<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="data-paper">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ESSD</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Earth System Science Data</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ESSD</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Earth Syst. Sci. Data</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1866-3516</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/essd-13-2801-2021</article-id><title-group><article-title>A high-resolution gridded dataset of daily temperature and precipitation
records (1980–2018) for Trentino-South Tyrol (north-eastern Italian
Alps)</article-title><alt-title>A high-resolution gridded dataset for Trentino-South Tyrol</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{A high-resolution gridded dataset for Trentino-South Tyrol}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{A. Crespi et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Crespi</surname><given-names>Alice</given-names></name>
          <email>alice.crespi@eurac.edu</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4186-8474</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Matiu</surname><given-names>Michael</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5289-0592</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Bertoldi</surname><given-names>Giacomo</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0397-8103</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff3">
          <name><surname>Petitta</surname><given-names>Marcello</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0445-7713</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Zebisch</surname><given-names>Marc</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3530-7219</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Institute for Earth Observation, Eurac Research, Bolzano, 39100, Italy</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Institute for Alpine Environment, Eurac Research, Bolzano, 39100,
Italy</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>SSPT-MET-CLIM, ENEA, Rome, 00196, Italy</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Alice Crespi (alice.crespi@eurac.edu)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>16</day><month>June</month><year>2021</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>13</volume>
      <issue>6</issue>
      <fpage>2801</fpage><lpage>2818</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>12</day><month>November</month><year>2020</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>12</day><month>January</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>3</day><month>May</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>12</day><month>May</month><year>2021</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2021 Alice Crespi et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2021</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/13/2801/2021/essd-13-2801-2021.html">This article is available from https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/13/2801/2021/essd-13-2801-2021.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/13/2801/2021/essd-13-2801-2021.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/13/2801/2021/essd-13-2801-2021.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>
    <p id="d1e131">A high-resolution gridded dataset of daily mean
temperature and precipitation series spanning the period 1980–2018 was
built for Trentino-South Tyrol, a mountainous region in north-eastern
Italy, starting from an archive of observation series from more than 200
meteorological stations and covering the regional domain and surrounding
countries. The original station data underwent a processing chain including
quality and consistency checks, homogeneity tests, with the homogenization
of the most relevant breaks in the series, and a filling procedure of daily
gaps aiming at maximizing the data availability. Using the processed
database, an anomaly-based interpolation scheme was applied to project the
daily station observations of mean temperature and precipitation onto a
regular grid of 250 m <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 250 m resolution. The accuracy of the resulting
dataset was evaluated by leave-one-out station cross-validation. Averaged
over all sites, interpolated daily temperature and precipitation show no
bias, with a mean absolute error (MAE) of about 1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C and 1.1 mm
and a mean correlation of 0.97 and 0.91, respectively. The obtained daily
fields were used to discuss the spatial representation of selected past
events and the distribution of the main climatological features over the
region, which shows the role of the mountainous terrain in defining the
temperature and precipitation gradients. In addition, the suitability of the
dataset to be combined with other high-resolution products was evaluated
through a comparison of the gridded observations with snow-cover maps from
remote sensing observations. The presented dataset provides an accurate
insight into the spatio-temporal distribution of temperature and precipitation
over the mountainous terrain of Trentino-South Tyrol and a valuable
support for local and regional applications of climate variability and
change. The dataset is publicly available at <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.924502" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1594/PANGAEA.924502</ext-link> (Crespi et al., 2020).</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e162">High-resolution gridded datasets of in situ climate observations are of
increasing relevance not only for the studies on climate and its variability
but also for many applications, such as natural resource management,
adaptation planning, modelling and risk assessment in a wide range of fields
including hydrology, agriculture and energy (Haylock et al., 2008; Hofstra
et al., 2008). For instance, spatialized in situ observations can be used in
runoff, crop growth and glacier mass balance modelling (Engelhardt et al.,
2014; Ledesma and Futter, 2017), to validate and bias-correct climate
simulations (Kotlarski et al., 2019; Navarro-Racines et al., 2020), to
calibrate and integrate remote sensing products (Schlögel et al., 2020),
and to develop advanced monitoring systems supporting decision making
(Aadhar and Mishra, 2017). This is particularly meaningful for local studies
over topographically complex areas experiencing a high climatic
heterogeneity, such as the Alps where the Italian region of Trentino-South Tyrol is located. Mountain areas are essential for freshwater and
hydropower production, and they are particularly prone to natural hazards
such as floods,<?pagebreak page2802?> landslides and avalanches which threaten human life and
infrastructure and require monitoring and prevention (Immerzeel et al.,
2020).</p>
      <p id="d1e165">Several gridded products of temperature and precipitation series derived
from in situ observations are currently available globally, at European and
at national scales at different temporal and spatial resolutions, for
example Climatic Research Unit dataset (CRU) at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 km horizontal spacing for global monthly
data (Harris et al., 2020), E-OBS for Europe at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 km
resolution (Haylock et al., 2008), GAR-HRT (Chimani et al., 2013), and APGD and
LAPrec (Isotta et al., 2014, 2019) for the Alps at around 5 km
grid spacing. The datasets are derived by applying interpolation methods to
the meteorological station records unevenly located over the territory to
obtain estimates for each point of a regular grid. The accuracy of the
results depends on the available station coverage, which could be
particularly sparse for some mountain areas. However, the spatial resolution
of the large-scale gridded products (from a few to tens of kilometres) does not allow us
to properly capture the finer climate gradients of mountainous regions such
as Trentino-South Tyrol and to respond to the needs of local
applications. Further gridded data were computed at trans-regional,
subregional and catchment levels at different timescales and at finer
resolution, generally 1 km horizontal spacing (e.g. Brunetti et al., 2012;
Laiti et al., 2018; Mallucci et al., 2019); however most of them cover only
partially the study region and/or are not up to date, which limits their
applicability for operational purposes. In addition, several global and
quasi-global precipitation products based on satellite only or on a
satellite–gauge combination have been developed in the recent decades at
different temporal and spatial resolutions, such as GPCP (Adler et al.,
2018), TRMM (Huffman et al., 2007) and CHIRPS (Funk et al., 2015), whose
performances have been recently evaluated with respect to ground station
data over parts of the study region (Mei et al., 2014; Duan et al., 2016).
However, most products are available at 0.25<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> grid spacing, and
further enhancements in spatial resolution and agreement with daily
observations are still needed to improve their application in smaller basins
(Duan et al., 2016).</p>
      <p id="d1e191">The choice of the horizontal resolution of the gridded products is handled
differently by the different communities. From a climatological point of
view, developing kilometre-scale or even sub-kilometre-scale products based
on interpolated sparse observations does not provide more information than
deriving coarser products (Haylock et al., 2008). The effective resolution
is mostly defined by the underlying station distribution, and it can be
different from the target grid spacing (Grasso, 2000; Lussana et al., 2019).
However, from a user perspective, higher-resolution data might be more
desirable because they are closer to the actual problems for practical
applications (Beven et al., 2015), requiring a precise definition of local
gradients which in mountainous terrains can occur over distances less than 1 km. Even if they contain similar information as their coarser-resolution
counterparts, a sensible interpolation approach of climate variables to
finer spatial scales is beneficial, especially in highly complex mountainous
terrains such as Trentino-South Tyrol, to properly account for the
orographic gradients in a wide range of applications, e.g. modelling of
snow, hydrological processes, vegetation or climate-related health impacts.
Moreover, high-resolution data can be used more conveniently in hydrological
models or for processing satellite observations without the need of a
further downscaling.</p>
      <p id="d1e194">Different interpolation techniques have been developed so far to derive
gridded climate products, and the choice largely depends on the domain
features, data availability and desired spatial details. The proposed
methods include inverse distance weighting (IDW; Camera et al., 2014),
splines (Stewart and Nitschke, 2017), geostatistical schemes such as kriging
and its variants (Hengl, 2009; Sekulić et al., 2020), optimal
interpolation (Lussana et al., 2019) and regression-based approaches (Daly
et al., 2007; Brunsdon et al., 2001). In topographically complex domains the
interpolation schemes modelling the relationship between the terrain
features and the climate gradients are preferable (Daly et al., 2002).
However, the spatialization methods need to take into account the
heterogeneity of observation availability, which typically decreases, for example, in
high-elevation mountain regions where only over recent decades new
automatic meteorological stations have been settled and provide information
for previously uncovered areas.</p>
      <p id="d1e198">Geostatistical and regression-based methods computing local climate
gradients require dense data coverages and could provide unreliable spatial
patterns where data density is low and strong spatial variability occurs,
especially for precipitation fields and at a daily timescale (Hofstra et al.,
2010; Ly et al., 2011; Crespi et al., 2018). More straightforward
approaches, such as IDW, could provide more stable results even though the
final spatial variability could be highly smoothed and affected by
over- or underestimations if data are unevenly distributed (Di Piazza et al.,
2011). In order to partially overcome these issues, anomaly-based methods
were proposed in which the final gridded daily distribution for a certain
variable is obtained by superimposing the long-term climatological values of
reference, generally 30-year means, and the spatial distribution of the
local daily deviations from them (e.g. New et al., 2001). Especially for
daily precipitation, the interpolation with a reference field and anomalies
was proved to be less prone to errors than the direct interpolation of
absolute values, such as systematic underestimations in high-mountain
regions due to the prevalence of stations located in the low valleys (Isotta
et al., 2014; Crespi et al., 2021). This concept was applied in a relevant
number of studies (see, for example, Haylock et al., 2008; Brunetti et al., 2012;
Chimani et al., 2013; Hiebl and Frei, 2018; Longman et al., 2019).</p>
      <p id="d1e201">In this work, we present the gridded dataset of daily mean temperature and
precipitation for the Trentino-South Tyrol region covering a 39-year period
(1980–2018) at very<?pagebreak page2803?> high spatial resolution (250 m). The gridded dataset
is computed from a collection of more than 200 daily station records
retrieved from the regional meteorological network and checked for quality
and homogeneity. The daily interpolation is based on the anomaly concept by
superimposing the 1981–2010 daily climatologies at 250 m resolution
computed by a weighted linear regression with topographic features and the
250 m resolution fields of daily anomalies obtained by a weighted-averaging
approach. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first time such an
interpolation scheme has been applied to derive daily fields of these two key
climatic variables at such a fine grid spacing. The resulting gridded
climate product includes the small-scale terrain features of the region and
can be easily integrated and combined with models and other high-resolution
data, e.g. remote sensing observations, without applying any further
downscaling to get a target sub-kilometre scale. In addition, the resulting
product was designed to be regularly updated by the recent station records
in order to respond to more operational purposes.</p>
      <p id="d1e204">Section 2 describes the collection and processing of the meteorological
station data and provides a detailed explanation of the
interpolation technique applied. In Sect. 3 the accuracy of the gridded dataset is
discussed on the basis of the results of cross-validation analyses, and the
regional climate features and selected examples derived from the computed
fields are presented. In addition, a preliminary comparison of the 250 m
gridded temperature and precipitation series with the 2001–2018 winter
snow-cover data from remote sensing images over the region is reported in
order to provide an example of the potential applications of the dataset in
combination with other high-resolution products. Section 4 provides the
information about the dataset availability and access. Finally, the summary
of the main outcomes and outlooks of the work are reported in Sect. 5.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Data and methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>The study area</title>
      <p id="d1e222">Trentino-South Tyrol is a region located in north-eastern Italy covering
an area of around 13 000 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 1). Its territory is entirely
mountainous, including a large portion of the Dolomites and southern Alps, and it
is located at the intersection region for various types of air masses: humid
influences from the Atlantic north-west, dry air masses from the continental
east, typically experiencing cold winters and warm summers, and warm
contributions from the Mediterranean area bringing humid winters and dry
summers (Adler et al., 2015). The geographical location and the complex
topography of the region determine a strong climate variability and
contribute to define small-scale effects in the spatial distribution of
temperature and precipitation (Price, 2009). The territory is characterized
by strong altitude gradients with very narrow valleys surrounded by steep
slopes. Elevation range extends from 65 m a.s.l. (above sea level) in the areas close to Lake
Garda in the south to 3905 m a.s.l. of the Ortles peak in the Stelvio
National Park (north-west). The mean elevation of the region is around 1600 m with only 4 % flat areas, i.e. with slope steepness below 5 %. The
main valley is the one of Adige River, the second longest Italian river,
flowing from Reschen Pass in the north-western corner of the region,
crossing Venosta Valley west to east, and then the entire region north to
south towards the Adriatic Sea.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e236">The study region of Trentino-South Tyrol composed of the
autonomous provinces of Trento and Bolzano (red bordered) and the region
location in Italy (orange area in the inset plot). (© OpenStreetMap
contributors 2020. Distributed under a Creative Commons BY-SA License)</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/13/2801/2021/essd-13-2801-2021-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>The observation database</title>
      <p id="d1e253">The database used for the present study was set up by retrieving the
observation series of daily maximum and minimum temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>max⁡</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>min⁡</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and daily total precipitation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) from the stations of the
meteorological networks of the Trentino-South Tyrol region. More precisely,
the data for the Autonomous Province of Trento were received from
Meteotrentino (<uri>https://www.meteotrentino.it/</uri>, last access: 14 June 2021), while the
meteorological series for the Autonomous Province of Bolzano were provided
by the hydrographic office. In total 311 series of daily <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>max⁡</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>min⁡</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 243 series of daily <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> were collected (Fig. 2). The series were
integrated with the records from a few close sites located in surrounding
regions, especially in the north where the terrain is mainly mountainous,
and the less dense regional coverage could not be enough to provide a
suitable representation of climate gradients in the high-Alpine environment
over the borders. With this aim, some daily series from Switzerland, Austria
and Veneto<?pagebreak page2804?> were also included. Swiss sites were retrieved from MeteoSwiss
(IDAWEB, <uri>https://gate.meteoswiss.ch/idaweb/</uri>, last access: 14 June 2021), Veneto data were
provided by the Regional Agency of Environmental Protection (ARPA Veneto),
and Austrian series were provided by the Zentralanstalt für
Meteorologie und Geodynamik (ZAMG). In addition, data for some further
Austrian locations were collected from the HISTALP database of daily
homogenized records (Auer et al., 2007; <uri>http://www.zamg.ac.at/histalp/dataset/station/csvHOMSTART.php</uri>, last access: 14 June 2021).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e326">Spatial distribution of <bold>(a)</bold> temperature and <bold>(b)</bold> precipitation
weather stations superimposed onto the topography considered in the
interpolation scheme. In panel <bold>(a)</bold> the digital elevation model (DEM) at 250 m resolution is reported, and in panel <bold>(b)</bold> the smoothed version of the 250 m DEM
used for precipitation spatialization is shown.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=355.659449pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/13/2801/2021/essd-13-2801-2021-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e349">Elevation distribution of temperature and precipitation stations
in absolute numbers over 200 m bins (left axis). The relative elevation
distribution of the 250 m digital elevation model covering the study domain
is reported on the secondary <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis for the same 200 m bins.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/13/2801/2021/essd-13-2801-2021-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e366">The control of data quality and homogeneity represents a crucial preliminary
step to improve the general accuracy of the collected observation series.
The weather station records can be affected by a number of both random and
systematic errors, including erroneous transcriptions of data, station
malfunctions, sensor drifts and inhomogeneities due to non-climatic factors,
such as station relocation, or changes in surroundings or in sensors employed.
From around the 1990s, the manual measurements were replaced by automatic
stations in most meteorological services. In this study we did not
distinguish between manual and automatic records, and their consistency was
assured by quality-check and homogenization procedures. In addition, the
observation time and meteorological day definition slightly vary among the
networks and could change within the years, especially in the shift from
manual to automatic systems. For instance, daily precipitation records from
the regional network generally referred to the cumulated precipitation
from 08:00 UTC of the previous day to the 08:00 UTC of the current day, and also the
recent automatic records are defined by following this definition. However,
this information is not always reported, and other daily reading times could
have been adopted in some cases such as 07:00 and 00:00 UTC. Clear
shifts due to changes in time coding were checked and corrected, but no
specific correction of the observation time was applied, and induced
inhomogeneities were assessed through the quality-check procedures.</p>
      <p id="d1e369">The collected database spanned the period from 1950 to present, and the whole
interval was used for the quality and homogeneity checks in order to
increase the statistics and the robustness of the analyses. The series in
close proximity (horizontal distance <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 km and vertical distance
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 100 m) but covering different time periods were merged in order to
improve the length and continuity of available records. The merging
concerned mostly some stations for Trentino province, which were split due
to slight relocations and/or after the transition from mechanical to
automatic sensors.</p>
      <p id="d1e386">The quality-check analyses were performed on the daily series of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>max⁡</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>min⁡</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in order to detect outliers and to assess the spatial and
temporal consistency of data. Implausible values, such as negative
precipitation and out-of-range records, were scanned by setting fixed
thresholds. In particular, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> exceeding 500 mm, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>min⁡</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>min⁡</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>max⁡</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>max⁡</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C and
diurnal temperature range <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 35 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C were considered and
removed if not supported by metadata or by surrounding station records. In
addition, cases of daily <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>min⁡</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> exceeding <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>max⁡</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were invalidated, and
periods of continuous null daily <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> over more than 1 month were detected
and removed if a simultaneous dry period was not reported for nearby sites.
Temporal consistency was also scanned in both <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>max⁡</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>min⁡</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> series
by searching for differences in consecutive days greater than 20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C (Durre et al., 2010).</p>
      <p id="d1e647">In order to further assess the overall accuracy of the series, monthly
records were computed, and each one was simulated over the whole spanned
period by means of the surrounding station data (Crespi et al., 2018; Matiu
et al., 2021). The agreement between monthly observed and simulated values
was measured in terms of mean error (BIAS), mean absolute error (MAE) and
squared correlation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and allowed us to assess the spatial consistency
of the series and to further detect stations affected by frequent
malfunctions and periods of suspicious records. In particular, 11 temperature series and 13 precipitation series with low-quality data or
duplicates of other series were identified and discarded from the following
analyses. The final mean reconstruction BIAS over all <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>max⁡</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>min⁡</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> series was almost null, and mean MAE was 0.7 and 0.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, respectively, with a mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 0.98 for both variables.
For <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> series, the average relative BIAS was <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1 %, the relative MAE 17 %
and the mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.89.</p>
      <p id="d1e729">After the quality check, all series with more than 30 years of valid records
underwent homogeneity controls and the ones showing relevant breaks were
homogenized. To this aim, the Craddock test (Craddock, 1979) was applied by
following an approach similar to that adopted in previous studies (see, for example, Brunetti et al., 2006; Brugnara et al., 2012). The homogeneity test was
applied to the monthly records by using as reference the five nearby stations
with the highest amount of data in common. In some cases, the comparison
with the available homogenized records from HISTALP and MeteoSwiss supported
the identification of possible breaks. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> records showing relevant
breaks were homogenized by deriving the correcting factors at monthly scale
and applying then the adjustments to the daily values. More specifically,
once an inhomogeneous period was identified in the test series, the
adjustment for each month was estimated independently as the arithmetic
average of the corrections derived from each reference series according to a
common homogeneous period. In the case of precipitation, if no annual cycle
was evident, a single yearly adjustment was computed as the average of the
monthly factors; otherwise the monthly factors were used. The most recent
years were always left unchanged in order to ease the update of station
records. For precipitation series, the corrections derived from the monthly
values were directly applied as multiplicative factors to the daily records
in the corresponding inhomogeneous period. In the case of temperature
series, in order to take into account the annual seasonality and extract a
correction for each day of the year, the 12 monthly factors were
interpolated at a daily resolution by means of a<?pagebreak page2805?> second-order trigonometric
interpolation. The resulting 365 (366 for leap years) daily adjustments were
then applied to the inhomogeneous daily records as additive corrections.</p>
      <p id="d1e746">If <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>max⁡</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>min⁡</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> series were corrected, their internal consistency
was checked to be preserved. In total 11 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>max⁡</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> series, 13 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>min⁡</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
series and 48 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> series were homogenized. Short periods with strong breaks
for which no robust correction factors could be computed were invalidated. A
total of 20 and 22 breaks in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>max⁡</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>min⁡</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were identified with
almost half of them concerning the years prior to the 1980s, which is outside
the period of the computed spatial product. The average length of the
inhomogeneous periods was about 7 years with an average annual adjustment of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.2 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>max⁡</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>min⁡</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
respectively. As regards the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> series, 84 breakpoints were identified in
total, and the mean annual multiplicative factor applied was about 1.1.
Similar to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> series, the average extent of the corrected periods was about
11 years, and they mainly occurred before the 1980s. Due to the lack of
specific metadata supporting the break interpretation in the series, we
adopted a precautionary approach and no correction was performed if the
breakpoint could not be identified clearly.</p>
      <p id="d1e884">As the last step, in order to increase the data coverage and to maximize the
temporal extent of the records, a gap-filling procedure was applied to
reconstruct the missing daily data. The filling was performed by considering
the data of the surrounding station with the highest correlation with the
data of the series under evaluation and by rescaling its daily value for the
ratio (in case of precipitation) and the difference (in case of temperature)
of the daily averages of the two series over a common subset of data, which
is defined by a window centred on the daily gap and extending over both
years and days. The reconstruction was performed only if the test series
contained at least 70 % of valid daily data in the<?pagebreak page2806?> selected window and a
total of around 8000 daily entries were reconstructed over the period 1980–2018.</p>
      <p id="d1e887">All processed series with less than 10 years of records were discarded from
the database used for the interpolation since they could not provide robust
long-term references from which the anomalies were computed. Daily mean
temperature series were finally derived as the average of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>max⁡</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>min⁡</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values.</p>
      <p id="d1e912">The resulting database contained 236 daily mean temperature and 219 daily
precipitation series, 205 and 188 out of them located within the region,
respectively (Fig. 2). The station distribution varies strongly with
elevation. The best data coverage is between 500 and 1500 m for both
temperature and precipitation databases, while the number of available
stations gradually decreases for higher altitudes, and no precipitation sites
are located above 3000 m. The portion of the domain above 1500 m is, in
relative terms, underrepresented by the available observations, and thus a larger
uncertainty needs to be assigned to the final gridded estimates for such
areas (Fig. 3). The data coverage over higher altitudes can be improved in
the future thanks to the integration of the most recent automatic weather
stations when their temporal extent becomes suitable for climatological
assessments.</p>
      <p id="d1e915">The data availability also varies over time (Fig. 4). The first relevant
improvement of data coverage occurs during the 1970s, while the greatest
increase is observed after 1980 and, especially for temperature, after 1990
when the automatic stations started to operate in most areas. Due to the
significantly lower station availability before the 1980s, which could
reduce the general accuracy of the results for the early decades, the
starting year for the computation of the gridded dataset for both
temperature and precipitation was set to 1980. Although the coverage of
temperature series is less dense than that of precipitation data before
1990, this is not expected to affect the general robustness of the
results thanks to the greater spatial coherence typically shown by
temperature records (Brunetti et al., 2006). The effects of the variability
in data availability on the result accuracy is discussed more in detail in
Sect. 3.1.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e920">Number of available stations over the 1950–2018 period in the
collected databases of <bold>(a)</bold> temperature and <bold>(b)</bold> precipitation.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=355.659449pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/13/2801/2021/essd-13-2801-2021-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>The interpolation scheme</title>
      <p id="d1e943">The 250 m resolution fields of daily mean temperature and daily
precipitation over Trentino-South Tyrol were computed over the period
1980–2018 by applying the anomaly-based approach. In this framework, the
final gridded output is derived from the superimposition of the gridded
station daily anomalies and the interpolated climatologies, i.e. 30-year
means, for the reference period 1981–2010. The interpolation grid and all
topographic features were derived from the digital elevation model (DEM)
Copernicus EU-DEM v1.1 (<uri>https://land.copernicus.eu/imagery-in-situ/eu-dem/eu-dem-v1.1</uri>, last access: 14 June 2021), which was
aggregated from the original 25 m to the target 250 m resolution. The
elevation values of the DEM used for precipitation interpolation were
further smoothed by replacing the elevation of each point by a weighted
average of the surrounding grid-cell elevations with weights halving at 2 km
distance from the considered cell. The halving distance was chosen as the
one minimizing the modelling errors (see Sect. 3.1 for a description of
errors). As suggested in previous work, this procedure can avoid entering in
the interpolation terrain details that are too fine with respect to the expected
scales of interaction between atmospheric circulation and orography
(Brunetti et al., 2012; Foresti et al., 2018). In the following the two
steps of the interpolation procedure are described separately.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS1">
  <label>2.3.1</label><title>The 1981–2010 climatologies</title>
      <p id="d1e956">In order to derive the 1981–2010 climatological fields of mean
temperature and precipitation, the daily series were aggregated at monthly
scale, and the monthly climatological normals, defined as the averages over
the 30-year period, were computed for each station in the database. In order
to prevent the station normals from being biased due to the different amounts
of available monthly data over 1981–2010, before their calculation, all
missing monthly values in the reference interval for each series were
reconstructed by means of the nearby stations (Brunetti et al., 2014; Crespi
et al., 2018).</p>
      <p id="d1e959">The interpolation of the monthly station normals on the 250 m resolution
grid was based for both temperature and precipitation on the PRISM scheme
developed by Daly et al. (2002). More specifically, the monthly
climatological values at each target grid point were computed by applying a
linear relation with elevation which was estimated for each month from the
surrounding stations by means of a weighted linear regression:
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M70" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the climatology of month <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> at the
target point <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the local regression coefficients for month <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the grid point elevation. All stations were
weighted in order to select and assign a greater contribution in the
weighted linear fit to the sites which were closer to the target point and
with the most similar physiographic features. For both temperature and
precipitation interpolation, the geographical features considered for the
station weight were the horizontal distance and the difference in elevation
and slope conditions, i.e. steepness and orientation, from the target grid
point. Other potential geographical features which can have an influence on
the modelling of the climate spatial gradients, e.g. the difference in sea
distance, were not included since their contribution to the total weight was
found to be negligible.</p>
      <?pagebreak page2807?><p id="d1e1133">The weight of each station <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> was then expressed for each month <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and
grid point <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as the product of the single weighting functions for each
of the considered geographical parameters <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>:
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M82" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∏</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the geographical feature, i.e. horizontal distance, elevation
difference, difference in slope steepness and slope orientation. The single
weighting function was defined as a Gaussian function as
follows:
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><label>3</label><mml:math id="M84" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle scriptlevel="+1"><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the difference in the geographical parameter
between the station <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and the grid point, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the
corresponding decay coefficient which was kept constant over the entire
domain and estimated for each month and geographical feature by means of an
optimization procedure. The weighted linear fit at each target point was
performed by selecting the 35 stations, for temperature, and the 15
stations, for precipitation, with the highest weight. Also the number of
stations entering in the fit was defined by an optimization procedure
minimizing the model errors.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS2">
  <label>2.3.2</label><title>The daily anomalies and the absolute fields</title>
      <p id="d1e1358">The fields of daily mean temperature and daily precipitation anomalies were
computed over the period 1980–2018 for the 250 m resolution grid. To this
aim, the station daily records were converted into series of daily
anomalies. More precisely, for mean temperature, the daily normals of each
station were firstly obtained by interpolating the corresponding monthly
normals by means of the first two harmonics of a Fourier series, and the
daily anomalies were then computed as the difference between the daily
observed temperature and the daily normal for the corresponding calendar
day. As regards precipitation, daily anomalies were defined as the direct
ratio between the daily precipitation record and the climatological value of
the corresponding month.
<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
The station daily anomalies were interpolated onto the grid through an
IDW-based scheme:
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><label>4</label><mml:math id="M88" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the daily anomaly of mean temperature or
precipitation at the target point <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the daily step
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the anomaly of the station <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for the date <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the weight of station <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> relative to the grid point <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the total number of station records available for the date <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.
As for the climatology interpolation, the station weight was expressed as in
Eqs. (2) and  (3), but in this case it depended only on horizontal and
vertical distances. In the case of precipitation, in order to reduce the
simulation of false wet days, the daily estimate was set to zero if no
precipitation was recorded at the three closest stations on the day under
reconstruction.</p>
      <p id="d1e1586">Finally, the gridded anomalies were combined with the 1981–2010
climatologies to derive the daily fields of mean temperature and
precipitation in absolute values as follows:

                  <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M100" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E5"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>5</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">¯</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E6"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>6</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">¯</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

              where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the
interpolated values at the grid point <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on date <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of
mean temperature and precipitation, respectively, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">¯</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the
daily temperature climatology for the corresponding calendar day, and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">¯</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the monthly precipitation climatology for the
corresponding calendar month. The absolute daily precipitation fields were
derived directly as the product of daily anomalies and the corresponding
monthly climatologies obtained by Eq. (1). In the case of temperature, in
order to better account for the annual seasonality, the monthly normals for
each grid point from Eq. (1) were firstly fitted by means of the same
second-order trigonometric function used at station level to get a reference
value <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">¯</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for each day of the year. The absolute<?pagebreak page2808?> temperature
estimates were then computed as in Eq. (5) by adding the daily anomalies to
the fitted climatological values on the corresponding calendar day.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results and discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>The dataset validation</title>
      <p id="d1e1860">The uncertainty evaluation of the gridded datasets is essential to properly
apply the products and interpret the results. One of the most important
aspects to consider is that the grid-cell values obtained by the spatial
interpolation represent areal mean estimates of temperature and
precipitation. The punctual conditions at single station sites, especially
the daily precipitation peaks, are smoothed after the
spatialization so that the fine resolution of the daily grids does not
correspond to the scales being effectively resolved, which are limited by the
horizontal spacing of the station network.</p>
      <p id="d1e1863">The accuracy of the gridded dataset of daily mean temperature and
precipitation was evaluated by applying the anomaly-based reconstruction
scheme to simulate the daily records of all stations in Trentino-South
Tyrol over the study period 1980–2018 in a leave-one-out approach, i.e.
by removing the station data under evaluation in order to avoid
self-influence. The same approach was also applied to assess the errors of
the interpolated 1981–2010 monthly climatologies, separately. The
reconstruction accuracy was computed by comparing the simulations and
observations in terms of mean error (BIAS), mean absolute error (MAE), root
mean square error (RMSE) and correlation. For daily temperature
reconstruction, the resulting BIAS, as averaged over all stations and the whole
time period, was almost zero, and an MAE (RMSE) of around 1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C
(1.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) was obtained. The agreement between daily observations
and simulations was high with a mean Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.97
(Fig. 5). As regards the extremes, the correlation was still high if only
the temperature values above 95th percentiles were considered with a
mean Pearson coefficient of 0.94, while a slight overestimation was observed
for the simulation of temperature records below the 5th percentile
(Fig. 5). The reconstruction errors and correlation by months were also
evaluated (Table 1). MAE ranges from 1.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in July to 1.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in October, when the lowest correlation (0.80) was also
obtained. BIAS is within <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.5–0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in all months. The
simulated 1981–2010 monthly mean temperature climatologies at all station
sites in the study region showed zero BIAS and MAE (RMSE) ranging from 0.5
(0.6) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in May to 0.9 (1.1) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in January (Table 2).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e1940">Monthly mean leave-one-out reconstruction errors and correlation
for Trentino-South Tyrol daily mean temperature and daily precipitation
series over the period 1980–2018. BIAS is computed as the difference between
simulations and observations.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="10">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="left" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Month</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col2" nameend="col5" align="center">Daily mean temperature </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col7" nameend="col10" align="center">Daily precipitation </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">BIAS (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">MAE (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">RMSE (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">CORR</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">BIAS (mm)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">MAE (mm)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">RMSE (mm)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">CORR</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.88</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">2.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.91</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.90</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">2.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.91</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.89</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">2.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.90</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.86</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">2.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.92</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.85</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">3.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.91</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.90</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">3.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.88</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.91</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">4.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.86</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.90</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">3.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.87</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.82</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">3.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.92</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.80</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">3.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.94</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">11</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.84</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">3.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.94</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.87</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">2.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.92</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e2478">For precipitation, the reconstruction errors by averaging over all stations
and daily records showed an MAE (RMSE) of 1.1 (3.2) mm, zero BIAS and a mean
correlation coefficient of 0.91. By considering wet days only, i.e. daily
precipitation values <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 mm, the mean correlation decreased to 0.87, and
errors increased with mean BIAS of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.6 mm and MAE (RMSE) of 3.4 (5.8) mm,
suggesting a tendency to underestimate the higher precipitation records. The
mean monthly errors ranged from 0.6 mm in January to 1.7 mm in July for MAE and
from 2.0 mm in January to 4.1 mm in July for RMSE (Table 1). As regards the
precipitation climatological reconstruction, BIAS is below 0.5 mm in all
months, and MAE (RMSE) ranges from 4.1 (5.6) mm in February to 10.7 (14.2) mm
in November (Table 2). It is worth noting that systematic errors in
rain-gauge measurements can be attributed to the instrument type, site elevation
and exposure to wind. For instance, a well-known source of uncertainty
affecting precipitation records, especially in mountain environments, is the
“rain-gauge undercatch” which could be particularly relevant during
episodes of strong wind and solid precipitation and could account for up to
several tens of percent of the measured values (Frei and Schär, 1998;
Sevruk et al., 2009). Several approaches were developed to account for the
undercatch at station sites (see, for example, Grossi et al., 2017); however the
magnitude of correction is highly variable with locations, sensors and
seasons, and unproper corrections could reduce the general accuracy of the
dataset. For this reason, the contribution of rain-gauge undercatch was not
quantified in the current analyses.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d1e2498">Monthly mean leave-one-out reconstruction errors of the 1981–2010 monthly mean temperature and precipitation climatologies for Trentino-South Tyrol sites. BIAS is computed as the difference between simulations and
observations.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="8">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Month</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col2" nameend="col4" align="center">Monthly mean temperature climatologies </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col6" nameend="col8" align="center">Monthly precipitation climatologies </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">BIAS (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">MAE (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">RMSE (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">BIAS (mm)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">MAE (mm)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">RMSE (mm)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">5.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">7.1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">4.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">5.6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">5.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">7.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">8.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">11.8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">8.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">11.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">7.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">10.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">7.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">9.6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">7.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">9.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">7.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">9.6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">9.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">12.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">11</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">10.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">14.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">7.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">10.1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e2934">Due to the high variability in interpolation errors with the daily
precipitation intensity, the comparison between simulated and observed
precipitation on wet days during winter and summer was assessed by splitting
the data for intensity intervals (Fig. 6).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e2939">Distribution of simulated and observed daily mean temperature
values for all station sites in the study region over the period 1980–2018. The three panels report the comparison by considering only values
below the 5th percentile, all values and only values above the
95th percentile.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=355.659449pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/13/2801/2021/essd-13-2801-2021-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e2951">Ratio between daily simulated and observed precipitation (wet days
only) in <bold>(a)</bold> winter and <bold>(b)</bold> summer over 1980–2010 grouped for quantiles.
Boxplots extend over the interquartile range with the median reported by the
bold line, while whiskers extend over the full range of outliers.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/13/2801/2021/essd-13-2801-2021-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2966">Figure 6 confirms the general tendency of the daily reconstruction method to
underestimate intense daily precipitation totals, especially in summer when
the median underestimation in simulations for the highest quantile interval (0.98–0.999) is about 24 %. In contrast, overestimation of the
lowest quantiles (0.1–0.2) in summer was depicted with a median
exceedance of 30 %. The greater difficulty in simulating summer
precipitation could be mostly ascribed to the higher spatial variability in
summer precipitation events, mainly driven by convection.</p>
      <p id="d1e2969">In order to assess also the temporal variability in the dataset uncertainty
over the study period and the influence of changes in data coverage over
time, the daily simulations and observations were aggregated at monthly
scale, and reconstruction errors were evaluated for each month over all
available stations. The annual averages of monthly errors over 1980–2018
are reported in Fig. 7. It is worth noting that the values are almost stable
over the whole period for both temperature and precipitation with MAEs around
0.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C and 13 mm, respectively. However, temperature errors
slightly decreased after 1990 as a consequence of the increase in station
density (see Fig. 4a). As regards precipitation, a greater error variability
can be observed after 2000 probably due to the changes occurring in station
networks during the transition from the manual to automatic rain gauges. The
resulting reconstruction errors and their limited variability over the
spanned period enable the application of the derived dataset<?pagebreak page2809?> for the
assessment of climatological trends in temperature and precipitation. Such
applications could be useful to compare and integrate previous existing
studies analysing long-term climate trends and their spatial patterns over
the region (e.g. Brugnara et al., 2012). A trend analysis was beyond the
scope of the current study and thus not included in the present work, but it
will be discussed in forthcoming studies.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e2983">Annual series of mean monthly leave-one-out reconstruction errors
(MAE and BIAS) of <bold>(a)</bold> temperature and <bold>(b)</bold> precipitation over the study period
for the available stations in Trentino-South Tyrol.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/13/2801/2021/essd-13-2801-2021-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>The gridded dataset: regional climatic features, example cases and
snow-cover comparison</title>
      <?pagebreak page2810?><p id="d1e3006">The 250 m gridded dataset allows us to discuss and analyse the main features of
the climate in the region. In the following, the 30-year annual
climatologies of mean temperature and total precipitation over the period
1981–2010 are shown in Fig. 8. The derived features were largely in
agreement with the findings of previous works focusing on the regional
climate (e.g. Adler et al., 2015), and the 250 m grid spacing allows for a
detailed visualization of the spatial patterns. The mean annual temperature
ranges from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>14 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in the Garda Valley located in the
southernmost part of the region to about <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>11 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C at the Ortles
peak with an average value of around <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C over the entire
study region. The thermal contrast between the inner valleys and the steep
surrounding reliefs is well depicted. Mean annual values are around <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>12 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in the main valley bottoms, while the isothermal of 0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C occurs at about 2400 m. The annual cycle of mean temperature,
as averaged over the region and based on the 1981–2010 normals, is
characterized by the warmest conditions in July, while the coldest month is
January at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C (Fig. 9). The greatest warming occurs
between April and May, when the thermal range between the coldest and
the hottest locations also increases, reaching the maximum between May and June
at almost 30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. The most relevant cooling is found in the
transition from October to November when the isothermal of 0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C
drops from around 2700 to 1700 m and the occurrence of cold air pools in the
valleys becomes more frequent.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{8}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d1e3120">The 1981–2010 annual <bold>(a)</bold> mean temperature and <bold>(b)</bold> total precipitation
climatologies (250 m grid spacing) over Trentino-South Tyrol.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=441.017717pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/13/2801/2021/essd-13-2801-2021-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e3135">Topographic effects are also evident in the precipitation distribution over
the study region. Annual totals range from 530 mm in the inner Venosta
Valley (north-western South Tyrol) to more than 1700 mm in the southernmost
part of the region, where wet southerly flows are more relevant. The mean
annual precipitation sum is around 1000 mm as a spatial average over the whole
region, with drier conditions in the northern inner valleys of South Tyrol
with annual totals around 900 mm. As regards the mean annual cycle, the
driest conditions occur in late winter, with a minimum in February when the
mean regional totals are below 40 mm. In contrast, precipitation
significantly increases in May, with the growing contribution of local
convection, and the annual maximum is reached in July, with a regional
average of almost 120 mm. Regional mean precipitation values show a
secondary minimum in September and increase again in October, when greater
contrasts over the region, especially between north and south, are depicted
with the wettest contributions in the Trentino valleys, which are more exposed to
humid air masses coming from the Mediterranean sea.</p>
      <p id="d1e3139">By focusing on distinct portions of the study area, a relevant subregional
variability can be observed (Fig. 10). In particular, a different annual
precipitation cycle characterizes the northern and southern portions of the
study region. In the northern and central parts the precipitation cycle has
a maximum in summer, and the peak increases moving from west (Venosta
Valley), where rain-shadow effects are more frequent, to east, where the
Alpine ridge receives wet contributions from both northerly and southerly
flows. In contrast, the annual cycle in the south of the region shows
two<?pagebreak page2811?> precipitation maxima occurring in spring and autumn. The influence of
subtropical high-pressure areas is particularly relevant for the
southernmost valleys and contributes to the drying tendencies over summer
months which defines here the local precipitation minimum.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9"><?xmltex \currentcnt{9}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d1e3144">Mean regional annual cycle of monthly mean temperature and total
precipitation based on the 1981–2010 climatologies.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/13/2801/2021/essd-13-2801-2021-f09.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F10" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{10}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 10</label><caption><p id="d1e3155">Mean subregional annual cycles of monthly mean temperature and
total precipitation based on the 1981–2010 climatologies for five
distinct areas.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=469.470472pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/13/2801/2021/essd-13-2801-2021-f10.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e3164">Among the useful applications of high-resolution gridded climate variables
at a daily timescale, they allow us to study and reconstruct past episodes of
particular interest, such as intense precipitation events, and their
temporal day-by-day pattern over the entire region. In particular, we
reported as example cases the computed 250 m daily fields for two past
episodes experiencing meteorological extremes over the region.</p>
      <p id="d1e3167">One of the most recent intense events occurred on 27–30 October 2018 when
an intense storm affected a large portion of the eastern Italian Alps leading to
severe impacts, such as floods, landslides, interruption of traffic and
electricity supply, and severe forest damage due to intense wind gusts of up to
200 km h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Dalponte et al., 2020; Davolio et al., 2020). During this
event, exceptional amounts of precipitation were recorded in a few days at
many locations. In Fig. 11, the 4 d precipitation sum over 27–30 October 2018 is reported, together with the daily anomalies with respect to the 1981–2010 monthly normals for the month. In some areas, especially the upper
Isarco Valley in the north of South Tyrol, the south-western portion of
Trentino and along its eastern border with the Veneto region, precipitation
amounts were particularly intense, with 4 d totals locally exceeding 500 mm (Fig. 11a). Over the whole region, the 4 d precipitation totals were
greater than the monthly normals for October, with 80 % of the grid points
with precipitation amounts more than double the climatological totals for
the month (Fig. 11b). As discussed in Sect. 3.1, the reported daily fields
provide a comprehensive overview of the precipitation patterns over the
region and the locations of the maxima; however the applied daily
interpolation based on weighted spatial average has a smoothing effect so
that the daily gridded fields are expected to underestimate the very
localized peaks at individual stations.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F11" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{11}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 11</label><caption><p id="d1e3185">Event of October 2018 over Trentino-South Tyrol: <bold>(a)</bold> 4 d
total precipitation over 27–30 October 2018 (250 m spatial resolution) and
<bold>(b)</bold> relative anomalies of the 4 d totals with respect to the 1981–2010
monthly normals of total precipitation for October.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=469.470472pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/13/2801/2021/essd-13-2801-2021-f11.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?pagebreak page2812?><p id="d1e3200">As a second example case, the summer of 2003 was considered when exceptionally
high temperature values were recorded in a large part of western Europe due
to the influence of sub-tropical air masses and the presence of a wide
high-pressure system over Europe. The high temperatures and the relatively
scarce precipitation occurring in the previous winter and spring months
fostered drought conditions in several regions. In Trentino-South Tyrol
the mean temperature anomalies over the summer period were, as averaged over
the region, around <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C with respect to the reference 1981–2010 normals (Fig. 12a). In particular, August was the hottest month, and the
greatest temperature values were reached on 11 August with a mean
temperature on a regional level greater than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>21 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C and daily
maximum temperature close to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in Bolzano and Trento. The
distribution of the daily mean temperature on 11 August shows values above
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C along the main valley bottoms (Fig. 12b), and over almost
the whole region the daily values exceed the climatological means with a
mean anomaly of about <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C for that day.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F12" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{12}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 12</label><caption><p id="d1e3286">In panel <bold>(a)</bold> the regional daily mean temperature series for summer
2003 is shown (solid line), together with the 1981–2010 daily normals
(dashed line); in panel <bold>(b)</bold> the spatial distribution over Trentino-South
Tyrol of mean temperature on the hottest summer day in 2003 (11 August) is reported at 250 m grid spacing.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=412.564961pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/13/2801/2021/essd-13-2801-2021-f12.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e3301">In order to provide an example of the application of the gridded meteorological
data in combination with other high-resolution products, the dataset of mean
temperature and precipitation was compared to a 250 m resolution daily
dataset of snow cover available over the region. The daily snow-cover maps
used for the comparison are based on Moderate Resolution Imaging
Spectroradiometer (MODIS) images and provide binary snow-cover information
(snow, snow free) using an algorithm tailored to complex terrain
(Notarnicola et al., 2013). In this product, clouds were interpolated in
Terra-only images yielding almost cloud-free daily maps for the period 2000–2018 (Matiu et al., 2020). Starting from the snow-cover data, the
snow-cover duration (SCD) over the<?pagebreak page2813?> winter season (December, January and
February) was computed at each grid point of the study domain, and the
Pearson correlation with the mean winter temperature and total winter
precipitation was computed over all available winters of SCD data (2001–2018). Since SCD saturates at high elevations preventing the
correlation coefficients from being computed, all points above 2500 m were excluded from the
analysis. As expected, correlation coefficients with temperature are
negative within the inter-quantile range (25th–75th
percentiles) for all elevation intervals (Table 3). The anticorrelation
decreases with increasing elevation, with median values ranging from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.55
below 500 m to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.41 above 1500 m. In contrast, the correlation with
total winter precipitation is positive within the inter-quantile range in
all cases, and a clear elevation dependency is evident, with correlation
values increasing with altitudes, up to 0.55 as the median in the range of
1500–1750 m. In considering the behaviour of SCD correlation with
temperature and precipitation over different elevation bands, the effect of
winter SCD saturation with increasing elevation should be taken into
account. This could partly explain the increase in the anticorrelation with
temperature and the concurrent decrease in precipitation–SCD dependency in
the upper elevation bands (above 1750 m). These outcomes are in agreement
with other literature studies investigating the dependency of several snow
parameters with temperature and elevation in the Alps (see e.g.
Móran-Tejeda et al., 2013; Schöner et al., 2019; Matiu et al., 2021)
and specifically in the Trentino region (Marcolini et al., 2017).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><label>Table 3</label><caption><p id="d1e3321">Median and inter-quantile range of 2001–2018 correlation
coefficients over different elevation bands between SCD (snow-cover
duration) and (a) mean temperature and (b) total precipitation in the winter
season (December, January and February). Only grid points below 2500 m are
considered.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="7">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Elevation interval (m)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col2" nameend="col4" align="center" colsep="1">SCD and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> correlation </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col5" nameend="col7" align="center">SCD and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> correlation </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">25th percentile</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Median</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">75th percentile</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">25th percentile</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Median</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">75th percentile</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 500</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.63</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.55</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.44</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.14</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.28</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">500–750</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.60</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.51</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.38</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.14</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.28</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.43</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">750–1000</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.60</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.49</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.33</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.25</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.39</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.52</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1000–1250</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.58</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.45</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.27</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.34</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.47</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.58</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1250–1500</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.56</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.42</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.25</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.40</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.52</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.64</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1500–1750</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.52</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.41</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.26</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.43</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.55</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.66</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1750–2000</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.51</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.43</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.34</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.34</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.43</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.56</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2000–2500</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.50</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.44</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.37</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.25</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.36</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e3756">The elevation dependency of the winter SCD correlation with temperature and
precipitation is also highlighted in the spatial distribution of the
coefficients over the region (Fig. 13). The greatest anticorrelation with
temperature is depicted along the main valley floors, especially the Adige and
Isarco valleys, while the greatest dependency on precipitation is pointed
out along the mid-elevation zones, decreasing towards both lower elevations,
where winter precipitation occurs generally in liquid form, and higher
altitudes, where snowfall usually occurs in the winter season, and, regardless of
their magnitude, snow lasts on the ground due to the relatively low
temperature.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F13" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{13}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 13</label><caption><p id="d1e3761">Spatial distribution of 2001–2018 correlation coefficients
over the region between SCD (snow-cover duration) and <bold>(a)</bold> mean temperature
and <bold>(b)</bold> total precipitation in the winter season (December, January and
February). White areas correspond to masked grid points (above 2500 m) or to
missing snow-cover data.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=412.564961pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/13/2801/2021/essd-13-2801-2021-f13.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Code and data availability</title>
      <p id="d1e3785">The dataset of daily mean temperature and total precipitation at 250 m
resolution spanning the period 1980–2018 for Trentino-South Tyrol and
the 250 m resolution 1981–2010 monthly climatologies are freely available
at PANGAEA Data Publisher for Earth and Environmental Science through
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.924502" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1594/PANGAEA.924502</ext-link> (Crespi et al., 2020).
The data are stored in NetCDF format that eases the processing in scientific
programming software (e.g. Python and R) and geographic information system (GIS). The dataset of daily snow
cover used for the comparison is freely available from Matiu et al. (2019).
All routines are developed in the R environment and are available upon request
from the authors.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>5</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e3800">The 250 m resolution dataset of daily mean temperature and total
precipitation for the Trentino-South Tyrol region over 1980–2018 was
presented. It was derived starting from a dense database of more than 200
station observations, covering the region and close surroundings, which were
checked for quality and homogeneity. The gridded daily fields were computed
by applying an interpolation procedure in which the 30-year climatologies
(1981–2010) and the daily anomalies were combined. In this scheme, the
local relationship<?pagebreak page2814?> between the climate variables and the orography is
considered for the climatology spatialization, while the station daily
anomalies are interpolated by a weighted-averaging approach. The method was
demonstrated in previous studies to be particularly robust in reconstructing
climate fields in mountain areas, where systematic errors, especially
precipitation underestimations, could occur due to the uneven data coverage,
e.g. between low and high-elevation areas.</p>
      <p id="d1e3803">The leave-one-out cross-validation pointed out the overall robustness of
gridded fields for both daily temperature and precipitation with mean
correlation coefficients above 0.80 in all months and MAEs, as averaged over
all stations and months, of around 1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C for mean temperature
and 1.1 mm for precipitation. Moreover, the reconstruction errors were shown to
be almost constant over the whole study period despite the changes in
available station number, especially during the first decade.</p>
      <p id="d1e3815">The dataset provided represents a valuable source of continuous climate
information for the region, spanning almost 40 years, and the very fine grid
spacing facilitates its application for a wide range of uses requiring
spatially explicit fields of climate variables, such as hydrological
analyses, environmental modelling, impact studies and remote sensing data
validation. The availability of gridded information allows us to derive more
accurate aggregations and spatial averages over specific sub-domains, e.g.
at catchment and sub-catchment levels, than averaging the single station
records directly. In addition, the dataset could represent an archive of
climate information to support the assessment of spatio-temporal variability
and trends in temperature and precipitation over the region and to integrate
previous existing studies. The suitability of the dataset for such analyses
is supported by the use of quality-controlled station observations, the
application of homogenization procedures, the results of the accuracy
evaluation obtained for the entire spanned period and the regular updates.
Other potential applications of the dataset include the downscaling of
climate change scenarios<?pagebreak page2815?> and the improved evaluations of high-resolution
regional climate models.</p>
      <p id="d1e3818">However, it is necessary to take into account for any application that a
larger uncertainty should be associated with the gridded estimates for points
at higher altitudes due to the decrease in data coverage with increasing
elevation. In addition, the spatial scales effectively resolved by the
dataset at a daily resolution are coarser than the nominal grid spacing and of
the order of several kilometres, i.e. close to the mean inter-station distance, and
systematic errors in punctual values cannot be avoided, such as
underestimation of the highest intensities. Possible improvements in spatial
representativeness could be derived by the integration of additional in situ
observations, especially at higher elevations, and/or by evaluating
alternative and more sophisticated interpolation techniques for modelling
the small-scale interactions between climate variables and orography. In
this context, an extended inter-comparison work with existing products
covering the region at different temporal and spatial scales would be useful
to better investigate the benefits and limitations of the dataset, and it
will be addressed to a forthcoming study.</p>
      <p id="d1e3822">Despite the intrinsic issues, the dataset allows us to extract and analyse the
fine-scale distribution of the main climatic features over the region, which
are described by the 1981–2010 monthly climatologies. The suitability of
the daily fields in representing the spatial structure of specific events of
interest was discussed, and example cases of intense past episodes were
reported. In order to provide an example of the potential applications of
this fine-scale product with other high-resolution data, we also performed a
comparison between the gridded meteorological variables and the 250 m MODIS
SCD winter maps. The pointwise correlation analysis over the period 2001–2018 pointed out a clear elevation dependency of SCD on both temperature and
precipitation, and the fine spatial scale led to a more detailed insight into
the spatial distribution over the region of these relationships, suggesting
interesting open questions which need to be further developed in
forthcoming works.</p>
      <p id="d1e3825">The dataset is intended to be integrated in the near future by the gridded
fields of daily maximum and minimum temperature and to be converted into a
near-real-time product including regular updates and supporting operational
applications at local and regional levels.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e3832">AC implemented and performed the data interpolation. The data collection and
processing were performed by AC in collaboration with MM and GB. The
validation analyses were carried out by AC. MP contributed in the discussion
of the interpolation errors, and MM provided snow-cover data and supported
the interpretation of the results. MZ supervised and supported all phases of
the work. AC prepared the manuscript draft and the revised version with
assistance from MM. AC, MM, BG, MP and MZ collaborated on the editing.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e3838">The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e3844">The authors thank the Hydrographic Office of the Autonomous Province of
Bolzano and Meteotrentino for the provision of the meteorological data for
the study region and ARPA Veneto, ZAMG, the HISTALP project and MeteoSwiss
which provided the series used for the extra-regional sites. Bruno Majone
and  Alberto Bellin  from the University of Trento are also acknowledged for
providing useful information on available data and products.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e3849">This research has been supported by the Data Platform and Sensing Technology for Environmental Sensing LAB – DPS4ESLAB (grant no.ERDF1094).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e3855">This paper was edited by Martin Schultz and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Aadhar, S. and Mishra, V.: High-resolution near real-time drought monitoring
in South Asia, Sci. Data, 4, 170145, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2017.145" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/sdata.2017.145</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Adler, R. F., Sapiano, M. R. P., Huffman, G. J., Wang, J.-J., Gu, G., Bolvin,
D., Chiu, L., Schneider, U., Becker, A., Nelkin, E., Xie, P., Ferraro, R.,
and Shin, D.-B.: The Global Precipitation Climatology Project (GPCP) Monthly
Analysis (New Version 2.3) and a Review of 2017 Global Precipitation,
Atmosphere, 9, 138, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos9040138" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/atmos9040138</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Adler, S., Chimani, B., Drechsel, S., Haslinger, K., Hiebl, J., Meyer, V.,
Resch, G., Rudolph, J., Vergeiner, J., Zingerle, C., Marigo, G., Fischer, A., and Seiser, B.:  Das Klima: Von
Tirol-Sudtirol-Belluno, ZAMG, Autonome Provinz Bozen, ARPAV,
available at: <uri>http://www.3pclim.eu/images/Das_Klima_von_Tirol-Suedtirol-Belluno.pdf</uri>
(last access: 12 October 2020), 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Auer, I., Böhm, R., Jurkovic, A., Lipa, W., Orlik, A., Potzmann, R.,
Schöner, W., Ungersböck, M., Matulla, C., Briffa, K., Jones, P.,
Efthymiadis, D., Brunetti, M., Nanni, T., Maugeri, M., Mercalli, L., Mestre,
O., Moisselin, J., Begert, M., Müller-Westermeier, G., Kveton, V.,
Bochnicek, O., Stastny, P., Lapin, M., Szalai, S., Szentimrey, T., Cegnar,
T., Dolinar, M., Gajic-Capka, M., Zaninovic, K., Majstorovic, Z., and
Nieplova, E.: HISTALP – Historical instrumental climatological surface time
series of the Greater Alpine Region HISTALP, Int. J. Climatol., 27, 17–46,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.1377" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/joc.1377</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Beven, K., Cloke, H., Pappenberger, F., Lamb, R., and Hunter, N.:
Hyperresolution information and hyperresolution ignorance in modelling the
hydrology of the land surface, Science China Earth Sciences, 58, 25–35,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-014-5003-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11430-014-5003-4</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Brugnara, Y., Brunetti, M., Maugeri, M., Nanni, T., and Simolo, C.:
High-resolution analysis of daily precipitation trends in the central Alps
over the last century, Int. J. Climatol., 32, 1406–1422,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.2363" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/joc.2363</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Brunetti, M., Maugeri, M., Monti, F., and Nanni, T.: Temperature and
precipitation variability in Italy in the last two centuries from
homogenised instrumental time series, Int. J. Climatol., 26, 345–381,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.1251" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/joc.1251</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Brunetti, M., Lentini, G., Maugeri, M., Nanni, T. and Spinoni, J.:
Projecting North Eastern Italy temperature and precipitation secular records
onto a high-resolution grid, Phys. Chem. Earth, 40–41, 9–22,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2009.12.005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.pce.2009.12.005</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Brunetti, M., Maugeri, M., Nanni, T., Simolo, C., and Spinoni, J.:
High-resolution temperature climatology for Italy: interpolation method
intercomparison, Int. J. Climatol., 34, 1278–1296, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3764" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/joc.3764</ext-link>,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Brunsdon, C., McClatchey, J., and Unwin, D.: Spatial variations in the
average rainfall–altitude relationship in Great Britain: an approach using
geographically weighted regression, Int. J. Climatol., 21, 455–466,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.614" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/joc.614</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Camera, C., Bruggeman, A., Hadjinicolaou, P., Pashiardis, S., and Lange, M.
A.: Evaluation of interpolation techniques for the creation of gridded daily
precipitation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>); Cyprus, 1980–2010, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 119, 693–712, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD020611" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2013JD020611</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chimani, B., Matulla, C., Böhm, R., and Hofstätter, M.: A new high
resolution absolute temperature grid for the Greater Alpine Region back to
1780, Int. J. Climatol., 33, 2129–2141, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3574" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/joc.3574</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Craddock, J.: Methods of comparing annual rainfall records for climatic
purposes, Weather, 34, 332–346, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1477-8696.1979.tb03465.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/j.1477-8696.1979.tb03465.x</ext-link>,
1979.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Crespi, A., Brunetti, M., Lentini, G., and Maugeri, M.: 1961–1990
high-resolution monthly precipitation climatologies for Italy, Int. J.
Climatol., 3, 878–895, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.5217" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/joc.5217</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Crespi, A., Matiu, M., Bertoldi, G., Petitta, M., and Zebisch, M.:
High-resolution daily series (1980–2018) and monthly climatologies (1981–1010) of mean temperature and precipitation for Trentino – South Tyrol
(north-eastern Italian Alps), PANGAEA, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.924502" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1594/PANGAEA.924502</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Crespi, A., Brunetti, M., Ranzi, R., Tomirotti, M., and Maugeri, M.: A
multi-century meteo-hydrological analysis for the Adda river basin (Central
Alps). Part I: Gridded monthly precipitation (1800–2016) records, Int. J.
Climatol., 41, 162–180, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.6614" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/joc.6614</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Dalponte, M., Marzini, S., Solano-Correa, Y. T., Tonon, G., Vescovo, L., and
Gianelle, D.: Mapping forest windthrows using high spatial resolution
multispectral satellite images, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf., 93,
102206, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2020.102206" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jag.2020.102206</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Daly, C., Gibson, W. P., Taylor, G. H., Johnson, G. L., and Pasteris, P.: A
knowledge-based approach to the statistical mapping of climate, Clim. Res.,
22, 99–113, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3354/cr022099" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3354/cr022099</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Daly, C., Smith, J. W., Smith, J. I., and McKane, R. B.: High-Resolution
Spatial Modeling of Daily Weather Elements for a Catchment in the Oregon
Cascade Mountains, United States, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 46, 1565–1586,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAM2548.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JAM2548.1</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Davolio, S., Della Fera, S., Laviola, S., Miglietta, M. M., and Levizzani,
V.: Heavy Precipitation over Italy from the Mediterranean Storm “Vaia” in
October 2018: Assessing the Role of an Atmospheric River, Mon. Weather Rev.,
148, 3571–3588, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-20-0021.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/MWR-D-20-0021.1</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Di Piazza, A., Conti, F. L., Noto, L., Viola, F., and La Loggia, G.:
Comparative analysis of different techniques for spatial interpolation of
rainfall data to create a serially complete monthly time series of
precipitation for Sicily, Italy, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf., 13,
396–408, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2011.01.005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jag.2011.01.005</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Duan, Z., Liu, J. Z., Tuo, Y., Chiogna, G., and Disse, M.: Evaluation of
eight high spatial resolution gridded precipitation products in Adige Basin
(Italy) at multiple temporal and spatial scales, Sci. Total Environ., 573,
1536–1553, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.08.213" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.08.213</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Durre, I., Menne, M. J., Gleason, B. E., Houston, T. G., and Vose, R. S.:
Comprehensive Automated Quality Assurance of Daily Surface Observations, J.
Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 49, 1615–1633, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JAMC2375.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/2010JAMC2375.1</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Engelhardt, M., Schuler, T. V., and Andreassen, L. M.: Contribution of snow and glacier melt to discharge for highly glacierised catchments in Norway, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 511–523, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-511-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-18-511-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Foresti, L., Sideris, I., Panziera, L., Nerini, D., and Germann, U.: A
10-year radar-based analysis of orographic precipitation growth and decay
patterns over the Swiss Alpine region, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 144,
2277–2301, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3364" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/qj.3364</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Frei, C. and Schär, C.: A precipitation climatology of the Alps from
high-resolution rain-gauge observations, Int. J. Climatol., 18, 873–900,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0088(19980630)18:8&lt;873::AID-JOC255&gt;3.0.CO;2-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/(SICI)1097-0088(19980630)18:8&lt;873::AID-JOC255&gt;3.0.CO;2-9</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Funk, C., Peterson, P., Landsfeld, M., Pedreros, D., Verdin, J., Shukla, S.,
Husak, G., Rowland, J., Harrison, L., Hoell, A., and Michaelsen, J.: The
climate hazards group infrared precipitation with stations – A new
environmental record for monitoring extremes, Sci. Data, 2, 150066,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2015.66" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/sdata.2015.66</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Grasso, L. D.: The differentiation between grid spacing and resolution and
their application to numerical modeling, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 81,
579–580, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(2000)081&lt;0579:CAA&gt;2.3.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0477(2000)081&lt;0579:CAA&gt;2.3.CO;2</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Grossi, G., Lendvai, A., Peretti, G., and Ranzi, R.: Snow Precipitation
Measured by Gauges: Systematic Error Estimation and Data Series Correction
in the Central Italian Alps, Water, 9, 461, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/w9070461" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/w9070461</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Harris, I., Osborn, T. J., Jones, P., and Lister, D.: Version 4 of the CRU TS
monthly high-resolution gridded multivariate climate dataset, Sci. Data, 7,
109, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-020-0453-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41597-020-0453-3</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Haylock, M. R., Hofstra, N., Klein Tank, A. M. G., Klok, E. J., Jones, P.
D., and New, M.: A European daily high-resolution gridded data set of
surface temperature and precipitation for 1950–2006, J. Geophys. Res., 113,
D20119, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010201" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008JD010201</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hengl, T.: A Practical Guide to Geostatistical Mapping, ISBN
978–90–9024981-0,   available at:
<uri>https://library.wur.nl/isric/fulltext/isricu_i27272_001.pdf</uri> (last access: 14 June 2021), 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hiebl, J. and Frei, C.: Daily precipitation grids for Austria since
1961 – development and evaluation of a spatial dataset fo<?pagebreak page2817?>r hydroclimatic
monitoring and modelling, Theor. Appl. Climatol., 132, 327–345,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-017-2093-x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00704-017-2093-x</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hofstra, N., Haylock, M., New, M., Jones, P., and Frei, C.: Comparison of
six methods for the interpolation of daily European climate data, J.
Geophys. Res., 113, D21110, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010100" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008JD010100</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hofstra, N., New, M., and McSweeney, C.: The influence of interpolation and
station network density on the distributions and trends of climate variables
in gridded daily data, Clim. Dyn., 35, 841–858.
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-009-0698-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00382-009-0698-1</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Huffman, G. J., Bolvin, D. T., Nelkin, E. J., Wolff, D. B., Adler, R. F.,
Gu, G., Hong, Y., Bowman, K. P., and Stocker, E. F.: The TRMM Multisatellite
Precipitation Analysis (TMPA): Quasi-Global, Multiyear, Combined-Sensor
Precipitation Estimates at Fine Scales, J. Hydrometeorol., 8, 38–55,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM560.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JHM560.1</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Immerzeel, W. W., Lutz, A. F., Andrade, M., Bahl, A., Biemans, H., Bolch,
T., Hyde, S., Brumby, S., Davies, B. J., Elmore, A. C., Emmer, A., Feng, M.,
Fernández, A., Haritashya, U., Kargel, J. S., Koppes, M., Kraaijenbrink,
P. D. A., Kulkarni, A. V., Mayewski, P. A., Nepal, S., Pacheco, P., Painter,
T. H., Pellicciotti, F., Rajaram, H., Rupper, S., Sinisalo, A., Shrestha, A.
B., Viviroli, D., Wada, Y., Xiao, C., Yao, T., and Baillie J. E.
M.: Importance and vulnerability of the world's water
towers, Nature, 577, 364–369, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1822-y" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41586-019-1822-y</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Isotta, F. A., Frei, C., Weilguni, V., Perčec Tadić, M.,
Lassègues, P., Rudolf, B., Pavan, V., Cacciamani, C., Antolini, G.,
Ratto, S. M., Munari, M., Micheletti, S., Bonati, V., Lussana, C., Ronchi,
C., Panettieri, E., Marigo, G., and Vertačnik, G.: The climate of daily
precipitation in the Alps: development and analysis of a high-resolution
grid dataset from pan-Alpine rain-gauge data, Int. J. Climatol., 34,
1657–1675, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3794" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/joc.3794</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Isotta, F. A., Begert, M., and Frei, C.: Long-term consistent monthly
temperature and precipitation grid data sets for Switzerland over the past
150 years, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 124, 3783–3799,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD029910" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018JD029910</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kotlarski, S., Szabó, P., Herrera, S., Räty, O., Keuler, K., Soares,
P. M., Cardoso, R. M., Bosshard, T., Pagé, C., Boberg, F.,
Gutiérrez, J. M., Isotta, F. A., Jaczewski, A., Kreienkamp, F., Liniger,
M. A., Lussana, C., and Pianko-Kluczyńska, C.: Observational uncertainty
and regional climate model evaluation: A pan-European perspective, Int. J.
Climatol., 39, 3730–3749, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.5249" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/joc.5249</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Laiti, L., Mallucci, S., Piccolroaz, S., Bellin, A., Zardi, D., Fiori, A.,
Nikulin, G., and Majone, B.: Testing the hydrological coherence of
high-resolution gridded precipitation and temperature data sets, Water
Resour. Res., 54, 1999–2016, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR021633" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2017WR021633</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ledesma, J. L. J. and Futter, M. N.: Gridded climate data products are an
alternative to instrumental measurements as inputs to rainfall–runoff
models, Hydrol. Process., 31, 3283–3293, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.11269" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/hyp.11269</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Longman, R. J., Frazier, A. G., Newman, A. J., Giambelluca, T. W.,
Schanzenbach, D., Kagawa-Viviani, A., Needham, H., Arnold, J. R., and Clark,
M. P.: High-Resolution Gridded Daily Rainfall and Temperature for the
Hawaiian Islands (1990–2014), J. Hydrometeorol., 20, 489–508,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-18-0112.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JHM-D-18-0112.1</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lussana, C., Tveito, O. E., Dobler, A., and Tunheim, K.: seNorge_2018, daily precipitation, and temperature datasets over Norway, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 11, 1531–1551, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-11-1531-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/essd-11-1531-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ly, S., Charles, C., and Degré, A.: Geostatistical interpolation of daily rainfall at catchment scale: the use of several variogram models in the Ourthe and Ambleve catchments, Belgium, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 2259–2274, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-2259-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-15-2259-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Mallucci, S., Majone, B., and Bellin, A.: Detection and attribution of
hydrological changes in a large Alpine river basin,
J. Hydrol., 575, 1214–1229, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.06.020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.06.020</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Marcolini, G., Bellin, A., Disse, M., and Chiogna, G.: Variability in snow
depth time series in the Adige catchment, J. Hydrol. Reg. Stud., 13,
240–254, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2017.08.007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.ejrh.2017.08.007</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Matiu, M., Jacob, A., and Notarnicola, C.: Daily MODIS snow cover maps for
the European Alps from 2002 onwards at 250m horizontal resolution along with
a nearly cloud-free version (Version v1.0.2) [Data set], Zenodo,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3601891" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.3601891</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Matiu, M., Jacob, A., and Notarnicola, C.: Daily MODIS Snow Cover Maps for
the European Alps from 2002 onwards at 250 m Horizontal Resolution Along
with a Nearly Cloud-Free Version, Data, 5, 1,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/data5010001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/data5010001</ext-link>, 2020. </mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Matiu, M., Crespi, A., Bertoldi, G., Carmagnola, C. M., Marty, C., Morin, S., Schöner, W., Cat Berro, D., Chiogna, G., De Gregorio, L., Kotlarski, S., Majone, B., Resch, G., Terzago, S., Valt, M., Beozzo, W., Cianfarra, P., Gouttevin, I., Marcolini, G., Notarnicola, C., Petitta, M., Scherrer, S. C., Strasser, U., Winkler, M., Zebisch, M., Cicogna, A., Cremonini, R., Debernardi, A., Faletto, M., Gaddo, M., Giovannini, L., Mercalli, L., Soubeyroux, J.-M., Sušnik, A., Trenti, A., Urbani, S., and Weilguni, V.: Observed snow depth trends in the European Alps: 1971 to 2019, The Cryosphere, 15, 1343–1382, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-1343-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-15-1343-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Mei, Y., Anagnostou, E. N., Nikolopoulos, E. I., and Borga, M.: Error
analysis of satellite precipitation products in mountainous basins, J.
Hydrometeorol., 15, 1778–1793, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-13-0194.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JHM-D-13-0194.1</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Morán-Tejeda, E., López-Moreno, J. I., and Beniston, M.: The
changing roles of temperature and precipitation on snowpack variability in
Switzerland as a function of altitude, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 2131–2136,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50463" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/grl.50463</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Navarro-Racines, C., Tarapues, J., Thornton, P., Jarvis, H., and
Ramirez-Villega, J.: High-resolution and bias-corrected CMIP5 projections
for climate change impact assessments, Sci. Data, 7, 7,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-019-0343-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41597-019-0343-8</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>New, M., Todd, M., Hulme, M., and Jones, P.: Precipitation measurements and
trends in the twentieth century, Int. J. Climatol., 21, 1899–1922,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.680" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/joc.680</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Notarnicola, C., Duguay, M., Moelg, N., Schellenberger, T., Tetzlaff, A.,
Monsorno, R., Costa, A., Steurer, C., and Zebisch, M.: Snow Cover Maps from
MODIS Images at 250 m Resolution, Part 2: Validation, Remote Sens., 5,
1568–1587, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs5041568" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/rs5041568</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page2818?><ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Price, F. M.: Alpenatlas – Atlas des Alpes – Atlante delle Alpi – Atlas
Alp – Mapping the Alps: Society – Economy – Environment,  Mt. Res. Dev., 29, 292–293,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1659/mrd.mm057" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1659/mrd.mm057</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Schlögel, R., Kofler, C., Gariano, S. L., Van Campenhout, J., and
Plummer, S.: Changes in climate patterns and their association to natural
hazard distribution in South Tyrol (Eastern Italian Alps), Sci. Rep.,
10, 5022, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-61615-w" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41598-020-61615-w</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Schöner, W., Koch, R., Matulla, C., Marty, C., and Tilg, A-M.:
Spatiotemporal patterns of snow depth within the Swiss-Austrian Alps for the
past half century (1961 to 2012) and linkages to climate change, Int. J.
Climatol., 39, 1589–1603, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.5902" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/joc.5902</ext-link>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sekulić, A., Kilibarda, M., Protić, D., Perčec Tadić, M.,
and Bajat, B.: Spatio-temporal regression kriging model of mean daily
temperature for Croatia, Theor. Appl. Climatol., 140, 101–114,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-019-03077-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00704-019-03077-3</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sevruk, B., Ondrás, M., and Chvíla, B.: The WMO precipitation
measurement intercomparisons, Atmos. Res., 92, 376–380,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2009.01.016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosres.2009.01.016</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Stewart, S. B. and Nitschke, C. R.: Improving temperature interpolation
using MODIS LST and local topography: a comparison of methods in south east
Australia, Int. J. Climatol., 37, 3098–3110, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.4902" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/joc.4902</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>A high-resolution gridded dataset of daily temperature and precipitation records (1980–2018) for Trentino-South Tyrol (north-eastern Italian Alps)</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>A high-resolution gridded dataset of daily mean
temperature and precipitation series spanning the period 1980–2018 was
built for Trentino-South Tyrol, a mountainous region in north-eastern
Italy, starting from an archive of observation series from more than 200
meteorological stations and covering the regional domain and surrounding
countries. The original station data underwent a processing chain including
quality and consistency checks, homogeneity tests, with the homogenization
of the most relevant breaks in the series, and a filling procedure of daily
gaps aiming at maximizing the data availability. Using the processed
database, an anomaly-based interpolation scheme was applied to project the
daily station observations of mean temperature and precipitation onto a
regular grid of 250&thinsp;m&thinsp; × &thinsp;250&thinsp;m resolution. The accuracy of the resulting
dataset was evaluated by leave-one-out station cross-validation. Averaged
over all sites, interpolated daily temperature and precipitation show no
bias, with a mean absolute error (MAE) of about 1.5&thinsp;°C and 1.1&thinsp;mm
and a mean correlation of 0.97 and 0.91, respectively. The obtained daily
fields were used to discuss the spatial representation of selected past
events and the distribution of the main climatological features over the
region, which shows the role of the mountainous terrain in defining the
temperature and precipitation gradients. In addition, the suitability of the
dataset to be combined with other high-resolution products was evaluated
through a comparison of the gridded observations with snow-cover maps from
remote sensing observations. The presented dataset provides an accurate
insight into the spatio-temporal distribution of temperature and precipitation
over the mountainous terrain of Trentino-South Tyrol and a valuable
support for local and regional applications of climate variability and
change. The dataset is publicly available at <a href="https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.924502" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.924502</a> (Crespi et al., 2020).</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Aadhar, S. and Mishra, V.: High-resolution near real-time drought monitoring
in South Asia, Sci. Data, 4, 170145, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2017.145" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2017.145</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Adler, R. F., Sapiano, M. R. P., Huffman, G. J., Wang, J.-J., Gu, G., Bolvin,
D., Chiu, L., Schneider, U., Becker, A., Nelkin, E., Xie, P., Ferraro, R.,
and Shin, D.-B.: The Global Precipitation Climatology Project (GPCP) Monthly
Analysis (New Version 2.3) and a Review of 2017 Global Precipitation,
Atmosphere, 9, 138, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos9040138" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos9040138</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Adler, S., Chimani, B., Drechsel, S., Haslinger, K., Hiebl, J., Meyer, V.,
Resch, G., Rudolph, J., Vergeiner, J., Zingerle, C., Marigo, G., Fischer, A., and Seiser, B.:  Das Klima: Von
Tirol-Sudtirol-Belluno, ZAMG, Autonome Provinz Bozen, ARPAV,
available at: <a href="http://www.3pclim.eu/images/Das_Klima_von_Tirol-Suedtirol-Belluno.pdf" target="_blank"/>
(last access: 12 October 2020), 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Auer, I., Böhm, R., Jurkovic, A., Lipa, W., Orlik, A., Potzmann, R.,
Schöner, W., Ungersböck, M., Matulla, C., Briffa, K., Jones, P.,
Efthymiadis, D., Brunetti, M., Nanni, T., Maugeri, M., Mercalli, L., Mestre,
O., Moisselin, J., Begert, M., Müller-Westermeier, G., Kveton, V.,
Bochnicek, O., Stastny, P., Lapin, M., Szalai, S., Szentimrey, T., Cegnar,
T., Dolinar, M., Gajic-Capka, M., Zaninovic, K., Majstorovic, Z., and
Nieplova, E.: HISTALP – Historical instrumental climatological surface time
series of the Greater Alpine Region HISTALP, Int. J. Climatol., 27, 17–46,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.1377" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.1377</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Beven, K., Cloke, H., Pappenberger, F., Lamb, R., and Hunter, N.:
Hyperresolution information and hyperresolution ignorance in modelling the
hydrology of the land surface, Science China Earth Sciences, 58, 25–35,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-014-5003-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-014-5003-4</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Brugnara, Y., Brunetti, M., Maugeri, M., Nanni, T., and Simolo, C.:
High-resolution analysis of daily precipitation trends in the central Alps
over the last century, Int. J. Climatol., 32, 1406–1422,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.2363" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.2363</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Brunetti, M., Maugeri, M., Monti, F., and Nanni, T.: Temperature and
precipitation variability in Italy in the last two centuries from
homogenised instrumental time series, Int. J. Climatol., 26, 345–381,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.1251" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.1251</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Brunetti, M., Lentini, G., Maugeri, M., Nanni, T. and Spinoni, J.:
Projecting North Eastern Italy temperature and precipitation secular records
onto a high-resolution grid, Phys. Chem. Earth, 40–41, 9–22,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2009.12.005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2009.12.005</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Brunetti, M., Maugeri, M., Nanni, T., Simolo, C., and Spinoni, J.:
High-resolution temperature climatology for Italy: interpolation method
intercomparison, Int. J. Climatol., 34, 1278–1296, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3764" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3764</a>,
2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Brunsdon, C., McClatchey, J., and Unwin, D.: Spatial variations in the
average rainfall–altitude relationship in Great Britain: an approach using
geographically weighted regression, Int. J. Climatol., 21, 455–466,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.614" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.614</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Camera, C., Bruggeman, A., Hadjinicolaou, P., Pashiardis, S., and Lange, M.
A.: Evaluation of interpolation techniques for the creation of gridded daily
precipitation (1×1&thinsp;km<sup>2</sup>); Cyprus, 1980–2010, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 119, 693–712, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD020611" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD020611</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Chimani, B., Matulla, C., Böhm, R., and Hofstätter, M.: A new high
resolution absolute temperature grid for the Greater Alpine Region back to
1780, Int. J. Climatol., 33, 2129–2141, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3574" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3574</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Craddock, J.: Methods of comparing annual rainfall records for climatic
purposes, Weather, 34, 332–346, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1477-8696.1979.tb03465.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1477-8696.1979.tb03465.x</a>,
1979.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Crespi, A., Brunetti, M., Lentini, G., and Maugeri, M.: 1961–1990
high-resolution monthly precipitation climatologies for Italy, Int. J.
Climatol., 3, 878–895, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.5217" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.5217</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Crespi, A., Matiu, M., Bertoldi, G., Petitta, M., and Zebisch, M.:
High-resolution daily series (1980–2018) and monthly climatologies (1981–1010) of mean temperature and precipitation for Trentino – South Tyrol
(north-eastern Italian Alps), PANGAEA, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.924502" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.924502</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Crespi, A., Brunetti, M., Ranzi, R., Tomirotti, M., and Maugeri, M.: A
multi-century meteo-hydrological analysis for the Adda river basin (Central
Alps). Part I: Gridded monthly precipitation (1800–2016) records, Int. J.
Climatol., 41, 162–180, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.6614" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.6614</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Dalponte, M., Marzini, S., Solano-Correa, Y. T., Tonon, G., Vescovo, L., and
Gianelle, D.: Mapping forest windthrows using high spatial resolution
multispectral satellite images, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf., 93,
102206, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2020.102206" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2020.102206</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Daly, C., Gibson, W. P., Taylor, G. H., Johnson, G. L., and Pasteris, P.: A
knowledge-based approach to the statistical mapping of climate, Clim. Res.,
22, 99–113, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3354/cr022099" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3354/cr022099</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Daly, C., Smith, J. W., Smith, J. I., and McKane, R. B.: High-Resolution
Spatial Modeling of Daily Weather Elements for a Catchment in the Oregon
Cascade Mountains, United States, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 46, 1565–1586,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAM2548.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JAM2548.1</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Davolio, S., Della Fera, S., Laviola, S., Miglietta, M. M., and Levizzani,
V.: Heavy Precipitation over Italy from the Mediterranean Storm “Vaia” in
October 2018: Assessing the Role of an Atmospheric River, Mon. Weather Rev.,
148, 3571–3588, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-20-0021.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-20-0021.1</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Di Piazza, A., Conti, F. L., Noto, L., Viola, F., and La Loggia, G.:
Comparative analysis of different techniques for spatial interpolation of
rainfall data to create a serially complete monthly time series of
precipitation for Sicily, Italy, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf., 13,
396–408, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2011.01.005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2011.01.005</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Duan, Z., Liu, J. Z., Tuo, Y., Chiogna, G., and Disse, M.: Evaluation of
eight high spatial resolution gridded precipitation products in Adige Basin
(Italy) at multiple temporal and spatial scales, Sci. Total Environ., 573,
1536–1553, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.08.213" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.08.213</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Durre, I., Menne, M. J., Gleason, B. E., Houston, T. G., and Vose, R. S.:
Comprehensive Automated Quality Assurance of Daily Surface Observations, J.
Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 49, 1615–1633, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JAMC2375.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JAMC2375.1</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Engelhardt, M., Schuler, T. V., and Andreassen, L. M.: Contribution of snow and glacier melt to discharge for highly glacierised catchments in Norway, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 511–523, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-511-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-511-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Foresti, L., Sideris, I., Panziera, L., Nerini, D., and Germann, U.: A
10-year radar-based analysis of orographic precipitation growth and decay
patterns over the Swiss Alpine region, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 144,
2277–2301, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3364" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3364</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Frei, C. and Schär, C.: A precipitation climatology of the Alps from
high-resolution rain-gauge observations, Int. J. Climatol., 18, 873–900,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0088(19980630)18:8&lt;873::AID-JOC255&gt;3.0.CO;2-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0088(19980630)18:8&lt;873::AID-JOC255&gt;3.0.CO;2-9</a>, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Funk, C., Peterson, P., Landsfeld, M., Pedreros, D., Verdin, J., Shukla, S.,
Husak, G., Rowland, J., Harrison, L., Hoell, A., and Michaelsen, J.: The
climate hazards group infrared precipitation with stations – A new
environmental record for monitoring extremes, Sci. Data, 2, 150066,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2015.66" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2015.66</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Grasso, L. D.: The differentiation between grid spacing and resolution and
their application to numerical modeling, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 81,
579–580, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(2000)081&lt;0579:CAA&gt;2.3.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(2000)081&lt;0579:CAA&gt;2.3.CO;2</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Grossi, G., Lendvai, A., Peretti, G., and Ranzi, R.: Snow Precipitation
Measured by Gauges: Systematic Error Estimation and Data Series Correction
in the Central Italian Alps, Water, 9, 461, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/w9070461" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/w9070461</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Harris, I., Osborn, T. J., Jones, P., and Lister, D.: Version 4 of the CRU TS
monthly high-resolution gridded multivariate climate dataset, Sci. Data, 7,
109, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-020-0453-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-020-0453-3</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Haylock, M. R., Hofstra, N., Klein Tank, A. M. G., Klok, E. J., Jones, P.
D., and New, M.: A European daily high-resolution gridded data set of
surface temperature and precipitation for 1950–2006, J. Geophys. Res., 113,
D20119, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010201" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010201</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Hengl, T.: A Practical Guide to Geostatistical Mapping, ISBN
978–90–9024981-0,   available at:
<a href="https://library.wur.nl/isric/fulltext/isricu_i27272_001.pdf" target="_blank"/> (last access: 14 June 2021), 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Hiebl, J. and Frei, C.: Daily precipitation grids for Austria since
1961 – development and evaluation of a spatial dataset for hydroclimatic
monitoring and modelling, Theor. Appl. Climatol., 132, 327–345,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-017-2093-x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-017-2093-x</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Hofstra, N., Haylock, M., New, M., Jones, P., and Frei, C.: Comparison of
six methods for the interpolation of daily European climate data, J.
Geophys. Res., 113, D21110, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010100" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010100</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Hofstra, N., New, M., and McSweeney, C.: The influence of interpolation and
station network density on the distributions and trends of climate variables
in gridded daily data, Clim. Dyn., 35, 841–858.
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-009-0698-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-009-0698-1</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Huffman, G. J., Bolvin, D. T., Nelkin, E. J., Wolff, D. B., Adler, R. F.,
Gu, G., Hong, Y., Bowman, K. P., and Stocker, E. F.: The TRMM Multisatellite
Precipitation Analysis (TMPA): Quasi-Global, Multiyear, Combined-Sensor
Precipitation Estimates at Fine Scales, J. Hydrometeorol., 8, 38–55,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM560.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM560.1</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Immerzeel, W. W., Lutz, A. F., Andrade, M., Bahl, A., Biemans, H., Bolch,
T., Hyde, S., Brumby, S., Davies, B. J., Elmore, A. C., Emmer, A., Feng, M.,
Fernández, A., Haritashya, U., Kargel, J. S., Koppes, M., Kraaijenbrink,
P. D. A., Kulkarni, A. V., Mayewski, P. A., Nepal, S., Pacheco, P., Painter,
T. H., Pellicciotti, F., Rajaram, H., Rupper, S., Sinisalo, A., Shrestha, A.
B., Viviroli, D., Wada, Y., Xiao, C., Yao, T., and Baillie J. E.
M.: Importance and vulnerability of the world's water
towers, Nature, 577, 364–369, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1822-y" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1822-y</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Isotta, F. A., Frei, C., Weilguni, V., Perčec Tadić, M.,
Lassègues, P., Rudolf, B., Pavan, V., Cacciamani, C., Antolini, G.,
Ratto, S. M., Munari, M., Micheletti, S., Bonati, V., Lussana, C., Ronchi,
C., Panettieri, E., Marigo, G., and Vertačnik, G.: The climate of daily
precipitation in the Alps: development and analysis of a high-resolution
grid dataset from pan-Alpine rain-gauge data, Int. J. Climatol., 34,
1657–1675, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3794" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3794</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Isotta, F. A., Begert, M., and Frei, C.: Long-term consistent monthly
temperature and precipitation grid data sets for Switzerland over the past
150 years, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 124, 3783–3799,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD029910" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD029910</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Kotlarski, S., Szabó, P., Herrera, S., Räty, O., Keuler, K., Soares,
P. M., Cardoso, R. M., Bosshard, T., Pagé, C., Boberg, F.,
Gutiérrez, J. M., Isotta, F. A., Jaczewski, A., Kreienkamp, F., Liniger,
M. A., Lussana, C., and Pianko-Kluczyńska, C.: Observational uncertainty
and regional climate model evaluation: A pan-European perspective, Int. J.
Climatol., 39, 3730–3749, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.5249" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.5249</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Laiti, L., Mallucci, S., Piccolroaz, S., Bellin, A., Zardi, D., Fiori, A.,
Nikulin, G., and Majone, B.: Testing the hydrological coherence of
high-resolution gridded precipitation and temperature data sets, Water
Resour. Res., 54, 1999–2016, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR021633" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR021633</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Ledesma, J. L. J. and Futter, M. N.: Gridded climate data products are an
alternative to instrumental measurements as inputs to rainfall–runoff
models, Hydrol. Process., 31, 3283–3293, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.11269" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.11269</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Longman, R. J., Frazier, A. G., Newman, A. J., Giambelluca, T. W.,
Schanzenbach, D., Kagawa-Viviani, A., Needham, H., Arnold, J. R., and Clark,
M. P.: High-Resolution Gridded Daily Rainfall and Temperature for the
Hawaiian Islands (1990–2014), J. Hydrometeorol., 20, 489–508,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-18-0112.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-18-0112.1</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Lussana, C., Tveito, O. E., Dobler, A., and Tunheim, K.: seNorge_2018, daily precipitation, and temperature datasets over Norway, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 11, 1531–1551, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-11-1531-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-11-1531-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Ly, S., Charles, C., and Degré, A.: Geostatistical interpolation of daily rainfall at catchment scale: the use of several variogram models in the Ourthe and Ambleve catchments, Belgium, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 2259–2274, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-2259-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-2259-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Mallucci, S., Majone, B., and Bellin, A.: Detection and attribution of
hydrological changes in a large Alpine river basin,
J. Hydrol., 575, 1214–1229, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.06.020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.06.020</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Marcolini, G., Bellin, A., Disse, M., and Chiogna, G.: Variability in snow
depth time series in the Adige catchment, J. Hydrol. Reg. Stud., 13,
240–254, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2017.08.007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2017.08.007</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Matiu, M., Jacob, A., and Notarnicola, C.: Daily MODIS snow cover maps for
the European Alps from 2002 onwards at 250m horizontal resolution along with
a nearly cloud-free version (Version v1.0.2) [Data set], Zenodo,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3601891" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3601891</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Matiu, M., Jacob, A., and Notarnicola, C.: Daily MODIS Snow Cover Maps for
the European Alps from 2002 onwards at 250&thinsp;m Horizontal Resolution Along
with a Nearly Cloud-Free Version, Data, 5, 1,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/data5010001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/data5010001</a>, 2020. </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Matiu, M., Crespi, A., Bertoldi, G., Carmagnola, C. M., Marty, C., Morin, S., Schöner, W., Cat Berro, D., Chiogna, G., De Gregorio, L., Kotlarski, S., Majone, B., Resch, G., Terzago, S., Valt, M., Beozzo, W., Cianfarra, P., Gouttevin, I., Marcolini, G., Notarnicola, C., Petitta, M., Scherrer, S. C., Strasser, U., Winkler, M., Zebisch, M., Cicogna, A., Cremonini, R., Debernardi, A., Faletto, M., Gaddo, M., Giovannini, L., Mercalli, L., Soubeyroux, J.-M., Sušnik, A., Trenti, A., Urbani, S., and Weilguni, V.: Observed snow depth trends in the European Alps: 1971 to 2019, The Cryosphere, 15, 1343–1382, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-1343-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-1343-2021</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Mei, Y., Anagnostou, E. N., Nikolopoulos, E. I., and Borga, M.: Error
analysis of satellite precipitation products in mountainous basins, J.
Hydrometeorol., 15, 1778–1793, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-13-0194.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-13-0194.1</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Morán-Tejeda, E., López-Moreno, J. I., and Beniston, M.: The
changing roles of temperature and precipitation on snowpack variability in
Switzerland as a function of altitude, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 2131–2136,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50463" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50463</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Navarro-Racines, C., Tarapues, J., Thornton, P., Jarvis, H., and
Ramirez-Villega, J.: High-resolution and bias-corrected CMIP5 projections
for climate change impact assessments, Sci. Data, 7, 7,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-019-0343-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-019-0343-8</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
New, M., Todd, M., Hulme, M., and Jones, P.: Precipitation measurements and
trends in the twentieth century, Int. J. Climatol., 21, 1899–1922,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.680" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.680</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Notarnicola, C., Duguay, M., Moelg, N., Schellenberger, T., Tetzlaff, A.,
Monsorno, R., Costa, A., Steurer, C., and Zebisch, M.: Snow Cover Maps from
MODIS Images at 250&thinsp;m Resolution, Part 2: Validation, Remote Sens., 5,
1568–1587, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs5041568" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/rs5041568</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Price, F. M.: Alpenatlas – Atlas des Alpes – Atlante delle Alpi – Atlas
Alp – Mapping the Alps: Society – Economy – Environment,  Mt. Res. Dev., 29, 292–293,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1659/mrd.mm057" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1659/mrd.mm057</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Schlögel, R., Kofler, C., Gariano, S. L., Van Campenhout, J., and
Plummer, S.: Changes in climate patterns and their association to natural
hazard distribution in South Tyrol (Eastern Italian Alps), Sci. Rep.,
10, 5022, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-61615-w" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-61615-w</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Schöner, W., Koch, R., Matulla, C., Marty, C., and Tilg, A-M.:
Spatiotemporal patterns of snow depth within the Swiss-Austrian Alps for the
past half century (1961 to 2012) and linkages to climate change, Int. J.
Climatol., 39, 1589–1603, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.5902" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.5902</a>, 2019.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Sekulić, A., Kilibarda, M., Protić, D., Perčec Tadić, M.,
and Bajat, B.: Spatio-temporal regression kriging model of mean daily
temperature for Croatia, Theor. Appl. Climatol., 140, 101–114,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-019-03077-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-019-03077-3</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Sevruk, B., Ondrás, M., and Chvíla, B.: The WMO precipitation
measurement intercomparisons, Atmos. Res., 92, 376–380,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2009.01.016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2009.01.016</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Stewart, S. B. and Nitschke, C. R.: Improving temperature interpolation
using MODIS LST and local topography: a comparison of methods in south east
Australia, Int. J. Climatol., 37, 3098–3110, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.4902" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.4902</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
