrams (OIB profile 20130402_01_026 and AWI profile 20180512_02_003; blue lines in <bold>a</bold>) and <bold>(c, d)</bold> two nearly parallel-oriented profiles showing both shear margins of NEGIS (OIB profile 20070912_01_005 and AWI profile 20180514_01_015; yellow lines in <bold>a</bold>). The 2007 OIB radar profile was recorded with the MCRDS (Multi-Channel Radar Depth Sounder) system with a bandwidth of 140–160 MHz and the 2013 profile with the MCoRDS 3 (Multi-Channel Coherent Radar Depth
Sounder) system with a bandwidth of 180–210 MHz.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \hack{\hsize\textwidth}?>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/14/763/2022/essd-14-763-2022-f07.png"/>

      </fig>

<?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?>
</app>
  </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e2945">SF, ND, and TAG wrote the manuscript. TB, DJ, and JDP acquired the radar data in the field. OE and DJ were PI and co-PI of the radar campaign. TB and SF processed the radar data with the support of JDP, DJ, VH, and DS. All authors discussed and revised the manuscript.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e2951">The contact author has declared that neither they nor their co-authors have any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d1e2957">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="sistatement"><title>Special issue statement</title>

      <p id="d1e2963">This article is part of the special issue “Extreme environment datasets for the three poles”. It is not associated with a conference.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e2970">We thank the AWI and Kenn Borek crew of the research aircraft Polar 6. Logistical support in the field was provided by the East Greenland Ice-Core Project. EastGRIP is directed and organized by the Centre of Ice and Climate at the Niels Bohr Institute.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e2975">EastGRIP is supported by funding agencies and institutions in Denmark (A. P. Møller Foundation, University of Copenhagen), the USA (US National Science Foundation, Office of Polar Programs), Germany (Alfred Wegener Institute, Helmholtz Centre
for Polar and Marine Research), Japan (National Institute of Polar Research and Arctic Challenge for Sustainability), Norway (University of Bergen and Bergen Research Foundation), Switzerland (Swiss National Science Foundation), France (French Polar Institute Paul-Emile Victor, Institute for Geosciences and Environmental research), and China (Chinese Academy of Sciences and Beijing Normal University). Support was provided through the use of the CReSIS toolbox from CReSIS, generated with support from the University of Kansas; NASA Operation IceBridge (grant no. NNX16AH54G); and the NSF (grant nos. ACI-1443054, OPP-1739003, and IIS-1838230). Steven Franke was funded by the AWI Strategy Fund and Daniela Jansen by the AWI Strategy Fund and the Helmholtz Young Investigator Group (grant no. HGF YIG VH-NG-802).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e2981">This paper was edited by Tao Che and reviewed by Baojun Zhang and one anonymous referee.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{{Allen} et~al.(2005)}}?><label>Allen et al.(2005)</label><?label Allen2005?><mixed-citation>Allen, C. T., Mozaffar, S. N., and Akins, T. L.: Suppressing coherent
noise in radar applications with long dwell times, IEEE Geoscience and Remote
Sens. Lett., 2, 284–286, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2005.847931" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1109/LGRS.2005.847931</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Baldwin et~al.(2003)}}?><label>Baldwin et al.(2003)</label><?label Baldwin2003?><mixed-citation>Baldwin, D. J., Bamber, J. L., Payne, A. J., and Layberry, R. L.: Using
internal layers from the Greenland ice sheet, identified from radio-echo
sounding data, with numerical models, Ann. Glaciol., 37, 325–330,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3189/172756403781815438" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3189/172756403781815438</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Bamber et~al.(2013)}}?><label>Bamber et al.(2013)</label><?label Bamber2013?><mixed-citation>Bamber, J. L., Griggs, J. A., Hurkmans, R. T. W. L., Dowdeswell, J. A., Gogineni, S. P., Howat, I., Mouginot, J., Paden, J., Palmer, S., Rignot, E., and Steinhage, D.: A new bed elevation dataset for Greenland, The Cryosphere, 7, 499–510, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-7-499-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-7-499-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Blackwell and Richards(2004)}}?><label>Blackwell and Richards(2004)</label><?label Blackwell_2004?><mixed-citation>Blackwell, D. and Richards, M.: Geothermal Map of North America, AAPG Map,
scale <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">500</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <uri>https://www.smu.edu/Dedman/Academics/Departments/Earth-Sciences/Research/GeothermalLab/DataMaps/GeothermalMapofNorthAmerica</uri> (last access: 17 March 2021), 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Bohleber et~al.(2012)}}?><label>Bohleber et al.(2012)</label><?label Bohleber_2012?><mixed-citation>Bohleber, P., Wagner, N., and Eisen, O.: Permittivity of ice at radio
frequencies: Part II. Artificial and natural polycrystalline ice, Cold
Reg. Sci. Technol., 83–84, 13–19,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2012.05.010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.coldregions.2012.05.010</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Bons et~al.(2021)}}?><label>Bons et al.(2021)</label><?label Bons_2020?><mixed-citation>Bons, P. D., de Riese, T., Franke, S., Llorens, M.-G., Sachau, T., Stoll, N., Weikusat, I., Westhoff, J., and Zhang, Y.: Comment on “Exceptionally high heat flux needed to sustain the Northeast Greenland Ice Stream” by Smith-Johnsen et al. (2020), The Cryosphere, 15, 2251–2254, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-2251-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-15-2251-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Buchardt and Dahl-Jensen(2007)}}?><label>Buchardt and Dahl-Jensen(2007)</label><?label Buchardt_2007?><mixed-citation>Buchardt, S. L. and Dahl-Jensen, D.: Estimating the basal melt rate at
NorthGRIP using a Monte Carlo technique, Ann. Glaciol., 45, 137–142,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3189/172756407782282435" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3189/172756407782282435</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Carter et~al.(2007)}}?><label>Carter et al.(2007)</label><?label Carter2007?><mixed-citation>Carter, S. P., Blankenship, D. D., Peters, M. E., Young, D. A., Holt, J. W.,
and Morse, D. L.: Radar-based subglacial lake classification in Antarctica,
Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst., 8, Q03016, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GC001408" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006GC001408</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Christianson et~al.(2014)}}?><label>Christianson et al.(2014)</label><?label Christianson_2014?><mixed-citation>Christianson, K., Peters, L. E., Alley, R. B., Anandakrishnan, S., Jacobel,
R. W., Riverman, K. L., Muto, A., and Keisling, B. A.: Dilatant till
facilitates ice-stream flow in northeast Greenland, Earth Planet.
Sc. Lett., 401, 57–69, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2014.05.060" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.epsl.2014.05.060</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Copland and Sharp(2001)}}?><label>Copland and Sharp(2001)</label><?label Copland2001?><mixed-citation>Copland, L. and Sharp, M.: Mapping thermal and hydrological conditions beneath
a polythermal glacier with radio-echo sounding, J. Glaciol., 47,
232–242, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3189/172756501781832377" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3189/172756501781832377</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{CReSIS(2020{\natexlab{a}})}}?><label>CReSIS(2020a)</label><?label CresisDoc?><mixed-citation>CReSIS: CReSIS rds documentation,
<uri>https://data.cresis.ku.edu/data/rds/rds_readme.pdf</uri> (last access: 17 March 2021),
2020a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{CReSIS(2020{\natexlab{b}})}}?><label>CReSIS(2020b)</label><?label CresisToolbox?><mixed-citation>CReSIS: CReSIS Toolbox [computer software], Lawrence, Kansas, USA, <uri>https://ops.cresis.ku.edu/wiki/index.php/Main_Page</uri> (last access: 17 March 2021),
2020b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Dahl-Jensen et~al.(1997)}}?><label>Dahl-Jensen et al.(1997)</label><?label dahl1997flow?><mixed-citation>Dahl-Jensen, D., Thorsteinsson, T., Alley, R., and Shoji, H.: Flow properties
of the ice from the Greenland Ice Core Project ice core: The reason for
folds?, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 102, 26831–26840,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/97JC01266" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/97JC01266</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Eder et~al.(2008)}}?><label>Eder et al.(2008)</label><?label Eder2008?><mixed-citation>
Eder, K., Reidler, C., Mayer, C., and Leopold, M.: Crevasse detection in
alpine areas using ground penetrating radar as a component for a mountain
guide system, International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing
and Spatial Information Sciences – ISPRS Archives, 37, 837–842, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Eisen et~al.(2007)}}?><label>Eisen et al.(2007)</label><?label eisen2007direct?><mixed-citation>Eisen, O., Hamann, I., Kipfstuhl, S., Steinhage, D., and Wilhelms, F.: Direct evidence for continuous radar reflector originating from changes in crystal-orientation fabric, The Cryosphere, 1, 1–10, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-1-1-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-1-1-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page777?><ref id="bib1.bibx16"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{Eisen et al.(2021)}?><label>Eisen et al.(2021)</label><?label Eisen2021?><mixed-citation>Eisen, O., Franke, S., Jansen, D., Paden, J., Drews, R., Ershadi, M. R., Steinhage, D., Lilien, D., Yan, J., Weikusat, I., Wilhelms, F., Dahl-Jensen, D., Grindsted, A., Hvidberg, C., and Miller, H.: Fabric beats in radar data across the NEGIS ice stream, EGU General Assembly 2021, online, 19–30 April 2021, EGU21-1207, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu21-1207" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/egusphere-egu21-1207</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Fahnestock et~al.(1993)}}?><label>Fahnestock et al.(1993)</label><?label Fahnestock1993?><mixed-citation>Fahnestock, M., Bindschadler, R., Kwok, R., and Jezek, K.: Greenland Ice Sheet
surface properties and ice dynamics from ERS-1 SAR imagery, Science, 262, 1530–1534,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.262.5139.1530" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.262.5139.1530</ext-link>, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Fahnestock et~al.(2001)}}?><label>Fahnestock et al.(2001)</label><?label Fahnestock2001?><mixed-citation>Fahnestock, M. A., Joughin, I., Scambos, T. A., Kwok, R., Krabill, W. B., and
Gogineni, S.: Ice-stream-related patterns of ice flow in the interior of
northeast Greenland, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 106,
34035–34045, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD900194" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001JD900194</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Franke et~al.(2019)}}?><label>Franke et al.(2019)</label><?label Franke_2020a_dataset?><mixed-citation>Franke, S., Jansen, D., Binder, T., Dörr, N., Paden, J., Helm, V.,
Steinhage, D., and Eisen, O.: Bedrock topography and ice thickness in the
onset region of the Northeast Greenland Ice Stream recorded with the airborne
AWI Ultra-Wideband radar (UWB) in 2018, PANGAEA [data set],
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.907918" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1594/PANGAEA.907918</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Franke et~al.(2020)}}?><label>Franke et al.(2020)</label><?label Franke_2020a?><mixed-citation>Franke, S., Jansen, D., Binder, T., Dörr, N., Helm, V., Paden, J., Steinhage,
D., and Eisen, O.: Bed topography and subglacial landforms in the onset
region of the Northeast Greenland Ice Stream, Ann. Glaciol., 61,
143–153, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/aog.2020.12" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/aog.2020.12</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Franke et~al.(2021{\natexlab{a}})}}?><label>Franke et al.(2021a)</label><?label Franke_egrip_nor_2018?><mixed-citation>Franke, S., Binder, T., Jansen, D., Paden, J. D., Dörr, N., Gerber, T.,
Miller, H., Dahl-Jensen, D., Helm, V., Steinhage, D., Weikusat, I., Wilhelms,
F., and Eisen, O.: Ultra-wideband radar data over the shear
margins and along flow lines at the onset region of the Northeast Greenland
Ice Stream (NEGIS), PANGAEA [data set],
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.928569" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1594/PANGAEA.928569</ext-link>,
2021a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Franke et~al.(2021{\natexlab{b}})}}?><label>Franke et al.(2021b)</label><?label Franke_2021_espl?><mixed-citation>Franke, S., Eisermann, H., Jokat, W., Eagles, G., Asseng, J., Miller, H.,
Steinhage, D., Helm, V., Eisen, O., and Jansen, D.: Preserved landscapes
underneath the Antarctic Ice Sheet reveal the geomorphological history of
Jutulstraumen Basin, Earth Surf. Process. Landf., 46, 2728–2745,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.5203" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/esp.5203</ext-link>, 2021b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Franke et~al.(2021{\natexlab{c}})}}?><label>Franke et al.(2021c)</label><?label Franke_2020b?><mixed-citation>Franke, S., Jansen, D., Beyer, S., Neckel, N., Binder, T., Paden, J., and
Eisen, O.: Complex Basal Conditions and Their Influence on Ice Flow at the
Onset of the Northeast Greenland Ice Stream, J. Geophys. Res.-Earth Surf., 126, e2020JF005689, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JF005689" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2020JF005689</ext-link>,
2021c.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Frezzotti et~al.(2002)}}?><label>Frezzotti et al.(2002)</label><?label Frezzotti2002?><mixed-citation>Frezzotti, M., Gandolfi, S., and Urbini, S.: Snow megadunes in Antarctica:
Sedimentary structure and genesis, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 107, ACL 1-1–ACL 1-12, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000673" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001JD000673</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Fujita et~al.(1999)}}?><label>Fujita et al.(1999)</label><?label Fujita1999?><mixed-citation>Fujita, S., Maeno, H., Uratsuka, S., Furukawa, T., Mae, S., Fujii, Y., and
Watanabe, O.: Nature of radio echo layering in the Antarctic ice sheet
detected by a two-frequency experiment, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 104, 13013–13024, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999jb900034" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/1999jb900034</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Gazdag(1978)}}?><label>Gazdag(1978)</label><?label gazdag1978?><mixed-citation>Gazdag, J.: Wave equation migration with the phase‐shift method, Geophysics,
43, 1342–1351, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1440899" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1190/1.1440899</ext-link>, 1978.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Gerber et~al.(2021)}}?><label>Gerber et al.(2021)</label><?label Gerber_2021?><mixed-citation>Gerber, T. A., Hvidberg, C. S., Rasmussen, S. O., Franke, S., Sinnl, G., Grinsted, A., Jansen, D., and Dahl-Jensen, D.: Upstream flow effects revealed in the EastGRIP ice core using Monte Carlo inversion of a two-dimensional ice-flow model, The Cryosphere, 15, 3655–3679, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-3655-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-15-3655-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Gogineni et~al.(1998)}}?><label>Gogineni et al.(1998)</label><?label Gogineni1998?><mixed-citation>Gogineni, S., Chuah, T., Allen, C., Jezek, K., and Moore, R. K.: An improved
coherent radar depth sounder, J. Glaciol., 44, 659–669,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3189/S0022143000002161" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3189/S0022143000002161</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Hale et~al.(2016)}}?><label>Hale et al.(2016)</label><?label Hale2016?><mixed-citation>Hale, R., Miller, H., Gogineni, S., Yan, J. B., Rodriguez-Morales, F.,
Leuschen, C., Paden, J., Li, J., Binder, T., Steinhage, D., Gehrmann, M., and
Braaten, D.: Multi-channel ultra-wideband radar sounder and imager, in: 2016
IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), 10–15 July 2016, Beijing, China,
2112–2115, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.2016.7729545" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1109/IGARSS.2016.7729545</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Hempel and Thyssen(1992)}}?><label>Hempel and Thyssen(1992)</label><?label hempel1993deep?><mixed-citation>
Hempel, L. and Thyssen, F.: Deep radio echo soundings in the vicinity of GRIP
and GISP2 drill sites, Greenland, Polarforschung, 62, 11–16, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Hempel et~al.(2000)}}?><label>Hempel et al.(2000)</label><?label Hempel2000?><mixed-citation>Hempel, L., Thyssen, F., Gundestrup, N., Clausen, H. B., and Miller, H.: A
comparison of radio-echo sounding data and electrical conductivity of the
GRIP ice core, J. Glaciol., 46, 369–374,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3189/172756500781833070" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3189/172756500781833070</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Hodgkins et~al.(2000)}}?><label>Hodgkins et al.(2000)</label><?label Hodgkins2000?><mixed-citation>Hodgkins, R., Siegert, M. J., and Dowdeswell, J. A.: Geophysical
investigations of ice-sheet internal layering and deformation in the Dome C
region of central East Antarctica, J. Glaciol., 46, 161–166,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3189/172756500781833223" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3189/172756500781833223</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Holschuh et~al.(2014)}}?><label>Holschuh et al.(2014)</label><?label Holschuh_2014?><mixed-citation>Holschuh, N., Christianson, K., and Anandakrishnan, S.: Power loss in dipping
internal reflectors, imaged using ice-penetrating radar, Ann.
Glaciol., 55, 49–56, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3189/2014aog67a005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3189/2014aog67a005</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Holschuh et~al.(2019)}}?><label>Holschuh et al.(2019)</label><?label Holschuh_2019?><mixed-citation>Holschuh, N., Lilien, D. A., and Christianson, K.: Thermal Weakening,
Convergent Flow, and Vertical Heat Transport in the Northeast Greenland Ice
Stream Shear Margins, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 8184–8193,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL083436" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019GL083436</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Huybrechts et~al.(2000)}}?><label>Huybrechts et al.(2000)</label><?label Huybrechts2000?><mixed-citation>Huybrechts, P., Steinhage, D., Wilhelms, F., and Bamber, J.: Balance
velocities and measured properties of the Antarctic ice sheet from a new
compilation of gridded data for modelling, Ann. Glaciol., 30, 52–60,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3189/172756400781820778" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3189/172756400781820778</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Jacobel and Hodge(1995)}}?><label>Jacobel and Hodge(1995)</label><?label Jacobel1995?><mixed-citation>Jacobel, R. W. and Hodge, S. M.: Radar internal layers from the Greenland
Summit, Geophys. Res. Lett., 22, 587–590, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/95GL00110" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/95GL00110</ext-link>,
1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Jacobel et~al.(1993)}}?><label>Jacobel et al.(1993)</label><?label Jacobel1993?><mixed-citation>Jacobel, R. W., Gades, A. M., Gottschling, D. L., Hodge, S. M., and Wright,
D. L.: Interpretation of radar-detected internal layer folding in West
Antarctic ice streams, J. Glaciol., 39, 528–537,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022143000016427" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/s0022143000016427</ext-link>, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{J\'{o}hannesson et~al.(2020)}}?><label>Jóhannesson et al.(2020)</label><?label Johannesson_2020?><mixed-citation>Jóhannesson, T., Pálmason, B., Hjartarson, A., Jarosch, A. H.,
Magnússon, E., Belart, J. M. C., and Gudmundsson, M. T.: Non-surface mass
balance of glaciers in Iceland, J. Glaciol., 66, 685–697,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2020.37" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/jog.2020.37</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Jordan et~al.(2020)}}?><label>Jordan et al.(2020)</label><?label Jordan2020?><mixed-citation>Jordan, T. M., Schroeder, D. M., Elsworth, C. W., and Siegfried, M. R.:
Estimation of ice fabric within Whillans Ice Stream using polarimetric
phase-sensitive radar sounding, Ann. Glaciol., 61, 74–83,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/aog.2020.6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/aog.2020.6</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Joughin et~al.(2001)}}?><label>Joughin et al.(2001)</label><?label Joughin2001a?><mixed-citation>Joughin, I., Fahnestock, M., MacAyeal, D., Bamber, J. L., and Gogineni, P.:
Observation and analysis of ice flow in the largest Greenland ice stream,
J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 106, 34021–34034,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD900087" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001JD900087</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{Joughin et al.(2015, updated 2018)}?><label>Joughin et al.(2015, updated 2018)</label><?label Joughin2015?><mixed-citation>Joughin, I., Smith, B., Howat, I., and Scambos, T.: MEaSUREs Greenland Ice Sheet Velocity Map from InSAR Data, Version 2, Boulder, Colorado USA, NASA National Snow and Ice Data Center Distributed Active Archive Center [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5067/OC7B04ZM9G6Q" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5067/OC7B04ZM9G6Q</ext-link>, 2015, updated 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page778?><ref id="bib1.bibx42"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Joughin et~al.(2017)}}?><label>Joughin et al.(2017)</label><?label JOUGHIN_2017?><mixed-citation>Joughin, I., Smith, B. E., and Howat, I. M.: A complete map of Greenland ice
velocity derived from satellite data collected over 20 years, J.
Glaciol., 64, 1–11, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2017.73" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/jog.2017.73</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx43"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Kanagaratnam et~al.(2001)}}?><label>Kanagaratnam et al.(2001)</label><?label Kanagaratnam2001?><mixed-citation>Kanagaratnam, P., Gogineni, S. P., Gundestrup, N., and Larsen, L.:
High-resolution radar mapping of internal layers at the North Greenland Ice
Core Project, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 106,
33799–33811, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD900191" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001JD900191</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx44"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Keisling et~al.(2014)}}?><label>Keisling et al.(2014)</label><?label keisling2014basal?><mixed-citation>Keisling, B. A., Christianson, K., Alley, R. B., Peters, L. E., Christian,
J. E., Anandakrishnan, S., Riverman, K. L., Muto, A., and Jacobel, R. W.:
Basal conditions and ice dynamics inferred from radar-derived internal
stratigraphy of the northeast Greenland ice stream, Ann. Glaciol.,
55, 127–137, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3189/2014AoG67A090" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3189/2014AoG67A090</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx45"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Leuschen et~al.(2000)}}?><label>Leuschen et al.(2000)</label><?label leuschen2000?><mixed-citation>Leuschen, C., Gogineni, S., and Tammana, D.: SAR processing of radar echo
sounder data, in: IGARSS 2000. IEEE 2000 International Geoscience and Remote
Sensing Symposium. Taking the Pulse of the Planet: The Role of Remote Sensing
in Managing the Environment. Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37120), 6,
2570–2572, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.2000.859643" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1109/IGARSS.2000.859643</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx46"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Li et~al.(2013)}}?><label>Li et al.(2013)</label><?label Li2013?><mixed-citation>Li, J., Paden, J., Leuschen, C., Rodriguez-Morales, F., Hale, R. D., Arnold,
E. J., Crowe, R., Gomez-Garcia, D., and Gogineni, P.: High-Altitude Radar
Measurements of Ice Thickness Over the Antarctic and Greenland Ice Sheets as
a Part of Operation IceBridge, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 51, 742–754, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2012.2203822" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1109/TGRS.2012.2203822</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx47"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Lilien et~al.(2021)}}?><label>Lilien et al.(2021)</label><?label Lilien_2021?><mixed-citation>Lilien, D. A., Rathmann, N. M., Hvidberg, C. S., and Dahl-Jensen, D.: Modeling
Ice-Crystal Fabric as a Proxy for Ice-Stream Stability, J.
Geophys. Res.-Earth Surf., 126, e2021JF006306,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JF006306" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2021JF006306</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx48"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{MacGregor et~al.(2016)}}?><label>MacGregor et al.(2016)</label><?label MacGregor_2016?><mixed-citation>MacGregor, J. A., Fahnestock, M. A., Catania, G. A., Aschwanden, A., Clow,
G. D., Colgan, W. T., Gogineni, S. P., Morlighem, M., Nowicki, S. M., Paden,
J. D., Price, S. F., and Seroussi, H.: A synthesis of the basal thermal
state of the Greenland Ice Sheet, J. Geophys. Res.-Earth
Surf., 121, 1328–1350, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JF003803" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015JF003803</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx49"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Matsuoka et~al.(2003)}}?><label>Matsuoka et al.(2003)</label><?label matsuoka2003crystal?><mixed-citation>Matsuoka, K., Furukawa, T., Fujita, S., Maeno, H., Uratsuka, S., Naruse, R.,
and Watanabe, O.: Crystal orientation fabrics within the Antarctic ice sheet
revealed by a multipolarization plane and dual-frequency radar survey,
J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 108, 2499,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003jb002425" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003jb002425</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx50"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Millar(1981)}}?><label>Millar(1981)</label><?label Millar1981?><mixed-citation>Millar, D. H.: Radio-echo layering in polar ice sheets and past volcanic
activity, Nature, 292, 441–443, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/292441a0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/292441a0</ext-link>, 1981.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx51"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Mottram et~al.(2019)}}?><label>Mottram et al.(2019)</label><?label Mottram2019?><mixed-citation>Mottram, R., Simonsen, S. B., Svendsen, S. H., Barletta, V. R., Sørensen,
L. S., Nagler, T., Wuite, J., Groh, A., Horwath, M., Rosier, J., Solgaard,
A., Hvidberg, C. S., and Forsberg, R.: An integrated view of greenland ice
sheet mass changes based on models and satellite observations, Remote
Sens., 11, 1–26, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11121407" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/rs11121407</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx52"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Murray et~al.(2000)}}?><label>Murray et al.(2000)</label><?label Murray2000?><mixed-citation>Murray, T., Stuart, G. W., Miller, P. J., Woodward, J., Smith, A. M., Porter,
P. R., and Jiskoot, H.: Glacier surge propagation by thermal evolution at
the bed, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 105,
13491–13507, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000jb900066" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2000jb900066</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx53"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Nereson and Raymond(2001)}}?><label>Nereson and Raymond(2001)</label><?label Nereson2001?><mixed-citation>Nereson, N. A. and Raymond, C. F.: The elevation history of ice streams and
the spatial accumulation pattern along the Siple Coast of West Antarctica
inferred from ground-based radar data from three inter-ice-stream ridges,
J. Glaciol., 47, 303–313, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3189/172756501781832197" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3189/172756501781832197</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx54"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Nereson et~al.(2000)}}?><label>Nereson et al.(2000)</label><?label Nereson2000?><mixed-citation>Nereson, N. A., Raymond, C. F., Jacobel, R. W., and Waddington, E. D.: The
accumulation pattern across Siple Dome, West Antarctica, inferred from
radar-detected internal layers, J. Glaciol., 46, 75–87,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3189/172756500781833449" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3189/172756500781833449</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx55"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Nixdorf and G{\"{o}}ktas(2001)}}?><label>Nixdorf and Göktas(2001)</label><?label Nixdorf2001?><mixed-citation>Nixdorf, U. and Göktas, F.: Spatial depth distribution of the subglacial
bed and internal layers in the ice around NGRIP, Greenland, derived with
airborne RES, J. Appl. Geophys., 47, 175–182,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-9851(01)00062-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0926-9851(01)00062-3</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx56"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{P{\"{a}}lli et~al.(2002)}}?><label>Pälli et al.(2002)</label><?label Palli2002?><mixed-citation>Pälli, A., Kohler, J. C., Isaksson, E., Moore, J. C., Pinglot, J. F.,
Pohjola, V. A., and Samuelsson, H.: Spatial and temporal variability of snow
accumulation using ground-penetrating radar and ice cores on a Svalbard
glacier, J. Glaciol., 48, 417–424,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3189/172756502781831205" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3189/172756502781831205</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx57"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Palmer et~al.(2013)}}?><label>Palmer et al.(2013)</label><?label Palmer2013?><mixed-citation>Palmer, S. J., Dowdeswell, J. A., Christoffersen, P., Young, D. A.,
Blankenship, D. D., Greenbaum, J. S., Benham, T., Bamber, J., and Siegert,
M. J.: Greenland subglacial lakes detected by radar, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 40, 6154–6159, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013GL058383" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2013GL058383</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx58"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Richardson et~al.(1997)}}?><label>Richardson et al.(1997)</label><?label Richardson1997?><mixed-citation>
Richardson, C., Aarholt, E., Hamran, S.-E., Holmlund, P., and Isaksson, E.:
Spatial distribution of snow in western Dronning Maud Land, East Antarctica,
mapped by a ground-based snow radar, J. Geophys. Res., 102,
20343–20353, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx59"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Rignot and Mouginot(2012)}}?><label>Rignot and Mouginot(2012)</label><?label rignot2011acceleration?><mixed-citation>Rignot, E. and Mouginot, J.: Ice flow in Greenland for the International Polar
Year 2008-2009, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L11501,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL051634" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012GL051634</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx60"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Riverman et~al.(2019{\natexlab{a}})}}?><label>Riverman et al.(2019a)</label><?label Riverman_2019a?><mixed-citation>Riverman, K. L., Alley, R. B., Anandakrishnan, S., Christianson, K., Holschuh,
N. D., Medley, B., Muto, A., and Peters, L. E.: Enhanced Firn Densification
in High‐Accumulation Shear Margins of the NE Greenland Ice Stream, J. Geophys. Res.-Earth Surf., 124, 365–382,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2017JF004604" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2017JF004604</ext-link>, 2019a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx61"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Riverman et~al.(2019{\natexlab{b}})}}?><label>Riverman et al.(2019b)</label><?label Riverman2019b?><mixed-citation>Riverman, K. L., Anandakrishnan, S., Alley, R. B., Holschuh, N., Dow, C. F.,
Muto, A., Parizek, B. R., Christianson, K., and Peters, L. E.: Wet
subglacial bedforms of the NE Greenland Ice Stream shear margins, Ann.
Glaciol., 60, 91–99, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/aog.2019.43" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/aog.2019.43</ext-link>, 2019b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx62"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Schroeder et~al.(2020)}}?><label>Schroeder et al.(2020)</label><?label Schroeder_2020?><mixed-citation>Schroeder, D. M., Bingham, R. G., Blankenship, D. D., Christianson, K., Eisen,
O., Flowers, G. E., Karlsson, N. B., Koutnik, M. R., Paden, J. D., and
Siegert, M. J.: Five decades of radioglaciology, Ann. Glaciol., 61, 1–13,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/aog.2020.11" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/aog.2020.11</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx63"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Shepherd et~al.(2020)}}?><label>Shepherd et al.(2020)</label><?label Shepherd2020?><mixed-citation>Shepherd, A., Ivins, E., Rignot, E., Smith, B., van den Broeke, M., Velicogna,
I., Whitehouse, P., Briggs, K., Joughin, I., Krinner, G., Nowicki, S., Payne,
T., Scambos, T., Schlegel, N., A, G., Agosta, C., Ahlstrøm, A., Babonis,
G., Barletta, V. R., Bjørk, A. A., Blazquez, A., Bonin, J., Colgan, W.,
Csatho, B., Cullather, R., Engdahl, M. E., Felikson, D., Fettweis, X.,
Forsberg, R., Hogg, A. E., Gallee, H., Gardner, A., Gilbert, L., Gourmelen,
N., Groh, A., Gunter, B., Hanna, E., Harig, C., Helm, V., Horvath, A.,
Horwath, M., Khan, S., Kjeldsen, K. K., Konrad, H., Langen, P. L.,
Lecavalier, B., Loomis, B., Luthcke, S., McMillan, M., Melini, D., Mernild,
S., Mohajerani, Y., Moore, P., Mottram, R., Mouginot, J., Moyano, G., Muir,
A., Nagler, T., Nield, G., Nilsson, J., Noël, B., Otosaka, I., Pattle,
M. E., Peltier, W. R., Pie, N., Rietbroek, R., Rott, H., Sandberg
Sørensen, L., Sasgen, I., Save, H., Scheuchl, B., Schrama, E.,
Schröder, L., Seo, K. W., Simonsen, S. B., Slater, T., Spada, G.,
Sutterley, T., Talpe, M., Tarasov, L., van de Berg, W. J., van der Wal, W.,
van<?pagebreak page779?> Wessem, M., Vishwakarma, B. D., Wiese, D., Wilton, D., Wagner, T.,
Wouters, B., and Wuite, J.: Mass balance of the Greenland Ice Sheet from
1992 to 2018, Nature, 579, 233–239, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1855-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41586-019-1855-2</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx64"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Siegert and Hodgkins(2000)}}?><label>Siegert and Hodgkins(2000)</label><?label Siegert2000?><mixed-citation>Siegert, M. J. and Hodgkins, R.: A stratigraphic link across 1100 km of the
antarctic ice sheet between the Vostok ice-core site and Titan Dome (near
South Pole), Geophys. Res. Lett., 27, 2133–2136,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000GL008479" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2000GL008479</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx65"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Siegert et~al.(1998)}}?><label>Siegert et al.(1998)</label><?label Siegert1998?><mixed-citation>Siegert, M. J., Hodgkins, R., and Dowdeswell, J. A.: A chronology for the Dome
C deep ice-core site through radio-echo layer correlation with the Vostok ice
core, Antarctica, Geophys. Res. Lett., 25, 1019–1022,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/98GL00718" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/98GL00718</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx66"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Smith-Johnsen et~al.(2020)}}?><label>Smith-Johnsen et al.(2020)</label><?label Smith-Johnsen_2020_jgr?><mixed-citation>Smith-Johnsen, S., Schlegel, N.-J., de Fleurian, B., and Nisancioglu, K. H.:
Sensitivity of the Northeast Greenland Ice Stream to Geothermal Heat, J. Geophys. Res.-Earth Surf., 125, e2019JF005252,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JF005252" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019JF005252</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx67"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Steinhage et~al.(1999)}}?><label>Steinhage et al.(1999)</label><?label Steinhage1999?><mixed-citation>Steinhage, D., Nixdorf, U., Meyer, U., and Miller, H.: New maps of the ice
thickness and subglacial topography in Dronning Maud Land, Antarctica,
determined by means of airborne radio-echo sounding, Ann. Glaciol.,
29, 267–272, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3189/172756499781821409" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3189/172756499781821409</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx68"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Straneo et~al.(2012)}}?><label>Straneo et al.(2012)</label><?label Straneo2012?><mixed-citation>Straneo, F., Sutherland, D. A., Holland, D., Gladish, C., Hamilton, G. S.,
Johnson, H. L., Rignot, E., Xu, Y., and Koppes, M.: Characteristics of ocean
waters reaching Greenland's glaciers, Ann. Glaciol., 53, 202–210,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3189/2012AoG60A059" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3189/2012AoG60A059</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx69"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Vallelonga et~al.(2014)}}?><label>Vallelonga et al.(2014)</label><?label Vallelonga_2014?><mixed-citation>Vallelonga, P., Christianson, K., Alley, R. B., Anandakrishnan, S., Christian, J. E. M., Dahl-Jensen, D., Gkinis, V., Holme, C., Jacobel, R. W., Karlsson, N. B., Keisling, B. A., Kipfstuhl, S., Kjær, H. A., Kristensen, M. E. L., Muto, A., Peters, L. E., Popp, T., Riverman, K. L., Svensson, A. M., Tibuleac, C., Vinther, B. M., Weng, Y., and Winstrup, M.: Initial results from geophysical surveys and shallow coring of the Northeast Greenland Ice Stream (NEGIS), The Cryosphere, 8, 1275–1287, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-8-1275-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-8-1275-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx70"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Vaughan et~al.(1999)}}?><label>Vaughan et al.(1999)</label><?label Vaughan1999?><mixed-citation>Vaughan, D. G., Corr, H. F., Doake, C. S., and Waddington, E. D.: Distortion
of isochronous layers in ice revealed by ground-penetrating radar, Nature,
398, 323–326, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/18653" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/18653</ext-link>, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx71"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Wang et~al.(2015)}}?><label>Wang et al.(2015)</label><?label Wang2016?><mixed-citation>Wang, Z., Gogineni, S., Rodriguez-Morales, F., Yan, J.-B., Paden, J., Leuschen,
C. Hale, R. D., Li, J., Carabajal, L. C., Gomez-Garcia, D., Townley, B.,
Willer, R., Stearns, L., Child, S., and Braaten, D.: Multichannel Wideband
Synthetic Aperture Radar for Ice Sheet Remote Sensing: Development and the
First Deployment in Antarctica, IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl., 9, 1–28,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2015.2403611" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1109/JSTARS.2015.2403611</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx72"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Westhoff et~al.(2020)}}?><label>Westhoff et al.(2020)</label><?label Westhoff_2020?><mixed-citation>Westhoff, J., Stoll, N., Franke, S., Weikusat, I., Bons, P., Kerch, J., Jansen,
D., Kipfstuhl, S., and Dahl-Jensen, D.: A stratigraphy-based method for
reconstructing ice core orientation, Ann. Glaciol., 62, 191–202,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/aog.2020.76" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/aog.2020.76</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx73"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Williams et~al.(2014)}}?><label>Williams et al.(2014)</label><?label Williams2014?><mixed-citation>Williams, R. M., Ray, L. E., Lever, J. H., and Burzynski, A. M.: Crevasse
detection in ice sheets using ground penetrating radar and machine learning,
IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl., 7, 4836–4848, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2014.2332872" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1109/JSTARS.2014.2332872</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx74"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Yin et~al.(2011)}}?><label>Yin et al.(2011)</label><?label Yin2011?><mixed-citation>Yin, J., Overpeck, J. T., Griffies, S. M., Hu, A., Russell, J. L., and
Stouffer, R. J.: Different magnitudes of projected subsurface ocean warming
around Greenland and Antarctica, Nat. Geosci., 4, 524–528,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys1189" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nphys1189</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx75"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Young et~al.(2016)}}?><label>Young et al.(2016)</label><?label Young2016?><mixed-citation>Young, D. A., Schroeder, D. M., Blankenship, D. D., Kempf, S. D., and Quartini,
E.: The distribution of basal water between Antarctic subglacial lakes from
radar sounding, Philos. T. R. Soc. A, 374,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2014.0297" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1098/rsta.2014.0297</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx76"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Young et~al.(2021)}}?><label>Young et al.(2021)</label><?label Young_2021?><mixed-citation>Young, T. J., Schroeder, D. M., Jordan, T. M., Christoffersen, P., Tulaczyk,
S. M., Culberg, R., and Bienert, N. L.: Inferring Ice Fabric From
Birefringence Loss in Airborne Radargrams: Application to the Eastern Shear
Margin of Thwaites Glacier, West Antarctica, J. Geophys. Res.-Earth Surf., 126, e2020JF006023,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JF006023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2020JF006023</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx77"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Zamora et~al.(2007)}}?><label>Zamora et al.(2007)</label><?label Zamora2007?><mixed-citation>
Zamora, R., Casassa, G., Rivera, A., Ordenes, F., Neira, G., Araya, L., Mella,
R., and Bunster, C.: Crevasse detection in glaciers of southern Chile and
Antarctica by means of ground penetrating radar, IAHS-AISH Publication, 153–162, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx78"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Zeising and Humbert(2021)}}?><label>Zeising and Humbert(2021)</label><?label Zeising_2021?><mixed-citation>Zeising, O. and Humbert, A.: Indication of high basal melting at the EastGRIP drill site on the Northeast Greenland Ice Stream, The Cryosphere, 15, 3119–3128, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-3119-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-15-3119-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Airborne ultra-wideband radar sounding over the shear margins and along flow lines at the onset region of the Northeast Greenland Ice Stream</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>Allen et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
Allen, C. T., Mozaffar, S. N., and Akins, T. L.: Suppressing coherent
noise in radar applications with long dwell times, IEEE Geoscience and Remote
Sens. Lett., 2, 284–286, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2005.847931" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2005.847931</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>Baldwin et al.(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
Baldwin, D. J., Bamber, J. L., Payne, A. J., and Layberry, R. L.: Using
internal layers from the Greenland ice sheet, identified from radio-echo
sounding data, with numerical models, Ann. Glaciol., 37, 325–330,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3189/172756403781815438" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3189/172756403781815438</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>Bamber et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Bamber, J. L., Griggs, J. A., Hurkmans, R. T. W. L., Dowdeswell, J. A., Gogineni, S. P., Howat, I., Mouginot, J., Paden, J., Palmer, S., Rignot, E., and Steinhage, D.: A new bed elevation dataset for Greenland, The Cryosphere, 7, 499–510, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-7-499-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-7-499-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>Blackwell and Richards(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Blackwell, D. and Richards, M.: Geothermal Map of North America, AAPG Map,
scale 1:6 500 000, <a href="https://www.smu.edu/Dedman/Academics/Departments/Earth-Sciences/Research/GeothermalLab/DataMaps/GeothermalMapofNorthAmerica" target="_blank"/> (last access: 17 March 2021), 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>Bohleber et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Bohleber, P., Wagner, N., and Eisen, O.: Permittivity of ice at radio
frequencies: Part II. Artificial and natural polycrystalline ice, Cold
Reg. Sci. Technol., 83–84, 13–19,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2012.05.010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2012.05.010</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>Bons et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
Bons, P. D., de Riese, T., Franke, S., Llorens, M.-G., Sachau, T., Stoll, N., Weikusat, I., Westhoff, J., and Zhang, Y.: Comment on “Exceptionally high heat flux needed to sustain the Northeast Greenland Ice Stream” by Smith-Johnsen et al. (2020), The Cryosphere, 15, 2251–2254, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-2251-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-2251-2021</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>Buchardt and Dahl-Jensen(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Buchardt, S. L. and Dahl-Jensen, D.: Estimating the basal melt rate at
NorthGRIP using a Monte Carlo technique, Ann. Glaciol., 45, 137–142,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3189/172756407782282435" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3189/172756407782282435</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>Carter et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Carter, S. P., Blankenship, D. D., Peters, M. E., Young, D. A., Holt, J. W.,
and Morse, D. L.: Radar-based subglacial lake classification in Antarctica,
Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst., 8, Q03016, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GC001408" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GC001408</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>Christianson et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Christianson, K., Peters, L. E., Alley, R. B., Anandakrishnan, S., Jacobel,
R. W., Riverman, K. L., Muto, A., and Keisling, B. A.: Dilatant till
facilitates ice-stream flow in northeast Greenland, Earth Planet.
Sc. Lett., 401, 57–69, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2014.05.060" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2014.05.060</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>Copland and Sharp(2001)</label><mixed-citation>
Copland, L. and Sharp, M.: Mapping thermal and hydrological conditions beneath
a polythermal glacier with radio-echo sounding, J. Glaciol., 47,
232–242, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3189/172756501781832377" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3189/172756501781832377</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>CReSIS(2020a)</label><mixed-citation>
CReSIS: CReSIS rds documentation,
<a href="https://data.cresis.ku.edu/data/rds/rds_readme.pdf" target="_blank"/> (last access: 17 March 2021),
2020a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>CReSIS(2020b)</label><mixed-citation>
CReSIS: CReSIS Toolbox [computer software], Lawrence, Kansas, USA, <a href="https://ops.cresis.ku.edu/wiki/index.php/Main_Page" target="_blank"/> (last access: 17 March 2021),
2020b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>Dahl-Jensen et al.(1997)</label><mixed-citation>
Dahl-Jensen, D., Thorsteinsson, T., Alley, R., and Shoji, H.: Flow properties
of the ice from the Greenland Ice Core Project ice core: The reason for
folds?, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 102, 26831–26840,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/97JC01266" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/97JC01266</a>, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>Eder et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Eder, K., Reidler, C., Mayer, C., and Leopold, M.: Crevasse detection in
alpine areas using ground penetrating radar as a component for a mountain
guide system, International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing
and Spatial Information Sciences – ISPRS Archives, 37, 837–842, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>Eisen et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Eisen, O., Hamann, I., Kipfstuhl, S., Steinhage, D., and Wilhelms, F.: Direct evidence for continuous radar reflector originating from changes in crystal-orientation fabric, The Cryosphere, 1, 1–10, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-1-1-2007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-1-1-2007</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>Eisen et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
Eisen, O., Franke, S., Jansen, D., Paden, J., Drews, R., Ershadi, M. R., Steinhage, D., Lilien, D., Yan, J., Weikusat, I., Wilhelms, F., Dahl-Jensen, D., Grindsted, A., Hvidberg, C., and Miller, H.: Fabric beats in radar data across the NEGIS ice stream, EGU General Assembly 2021, online, 19–30 April 2021, EGU21-1207, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu21-1207" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu21-1207</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>Fahnestock et al.(1993)</label><mixed-citation>
Fahnestock, M., Bindschadler, R., Kwok, R., and Jezek, K.: Greenland Ice Sheet
surface properties and ice dynamics from ERS-1 SAR imagery, Science, 262, 1530–1534,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.262.5139.1530" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.262.5139.1530</a>, 1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>Fahnestock et al.(2001)</label><mixed-citation>
Fahnestock, M. A., Joughin, I., Scambos, T. A., Kwok, R., Krabill, W. B., and
Gogineni, S.: Ice-stream-related patterns of ice flow in the interior of
northeast Greenland, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 106,
34035–34045, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD900194" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD900194</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>Franke et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
Franke, S., Jansen, D., Binder, T., Dörr, N., Paden, J., Helm, V.,
Steinhage, D., and Eisen, O.: Bedrock topography and ice thickness in the
onset region of the Northeast Greenland Ice Stream recorded with the airborne
AWI Ultra-Wideband radar (UWB) in 2018, PANGAEA [data set],
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.907918" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.907918</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>Franke et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
Franke, S., Jansen, D., Binder, T., Dörr, N., Helm, V., Paden, J., Steinhage,
D., and Eisen, O.: Bed topography and subglacial landforms in the onset
region of the Northeast Greenland Ice Stream, Ann. Glaciol., 61,
143–153, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/aog.2020.12" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/aog.2020.12</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>Franke et al.(2021a)</label><mixed-citation>
Franke, S., Binder, T., Jansen, D., Paden, J. D., Dörr, N., Gerber, T.,
Miller, H., Dahl-Jensen, D., Helm, V., Steinhage, D., Weikusat, I., Wilhelms,
F., and Eisen, O.: Ultra-wideband radar data over the shear
margins and along flow lines at the onset region of the Northeast Greenland
Ice Stream (NEGIS), PANGAEA [data set],
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.928569" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.928569</a>,
2021a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>Franke et al.(2021b)</label><mixed-citation>
Franke, S., Eisermann, H., Jokat, W., Eagles, G., Asseng, J., Miller, H.,
Steinhage, D., Helm, V., Eisen, O., and Jansen, D.: Preserved landscapes
underneath the Antarctic Ice Sheet reveal the geomorphological history of
Jutulstraumen Basin, Earth Surf. Process. Landf., 46, 2728–2745,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.5203" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.5203</a>, 2021b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>Franke et al.(2021c)</label><mixed-citation>
Franke, S., Jansen, D., Beyer, S., Neckel, N., Binder, T., Paden, J., and
Eisen, O.: Complex Basal Conditions and Their Influence on Ice Flow at the
Onset of the Northeast Greenland Ice Stream, J. Geophys. Res.-Earth Surf., 126, e2020JF005689, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JF005689" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JF005689</a>,
2021c.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>Frezzotti et al.(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Frezzotti, M., Gandolfi, S., and Urbini, S.: Snow megadunes in Antarctica:
Sedimentary structure and genesis, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 107, ACL 1-1–ACL 1-12, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000673" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000673</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>Fujita et al.(1999)</label><mixed-citation>
Fujita, S., Maeno, H., Uratsuka, S., Furukawa, T., Mae, S., Fujii, Y., and
Watanabe, O.: Nature of radio echo layering in the Antarctic ice sheet
detected by a two-frequency experiment, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 104, 13013–13024, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999jb900034" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/1999jb900034</a>, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>Gazdag(1978)</label><mixed-citation>
Gazdag, J.: Wave equation migration with the phase‐shift method, Geophysics,
43, 1342–1351, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1440899" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1440899</a>, 1978.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>Gerber et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
Gerber, T. A., Hvidberg, C. S., Rasmussen, S. O., Franke, S., Sinnl, G., Grinsted, A., Jansen, D., and Dahl-Jensen, D.: Upstream flow effects revealed in the EastGRIP ice core using Monte Carlo inversion of a two-dimensional ice-flow model, The Cryosphere, 15, 3655–3679, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-3655-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-3655-2021</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>Gogineni et al.(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
Gogineni, S., Chuah, T., Allen, C., Jezek, K., and Moore, R. K.: An improved
coherent radar depth sounder, J. Glaciol., 44, 659–669,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3189/S0022143000002161" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3189/S0022143000002161</a>, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>Hale et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Hale, R., Miller, H., Gogineni, S., Yan, J. B., Rodriguez-Morales, F.,
Leuschen, C., Paden, J., Li, J., Binder, T., Steinhage, D., Gehrmann, M., and
Braaten, D.: Multi-channel ultra-wideband radar sounder and imager, in: 2016
IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), 10–15 July 2016, Beijing, China,
2112–2115, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.2016.7729545" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.2016.7729545</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>Hempel and Thyssen(1992)</label><mixed-citation>
Hempel, L. and Thyssen, F.: Deep radio echo soundings in the vicinity of GRIP
and GISP2 drill sites, Greenland, Polarforschung, 62, 11–16, 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>Hempel et al.(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Hempel, L., Thyssen, F., Gundestrup, N., Clausen, H. B., and Miller, H.: A
comparison of radio-echo sounding data and electrical conductivity of the
GRIP ice core, J. Glaciol., 46, 369–374,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3189/172756500781833070" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3189/172756500781833070</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>Hodgkins et al.(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Hodgkins, R., Siegert, M. J., and Dowdeswell, J. A.: Geophysical
investigations of ice-sheet internal layering and deformation in the Dome C
region of central East Antarctica, J. Glaciol., 46, 161–166,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3189/172756500781833223" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3189/172756500781833223</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>Holschuh et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Holschuh, N., Christianson, K., and Anandakrishnan, S.: Power loss in dipping
internal reflectors, imaged using ice-penetrating radar, Ann.
Glaciol., 55, 49–56, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3189/2014aog67a005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3189/2014aog67a005</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>Holschuh et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
Holschuh, N., Lilien, D. A., and Christianson, K.: Thermal Weakening,
Convergent Flow, and Vertical Heat Transport in the Northeast Greenland Ice
Stream Shear Margins, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 8184–8193,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL083436" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL083436</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>Huybrechts et al.(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Huybrechts, P., Steinhage, D., Wilhelms, F., and Bamber, J.: Balance
velocities and measured properties of the Antarctic ice sheet from a new
compilation of gridded data for modelling, Ann. Glaciol., 30, 52–60,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3189/172756400781820778" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3189/172756400781820778</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>Jacobel and Hodge(1995)</label><mixed-citation>
Jacobel, R. W. and Hodge, S. M.: Radar internal layers from the Greenland
Summit, Geophys. Res. Lett., 22, 587–590, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/95GL00110" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/95GL00110</a>,
1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>Jacobel et al.(1993)</label><mixed-citation>
Jacobel, R. W., Gades, A. M., Gottschling, D. L., Hodge, S. M., and Wright,
D. L.: Interpretation of radar-detected internal layer folding in West
Antarctic ice streams, J. Glaciol., 39, 528–537,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022143000016427" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022143000016427</a>, 1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>Jóhannesson et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
Jóhannesson, T., Pálmason, B., Hjartarson, A., Jarosch, A. H.,
Magnússon, E., Belart, J. M. C., and Gudmundsson, M. T.: Non-surface mass
balance of glaciers in Iceland, J. Glaciol., 66, 685–697,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2020.37" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2020.37</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>Jordan et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
Jordan, T. M., Schroeder, D. M., Elsworth, C. W., and Siegfried, M. R.:
Estimation of ice fabric within Whillans Ice Stream using polarimetric
phase-sensitive radar sounding, Ann. Glaciol., 61, 74–83,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/aog.2020.6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/aog.2020.6</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>Joughin et al.(2001)</label><mixed-citation>
Joughin, I., Fahnestock, M., MacAyeal, D., Bamber, J. L., and Gogineni, P.:
Observation and analysis of ice flow in the largest Greenland ice stream,
J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 106, 34021–34034,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD900087" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD900087</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>Joughin et al.(2015, updated 2018)</label><mixed-citation>
Joughin, I., Smith, B., Howat, I., and Scambos, T.: MEaSUREs Greenland Ice Sheet Velocity Map from InSAR Data, Version 2, Boulder, Colorado USA, NASA National Snow and Ice Data Center Distributed Active Archive Center [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5067/OC7B04ZM9G6Q" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5067/OC7B04ZM9G6Q</a>, 2015, updated 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>Joughin et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Joughin, I., Smith, B. E., and Howat, I. M.: A complete map of Greenland ice
velocity derived from satellite data collected over 20 years, J.
Glaciol., 64, 1–11, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2017.73" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2017.73</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>Kanagaratnam et al.(2001)</label><mixed-citation>
Kanagaratnam, P., Gogineni, S. P., Gundestrup, N., and Larsen, L.:
High-resolution radar mapping of internal layers at the North Greenland Ice
Core Project, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 106,
33799–33811, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD900191" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD900191</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>Keisling et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Keisling, B. A., Christianson, K., Alley, R. B., Peters, L. E., Christian,
J. E., Anandakrishnan, S., Riverman, K. L., Muto, A., and Jacobel, R. W.:
Basal conditions and ice dynamics inferred from radar-derived internal
stratigraphy of the northeast Greenland ice stream, Ann. Glaciol.,
55, 127–137, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3189/2014AoG67A090" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3189/2014AoG67A090</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>Leuschen et al.(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Leuschen, C., Gogineni, S., and Tammana, D.: SAR processing of radar echo
sounder data, in: IGARSS 2000. IEEE 2000 International Geoscience and Remote
Sensing Symposium. Taking the Pulse of the Planet: The Role of Remote Sensing
in Managing the Environment. Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37120), 6,
2570–2572, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.2000.859643" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.2000.859643</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>Li et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Li, J., Paden, J., Leuschen, C., Rodriguez-Morales, F., Hale, R. D., Arnold,
E. J., Crowe, R., Gomez-Garcia, D., and Gogineni, P.: High-Altitude Radar
Measurements of Ice Thickness Over the Antarctic and Greenland Ice Sheets as
a Part of Operation IceBridge, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 51, 742–754, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2012.2203822" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2012.2203822</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>Lilien et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
Lilien, D. A., Rathmann, N. M., Hvidberg, C. S., and Dahl-Jensen, D.: Modeling
Ice-Crystal Fabric as a Proxy for Ice-Stream Stability, J.
Geophys. Res.-Earth Surf., 126, e2021JF006306,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JF006306" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JF006306</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>MacGregor et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
MacGregor, J. A., Fahnestock, M. A., Catania, G. A., Aschwanden, A., Clow,
G. D., Colgan, W. T., Gogineni, S. P., Morlighem, M., Nowicki, S. M., Paden,
J. D., Price, S. F., and Seroussi, H.: A synthesis of the basal thermal
state of the Greenland Ice Sheet, J. Geophys. Res.-Earth
Surf., 121, 1328–1350, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JF003803" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JF003803</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>Matsuoka et al.(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
Matsuoka, K., Furukawa, T., Fujita, S., Maeno, H., Uratsuka, S., Naruse, R.,
and Watanabe, O.: Crystal orientation fabrics within the Antarctic ice sheet
revealed by a multipolarization plane and dual-frequency radar survey,
J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 108, 2499,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003jb002425" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003jb002425</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>Millar(1981)</label><mixed-citation>
Millar, D. H.: Radio-echo layering in polar ice sheets and past volcanic
activity, Nature, 292, 441–443, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/292441a0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/292441a0</a>, 1981.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>Mottram et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
Mottram, R., Simonsen, S. B., Svendsen, S. H., Barletta, V. R., Sørensen,
L. S., Nagler, T., Wuite, J., Groh, A., Horwath, M., Rosier, J., Solgaard,
A., Hvidberg, C. S., and Forsberg, R.: An integrated view of greenland ice
sheet mass changes based on models and satellite observations, Remote
Sens., 11, 1–26, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11121407" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11121407</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>Murray et al.(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Murray, T., Stuart, G. W., Miller, P. J., Woodward, J., Smith, A. M., Porter,
P. R., and Jiskoot, H.: Glacier surge propagation by thermal evolution at
the bed, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 105,
13491–13507, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000jb900066" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2000jb900066</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>Nereson and Raymond(2001)</label><mixed-citation>
Nereson, N. A. and Raymond, C. F.: The elevation history of ice streams and
the spatial accumulation pattern along the Siple Coast of West Antarctica
inferred from ground-based radar data from three inter-ice-stream ridges,
J. Glaciol., 47, 303–313, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3189/172756501781832197" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3189/172756501781832197</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>Nereson et al.(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Nereson, N. A., Raymond, C. F., Jacobel, R. W., and Waddington, E. D.: The
accumulation pattern across Siple Dome, West Antarctica, inferred from
radar-detected internal layers, J. Glaciol., 46, 75–87,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3189/172756500781833449" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3189/172756500781833449</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>Nixdorf and Göktas(2001)</label><mixed-citation>
Nixdorf, U. and Göktas, F.: Spatial depth distribution of the subglacial
bed and internal layers in the ice around NGRIP, Greenland, derived with
airborne RES, J. Appl. Geophys., 47, 175–182,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-9851(01)00062-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-9851(01)00062-3</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>Pälli et al.(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Pälli, A., Kohler, J. C., Isaksson, E., Moore, J. C., Pinglot, J. F.,
Pohjola, V. A., and Samuelsson, H.: Spatial and temporal variability of snow
accumulation using ground-penetrating radar and ice cores on a Svalbard
glacier, J. Glaciol., 48, 417–424,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3189/172756502781831205" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3189/172756502781831205</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>Palmer et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Palmer, S. J., Dowdeswell, J. A., Christoffersen, P., Young, D. A.,
Blankenship, D. D., Greenbaum, J. S., Benham, T., Bamber, J., and Siegert,
M. J.: Greenland subglacial lakes detected by radar, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 40, 6154–6159, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013GL058383" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2013GL058383</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>Richardson et al.(1997)</label><mixed-citation>
Richardson, C., Aarholt, E., Hamran, S.-E., Holmlund, P., and Isaksson, E.:
Spatial distribution of snow in western Dronning Maud Land, East Antarctica,
mapped by a ground-based snow radar, J. Geophys. Res., 102,
20343–20353, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>Rignot and Mouginot(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Rignot, E. and Mouginot, J.: Ice flow in Greenland for the International Polar
Year 2008-2009, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L11501,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL051634" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL051634</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>Riverman et al.(2019a)</label><mixed-citation>
Riverman, K. L., Alley, R. B., Anandakrishnan, S., Christianson, K., Holschuh,
N. D., Medley, B., Muto, A., and Peters, L. E.: Enhanced Firn Densification
in High‐Accumulation Shear Margins of the NE Greenland Ice Stream, J. Geophys. Res.-Earth Surf., 124, 365–382,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2017JF004604" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2017JF004604</a>, 2019a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>Riverman et al.(2019b)</label><mixed-citation>
Riverman, K. L., Anandakrishnan, S., Alley, R. B., Holschuh, N., Dow, C. F.,
Muto, A., Parizek, B. R., Christianson, K., and Peters, L. E.: Wet
subglacial bedforms of the NE Greenland Ice Stream shear margins, Ann.
Glaciol., 60, 91–99, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/aog.2019.43" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/aog.2019.43</a>, 2019b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>Schroeder et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
Schroeder, D. M., Bingham, R. G., Blankenship, D. D., Christianson, K., Eisen,
O., Flowers, G. E., Karlsson, N. B., Koutnik, M. R., Paden, J. D., and
Siegert, M. J.: Five decades of radioglaciology, Ann. Glaciol., 61, 1–13,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/aog.2020.11" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/aog.2020.11</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>Shepherd et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
Shepherd, A., Ivins, E., Rignot, E., Smith, B., van den Broeke, M., Velicogna,
I., Whitehouse, P., Briggs, K., Joughin, I., Krinner, G., Nowicki, S., Payne,
T., Scambos, T., Schlegel, N., A, G., Agosta, C., Ahlstrøm, A., Babonis,
G., Barletta, V. R., Bjørk, A. A., Blazquez, A., Bonin, J., Colgan, W.,
Csatho, B., Cullather, R., Engdahl, M. E., Felikson, D., Fettweis, X.,
Forsberg, R., Hogg, A. E., Gallee, H., Gardner, A., Gilbert, L., Gourmelen,
N., Groh, A., Gunter, B., Hanna, E., Harig, C., Helm, V., Horvath, A.,
Horwath, M., Khan, S., Kjeldsen, K. K., Konrad, H., Langen, P. L.,
Lecavalier, B., Loomis, B., Luthcke, S., McMillan, M., Melini, D., Mernild,
S., Mohajerani, Y., Moore, P., Mottram, R., Mouginot, J., Moyano, G., Muir,
A., Nagler, T., Nield, G., Nilsson, J., Noël, B., Otosaka, I., Pattle,
M. E., Peltier, W. R., Pie, N., Rietbroek, R., Rott, H., Sandberg
Sørensen, L., Sasgen, I., Save, H., Scheuchl, B., Schrama, E.,
Schröder, L., Seo, K. W., Simonsen, S. B., Slater, T., Spada, G.,
Sutterley, T., Talpe, M., Tarasov, L., van de Berg, W. J., van der Wal, W.,
van Wessem, M., Vishwakarma, B. D., Wiese, D., Wilton, D., Wagner, T.,
Wouters, B., and Wuite, J.: Mass balance of the Greenland Ice Sheet from
1992 to 2018, Nature, 579, 233–239, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1855-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1855-2</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>Siegert and Hodgkins(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Siegert, M. J. and Hodgkins, R.: A stratigraphic link across 1100 km of the
antarctic ice sheet between the Vostok ice-core site and Titan Dome (near
South Pole), Geophys. Res. Lett., 27, 2133–2136,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000GL008479" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2000GL008479</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>Siegert et al.(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
Siegert, M. J., Hodgkins, R., and Dowdeswell, J. A.: A chronology for the Dome
C deep ice-core site through radio-echo layer correlation with the Vostok ice
core, Antarctica, Geophys. Res. Lett., 25, 1019–1022,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/98GL00718" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/98GL00718</a>, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>Smith-Johnsen et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
Smith-Johnsen, S., Schlegel, N.-J., de Fleurian, B., and Nisancioglu, K. H.:
Sensitivity of the Northeast Greenland Ice Stream to Geothermal Heat, J. Geophys. Res.-Earth Surf., 125, e2019JF005252,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JF005252" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JF005252</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>Steinhage et al.(1999)</label><mixed-citation>
Steinhage, D., Nixdorf, U., Meyer, U., and Miller, H.: New maps of the ice
thickness and subglacial topography in Dronning Maud Land, Antarctica,
determined by means of airborne radio-echo sounding, Ann. Glaciol.,
29, 267–272, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3189/172756499781821409" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3189/172756499781821409</a>, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>Straneo et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Straneo, F., Sutherland, D. A., Holland, D., Gladish, C., Hamilton, G. S.,
Johnson, H. L., Rignot, E., Xu, Y., and Koppes, M.: Characteristics of ocean
waters reaching Greenland's glaciers, Ann. Glaciol., 53, 202–210,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3189/2012AoG60A059" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3189/2012AoG60A059</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>Vallelonga et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Vallelonga, P., Christianson, K., Alley, R. B., Anandakrishnan, S., Christian, J. E. M., Dahl-Jensen, D., Gkinis, V., Holme, C., Jacobel, R. W., Karlsson, N. B., Keisling, B. A., Kipfstuhl, S., Kjær, H. A., Kristensen, M. E. L., Muto, A., Peters, L. E., Popp, T., Riverman, K. L., Svensson, A. M., Tibuleac, C., Vinther, B. M., Weng, Y., and Winstrup, M.: Initial results from geophysical surveys and shallow coring of the Northeast Greenland Ice Stream (NEGIS), The Cryosphere, 8, 1275–1287, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-8-1275-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-8-1275-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>Vaughan et al.(1999)</label><mixed-citation>
Vaughan, D. G., Corr, H. F., Doake, C. S., and Waddington, E. D.: Distortion
of isochronous layers in ice revealed by ground-penetrating radar, Nature,
398, 323–326, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/18653" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/18653</a>, 1999.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>Wang et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, Z., Gogineni, S., Rodriguez-Morales, F., Yan, J.-B., Paden, J., Leuschen,
C. Hale, R. D., Li, J., Carabajal, L. C., Gomez-Garcia, D., Townley, B.,
Willer, R., Stearns, L., Child, S., and Braaten, D.: Multichannel Wideband
Synthetic Aperture Radar for Ice Sheet Remote Sensing: Development and the
First Deployment in Antarctica, IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl., 9, 1–28,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2015.2403611" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2015.2403611</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>Westhoff et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
Westhoff, J., Stoll, N., Franke, S., Weikusat, I., Bons, P., Kerch, J., Jansen,
D., Kipfstuhl, S., and Dahl-Jensen, D.: A stratigraphy-based method for
reconstructing ice core orientation, Ann. Glaciol., 62, 191–202,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/aog.2020.76" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/aog.2020.76</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>Williams et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Williams, R. M., Ray, L. E., Lever, J. H., and Burzynski, A. M.: Crevasse
detection in ice sheets using ground penetrating radar and machine learning,
IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl., 7, 4836–4848, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2014.2332872" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2014.2332872</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>Yin et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Yin, J., Overpeck, J. T., Griffies, S. M., Hu, A., Russell, J. L., and
Stouffer, R. J.: Different magnitudes of projected subsurface ocean warming
around Greenland and Antarctica, Nat. Geosci., 4, 524–528,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys1189" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys1189</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>Young et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Young, D. A., Schroeder, D. M., Blankenship, D. D., Kempf, S. D., and Quartini,
E.: The distribution of basal water between Antarctic subglacial lakes from
radar sounding, Philos. T. R. Soc. A, 374,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2014.0297" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2014.0297</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>Young et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
Young, T. J., Schroeder, D. M., Jordan, T. M., Christoffersen, P., Tulaczyk,
S. M., Culberg, R., and Bienert, N. L.: Inferring Ice Fabric From
Birefringence Loss in Airborne Radargrams: Application to the Eastern Shear
Margin of Thwaites Glacier, West Antarctica, J. Geophys. Res.-Earth Surf., 126, e2020JF006023,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JF006023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JF006023</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>Zamora et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Zamora, R., Casassa, G., Rivera, A., Ordenes, F., Neira, G., Araya, L., Mella,
R., and Bunster, C.: Crevasse detection in glaciers of southern Chile and
Antarctica by means of ground penetrating radar, IAHS-AISH Publication, 153–162, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>Zeising and Humbert(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
Zeising, O. and Humbert, A.: Indication of high basal melting at the EastGRIP drill site on the Northeast Greenland Ice Stream, The Cryosphere, 15, 3119–3128, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-3119-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-3119-2021</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
